Recommended Posts

I notice in OS X, everything is real smooth. There is little or no motion blur (can read text clearly) when you drag objects around. And scrolling with the mouse wheel in browsers is all smooth n stuff. In windows it jerks rather than float.

Is there any way to get windows to feel all clean the way OS X does? Like some kind of 3rd party desktop rendering engine? or shell? I have no idea what's responsible for this.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/769626-getting-windows-to-be-smooth/
Share on other sites

Depends. There is no alternative desktop rendering or "shell" that can improve this.

The reason why Vista's desktop management is sluggish is because of the way Microsoft implemented it. Also, Drivers and the hardware you use are a critical factor as well. If you want a smoother experience, go with Windows 7.

Microsoft really improved things in Windows 7 by cutting some fat from the bloat.

Like waruikoohii said, the "motion blur" (or ghosting) is the result of a poor refresh rate on your monitor. Nothing to do with your operating system. And to be honest, your whole clear readability complaint makes me facepalm, because Mac OS' font smoothing sucks compared to Windows' ClearType. Apple needs to stop pretending that a screen is paper and tune their retarded sub-pixel font rendering to the pixel grid.

If his video drivers arent installed correctly - or has some lame ass computer specs - it too could cause these issues. When you are using the generic VGA driver - it is horrible.

Also, if his computer is crap possibly it cant re-render the image fast enough - or like others mentioned - the LCD sucks.

Knowing the OP's system specs would help a great deal.

OS-X does have a rather simplistic rendering - Vista or even better Win7 should be used to really decide what the problematic variable is -- if any.

no no the LCD is fine, and drivers are up to par. when i use that er OS X (10.4 for intel) well ya know what i mean by that, it appears just fine. no blur, all smooth, perfecto. maybe you're right about the simplistic rendering. was just wonderin if there was something like a gdi++ type thing (made the fonts all smooth that i found in someone's thread below in this forum) but for the desktop itself instead of only the fonts :)

no no the LCD is fine, and drivers are up to par. when i use that er OS X (10.4 for intel) well ya know what i mean by that, it appears just fine. no blur, all smooth, perfecto. maybe you're right about the simplistic rendering. was just wonderin if there was something like a gdi++ type thing (made the fonts all smooth that i found in someone's thread below in this forum) but for the desktop itself instead of only the fonts :)

Your LCD apparently isn't fine if it's ghosting :p

As far as ClearType (for font smoothing)...why don't you tune it? I don't remember if Vista has a built in utility (I'm on 7, which does), but tuning ClearType will make it look better (usually...I find the defaults to actually work fine in most cases).

Oh, and make sure you're at your LCD's native resolution.

As far as Vista not operating smoothly, and 10.4 operating smoothly on the same hardware...if this is true, then your Vista drvers aren't up to par.

I wish they would fix some of those rough spots such as the fast-user switching feature which blanks the display when switching users, and it is more retarded more than ever now with locking on Vista/2008 and 7/2008R2 making it just lock and then having to click switch user which then blanks it out. Very confusing process, on Mac OS X, I always loved how it did a cube effect with your desktop switching to the other user's desktop or to the login screen, it was so much smoother IMO. Never made sense to me why they never attempted to fix this, but confuse it even more with locking and switching users... :wacko:

Depends. There is no alternative desktop rendering or "shell" that can improve this.

The reason why Vista's desktop management is sluggish is because of the way Microsoft implemented it. Also, Drivers and the hardware you use are a critical factor as well. If you want a smoother experience, go with Windows 7.

Microsoft really improved things in Windows 7 by cutting some fat from the bloat.

There is no problem with the way Aero is implemented, on any computer with a compatible graphics chip and 1GB of ram or more it works pretty smoothly. People often try to run it on inadequate hardware and then wonder why it doesn't work flawlessly.

Also bear in mind that OSX Tiger is slightly old and won't stress your hardware as much as Visdta

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • It is silly there is no simple way to check whether this profile has been activated. CFRs are normal, but trying to even hide the fact if it's on / off seems silly, especially for something so user-facing. Surely Microsoft is "proud" of their engineering efforts on this one and ought to display it somwhere in the GUI.
    • Many Linux distros are not known for excellent battery life, so I'm not sure that is the best example. A more apt example may be Apple, but Apple's CPUs are simply far more efficient than Intel & AMD at single-threaded tasks like these, so "boosting" is not as power-hungry and less heat-inducing. Not to mention Apple will hardly engage P-cores for basic UI tasks; they use a pretty complicated QoS scheme to only activate P-cores for more serious workloads like HTML / JS execution or decompression or application launch. Microsoft is (smartly) doing it for launch, but also for UI tasks, which is the more nonsensical part: why ... do Windows 11's UIs need modern CPUs to boost? It should load so quickly that there's not even time for the CPU to boost.
    • I've not seen any controlled testing and, judging by Microsoft's mentality, within a year, they'll have added so much more bloat, it'll undo any perceptible latency benefit and we'll have boosted the CPU clocks for nothing.
    • It depends: heat soak is a thing. Initially on cold boot-up, the heatsinks & heatpipes are at ambient temp. After heatsinks & heatpipes warm up (through normal usage), they don't immediately cool to ambient temp when the load goes away. So their baseline is higher and the trigger point for fans is much less stress. Add a few more CPU spikes → it's too hot to stay at the same fan RPM → fans get triggered to start up up much sooner / get triggered to ramp much more quickly.
    • Can LibreOffice just shut up and worry about themselves and stop comparing themselves? Do we see Microsoft complaining about euro office?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      slackerzz earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      198
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      74
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!