Recommended Posts

I will be getting a new computer in the next 12 or so months, so I compiled a list of the most CPU and GPU intensive games.

SUPREME COMMANDER, CRYSIS, GTA 4, etc

I figure my price limit will be $1500. Now, I just visited the Canadian Mac store.

iMac, 20-inch (Part Number: MB417LL/A)

2GB 1066MHz DDR3 SDRAM - 2x1GB

320GB Serial ATA Drive

Apple Mighty Mouse

$ 1,399

or it's upgraded maxed-out version

iMac, 20-inch, 2.66GHz Intel Core 2 Duo (Part Number: Z0FN)

8GB 1066MHz DDR3 SD RAM

640GB Serial ATA Drive

Apple Wireless Mighty Mouse

Price: $2,814

The base iMac is identical to my aging HP (Spec's below)

2GB DDR2 ram

300 GB Drive

1 DVD RW + 1 DVD Rom

For rendering in DAZ and Poser, plus playing most of the newest games, is identical Apple spec's enough ?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/774950-want-to-move-to-mac/
Share on other sites

using a iMac for gaming is not the best buy for power to cost ratio use that money to build you a intel i7 system LOL for less then 2,800 for a maxed out iMac you can build a Dual Intel Xeon 5500 system for 2,500 same price as apples quad mac pro just one big Fail to go with apple so early

So you want to play Crysis and GTA IV? Apple may say the imac has "ultrafast graphics" but compared to what we Crysis players run in our rigs, the maxed imac is truly crappy.

The best card, a single ATI 4850, won't play those on high at the native resolution while our SLI/Crossfire rigs do, for about half the price to boot. But the catch is, if you want a monster rig for less, you have to build it yourself.

I can see Apple fanboy in your signature, and nothing against it. However you must realise Mac does not actually support majority of the latest games. So if you want to play latest games you will eventually have to go with Microsoft even if you will be using a Mac computer.

Doesn't seem reasonable to me.

for all my sins, i love macs but trust me, dont get one for gaming.

i have the base imac there (it was spec'd up a year ago) and it barely copes with the sims for my girlfriend.

i bit the bullet and got a decent phenom x4 and x-fire cards and 2 1080p 42" tvs hooked up via HDMI

only cost me ?2000 all in and its awesome

If you're serious about gaming and switching to a Mac...then a Mac Pro would be a better choice.

would be a better choice if you have a lot of money to kick around.

Yeah, I'd suggest a PC for PC gaming. You could easily build an awesome rig for under $1000. Toss yourself a Macbook or Mac Mini and you'd have an Apple computer, all for less than the price of a Mac Pro. You'd probably have a better experience too.

Or buy a apple retail DVD you pay of it so you get to do what you want with it :)

When you buy a DVD you're paying for the plastic circle and a license to use the data on it.

The physical media has almost no value at all - if you lose your copy in a fire your license to

use the software on it will remain intact. Likewise, it's possible to purchase a software license

(even for mac os x) without actually receiving physical media. Large organizations like school

boards do this as a matter of course: storing 500+ manuals and CDs for Mac OS X is a huge

waste of space.

When you install Mac OS X on an unsanctioned machines Apple revokes the license to use it.

When you use software that you don't have a license to use then you're not any better off

(legally) than if you had just downloaded the thing from a Bit Torrent community. You avoid

the "unauthorized distribution" charges but your use of the software is still unlicensed. The

best analog I can think of would be using a crack to turn a demo version of Microsoft Office

into a retail release and/or hacking a copy of Windows 2000 Pro into a Server edition.

If you don't like the way that works I encourage you to write your senator, member of

parliament, etc. and argue for copyright reform and sane EULA requirements. The EFF

(Electronic Frontiers Foundation) is a good charity to support if you'd like to donate money.

Though the scope of the EFF is larger than than just license agreements, they're much

more focused on them than groups like national civil liberties unions (ie: ACLU).

We'll never get sane laws if you don't demand them. It only a few minutes to make your

views known - and the world may end up a better place because of it.

So you want to play Crysis and GTA IV? Apple may say the imac has "ultrafast graphics" but compared to what we Crysis players run in our rigs, the maxed imac is truly crappy.

The best card, a single ATI 4850, won't play those on high at the native resolution while our SLI/Crossfire rigs do, for about half the price to boot. But the catch is, if you want a monster rig for less, you have to build it yourself.

That shows how bad a machine killer Crysis is, because I own a single 4850 and it is an awesome card. But yeah, I could only run it in medium at 1280x768 which is pretty bad really seeing as I can max out every other game on this card.

12 months or so ???/ and youre wondering about games now ?

Uhh... were you bored and couldnt think of what to post or are you really that excited about something so small so far from now ?

using a iMac for gaming is not the best buy for power to cost ratio use that money to build you a intel i7 system LOL for less then 2,800 for a maxed out iMac you can build a Dual Intel Xeon 5500 system for 2,500 same price as apples quad mac pro just one big Fail to go with apple so early

punctuation ?

or is english not your 1st language ?

12 months or so ???/ and youre wondering about games now ?

Uhh... were you bored and couldnt think of what to post or are you really that excited about something so small so far from now ?

punctuation ?

or is english not your 1st language ?

punctuation..... for what im doing this on my iphone just imagine were the dots would be :)

If you're purely gaming, then a Mac is unfortunately not the best idea. If you want other things, increase in productivity etc, then go mac.

Well to be perfectly honest I use both a maxed out Mac Pro 8-core and super fast PCs and I really didn't see any increase in productivity just by using Mac. But I must be missing something.

iMac's are based on laptop hardware, ive got a 24' inch iMac and i run run Vista and Win-7 on it and gaming power sucks just as it would on a laptop.

all the "gaming hardware" is meant for PC's even if you did install OS X on a PC your not guaranteed that OS X will run that hardware at a level higher than basic functionality if at all.

There was a post on the forums of someone who just built a wicked i7 system complete with a new glass desk, he got a puppy to for around $2,800

Seriously, don't buy an iMac for gaming. They have cheap and underpowered graphics cards into them

Also as a gamer one would assume that to get maximum longevity out of the machine one would want it to also be upgradeable; being able to upgrade the graphics card for instance.

As much as I advocate Mac's, if you're a serious gamer and as a result going to have to use Windows 95% of the time, it doesn't make alot of sense buying a Mac.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Maradona if hydration breaks had existed in Mexico 86.
    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!