Power consumption with high CPU usage


Recommended Posts

I was wondering what difference there is between a typical desktop computer that uses a lot of CPU for number crunching compared to a computer that runs less intensive activities.

Would a desktop that averages 10% CPU usage use significantly less power than an idential desktop that averages 90% or would they both use roughly the same amount of power? I have tried to look up rough figures of power consumption versus CPU usage for a typical desktop PC but had no luck. Any ideas?

You will notice a difference in energy usage, I did when I was running the F@H Client, whilst running the client I used significantly more energy and ultimately had to stop because I couldn't afford to run it. Sorry but I can't give you any figures :(

Yes, a desktop that averages 10% CPU usage would use less power than a desktop that averages 90% CPU usage. It depends on what kind of application we're talking about. If we're talking about gaming, and the CPU usage is pretty high, you have to figure in the graphics card is also drawing a lot of power too (graphics cards draw more power when under load compared to idle), so therefore the total system is using more energy than say if it was just browsing the web.

If you're worried about power consumption, you can look into the Intel Atom, Via processors, and AMD also has some low wattage processors. Again, it depends on what apps you're trying to run. If you're just browsing the web, doing office documents, then a Atom processor should be fine.

  hjf288 said:
With my comp idle according to Gigabyte Energy Saving Tool my CPU uses about 6.9 - 7 Watts.

At 83% CPU Usage it rises to about 32Watts

Wow that seems pretty low considering a Intel Core 2 Duo has a tdp of 45W and the Quads and Core i7 are 90W+, not sure of the exact figure.

TDP and usage have nothing to do with one another but are related one is heat the other amount of power being used

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_Design_Power

read that and you'll get a little better understanding of what i said

You will always have some kind of difference between low and high CPU usage, but how big the difference is depends on the CPU. For example a power hungry CPU like a Pentium 4 would have a larger power usage difference between low and high load than say for example a 45nm Core 2 Duo.

  GrimReeper said:
Wow that seems pretty low considering a Intel Core 2 Duo has a tdp of 45W and the Quads and Core i7 are 90W+, not sure of the exact figure.

Most C2Ds actually have a TDP of about 65 watts, and the quads about 100-110w at stock clocks.

  hjf288 said:
With my comp idle according to Gigabyte Energy Saving Tool my CPU uses about 6.9 - 7 Watts.

At 83% CPU Usage it rises to about 32Watts

Doesn't make sense because if that were the case you could run your computer on a 150W PSU 'cause 32W at 83% load would give you less than 25% load on your PSU...

  Frank Fontaine said:
You will always have some kind of difference between low and high CPU usage, but how big the difference is depends on the CPU. For example a power hungry CPU like a Pentium 4 would have a larger power usage difference between low and high load than say for example a 45nm Core 2 Duo.

Most C2Ds actually have a TDP of about 65 watts, and the quads about 100-110w at stock clocks.

95W for 45nm variants, as well as G0 Revision Q6600m 105W for B3 revision ;)

  Atlonite said:
TDP and usage have nothing to do with one another but are related one is heat the other amount of power being used

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_Design_Power

read that and you'll get a little better understanding of what i said

I didn't realize. Thanks for the heads up :) I've never used tdp for measuring power usage I always used it to determine what to buy so I could use passive heat sinks without frying things haha :p I just assumed it was related but I was wrong :(

  shift. said:
Doesn't make sense because if that were the case you could run your computer on a 150W PSU 'cause 32W at 83% load would give you less than 25% load on your PSU...

95W for 45nm variants, as well as G0 Revision Q6600m 105W for B3 revision ;)

Without a meter i cant really check but thats what the gigabyte tool says, Processor is Q6600 undervolted.

  Atlonite said:
TDP and usage have nothing to do with one another but are related one is heat the other amount of power being used

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_Design_Power

read that and you'll get a little better understanding of what i said

Actually, they are relatively close in fact.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CPU_power_dissipation

"Some CPUs (i.E. newer Intel-CPUs) have the typical power consumption defined as TDP and some (like CPUs from AMD) have the maximum power consumption defined as TDP."

