Recommended Posts

  • 1 month later...

I use aveicon, you can get it from here. Freeware, converts either ico to png or png to ico, all you do is drag the ico's into the program and drag the png's out. It can do hundereds at a time (I've done 606).

  • 1 month later...
I use aveicon, you can get it from here. Freeware, converts either ico to png or png to ico, all you do is drag the ico's into the program and drag the png's out. It can do hundereds at a time (I've done 606).

Typical Scot, keeps track of everything !

:p

:D <---- also Scottish.

  • 1 month later...
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

:yes:

I realize my comment is a little to little to late but I'll post it anyway.

I've tried a few icon programs and ended up buying Axialis' Icon Workshop after trying it because of how easily it automatically creates win XP Icon sets from a single image in the blink of an eye.

I edit in photoshop cs in 128x128 usually, or greater png format then export to Icon workshop via filter and create XP icon set and save as ico. The best way to created the highest quality icons

period. Icon workshop cost a bit, but if you like to make quality icons, it's worth the money ten times over, and the program was superbly designed.

:yes:

I realize my comment is a little to little to late but I'll post it anyway.

I've tried a few icon programs and ended up buying Axialis' Icon Workshop after trying it because of how easily it automatically creates win XP Icon sets from a single image in the blink of an eye.

I edit in photoshop cs in 128x128 usually, or greater png format then export to Icon workshop via filter and create XP icon set and save as ico. The best way to created the highest quality icons

period. Icon workshop cost a bit, but if you like to make quality icons, it's worth the money ten times over, and the program was superbly designed.

While I agree that Iconworkshop is an excellent piece of software that makes icon conversion a breeze (I use it myself), I'm not sure if it would be correct to say that it produces the "highest quality icons period". In my opinion, if you want your icons to be of the highest quality, the best method would be an old one (before such icon conversion programs came about). This consists in creating each size format (128x128, 96x96, etc) in Photoshop, saving them in PSD format and then compiling them together as an ICO file in Gif Movie Gear. This way, you are sure that the image in each of the size formats are of excellent quality (no jagged edges, sharp images even at the lowest size format, so forth). Of course, this method is rather tedious.

:yes: To the contrary, Photoshop combined with my skill level produces the quality images, Axialis Icon workshop resizes them with the best quality.... comparable to Photoshop, and much easier. I ditched GIF moviegear for icons 2 years ago and never looked back! Here's are a couple of examples. Load either of the 128x128 images into Icon workshop and see for yourself! Very minimal jaggies far less than any other method. If you start with a high quality image with no jaggies, then you'll end up with high quality icons at the lower end in the resize process of Icon workshop with very little jaggies. If you like a little sharper image, erase some of the transparency on the edges. Try it for yourself. The search image is a search icon I made from scratch. Although there is nothing significant about it, and I agree that it still needs some reflective light shading on the lens, and it is slightly blurred (my preference), it is of top quality. Open it in Photoshop and use the plugin to transfer to Icon workshop (IW), or just open the image in IW and create a new XP icon set and you'll see what i mean. Then try to recreate the icons in your own way separately and see if the results are better. I would venture to guess that they aren't, and with much more time consumed. I made the mail icon from an image I took of a bill I forgot to send as another example. I run 1600x1200 desktop at present with 56x56 icon sizes and these look fantastic on the start menu or task bar Quicklaunch with large icons nenabled. Small icons look great too.

search.png 128x128 search32.png 32x32

mail.png 128x128 mail32.png 32x32

  • 2 months later...
Try IconSuchi,

Click to google it! <!--google-->iconsuchi<!--endgoogle--> (Powered by TimDorr)

857344[/snapback]

Yeah I google it and it says no match's I guess this means that Google isn't always the answer!

