Recommended Posts

Besides, most people (including myself) do not recommend Windows XP x64 - there are many many driver and software issues. If you need a 64-bit system, get Windows Vista or wait for Windows 7.

Besides, most people (including myself) do not recommend Windows XP x64 - there are many many driver and software issues. If you need a 64-bit system, get Windows Vista or wait for Windows 7.

Haven't found any software issues myself, in fact, the WoW64 implementation in XP/2003 x64 is a bit more thorough because certain modes and functions were deprecated for Vista that were formerly available in XP and previous editions. Hence some older games using DirectX 3/5 work on Windows XP x64 that do not run on Vista x64 (in some cases importing XP dll's work but not always).

Driver issues were an initial problem only when XP/2003 x64 first came to market because vendors did not have support ready. Nowdays, most reputable hardware vendors offer XP/2003 x64 drivers for their devices.

I'd recommend XP x64, and if I'm not mistaken, there is an upgrade option for Windows XP x86 Professional but not Home versions, etc.

Technically, you cannot 'upgrade' from any 32 bit Windows to any 64 bit Windows.

So... if you want to be technical- you can't upgrade. You can "export" x86 files and settings, "install" and "migrate" files from the x86 to x64 system ... and maybe even programs (if the programs didn't use 16 bit installers) but in my experience many hardware as well as software vendors straight-up ignored XP64 since it was primarily a business / academic release and either didn't upgrade their installers or didn't offer XP64 drivers for hardware.

For what it's worth, I require the use of a program at work that was compiled in December 2008 and doesn't even consider Vista and won't install on 64 bit systems at all even though it uses a 32 bit installer. How's that for forward thinking?

Technically, you cannot 'upgrade' from any 32 bit Windows to any 64 bit Windows.

So... if you want to be technical- you can't upgrade. You can "export" x86 files and settings, "install" and "migrate" files from the x86 to x64 system ... and maybe even programs (if the programs didn't use 16 bit installers) but in my experience many hardware as well as software vendors straight-up ignored XP64 since it was primarily a business / academic release and either didn't upgrade their installers or didn't offer XP64 drivers for hardware.

For what it's worth, I require the use of a program at work that was compiled in December 2008 and doesn't even consider Vista and won't install on 64 bit systems at all even though it uses a 32 bit installer. How's that for forward thinking?

Right, well after looking around you're probably right about not being able to upgrade. However, transitioning the installed programs from /Program Files/ to /Program Files (x86)/ and moving the existing registry information from the x86 registry to the SysWoW64 node of the x64 registry would in theory yield a functional upgrade.

Compiling the a program to run on x64 and and compiling the installer for x64 interoperbility are separate issues. I have modified old Windows 95 games that were 32-bit but shipped with 16-bit installers to use a new 32-bit installer compiled from a project created in InstallShield, just specify the original files to be bundled, their destination, and the appropriate keys and everything works. This was about three years ago when XP x64 was relatively new as well. Perhaps your employer uses an outdated version of InstallShield to manage installation of their product?

Besides, most people (including myself) do not recommend Windows XP x64 - there are many many driver and software issues. If you need a 64-bit system, get Windows Vista or wait for Windows 7.

Nonsense :pinch:

I've been using XP 64 for three years and never had any driver or software issues.

I can only recommend it :cool: (btw, it's actually not XP, but the desktop version of Windows 2003 Server)

Nonsense :pinch:

I've been using XP 64 for three years and never had any driver or software issues.

I can only recommend it :cool: (btw, it's actually not XP, but the desktop version of Windows 2003 Server)

Because your hardware supports it? And it is XP just the kernal is based off of Server. Quit with the FUD.

Right, well after looking around you're probably right about not being able to upgrade. However, transitioning the installed programs from /Program Files/ to /Program Files (x86)/ and moving the existing registry information from the x86 registry to the SysWoW64 node of the x64 registry would in theory yield a functional upgrade.

Compiling the a program to run on x64 and and compiling the installer for x64 interoperbility are separate issues. I have modified old Windows 95 games that were 32-bit but shipped with 16-bit installers to use a new 32-bit installer compiled from a project created in InstallShield, just specify the original files to be bundled, their destination, and the appropriate keys and everything works. This was about three years ago when XP x64 was relatively new as well. Perhaps your employer uses an outdated version of InstallShield to manage installation of their product?

I get what you're saying but the company supplying the program uses a 32 bit installer and compiles 32 bit code which should technically work on 32 or 64 bit as you've stated. But even in late 2008, it won't run at all on XP64. They rely on 32 bit drivers for their hardware (which interfaces via USB so we're at a loss). So even in 2008 they won't supply 64bit drivers.