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Isn't the CPU used to calculate the parity for the RAID? If so, the combination of SSDs and 10GBe might make the CPU more important
    • yeah GSMA began working to enable end to end encryption between android and iphone last year and apparently a new standard was developed. apple has said that they would implement this in "future software updates" but i haven't heard anything since march, the time this was all reported on. shortly after, i read on forbes that the FBI suggests not sending texts between iphone and android because they're unencrypted. i use signal to chat with my wife but i'd rather just use messages tbh (she has an iphone), i'm not really a 3rd party guy haha
    • Well, I did not like the trailer for the project he went to work on also, but why do you think he should waste time with this… did you love the season 2? Maybe I am missing out after the crap I saw in first season ep1-3? I love the first last of us game… while not the BEST it was one of the games that I will remember for the EXPERIENCE it game me… last of us 2 was not on the same level at all and the show🤔 complete miss in my experience of the first few level
    • They're likely moving all resources to other things. Clearly Windows is not important to them.
    • Image Uploader 1.4.3 Build 5352 by Razvan Serea Image Uploader is a free and open-source program for Windows that that allows you to effortlessly upload images, screenshots, and various files to a wide array of hosting services. With its capability to capture selected screen areas, it promptly uploads content to image hosting services, while also offering the convenience of automatically copying the URL to your clipboard. Key Features of Image Uploader: Upload to Multiple Hosting Services Image Uploader supports uploading images and files to over 30 popular hosting services. Additionally, it can upload directly to your own FTP, SFTP, or WebDAV server. After upload, the tool automatically generates sharing codes in HTML, BBCode, and Markdown, with support for custom output templates tailored to your needs. Video Frame Grabbing and Screenshot Tools You can extract multiple frames from video files in a wide range of formats including AVI, MP4, MKV, WMV, and more. It supports both system-installed codecs and built-in ones. The extracted frames can be uploaded individually or compiled into a single mosaic image. It also includes screenshot capabilities for the full screen or selected regions, along with a simple image editor for annotations, highlights, and blurring. Advanced Integration and Usability Image Uploader supports drag-and-drop, clipboard monitoring, and can be accessed via Windows Explorer’s context menu. It also features URL shortening, multi-account support, reuploading, and the ability to upload images embedded in text while retaining formatting. The app is available in several languages, including English, Russian, Turkish, Korean, Arabic, and more. Image Uploader 1.4.3 Build 5352 changelog: New Features Screen Recording: Added two powerful capture methods: DirectX (Desktop Duplication API) FFmpeg-based recording Expanded Hosting Services: Added support for new file hosting platforms: TeleBox (linkbox.to) take-me-to.space ranoz.gg webshare.cz lobfile.com imgpx.com freeimghost.net radikal.cloud anonpic.org fotozavr.ru imgtr.ee thumbsnap.com 8upload.com filemail.com Others Video Uploads: Added Flickr.com support for video uploads Localization: New French translation added Context Menu: Added "File Information" option to video file context menus DPI Support: Improved support for: Screen DPI changes Mixed-DPI multi-monitor setups Improvements Disabled application window animations during screenshot/screen recording initiation Updated API and documentation Improved overall stability Bug Fixes Fixed network client error that could cause application crashes Resolved unauthorized startup registration issue Fixed upload functionality for pixeldrain.com Restored tray icon balloon notifications visibility Various minor bug fixes Download: Image Uploader 64-bit | Portable 64-bit | ~16.0 MB | (Open Source) Download: Image Uploader 32-bit | Portable 32-bit | ~15.0 MB Download: Image Uploader ARM64 | Portable ARM64 | ~11.0 MB Links: Image Uploader Home Page | Screenshot | GitHub Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      SteveJaye earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Uranus_enjoyer earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Philsl earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Jaclidio hoy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      430
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      156
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      149
    4. 4
      Nick H.
      64
    5. 5
      +thexfile
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!