Recommended Posts

  • 1 month later...

I use aveicon, you can get it from here. Freeware, converts either ico to png or png to ico, all you do is drag the ico's into the program and drag the png's out. It can do hundereds at a time (I've done 606).

  • 1 month later...
I use aveicon, you can get it from here. Freeware, converts either ico to png or png to ico, all you do is drag the ico's into the program and drag the png's out. It can do hundereds at a time (I've done 606).

Typical Scot, keeps track of everything !

:p

:D <---- also Scottish.

  • 1 month later...
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

:yes:

I realize my comment is a little to little to late but I'll post it anyway.

I've tried a few icon programs and ended up buying Axialis' Icon Workshop after trying it because of how easily it automatically creates win XP Icon sets from a single image in the blink of an eye.

I edit in photoshop cs in 128x128 usually, or greater png format then export to Icon workshop via filter and create XP icon set and save as ico. The best way to created the highest quality icons

period. Icon workshop cost a bit, but if you like to make quality icons, it's worth the money ten times over, and the program was superbly designed.

:yes:

I realize my comment is a little to little to late but I'll post it anyway.

I've tried a few icon programs and ended up buying Axialis' Icon Workshop after trying it because of how easily it automatically creates win XP Icon sets from a single image in the blink of an eye.

I edit in photoshop cs in 128x128 usually, or greater png format then export to Icon workshop via filter and create XP icon set and save as ico. The best way to created the highest quality icons

period. Icon workshop cost a bit, but if you like to make quality icons, it's worth the money ten times over, and the program was superbly designed.

While I agree that Iconworkshop is an excellent piece of software that makes icon conversion a breeze (I use it myself), I'm not sure if it would be correct to say that it produces the "highest quality icons period". In my opinion, if you want your icons to be of the highest quality, the best method would be an old one (before such icon conversion programs came about). This consists in creating each size format (128x128, 96x96, etc) in Photoshop, saving them in PSD format and then compiling them together as an ICO file in Gif Movie Gear. This way, you are sure that the image in each of the size formats are of excellent quality (no jagged edges, sharp images even at the lowest size format, so forth). Of course, this method is rather tedious.

:yes: To the contrary, Photoshop combined with my skill level produces the quality images, Axialis Icon workshop resizes them with the best quality.... comparable to Photoshop, and much easier. I ditched GIF moviegear for icons 2 years ago and never looked back! Here's are a couple of examples. Load either of the 128x128 images into Icon workshop and see for yourself! Very minimal jaggies far less than any other method. If you start with a high quality image with no jaggies, then you'll end up with high quality icons at the lower end in the resize process of Icon workshop with very little jaggies. If you like a little sharper image, erase some of the transparency on the edges. Try it for yourself. The search image is a search icon I made from scratch. Although there is nothing significant about it, and I agree that it still needs some reflective light shading on the lens, and it is slightly blurred (my preference), it is of top quality. Open it in Photoshop and use the plugin to transfer to Icon workshop (IW), or just open the image in IW and create a new XP icon set and you'll see what i mean. Then try to recreate the icons in your own way separately and see if the results are better. I would venture to guess that they aren't, and with much more time consumed. I made the mail icon from an image I took of a bill I forgot to send as another example. I run 1600x1200 desktop at present with 56x56 icon sizes and these look fantastic on the start menu or task bar Quicklaunch with large icons nenabled. Small icons look great too.

search.png 128x128 search32.png 32x32

mail.png 128x128 mail32.png 32x32

  • 2 months later...
Try IconSuchi,

Click to google it! <!--google-->iconsuchi<!--endgoogle--> (Powered by TimDorr)

857344[/snapback]

Yeah I google it and it says no match's I guess this means that Google isn't always the answer!

869429[/snapback]

Think he means Iconsushi

http://towofu.s5.xrea.com/soft/e-index.html

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
:yes: To the contrary, Photoshop combined with my skill level produces the quality images, Axialis Icon workshop resizes them with the best quality.... comparable to Photoshop, and much easier. I ditched GIF moviegear for icons 2 years ago and never looked back! Here's are a couple of examples. Load either of the 128x128 images into Icon workshop and see for yourself! Very minimal jaggies far less than any other method. If you start with a high quality image with no jaggies, then you'll end up with high quality icons at the lower end in the resize process of Icon workshop with very little jaggies. If you like a little sharper image, erase some of the transparency on the edges. Try it for yourself. The search image is a search icon I made from scratch. Although there is nothing significant about it, and I agree that it still needs some reflective light shading on the lens, and it is slightly blurred (my preference), it is of top quality. Open it in Photoshop and use the plugin to transfer to Icon workshop (IW), or just open the image in IW and create a new XP icon set and you'll see what i mean. Then try to recreate the icons in your own way separately and see if the results are better. I would venture to guess that they aren't, and with much more time consumed. I made the mail icon from an image I took of a bill I forgot to send as another example. I run 1600x1200 desktop at present with 56x56 icon sizes and these look fantastic on the start menu or task bar Quicklaunch with large icons nenabled. Small icons look great too.

search.png  128x128  search32.png 32x32

mail.png  128x128  mail32.png 32x32

584669779[/snapback]

how can i use larger icons for folders? windows just resizes them.

how can i use larger icons for folders? windows just resizes them.

