Recommended Posts

hello all. i hope someone can help me with this.

at my we have a comcast business class router plugged into a linksys SRW248G4 switch.

everything runs fine for a while but at times during the day i am locked out of our comcast router.

we have had comcast come out and look at it many times. they have replaced the router 3 times.

comcast tells me that it must be the switch.

the problem is that when i log into the router. 192.168.1.1 i get an error message

Document Error: Data follows

Access Error: Data follows

Can't get memory

if i go and unplugg the router and plug it back in, than i can log into it.

so, is it possible that the linksys switch has something to do with this? i have not changed any settings. the switch is just plugged in right out of the box.

is there something i can change or try?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/782048-router-problems-with-linksys-switch/
Share on other sites

"the switch is just plugged in right out of the box."

Thats a shame -- thats a $300 "managed" switch - why would you spend $300+ on managed switch if your just going to plug it in and not use any of its managed features??

It seems highly unlikely that switch could be causing any issues.. What router do you have? Does it have more than 1 lan interface? If so plug into the one its lan ports -- do you still have the problem? Then its not the switch.

Again -- its is VERY UNLIKELY that the switch would be causing you any issues -- especially if your not using any of its managed features, vlans, etc.

Well depends on what your doing - if your not using any vlans, or don't want to monitor any ports or setup aggregated connections between any other switches, or setup any type of ACLs or QoS then no.

But since your rebooting the router to fix the issue -- how does that point to the switch?

i don't know. i don't really think it does.

that's just what the tool at comcast was saying. he was trying to tell me that the switch is sending data back through the router. or some crap like that.

I didn't believe him but what was i going to say.

we have a static ip address and the switch is also set with a static address. if that means anything.

What router do you have? And how many users? Thats a 48 port switch -- do you have 48+ users?

If he is saying its sending crap to the router - its a managed switch, so you can take a look at the amount of traffic is being sent to the router (port router is connected too) and look at your other ports and see if its coming from one of your machines, etc.

What crap would it be sending that would crash the router? Internet Traffic ;) hehehe

If I had to take a wild ass guess, I would think your routers not able to support the amount of users you have, etc. Can you post the model number of your router.

But sure take a look on the switch to see how much traffic is being sent to the router -- you should also be able to setup a span or monitor port and watch all the traffic going to and from the router -- use your fav network analyzer -- say wireshark and see what could causing you problems.

Off the top -- the only thing I could think of that a managed switch would be sending to the router -- other than traffic the users are sending to the gateway would be spanning tree. You could always turn that off, or at least turn it off for that port connected to the router. You could also block IGMP (multicast) from going to the router, etc.

edit: hmmm other thing you could look at I guess would be the speed of the port connecting the switch to the router compared to your internet connection speed. Let say your wan side is 10mbit and your lan side is 100mbit -- with lots of users talking to the internet -- they could could just be overloading the router. Not much point to talking to the router at 100, if its wan is only 10, so you could adjust that.

Again these are just wild ass guesses.. If they are saying its the switch -- have them tell you what its doing that the router does not like ;)

Edited by BudMan

I had a similar issue at one of my clients. It ended up being a spywared up computer that was sending a ton of traffic to the pos crapcast modem. crapcast blamed it on everything under the sun. Unfortunatly I couldn't properly troubleshoot it being that the users laptop was never there when I was and everything was working properly. They (crapcast) were called out and they (crapcast) found the issue.

the router is....

Comcast business IP Gateway. model # SMC8014

we have about 25 to 30 users. most of the computers are just time clock in machines. they are on the internet but not much goes on with them. and i clean them from spyware if any whenever i can.

i have to say that i don't really know how to monitor the traffic on specific ports. i am not familiar with managed switches.

we have a bunch of dell machines. a lot of them have gigabyte nics in them. some also have 10/100 nics.

if you have a small hub and/or switch put it between your modem and your switch. hook up a computer/laptop to monitor traffic between the two. what ever is sending the most traffic to the modem disconnect it and see if the issue goes away, if it does look at the logs and see what it is connecting to and clean it up if they are malware related sites.

http://www.wireshark.org

  sc302 said:
if you have a small hub and/or switch put it between your modem and your switch. hook up a computer/laptop to monitor traffic between the two. what ever is sending the most traffic to the modem disconnect it and see if the issue goes away, if it does look at the logs and see what it is connecting to and clean it up if they are malware related sites.

http://www.wireshark.org

Just a note on this, this will only work if its a hub. Unless you configure a managed switch to forward a copy of all traffic out a specific switchport (the one your laptop is connected too)

  sc302 said:
works with unmanaged switches and out of the box managed switches. this would hold true for vlan'd switches, or switches that have been locked down only allowing certain traffic to pass between ports.

I could be wrong on this, and Budman can correct me. But it has always been my understanding and I have always been taught that a switch even a dumb switch forwards traffic out the appropriate port only (based on the dest MAC address that the switch learns). However a hub will broadcast traffic out all ports regardless of destination.

look at your endpoints. see who is transmiting the most. look at your conversations see who is communicating to what.

  Sophism said:
I could be wrong on this, and Budman can correct me. But it has always been my understanding and I have always been taught that a switch even a dumb switch forwards traffic out the appropriate port only (based on the dest MAC address that the switch learns). However a hub will broadcast traffic out all ports regardless of destination.

you are absolutly right.

doubtful doubter, why don't you try wireshark and see what spits out.

  sc302 said:
look at your endpoints. see who is transmiting the most. look at your conversations see who is communicating to what.

you are absolutly right.

doubtful doubter, why don't you try wireshark and see what spits out.

