Recommended Posts

  • 1 month later...

I use aveicon, you can get it from here. Freeware, converts either ico to png or png to ico, all you do is drag the ico's into the program and drag the png's out. It can do hundereds at a time (I've done 606).

  • 1 month later...
I use aveicon, you can get it from here. Freeware, converts either ico to png or png to ico, all you do is drag the ico's into the program and drag the png's out. It can do hundereds at a time (I've done 606).

Typical Scot, keeps track of everything !

:p

:D <---- also Scottish.

  • 1 month later...
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

:yes:

I realize my comment is a little to little to late but I'll post it anyway.

I've tried a few icon programs and ended up buying Axialis' Icon Workshop after trying it because of how easily it automatically creates win XP Icon sets from a single image in the blink of an eye.

I edit in photoshop cs in 128x128 usually, or greater png format then export to Icon workshop via filter and create XP icon set and save as ico. The best way to created the highest quality icons

period. Icon workshop cost a bit, but if you like to make quality icons, it's worth the money ten times over, and the program was superbly designed.

:yes:

I realize my comment is a little to little to late but I'll post it anyway.

I've tried a few icon programs and ended up buying Axialis' Icon Workshop after trying it because of how easily it automatically creates win XP Icon sets from a single image in the blink of an eye.

I edit in photoshop cs in 128x128 usually, or greater png format then export to Icon workshop via filter and create XP icon set and save as ico. The best way to created the highest quality icons

period. Icon workshop cost a bit, but if you like to make quality icons, it's worth the money ten times over, and the program was superbly designed.

While I agree that Iconworkshop is an excellent piece of software that makes icon conversion a breeze (I use it myself), I'm not sure if it would be correct to say that it produces the "highest quality icons period". In my opinion, if you want your icons to be of the highest quality, the best method would be an old one (before such icon conversion programs came about). This consists in creating each size format (128x128, 96x96, etc) in Photoshop, saving them in PSD format and then compiling them together as an ICO file in Gif Movie Gear. This way, you are sure that the image in each of the size formats are of excellent quality (no jagged edges, sharp images even at the lowest size format, so forth). Of course, this method is rather tedious.

:yes: To the contrary, Photoshop combined with my skill level produces the quality images, Axialis Icon workshop resizes them with the best quality.... comparable to Photoshop, and much easier. I ditched GIF moviegear for icons 2 years ago and never looked back! Here's are a couple of examples. Load either of the 128x128 images into Icon workshop and see for yourself! Very minimal jaggies far less than any other method. If you start with a high quality image with no jaggies, then you'll end up with high quality icons at the lower end in the resize process of Icon workshop with very little jaggies. If you like a little sharper image, erase some of the transparency on the edges. Try it for yourself. The search image is a search icon I made from scratch. Although there is nothing significant about it, and I agree that it still needs some reflective light shading on the lens, and it is slightly blurred (my preference), it is of top quality. Open it in Photoshop and use the plugin to transfer to Icon workshop (IW), or just open the image in IW and create a new XP icon set and you'll see what i mean. Then try to recreate the icons in your own way separately and see if the results are better. I would venture to guess that they aren't, and with much more time consumed. I made the mail icon from an image I took of a bill I forgot to send as another example. I run 1600x1200 desktop at present with 56x56 icon sizes and these look fantastic on the start menu or task bar Quicklaunch with large icons nenabled. Small icons look great too.

search.png 128x128 search32.png 32x32

mail.png 128x128 mail32.png 32x32

  • 2 months later...
Try IconSuchi,

Click to google it! <!--google-->iconsuchi<!--endgoogle--> (Powered by TimDorr)

857344[/snapback]

Yeah I google it and it says no match's I guess this means that Google isn't always the answer!