585386368[/snapback]

I don't think you can, unless you choose to use thumbnail view in your explorer windows. I could be wrong, but I'm sure that thumbnail view will show the same size as what your desktop icons are being displayed at. I personally don't know of any other way to display larger icon sizes for folders in explorer.

I've tried like 100 different links and software, none worked well. Irfanview and Xnview are no good, they don't support alpha channels. That Icon Sushi app just showed me error messages, and so on with all other links posted in this thread.

I found this great program called Aveicon just drag and drop .... And various different size settings ;) http://www.aqua-soft.org/board/showthread.php?t=15304

585459411[/snapback]

But this worked. Thanks you so much for the link, it's great.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Which finger's fingernail are we talking about? I can see how not having this info can lead to massive differences in interpretation.
    • This Chinese company is reportedly developing a feature Apple and Samsung can only dream of by Hamid Ganji While companies like Apple and Samsung have been relatively conservative with their devices’ battery capacities in recent years, Chinese manufacturers have taken the competition to the next level by introducing significantly larger batteries. However, the latest report from China suggests that a local company may already be developing a smartphone with a whopping 14,000mAh battery. Chinese leaker Digital Chat Station claimed on Weibo that a smartphone maker is developing a device with a 14,000mAh battery. If true, it would be the largest battery ever used in a smartphone and could, in theory, provide up to a week of battery life on a single charge. The leaker did not reveal the name of the company behind the device, but there are some clues. This week, HONOR unveiled the X80 Pro Max in China with an 11,000mAh battery and 90W wired charging support. The company also launched the Honor Win in January, which packs a 10,000mAh battery. HONOR, a former subsidiary of Huawei, has a proven track record of developing smartphones with unusually large batteries. However, other Chinese brands, including Xiaomi, have also launched devices such as the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max with 7,500mAh batteries. Though Chinese users on Weibo also believe the company behind the new battery is HONOR. Interestingly, Digital Chat Station said the device with the 14,000mAh battery weighs around 220 grams, making it lighter than the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (233 grams) and slightly heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (214 grams). The iPhone 17 Pro Max currently packs a 5,088mAh battery in eSIM-only versions, while the Galaxy S26 Ultra features a 5,000mAh battery. Neither device is expected to see a dramatic increase in battery capacity in its next-generation successor. So when it comes to battery comparison, Chinese brands are unbeaten. HONOR smartphones are currently available in the EU, but the Chinese brand has no official presence in the United States due to restrictions imposed by the U.S. government.
    • Qualcomm takes on NVIDIA with new Dragonfly CPU and AI chips by Pradeep Viswanathan Microsoft, Google, Amazon, AMD, Meta, Apple, OpenAI, and several others have been developing their own chips for AI infrastructure. However, NVIDIA still remains the dominant player in the market. Today, Qualcomm announced a major expansion of its data center infrastructure portfolio to better compete with NVIDIA. The new lineup includes the Qualcomm Dragonfly C1000 CPU, Qualcomm High Bandwidth Compute technology, the Dragonfly AI300 inference accelerator, new connectivity products, and custom silicon solutions. Qualcomm claims that this new lineup improves performance per watt, token throughput, and total cost of ownership for AI data centers. The Dragonfly C1000 is a new data center CPU built with Qualcomm’s custom Oryon cores. This chip will feature more than 250 cores, frequencies above 5GHz, and a chiplet-based design. Qualcomm claims that this new C1000 can deliver more than 2x better performance per watt compared to existing server CPU offerings based on specifications. The Dragonfly C1000 will support PCIe Gen 7 with more than 2TB/s of connectivity, along with CXL, advanced RAS features, and both air and liquid cooling. Qualcomm expects the Dragonfly C1000 to be commercially available in 2028. Additionally, Qualcomm and Meta announced a multi-year, multi-generation agreement under which Qualcomm will supply Dragonfly C1000 data center CPUs for Meta’s next-generation server fleet. Qualcomm also announced High Bandwidth Compute, a new near-memory computing architecture designed to address AI’s memory bandwidth bottleneck. HBC Gen 1 will debut with the Dragonfly AI250, which is expected to sample in mid-2027. The AI250 will deliver 133TB/s per card, an 18x increase in effective memory bandwidth compared to the AI200 with LPDDR5X. The new Dragonfly AI300 with HBC Gen 2 is a rack-level AI inference platform from Qualcomm. Qualcomm claims that the AI300 can deliver 4x to 8x better performance per watt compared to existing GPU-based architectures based on memory bandwidth per watt per card. The Dragonfly AI300 is expected to be available in 2028.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Meta Plast earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      461
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      136
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!