Power consumption with high CPU usage


Recommended Posts

I was wondering what difference there is between a typical desktop computer that uses a lot of CPU for number crunching compared to a computer that runs less intensive activities.

Would a desktop that averages 10% CPU usage use significantly less power than an idential desktop that averages 90% or would they both use roughly the same amount of power? I have tried to look up rough figures of power consumption versus CPU usage for a typical desktop PC but had no luck. Any ideas?

You will notice a difference in energy usage, I did when I was running the F@H Client, whilst running the client I used significantly more energy and ultimately had to stop because I couldn't afford to run it. Sorry but I can't give you any figures :(

Yes, a desktop that averages 10% CPU usage would use less power than a desktop that averages 90% CPU usage. It depends on what kind of application we're talking about. If we're talking about gaming, and the CPU usage is pretty high, you have to figure in the graphics card is also drawing a lot of power too (graphics cards draw more power when under load compared to idle), so therefore the total system is using more energy than say if it was just browsing the web.

If you're worried about power consumption, you can look into the Intel Atom, Via processors, and AMD also has some low wattage processors. Again, it depends on what apps you're trying to run. If you're just browsing the web, doing office documents, then a Atom processor should be fine.

  hjf288 said:
With my comp idle according to Gigabyte Energy Saving Tool my CPU uses about 6.9 - 7 Watts.

At 83% CPU Usage it rises to about 32Watts

Wow that seems pretty low considering a Intel Core 2 Duo has a tdp of 45W and the Quads and Core i7 are 90W+, not sure of the exact figure.

TDP and usage have nothing to do with one another but are related one is heat the other amount of power being used

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_Design_Power

read that and you'll get a little better understanding of what i said

You will always have some kind of difference between low and high CPU usage, but how big the difference is depends on the CPU. For example a power hungry CPU like a Pentium 4 would have a larger power usage difference between low and high load than say for example a 45nm Core 2 Duo.

  GrimReeper said:
Wow that seems pretty low considering a Intel Core 2 Duo has a tdp of 45W and the Quads and Core i7 are 90W+, not sure of the exact figure.

Most C2Ds actually have a TDP of about 65 watts, and the quads about 100-110w at stock clocks.

  hjf288 said:
With my comp idle according to Gigabyte Energy Saving Tool my CPU uses about 6.9 - 7 Watts.

At 83% CPU Usage it rises to about 32Watts

Doesn't make sense because if that were the case you could run your computer on a 150W PSU 'cause 32W at 83% load would give you less than 25% load on your PSU...

  Frank Fontaine said:
You will always have some kind of difference between low and high CPU usage, but how big the difference is depends on the CPU. For example a power hungry CPU like a Pentium 4 would have a larger power usage difference between low and high load than say for example a 45nm Core 2 Duo.

Most C2Ds actually have a TDP of about 65 watts, and the quads about 100-110w at stock clocks.

95W for 45nm variants, as well as G0 Revision Q6600m 105W for B3 revision ;)

  Atlonite said:
TDP and usage have nothing to do with one another but are related one is heat the other amount of power being used

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_Design_Power

read that and you'll get a little better understanding of what i said

I didn't realize. Thanks for the heads up :) I've never used tdp for measuring power usage I always used it to determine what to buy so I could use passive heat sinks without frying things haha :p I just assumed it was related but I was wrong :(

  shift. said:
Doesn't make sense because if that were the case you could run your computer on a 150W PSU 'cause 32W at 83% load would give you less than 25% load on your PSU...

95W for 45nm variants, as well as G0 Revision Q6600m 105W for B3 revision ;)

Without a meter i cant really check but thats what the gigabyte tool says, Processor is Q6600 undervolted.

  Atlonite said:
TDP and usage have nothing to do with one another but are related one is heat the other amount of power being used

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_Design_Power

read that and you'll get a little better understanding of what i said

Actually, they are relatively close in fact.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CPU_power_dissipation

"Some CPUs (i.E. newer Intel-CPUs) have the typical power consumption defined as TDP and some (like CPUs from AMD) have the maximum power consumption defined as TDP."

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Is there anyone who did not see Microsoft extending updates for Windows 10? There are still ALOT of people who wont switch and it will become a security nightmare when they don't get security updates.
    • You need an MSA for the other two options as well (pay 1000 rewards points or $30). To me this reeks of desperation and defeat that they're not seeing W11 being adopted as quickly as they would like.
    • Where was this article in the Windows 8 era? Microsoft was thinking almost the same back then. Just look at the response they received with such thought process...
    • Hahaha! I've been arguing with my dad for 10 years (he's pro-Tesla, I'm impartial as I don't trust a lot of the people and their tech in these robotaxis) about this whole charade. His continued argument is the cost factor (economies of scale principle) and the associated technology (different dependencies of which reduced production cost is a potential outcome thus feeding into the reduced cost argument). And my rebuttal is the broad-market trust factor -- it's often not the most innovative or first-mover that wins (Uber and Tesla have been arguing/investing in autonomous vehicles forever) but rather the option that builds the most trust amongst the commonwealth. VW and Toyota are not the first or best or cheapest cars on the road, but they've built a long of continued trust to the scales of being the largest automakers by volume worldwide. Supercar makers have the highest profit margins, Tesla has the highest stock price, but VW and Toyota have the sales volumes. As it stands, the writing is on the wall... No matter what advantages Tesla had in their ambitions, they have an even-longer road to repair public trust than any other robotaxi provider (foreign or domestic). If the trend continues, everyone will realise that their market valuation is based on their non-automotive efforts (including not robotaxis or consumer humanoids).
    • Or just use Linux and live free. For the anti-Linux brigadiers reading this, this is the part where you go: Nooo! I love being digitally abused by Microsoft 😡😡 /s
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      DrRonSr earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Sharon dixon earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Parallax Abstraction earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      956400 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      davidfegan earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      601
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      225
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      168
    4. 4
      +FloatingFatMan
      153
    5. 5
      Xenon
      137
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!