Recommended Posts

  • 1 month later...

I simply don't get this. If you want Aero, get a machine that can support it. Or more correctly, an operating system that can.

Yeah because XP has Aero and for those who can't use it in Vista have the money to just go out and get a whole new machine. :rolleyes:

  • 1 month later...

Yeah because XP has Aero and for those who can't use it in Vista have the money to just go out and get a whole new machine. :rolleyes:

Right..because using things like windows blurring and aero on windows xp with no hardware acceleration isn't going to affect your systems performance at all :rolleyes:

Cool program none the less, but I'm pretty sure if you have a computer that can handle it on Windows Vista or Windows 7.

Great to see this app still in use and development. It's a great program with some definite advantages over using native Aero effects in Windows. I myself like the fact that BorderSkin's got the ability to adjust the blur of the windows, something I've been hoping and praying for one of the coders around here to develop for the DWM.

Right..because using things like windows blurring and aero on windows xp with no hardware acceleration isn't going to affect your systems performance at all :rolleyes:

Cool program none the less, but I'm pretty sure if you have a computer that can handle it on Windows Vista or Windows 7.

thanks, it sure affects performance, but if it is stable enough to work all the time without affecting performance too much then sure it can be used, don't u think ?

( my computer is not aero capable and it runs it fine)

Great to see this app still in use and development. It's a great program with some definite advantages over using native Aero effects in Windows. I myself like the fact that BorderSkin's got the ability to adjust the blur of the windows, something I've been hoping and praying for one of the coders around here to develop for the DWM.

thanks, but i don't think that controlling blur value is possible, vista and seven don't supply any API to change settings in DWM except for showing aero on forms.

  • 2 months later...
  • 2 months later...

Are people this attached to XP that they spend all this time trying to make it look like 7? Seriously, Windows 7 can be had for $100 or less, why spend all these hours making XP look like it? The OS is nearly a decade old, let it go.

Have to agree with that. Plus I'm tired of hearing the "oh its slow/bloated" excuse.. sorry but I have Win7 running on a tablet that's sporting a Celeron and 512MB, doesn't get much crappier than that, and it's perfectly usable. (Also seems a lot smoother in a low RAM environment that XP did, go figure.)

That aside, I tried the app in a virtual machine that I kept around just for random crapware testing. (Not implying anything, it's just a general dump box for unknown apps.) Seems to do the job fairly well. A couple apps didn't like it, namely the ones that insist on using non-standard frames, but the exclusions took care of it. I wouldn't use it myself if I was still running XP, but if you're the type that needs this sort of thing it's pretty good.

Hey Komalo! Remember me? :p

First of all , congrats for .2.9 version! Per app configurations seems great , is it possible to bring such a thing to Windows 7? Like make Firefox window bit orange , while Opera bit red , etc etc. I would really love to use such a feature :D

And to those who think its not worth to make apps for Xp now , hello! Almost 50% ppl still use xp and yes , they have about 256~512mb ram , and its not actually apt to run Windows 7 on it , with just basic theme :| See lee-soft.com , he has just updated his ViGlance version which is also used in Vista to mimic Superbar like functionality. Who knows , Komalo might someday add Windows Vista and 7 basic support to Border skin , so that even Home basic ppl can use aero. Anyways , i am , as always , impressed with Komalo's talent :D

There's really this many people who can't run Aero? The earliest nvidia card to support Aero is FX 5200, and for ATI it's the Radeon 9600 pro. Those two cards are DIRT OLD (think 8+ years old). Are there seriously this many people still using computers at home that have AGP video cards even worse than those? Even then, you can probably obtain an aero-capable AGP video card for such systems dirt cheap and quite easily, or maybe you can cannibalize one from an old system a buddy of yours isn't using anymore.

Even the onboard intel GPUs beyond the GMA945 can use Aero just fine. And they often lack shaders and dedicated video memory! Aero does not require very many resources, as many seem to believe it does. Even if your onboard video isn't up to snuff, refer above about getting a cheap and easy AGP card.

And just how many people still use (as their main computer) a system that has less than 512mb of RAM? Corporations and Businesses do not count here, I'm talking your everyday household computer you use as your main (or only) machine!