The waters are muddy and suggesting someone can go from x86 to x64 is a crap shoot.

I get what you're saying but the company supplying the program uses a 32 bit installer and compiles 32 bit code which should technically work on 32 or 64 bit as you've stated. But even in late 2008, it won't run at all on XP64. They rely on 32 bit drivers for their hardware (which interfaces via USB so we're at a loss). So even in 2008 they won't supply 64bit drivers.

The waters are muddy and suggesting someone can go from x86 to x64 is a crap shoot.

Right, well for smaller proprietary vendors that sell specialized software in conjuction with hardware components such as point of sale workstations, or similar situations I can understand the reluctance to invest any additional development cost for maintaining a x64 driver. If the application does not benefit from additional memory then no reason for the additional overhead in this instance. However, since XP x64 is a compiled workstation version of Windows 2003 Server x64 then any applications or hardware which may rely on server side installations would be more inclined to support a x64 driver model.

Because your hardware supports it? And it is XP just the kernal is based off of Server. Quit with the FUD.

Quit your Fud :pinch: You should really put an 'o' in your name, it would be so fitting :laugh:

Oh, and what's a "kernal"? :blink:

It *is* 2003, not XP. It has the same version version as 2003: 5.2 :yes:

Okay guys, thanks for the answers..

I have a licensed 64bit cd laying around and i'm getting many CTD's with memory hog program's so i wanted to upgrade.

Anyways tommorow i will try and see if it works. I will keep you guys updated ;)

Ok. As I said, you're unlikely to have any problems.

Right, well for smaller proprietary vendors that sell specialized software in conjuction with hardware components such as point of sale workstations, or similar situations I can understand the reluctance to invest any additional development cost for maintaining a x64 driver. If the application does not benefit from additional memory then no reason for the additional overhead in this instance. However, since XP x64 is a compiled workstation version of Windows 2003 Server x64 then any applications or hardware which may rely on server side installations would be more inclined to support a x64 driver model.

I'd hardly consider RFS Cablewave a 'small proprietary vendor' considering they sell coaxial cable to AM, FM, TV, CableTV, cellular / mobile phone, and terrestrial as well as satellite communications companied. ;)

I'd hardly consider RFS Cablewave a 'small proprietary vendor' considering they sell coaxial cable to AM, FM, TV, CableTV, cellular / mobile phone, and terrestrial as well as satellite communications companied. ;)

Well they are certainly not alone as major vendors that do not support it either; if it's just a piece of management software for an external device that doesn't benefit from additional memory to improve performance, it's better to avoid having the overhead associated with supporting additional driver models. In fact, I forsee the inclusion of XP Virtual Mode in Windows 7 will probably keep companies such as this from adopting native Windows 7 support and just keeping their XP version maintained to reduce costs.

Hehe, i would like to do it. But since Vista & 7 have limitations on videocard drivers. (you can only have 1 driver with 2 same vc's not 2 different vcs with 2 drivers)

I can't so i have to stick with XP

ok so let me get this right if i may you want to use 2 graphics cards with 2 drivers from 2 different vender's. umm do you mean 2 cards from 2 different manufactures like ATI + Nvidia or 2 different cards same company chipset cause you can SLI and Tri SLI and Quad SLI in vista and windows 7 just fine

please explain

ya know what just upgrade to windows 7 64bit cause windows XP is well old ass and well microsoft has hardly any support for it now and well ya know what Windows XP X64 is hated by most of the damn community out their gamers alike . if you want 2x video cards go buy 2 new nvidia or ATI cards and SLI or crossfire them and i am sure what ever the hek your needs are they will support that and if by chance your only wanting this cause of some old old software you need i am sure ther is something better out now on the market that does a better job

I knew I'd get some negative responses to my post - there are always some people that have used Windows XP x64 and have had no problems. Congratulations, you're a minority!

But that's why I said 'most people'.

Hey guys.. i just installed windows xp 64 clean.

I installed all the drivers and stuff.. and also some programs.

Then now after restarting i get a BSOD saying *** STOP: 0x0000001E (0xFFFFFFFFC0000005,...)

and some more numbers.. anyone know what this means?

Thx

Run a thorough memory diagnostic and make sure your system memory is reliable before researching the particular error code further, but as the previous poster pointed out, Google can tell you far more about specific codes as we can.

Run a thorough memory diagnostic and make sure your system memory is reliable before researching the particular error code further, but as the previous poster pointed out, Google can tell you far more about specific codes as we can.

