Recommended Posts

I will be getting a new computer in the next 12 or so months, so I compiled a list of the most CPU and GPU intensive games.

SUPREME COMMANDER, CRYSIS, GTA 4, etc

I figure my price limit will be $1500. Now, I just visited the Canadian Mac store.

iMac, 20-inch (Part Number: MB417LL/A)

2GB 1066MHz DDR3 SDRAM - 2x1GB

320GB Serial ATA Drive

Apple Mighty Mouse

$ 1,399

or it's upgraded maxed-out version

iMac, 20-inch, 2.66GHz Intel Core 2 Duo (Part Number: Z0FN)

8GB 1066MHz DDR3 SD RAM

640GB Serial ATA Drive

Apple Wireless Mighty Mouse

Price: $2,814

The base iMac is identical to my aging HP (Spec's below)

2GB DDR2 ram

300 GB Drive

1 DVD RW + 1 DVD Rom

For rendering in DAZ and Poser, plus playing most of the newest games, is identical Apple spec's enough ?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/774950-want-to-move-to-mac/
Share on other sites

using a iMac for gaming is not the best buy for power to cost ratio use that money to build you a intel i7 system LOL for less then 2,800 for a maxed out iMac you can build a Dual Intel Xeon 5500 system for 2,500 same price as apples quad mac pro just one big Fail to go with apple so early

So you want to play Crysis and GTA IV? Apple may say the imac has "ultrafast graphics" but compared to what we Crysis players run in our rigs, the maxed imac is truly crappy.

The best card, a single ATI 4850, won't play those on high at the native resolution while our SLI/Crossfire rigs do, for about half the price to boot. But the catch is, if you want a monster rig for less, you have to build it yourself.

I can see Apple fanboy in your signature, and nothing against it. However you must realise Mac does not actually support majority of the latest games. So if you want to play latest games you will eventually have to go with Microsoft even if you will be using a Mac computer.

Doesn't seem reasonable to me.

for all my sins, i love macs but trust me, dont get one for gaming.

i have the base imac there (it was spec'd up a year ago) and it barely copes with the sims for my girlfriend.

i bit the bullet and got a decent phenom x4 and x-fire cards and 2 1080p 42" tvs hooked up via HDMI

only cost me ?2000 all in and its awesome

If you're serious about gaming and switching to a Mac...then a Mac Pro would be a better choice.

would be a better choice if you have a lot of money to kick around.

Yeah, I'd suggest a PC for PC gaming. You could easily build an awesome rig for under $1000. Toss yourself a Macbook or Mac Mini and you'd have an Apple computer, all for less than the price of a Mac Pro. You'd probably have a better experience too.

Or buy a apple retail DVD you pay of it so you get to do what you want with it :)

When you buy a DVD you're paying for the plastic circle and a license to use the data on it.

The physical media has almost no value at all - if you lose your copy in a fire your license to

use the software on it will remain intact. Likewise, it's possible to purchase a software license

(even for mac os x) without actually receiving physical media. Large organizations like school

boards do this as a matter of course: storing 500+ manuals and CDs for Mac OS X is a huge

waste of space.

When you install Mac OS X on an unsanctioned machines Apple revokes the license to use it.

When you use software that you don't have a license to use then you're not any better off

(legally) than if you had just downloaded the thing from a Bit Torrent community. You avoid

the "unauthorized distribution" charges but your use of the software is still unlicensed. The

best analog I can think of would be using a crack to turn a demo version of Microsoft Office

into a retail release and/or hacking a copy of Windows 2000 Pro into a Server edition.

If you don't like the way that works I encourage you to write your senator, member of

parliament, etc. and argue for copyright reform and sane EULA requirements. The EFF

(Electronic Frontiers Foundation) is a good charity to support if you'd like to donate money.

Though the scope of the EFF is larger than than just license agreements, they're much

more focused on them than groups like national civil liberties unions (ie: ACLU).

We'll never get sane laws if you don't demand them. It only a few minutes to make your

views known - and the world may end up a better place because of it.

So you want to play Crysis and GTA IV? Apple may say the imac has "ultrafast graphics" but compared to what we Crysis players run in our rigs, the maxed imac is truly crappy.

The best card, a single ATI 4850, won't play those on high at the native resolution while our SLI/Crossfire rigs do, for about half the price to boot. But the catch is, if you want a monster rig for less, you have to build it yourself.