That said: this program woulda been nice to see years ago, during the whole anti-vista/downgrade-back-to-xp fiasco when most of us were still using XP. Might be useful for XP Mode, or other XP virtual machines tho!

And to those who think its not worth to make apps for Xp now , hello! Almost 50% ppl still use xp and yes , they have about 256~512mb ram , and its not actually apt to run Windows 7 on it , with just basic theme :|

7 will run just fine in 512MB. (Granted, not optimal.. neither with XP for that matter.) With 256MB, even XP is going to have horrible performance. You can load the OS itself sure, fire up any modern application though and you'll hear your hard drive thrashing the swap file like mad. This isn't Vista; the footprint between 7 and XP really isn't that much after all is said and done. On my particular system, I'm guesstimating 7 is taking about 3% more memory than XP did with the same background apps running. If I killed off 7's extras like DWM, indexing and whatnot, it'll be aprox identical. Even when XP was new, if you said you had 256MB people would be telling you to 1) Upgrade, or 2) Go back to 98 or Win2K.

That's why I run XP or Linux on my older dell x300, no support for aero thus runs like a dog

Again, that's your choice, but Aero is just accelerating the system by offloading the graphics to the GPU. Yes, without Aero, 7 runs a bit slower... basically, handling it just like XP.

I agree with the majority about XP and Aero.

I think it's time to stop beating that dead horse, bite the bullet and just upgrade to 7, for God's sake.

Again, that's your choice, but Aero is just accelerating the system by offloading the graphics to the GPU. Yes, without Aero, 7 runs a bit slower... basically, handling it just like XP.

This has to do with my machine (maybe others out there as well who have net yet upgraded their PC/Laptop) But because my onboard video does not have a WDDM compatible card (older intel 800/850) I was not able to utilize Aero or other core functionalities of the operating system I lost the ability to play DVDs entirely and other sources media in full screen(which became a huge issue for the kids on trips) any games that we owned were a complete failure. And not having a properly working display driver is not a suitable option for a day to day PC. I have Windows 7 running on a newer machine that I own, but to ask why people do not just upgrade or think it's ridiculous that they haven't is a bit superficial.

I certainly will not purchase a license for an operating system that is not compatible with my hardware, just doesn't make sense, especially when Windows XP runs perfectly fine on it.

okay, first of all, i am not a fan of the Windows Aero interface, i don't like it so much that i keep simulate every piece of it, but i do it because I've gained some experience about windows handling, skinning, programming teqs, very etc ... that i wouldn't dream to gain from developing any other software, i didn't actually thought that developing Border Skin would be so useful for my software developing that much, and not to mention, that this kind of software isn't stable on all computers, so that errors could happen on some computers, and don't happen on other, so when i face this kind errors, and fix them, and improve stability on all computers, imagine how that would be great addition in any developing of any software i might develop.

as for Aero, i myself am not against or with windows 7, nor keeping or getting rid of xp, i look at what i need, if windows xp is fine for me, all i need of programs of games is available for me, then i won't upgrade to 7, but if i needed one of the features that is available only on windows 7, i will defintly upgrade, that is my opinion, and i think that most of people think that way, and by features, i mean the ones that i need, not the better features of windows 7, of course windows 7 has so many new and better features than xp, but it doesn't necessarily mean that all of us need them, and we have to upgrade.

Hey Komalo! Remember me? :p

First of all , congrats for .2.9 version! Per app configurations seems great , is it possible to bring such a thing to Windows 7? Like make Firefox window bit orange , while Opera bit red , etc etc. I would really love to use such a feature :D

And to those who think its not worth to make apps for Xp now , hello! Almost 50% ppl still use xp and yes , they have about 256~512mb ram , and its not actually apt to run Windows 7 on it , with just basic theme :| See lee-soft.com , he has just updated his ViGlance version which is also used in Vista to mimic Superbar like functionality. Who knows , Komalo might someday add Windows Vista and 7 basic support to Border skin , so that even Home basic ppl can use aero. Anyways , i am , as always , impressed with Komalo's talent :D

and how exactly can i forget u my friend :), on windows vista & 7, Microsoft didn't add any programming way of controlling aero execpt for enabling and disabling only, which i find very annoying, btw, Border Skin can work on both vista and seven basic ;)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      458
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!