Recommended Posts

Longevity and upgradeable is wanted.

I may transplant some parts from my HP to a new rig. The Mac Pro is hideously expensive, is it overpriced ???!

Only you can answer that - cost is relative -

mac people will tell you NO - absolutely not - but they are telling you its not overpriced TO THEM.

Since everyone's finances are different - nobody can tell you if its overpriced to you

What are you considering transferring from your Hewlett Crapard ? and why ?

Longevity and upgradeable is wanted.

I may transplant some parts from my HP to a new rig. The Mac Pro is hideously expensive, is it overpriced ???!

Personally I think the iMacs are overpriced and thus not great for gaming. Unless you have endless money, you will always have to compromise performance because of the cost of Apple hardware. If you build a PC from scratch, you will get more performance for your money. Also, you have to install Windows whatever you go for, so it's not like you can avoid it with a Mac.

If it was your first Mac and you really wanted one, I would recommend saving up for a Pro, which my friend has dual booted with Vista. He's not that computer savvy but has managed upgrading it, and also plays his favourite games.

I have a MacBook for 95% of my computer usage, and I'm building a Windows based desktop for gaming. The new desktop is costing a fraction of what I would pay if I bought that spec. computer from Apple. As much as I love OS X, it won't run the games I want to play, so I see no point paying extra for another Mac just to boot it into Windows all the time.

  • 3 weeks later...

I own the 24" iMac right now, which I have partitioned with boot camp and do play games like Left 4 Dead, and Team Fortress 2 on. I love my Mac. Both of my Macs. But like everyone else have said, they aren't built for gaming. I manage fine with these games, but I do have to sacrifice a good deal of picture quality for it to run smoothly; and in my opinion, one of the perks of playing PC games over my Xbox 360 games is the awesome graphics and quality. I do also play with my Xbox controller rather than mouse and keyboard, because it's fairly difficult getting used to the mighty mouse with PC games. Right now, almost all of my video settings in my games are set pretty low just to avoid choppiness.

My boyfriend just recently built his PC (the specs on it are up to him to share), which he maxed out for gaming capabilities and with a Blu-ray player for just over $500. While I prefer using my Mac over a Windows machine 99% of the time, I do prefer to play PC games on his new monster (not to mention he hooks it up to his 47" Vizio, which I don't have the proper wiring to do with either of my Macs yet), even with his trackball mouse.

I have to second (or third or fourth or fifth, etc...) the opinion that if you're buying a Mac for the sole purpose of gaming, you'll probably be disappointed. Again, I'll also remind you that you'll still have to dual boot in Windows in order to play your PC games.

However, if you're buying your Mac mostly for everything else, with the hopes of getting a little PC gaming in (and with the understanding that you won't be playing those games to their full potential, and will be sacrificing a good deal of quality), then I say go for the Mac and enjoy yourself! You could always build your PC for gaming, and buy a Macbook later on down the road for everything else, as well.

Either way, good luck, and enjoy!

-Emily

I like my Mac for playing World of Warcraft. I use a PS3 and 360 for my console gaming.

If Apple does for the Mac what it is doing for the iPhone, then you can just about bet the Mac will become a gaming system.

The iPhone is a different market altogether, OSX will never become a viable gaming OS until it is embraced by more game makers, which is unlikely any time soon given its small market share, and lack of D3D

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The reviews you refer to mean nothing. Where there is no journalism there is no reason to call the gaming media's opinion pieces "reviews". For GP games there is indeed a metric for success - increasing subscriptions. Which turns in revenue. The only circumstance in which subs do not rise when great is being released is a Game Pass system where the company is close to fully saturated with customers in a subscription. However, in that case as the theory goes you spend aplenty in all kind of games - from shady live service cash cows and customer offending agitprop crap in purple colours to robust and entertaining single player games. And keep a solid level of profitability. Ignoring the simply innocuous but mid games MGS has released primarily of the second kind.
    • Report: Microsoft to use AWS to help GitHub deal with a major surge in demand by Pradeep Viswanathan Thanks to the surge of coding AI agents, GitHub's usage has skyrocketed over the past 12 months. To meet this demand, GitHub started with a plan in October 2025 to increase capacity by 10x. However, by early this year, the company realized that it needed 30x scale. This rapid growth has caused severe strain on the platform's reliability, resulting in several small outages over the past few months. In April, GitHub published a long blog post explaining the steps it is taking to resolve these reliability issues. In the post, the company also confirmed that it is working toward a multi-cloud architecture for better resilience. Today, Business Insider reported that GitHub is turning to Amazon Web Services to help deal with a major surge in AI-driven coding activity. It is important to note that GitHub is still in the process of moving completely to the Azure cloud. The current plan is to move the platform fully to Azure by 2027 so that it can scale better as per developer demand. Therefore, the current decision to utilize AWS might be part of a short-term plan to meet immediate demand. A Microsoft spokesperson confirmed that GitHub is using multiple cloud providers with the following statement: For Microsoft, the decision highlights the operational pressure behind the AI boom. GitHub has to stay reliable for developers at a time when rivals such as Codex, Cursor, Claude Code, and other AI coding tools are gaining attention. And the decision to use AWS for computing capacity seems practical given the circumstances.
    • It's growing on me, however, your right, it make better usability sense if the tabs were bellow the address bar.
    • Qwen 3.6 is better value per dollar, and you can run it locally for free.
    • I don't believe them that anyone using threads, at least meaningfully. It's the same thing for Facebook, people just don't engage with Meta platforms like they are thinking. This isn't 2006.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Conversation Starter
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      Console General earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      517
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      106
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      88
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!