That shows how bad a machine killer Crysis is, because I own a single 4850 and it is an awesome card. But yeah, I could only run it in medium at 1280x768 which is pretty bad really seeing as I can max out every other game on this card.

12 months or so ???/ and youre wondering about games now ?

Uhh... were you bored and couldnt think of what to post or are you really that excited about something so small so far from now ?

using a iMac for gaming is not the best buy for power to cost ratio use that money to build you a intel i7 system LOL for less then 2,800 for a maxed out iMac you can build a Dual Intel Xeon 5500 system for 2,500 same price as apples quad mac pro just one big Fail to go with apple so early

punctuation ?

or is english not your 1st language ?

12 months or so ???/ and youre wondering about games now ?

Uhh... were you bored and couldnt think of what to post or are you really that excited about something so small so far from now ?

punctuation ?

or is english not your 1st language ?

punctuation..... for what im doing this on my iphone just imagine were the dots would be :)

If you're purely gaming, then a Mac is unfortunately not the best idea. If you want other things, increase in productivity etc, then go mac.

Well to be perfectly honest I use both a maxed out Mac Pro 8-core and super fast PCs and I really didn't see any increase in productivity just by using Mac. But I must be missing something.

iMac's are based on laptop hardware, ive got a 24' inch iMac and i run run Vista and Win-7 on it and gaming power sucks just as it would on a laptop.

all the "gaming hardware" is meant for PC's even if you did install OS X on a PC your not guaranteed that OS X will run that hardware at a level higher than basic functionality if at all.

There was a post on the forums of someone who just built a wicked i7 system complete with a new glass desk, he got a puppy to for around $2,800

Seriously, don't buy an iMac for gaming. They have cheap and underpowered graphics cards into them

Also as a gamer one would assume that to get maximum longevity out of the machine one would want it to also be upgradeable; being able to upgrade the graphics card for instance.

As much as I advocate Mac's, if you're a serious gamer and as a result going to have to use Windows 95% of the time, it doesn't make alot of sense buying a Mac.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The reviews you refer to mean nothing. Where there is no journalism there is no reason to call the gaming media's opinion pieces "reviews". For GP games there is indeed a metric for success - increasing subscriptions. Which turns in revenue. The only circumstance in which subs do not rise when great is being released is a Game Pass system where the company is close to fully saturated with customers in a subscription. However, in that case as the theory goes you spend aplenty in all kind of games - from shady live service cash cows and customer offending agitprop crap in purple colours to robust and entertaining single player games. And keep a solid level of profitability. Ignoring the simply innocuous but mid games MGS has released primarily of the second kind.
    • Report: Microsoft to use AWS to help GitHub deal with a major surge in demand by Pradeep Viswanathan Thanks to the surge of coding AI agents, GitHub's usage has skyrocketed over the past 12 months. To meet this demand, GitHub started with a plan in October 2025 to increase capacity by 10x. However, by early this year, the company realized that it needed 30x scale. This rapid growth has caused severe strain on the platform's reliability, resulting in several small outages over the past few months. In April, GitHub published a long blog post explaining the steps it is taking to resolve these reliability issues. In the post, the company also confirmed that it is working toward a multi-cloud architecture for better resilience. Today, Business Insider reported that GitHub is turning to Amazon Web Services to help deal with a major surge in AI-driven coding activity. It is important to note that GitHub is still in the process of moving completely to the Azure cloud. The current plan is to move the platform fully to Azure by 2027 so that it can scale better as per developer demand. Therefore, the current decision to utilize AWS might be part of a short-term plan to meet immediate demand. A Microsoft spokesperson confirmed that GitHub is using multiple cloud providers with the following statement: For Microsoft, the decision highlights the operational pressure behind the AI boom. GitHub has to stay reliable for developers at a time when rivals such as Codex, Cursor, Claude Code, and other AI coding tools are gaining attention. And the decision to use AWS for computing capacity seems practical given the circumstances.
    • It's growing on me, however, your right, it make better usability sense if the tabs were bellow the address bar.
    • Qwen 3.6 is better value per dollar, and you can run it locally for free.
    • I don't believe them that anyone using threads, at least meaningfully. It's the same thing for Facebook, people just don't engage with Meta platforms like they are thinking. This isn't 2006.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Conversation Starter
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      Console General earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      517
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      106
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      88
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!