869429[/snapback]

Think he means Iconsushi

http://towofu.s5.xrea.com/soft/e-index.html

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
:yes: To the contrary, Photoshop combined with my skill level produces the quality images, Axialis Icon workshop resizes them with the best quality.... comparable to Photoshop, and much easier. I ditched GIF moviegear for icons 2 years ago and never looked back! Here's are a couple of examples. Load either of the 128x128 images into Icon workshop and see for yourself! Very minimal jaggies far less than any other method. If you start with a high quality image with no jaggies, then you'll end up with high quality icons at the lower end in the resize process of Icon workshop with very little jaggies. If you like a little sharper image, erase some of the transparency on the edges. Try it for yourself. The search image is a search icon I made from scratch. Although there is nothing significant about it, and I agree that it still needs some reflective light shading on the lens, and it is slightly blurred (my preference), it is of top quality. Open it in Photoshop and use the plugin to transfer to Icon workshop (IW), or just open the image in IW and create a new XP icon set and you'll see what i mean. Then try to recreate the icons in your own way separately and see if the results are better. I would venture to guess that they aren't, and with much more time consumed. I made the mail icon from an image I took of a bill I forgot to send as another example. I run 1600x1200 desktop at present with 56x56 icon sizes and these look fantastic on the start menu or task bar Quicklaunch with large icons nenabled. Small icons look great too.

search.png  128x128  search32.png 32x32

mail.png  128x128  mail32.png 32x32

584669779[/snapback]

how can i use larger icons for folders? windows just resizes them.

how can i use larger icons for folders? windows just resizes them.

585386368[/snapback]

I don't think you can, unless you choose to use thumbnail view in your explorer windows. I could be wrong, but I'm sure that thumbnail view will show the same size as what your desktop icons are being displayed at. I personally don't know of any other way to display larger icon sizes for folders in explorer.

I've tried like 100 different links and software, none worked well. Irfanview and Xnview are no good, they don't support alpha channels. That Icon Sushi app just showed me error messages, and so on with all other links posted in this thread.

I found this great program called Aveicon just drag and drop .... And various different size settings ;) http://www.aqua-soft.org/board/showthread.php?t=15304

585459411[/snapback]

But this worked. Thanks you so much for the link, it's great.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft's fast coding model MAI-Code-1-Flash comes to Copilot Business and Enterprise by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft’s recently announced MAI-Code-1-Flash model is now generally available to GitHub Copilot Business and Copilot Enterprise customers. With this support, organizations can have more centralized policy controls and billing while finally being able to use Microsoft’s lightweight, first-party coding model. According to GitHub’s announcement, Business and Enterprise plan administrators must enable the MAI-Code-1-Flash policy in Copilot settings before developers can access the model. Microsoft says that MAI-Code-1-Flash is for fast, iterative coding work rather than the most demanding architectural or debugging tasks. GitHub’s official model comparison page says that the model is great for "general-purpose coding and writing," while it excels at fast, accurate code completions and explanations Microsoft introduced MAI-Code-1-Flash on June 2 as part of a broader collection of internally developed MAI models. GitHub subsequently expanded support to Copilot CLI, the Copilot cloud agent, GitHub.com chat, GitHub Mobile, Visual Studio, JetBrains IDEs, Eclipse, and Xcode, but said support for managed Business and Enterprise customers was still on the way. In Microsoft’s own benchmark testing, MAI-Code-1-Flash scored 51.2% on SWE-Bench Pro, compared with 35.2% for Anthropic’s Claude Haiku 4.5. Microsoft also claimed that the model used up to 60% fewer tokens on SWE-Bench Verified. Do note that these are vendor-run results rather than independent measurements. The model is billed at provider list pricing under GitHub’s usage-based system. GitHub currently lists MAI-Code-1-Flash at $0.75 per million input tokens, $0.075 per million cached input tokens, and $4.50 per million output tokens. For organizations, the main incentive to use MAI-Code-1-Flash is likely to be efficiency rather than maximum capability. A smaller model that responds quickly and limits unnecessary output is quite useful for repetitive agent tasks at scale, especially after GitHub Copilot’s move toward usage-based billing. The "Flash" model is recommended for fast work and not necessarily for huge repositories with loads of context. It's better if teams compare their output with other larger models, especially if they're working on security-sensitive changes and complex, multi-file work.
    • yes AND no the "original" or plain/normal Optiplex 7010 won't be getting any more new firmware updates BUT the Optiplex SFF/SFF Plus {small form factor}, Micro/Micro Plus & Tower/Tower Plus 7010 editions DO get new updates such as this new one   and here are similar guides from the Dell web site for Dell systems: https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000390990/secure-boot-transition-faq https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000347876/microsoft-2011-secure-boot-certificate-expiration
    • AT&T has been spying on US citizens with the NSA for decades.. they just know how to keep it more under wraps.. the evil level is still there.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      459
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      212
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      157
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      71
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!