Anyways guys.. I have started the pc in the morning and it started working fine!

So there we go.. till now its working smooth with all my applications!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft finally admits its default Windows 11 25H2, 24H2 action broke key legacy component by Sayan Sen Microsoft last week released Windows 11 KB5094126 and KB5093998 as the latest Patch Tuesday updates. Following that the company also published the accompanying dynamic updates under KB5094149, KB5095971, and KB5094156. So far the company has acknowledged two known issues that have popped up after the release which include bugged-out Office apps as well as the Recycle Bin; though there could be more at play too. Speaking of bugs and issues, Microsoft seems to have finally acknowledged a problem that probably has been around for close to a year. That's because back in July of 2025 the company made a default change to the latest Windows 11 versions, wherein it switched to JScript9Legacy on Windows 11 24H2 and later releases. Hence following the release of version 25H2 in October 2025, JScript9Legacy also remained default-enabled. As a result there has been a compatibility issue ever since then. For those wondering, by switching to JScript9Legacy Microsoft intended to improve the security of modern Windows PCs by reducing vulnerabilities tied to legacy scripting like cross-site scripting (XSS), among others. XSS exploits can allow cyber-attackers to attach malicious code onto legitimate websites and use them to execute the code when a potential victim loads such a website. Hence the new JScript9Legacy engine enforced stricter execution policies and improved object handling, which should help mitigate such attacks. Microsoft today has published a new support article detailing the problem. Neowin spotted it while browsing. The company says that JScript global definitions and execution context may fail to persist across scripts, potentially breaking older dependent apps and web-based components that relied on this legacy behavior. In the article Microsoft has confirmed that the issue stems from its move away from the older jscript9.dll engine in favor of jscript9legacy.dll. As mentioned above, while the newer engine was designed to address vulnerabilities and strengthen security it also changes how JScript handles execution context. As a result functions and definitions loaded by one script could no longer remain available to subsequent scripts once execution ended. The company notes that some applications worked correctly on earlier Windows versions because the older JScript engine automatically retained global definitions and execution state between scripts. Under the newer model though that behavior is disabled by default causing certain legacy workloads and polyfill-dependent scripts to fail. Microsoft says it addressed the problem via the KB5077241 update though the fix had not been enabled automatically in the following updates. As such admins must explicitly turn on persistent JScript execution context using a Registry setting that the tech giant shared today. The configuration can be applied to individual processes or system-wide through the FEATURE_ENABLE_PERSISTENCE registry key. The steps have been outlined below: Run the following command to create the feature control registry key: reg add "HKLM\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Main\FeatureControl\FEATURE_ENABLE_PERSISTENCE" Under this key, create a new DWORD (32-bit) value. Configure the value as follows: To enable persistence for specific processes only: Set the value to 1 for each target process name. To enable persistence for all processes: Add * as the key name and set its value to 1. You can find the official support article here on Microsoft's website.
    • The possibility that milk gathers back into a glass implies that gravity can be 'reversed'.
    • VidCoder 12.20 by Razvan Serea  VidCoder is a DVD/Blu-ray ripping and video transcoding application for Windows. It uses HandBrake as its encoding engine. Calling directly into the HandBrake library gives it a more rich UI than the official HandBrake Windows GUI. VidCoder can rip DVDs but does not defeat the CSS encryption found in most commercial DVDs. You’ll need the NET 8 Desktop Runtime. If you don’t have it, VidCoder will prompt you to download and install it. The Portable version is self-contained and does not require any .NET Runtime to be installed. You do not need to install HandBrake for VidCoder to work. Feature list: Multi-threaded MP4, MKV containers Completely integrated encoding pipeline: everything is in one process and no huge intermediate temporary files H.264, H.265, MPEG-4, MPEG-2, VP8, Theora video Hardware-accelerated encoding with AMD VCE, Nvidia NVENC and Intel QuickSync AAC, MP3, Vorbis, AC3, FLAC audio encoding and AAC/AC3/MP3/DTS/DTS-HD passthrough Target bitrate, size or quality for video 2-pass encoding Decomb, detelecine, deinterlace, rotate, reflect, chroma smooth, colorspace filters Powerful batch encoding with simultaneous encodes Customizable Pickers to automatically pick audio and subtitle tracks, destination, titles and more Instant source previews Creates small encoded preview clips Pause, resume encoding VidCoder 12.20 changes: Updated HandBrake core to 1.11.2. Download: VidCoder 12.20 | 47.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Portable VidCoder 12.19 | 89.3 MB Link: VidCoder Home Page | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Too soon, I'm still not over this death!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      592
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      185
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      76
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!