Recommended Posts

I liked it, ok its teen angst but that's what the books are like there's the teen factor then the vampires second.

I can see some epic battles coming plus its a supernatural come horror night with Supernatural on after so it fits well.

I will be watching the first episode when I can get it, but does not look like I will continue, I will post back if my mind changes afterward.

And to the person who said True Blood kick started the vampire thing again, uh I believe there were 2 or 3 vamp shows before it, plus twilight, and yea.

So I watched it last night and thought it was pretty decent. First thing my son said when he walked by was "Daddy are you watching a new Twilight movie?" haha it does feel that way.

Overall I enjoyed it. I could see it getting very interesting as there is a lot they could do with Vampires, etc.

VAMPIRE DIARIES Sets Record as The CW?s Most Watched Series Premiere EVER

VAMPIRE DIARIES Hits CW?s Best Ratings in the Time Period EVER with Women;

Best in Nearly 2 Years with Adults 18-34, Adults 18-49 and Viewers

VAMPIRE DIARIES Improves The Time Period Versus Year Ago and

Builds in Second Half Hour Across the Board

SUPERNATURAL Improves Over Last Year?s Season Premiere with Young Women

VAMPIRE and SUPERNATURAL Combine for CW?s Best Thursday Ever with Women;

Best Thursday in 2 ? Years with Adults 18-34

September 11, 2009 (Burbank, CA) ? The debut of The CW?s THE VAMPIRE DIARIES bared its fangs last night, and scored the network?s largest audience EVER (4.84mil) for a series premiere, topping last year?s 90210, according to preliminary live plus same day Nielsen ratings for Thursday, Sept. 10, 2009.

Taking over the lead-off position on Thursday night, THE VAMPIRE DIARIES delivered The CW?s highest ratings ever in the 8-9pm time period with women 18-34 (3.0/10), women 18-49 (2.8/8), teens (2.7/11) and female teens (3.4/14). It also scored the best performance here in adults 18-34 (2.2/8), adults 18-49 (2.1/6) and viewers (4.84mil) since Oct. 2007.

THE VAMPIRE DIARIES out-performed last season?s Smallville premiere by 114% in women 18-34, 75% in women 18-49, 22% in adults 18-34, 17% in adults 18-49 and 11% in viewers.

THE VAMPIRE DIARIES built in the second half hour, growing 18% with women 18-34, 10% in adults 18-34, 17% in females 12-34, 14% in persons 12-34, 12% in women 18-49, 10% in adults 18-49 and 9% in viewers.

Competitively, THE VAMPIRE DIARIES was second in the 8:00-9:00p.m. hour with women 18-34 and adults 18-34, behind only football. THE VAMPIRE DIARIES also beat ABC and Fox in adults 18-49 and total viewers.

For its 5th season premiere, SUPERNATURAL improved over its strong premiere last year by 6% in women 18-34 (1.7/5). SUPERNATURAL also scored its best women 18-34 (1.7/5) and women 18-49 (1.7/5) ratings since Jan. 2009.

The CW?s new combination of THE VAMPIRE DIARIES and SUPERNATURAL scored the network?s best Thursday ever with women 18-34 (2.4/7) and women 18-49 (2.2/6). This marks The CW?s best Thursday since March 2007 with adults 18-34 (1.8/6) and the network?s largest Thursday audience (4.1mil) since Sept. 2008.

Competitively, The CW was second on Thursday night with women 18-34 and adults 18-34. The CW did also beat ABC and Fox in adults 18-49 and viewers for the night.

Versus premiere Thursday last year, The CW is up 60% with women 18-34, 29% with women 18-49 and 6% with adults 18-34.

Yea I finally ended up watching it (in crappy standard definition) and I enjoyed it.

They started quite well with a song I love, and for the most part, 90% of the show had awesome music. They other 10% was crappy Korney hip-hop teen music, which I hate. So far in terms of vampire related stuff, they did everything well and didn't make anything stupid. Like that glowy crap in Twilight. So happy with that, and not as stupid teen drama as I thought it would be, at least so far, its just the right amount. So I will be watching the next episode.

Four young stars from the CW Network?s hot new show The Vampire Diaries have been busted for flashing motorists from a bridge.b>

Click here to see their mug shots

Drivers in Forsyth, Georgia got an eyeful as they drove past the intersection as the shapely young stars were doing a promotional shoot .

Stars Nina Dobrev, 20, Candice Accola, 22, Kayla Ewell, 24, and Sara Canning, 22, all ended-up sinking their teeth into some jail food after they were charged with disorderly conduct charges.

Photographer Tyler Shields and actress Krystal Vayda - who does not appear on the show ? were also charged.

According to the police report from Monroe county Sheriff?s Department Deputies Morgan and Jackson responded to a call at Rumble Road Bridge at 3.42 pm on August 22 after reports that several kids had been hanging and flashing from the bridge at the I -75 northbound intersection.

The officers reported that when they arrived on the scene they made contact with five females and one male standing on the bridge.

Click here for document 1

Click here for document 2

Police informed them of the complaints and Shields told them that he was a photographer and that he was taking pictures for a TV show that was due to air in September.

Officer Morgan checked his cameras they discovered various images of females hanging, sitting and straddling the bridge.

One photograph even showed one female being held by her legs by the other female as if they were trying to throw her over.

The officers then instructed them to show some identification before taking them to the Sheriff?s Office and booking them for disorderly conduct.

Tyler Shields posted $4000 in fines and described the police as having a ?flair for the dramatic?

Vampire Diaries premiered on the CW Network last night and averaged 4.84 million total viewers, according to Nielsen overnights.

http://www.radaronline.com/exclusives/2009...rested-flashing

haha awesome Tyler Shields is quite well known on the Celebrity Photographer scene and he is quite out there with his shots...it's funny because I have seen 2 of the pictures and they are dodgy :p

85nina_dobrev_candice_ac.jpg

Edited by Rappy
Anyone know how I could find a list of the music that was played during the pilot? I REALLY enjoyed ALL the tracks

*edit* found it Here if anyone also liked it.

Thanks for the list! I was wondering about a couple of the tracks!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      576
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      78
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!