869429[/snapback]

Think he means Iconsushi

http://towofu.s5.xrea.com/soft/e-index.html

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
:yes: To the contrary, Photoshop combined with my skill level produces the quality images, Axialis Icon workshop resizes them with the best quality.... comparable to Photoshop, and much easier. I ditched GIF moviegear for icons 2 years ago and never looked back! Here's are a couple of examples. Load either of the 128x128 images into Icon workshop and see for yourself! Very minimal jaggies far less than any other method. If you start with a high quality image with no jaggies, then you'll end up with high quality icons at the lower end in the resize process of Icon workshop with very little jaggies. If you like a little sharper image, erase some of the transparency on the edges. Try it for yourself. The search image is a search icon I made from scratch. Although there is nothing significant about it, and I agree that it still needs some reflective light shading on the lens, and it is slightly blurred (my preference), it is of top quality. Open it in Photoshop and use the plugin to transfer to Icon workshop (IW), or just open the image in IW and create a new XP icon set and you'll see what i mean. Then try to recreate the icons in your own way separately and see if the results are better. I would venture to guess that they aren't, and with much more time consumed. I made the mail icon from an image I took of a bill I forgot to send as another example. I run 1600x1200 desktop at present with 56x56 icon sizes and these look fantastic on the start menu or task bar Quicklaunch with large icons nenabled. Small icons look great too.

search.png  128x128  search32.png 32x32

mail.png  128x128  mail32.png 32x32

584669779[/snapback]

how can i use larger icons for folders? windows just resizes them.

how can i use larger icons for folders? windows just resizes them.

585386368[/snapback]

I don't think you can, unless you choose to use thumbnail view in your explorer windows. I could be wrong, but I'm sure that thumbnail view will show the same size as what your desktop icons are being displayed at. I personally don't know of any other way to display larger icon sizes for folders in explorer.

I've tried like 100 different links and software, none worked well. Irfanview and Xnview are no good, they don't support alpha channels. That Icon Sushi app just showed me error messages, and so on with all other links posted in this thread.

I found this great program called Aveicon just drag and drop .... And various different size settings ;) http://www.aqua-soft.org/board/showthread.php?t=15304

585459411[/snapback]

But this worked. Thanks you so much for the link, it's great.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • IBM reveals sub-1nm chip technology, production expected in another 5 years by Pradeep Viswanathan TSMC is now leading the chip manufacturing industry with its 2nm-class process node called N2. Samsung Foundry also has a 2nm-class process node called SF2. TSMC says N2 entered volume production in Q4 2025. Samsung says SF2 started mass production in 2025. Today, IBM announced the world’s first sub-1-nanometer chip technology, marking another major semiconductor research milestone. The new technology is based on a 0.7nm, or 7-angstrom, node and uses a new transistor architecture called “nanostack.” The new design vertically stacks and staggers nanosheet-based transistors so that more components can fit into the same chip area while also improving performance and power efficiency. IBM claims that this new sub-1nm chip can pack nearly 100 billion transistors onto a chip the size of a fingernail. This offers almost twice the density, up to 50 percent higher performance, or 70 percent better energy efficiency when compared to IBM's 2nm node design announced back in 2021. Also, IBM mentioned that this new architecture can deliver 40 percent SRAM scaling. It is important to consider that this announcement from IBM is a research milestone rather than a near-term process node launch. Back in 2021, IBM unveiled the world’s first 2nm chip design, claiming 50 billion transistors on a fingernail-sized chip and major performance and efficiency gains. Five years later, IBM’s 2nm technology has still not entered mainstream commercial production. That is because IBM is no longer a major commercial chip manufacturer. It sold its chip manufacturing business to GlobalFoundries years ago and has since then focused only on semiconductor research, IP development, and partnerships. To productize its 2-nm chip technology, IBM partnered with Japan’s Rapidus, but it has not resulted in anything shipping at scale. IBM says that its new sub-1nm technology can reach production as early as within the next five years. If that happens, it will likely depend on manufacturing partners, advanced EUV tooling, and years of yield improvements.
    • It's funny when thieves accuse other thieves of stealing. Ai companies just blatantly siphoned all the knowledge of the internet without consent and are now selling it with their service... so excuse me if I find this a bit ironic.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Meta Plast earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      135
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!