With a switch, unless it is configured otherwise, you should only be seeing the traffic destined for the client that is running wireshark itself.

  Sophism said:
With a switch, unless it is configured otherwise, you should only be seeing the traffic destined for the client that is running wireshark itself.

extremely untrue. again, it is simple to see for yourself so why don't you.

  AOXOMOXOA said:
well just to check it out i installed wireshark on my machine. it is running and putting up all kinds of data. but i don't know how to read this or what i'm even looking for.

i am running wireshark.. but i don't know what it is telling me.

i just got this

wirelog.jpg

  sc302 said:
extremely untrue. again, it is simple to see for yourself so why don't you.

I did, and I see traffic destined for my machine only.

Here is a description of methods for capturing traffic from machines other then your own.

http://wiki.wireshark.org/CaptureSetup/Eth...65ffc8160f6f3a6

As for reading the output of wireshark...

http://openmaniak.com/wireshark.php

Another really good link:

users.rowan.edu/~shetty/classes/ece402/tutorial/Wireshark-Tutorial.pdf

Edited by Sophism

"Switched Networks

A switched network is also a good deterrent. In the non-switched environment, packets are visible to every node on the network, in a switched environment, packets are only delivered to the target address. While more expensive than hubs, the cost of switches have fallen over time, bringing them within reach of most budgets. Unlike hubs, switches only send frames to the designated recipient; therefore a NIC in promiscuous mode on a switched network will not capture every piece of local traffic. But programs such as dsniff, allow an attacker to monitor a switched network with a technique known as arp-spoofing. Although it uses different methods, arp-spoofing can provide results similar to sniffing, i.e. compromised data. Is there anything that can truly protect your data once it reaches the network?"

Edited by sc302

This is just a guess, but I am thinking that your router cannot handle the traffic that is comming from your network.

What kind of connection do you have?

WHen you did that wireshark capture... Did you place a hub between the router and the switch and then plug your computer into that hub? How long did that capture run before you ran into issues.

  sc302 said:
Switched Networks

A switched network is also a good deterrent. In the non-switched environment, packets are visible to every node on the network, in a switched environment, packets are only delivered to the target address. While more expensive than hubs, the cost of switches have fallen over time, bringing them within reach of most budgets. Unlike hubs, switches only send frames to the designated recipient; therefore a NIC in promiscuous mode on a switched network will not capture every piece of local traffic. But programs such as dsniff, allow an attacker to monitor a switched network with a technique known as arp-spoofing. Although it uses different methods, arp-spoofing can provide results similar to sniffing, i.e. compromised data. Is there anything that can truly protect your data once it reaches the network?

If the switched is configured in a way that blocks arp spoofing and broadcast traffic being sent to other ports then you are absolutly right.

Of course, you can also do MAC flooding as well. But both subjects our probably outside the scope of this user, therefor, recommending him to use a switch is a bad idea because he would run into issues. If your switches are spamming traffic (including unicast which is what we are most interested in) then you have some serious configuration/security issues on your network.

I dont know how his network is configured but most likely he is going to be receiving broadcast traffic anyway. Unicast is what you would want to look at.

  Sophism said:
This is just a guess, but I am thinking that your router cannot handle the traffic that is comming from your network.

What kind of connection do you have?

WHen you did that wireshark capture... Did you place a hub between the router and the switch and then plug your computer into that hub? How long did that capture run before you ran into issues.

no hub. i just ran it from my machine. my machine plugs in to the router and not the switch.

My vote is on a crappy router although I would wait on a second opinion from budman.

FYI looking at that screenshot you have users on your network who are downloading with Bittorrent. Probably a good idea to squash that if its not being used for legal purposes.

from that picture i would look at x.200. I would recommend getting a $10 hub and put it in between. it seems that you are getting a lot of data to that modem in a short amount of time, overloading it.

save a log, zip it, post it and lets see what we can help with.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Isn't the CPU used to calculate the parity for the RAID? If so, the combination of SSDs and 10GBe might make the CPU more important
    • yeah GSMA began working to enable end to end encryption between android and iphone last year and apparently a new standard was developed. apple has said that they would implement this in "future software updates" but i haven't heard anything since march, the time this was all reported on. shortly after, i read on forbes that the FBI suggests not sending texts between iphone and android because they're unencrypted. i use signal to chat with my wife but i'd rather just use messages tbh (she has an iphone), i'm not really a 3rd party guy haha
    • Well, I did not like the trailer for the project he went to work on also, but why do you think he should waste time with this… did you love the season 2? Maybe I am missing out after the crap I saw in first season ep1-3? I love the first last of us game… while not the BEST it was one of the games that I will remember for the EXPERIENCE it game me… last of us 2 was not on the same level at all and the show🤔 complete miss in my experience of the first few level
    • They're likely moving all resources to other things. Clearly Windows is not important to them.
    • Image Uploader 1.4.3 Build 5352 by Razvan Serea Image Uploader is a free and open-source program for Windows that that allows you to effortlessly upload images, screenshots, and various files to a wide array of hosting services. With its capability to capture selected screen areas, it promptly uploads content to image hosting services, while also offering the convenience of automatically copying the URL to your clipboard. Key Features of Image Uploader: Upload to Multiple Hosting Services Image Uploader supports uploading images and files to over 30 popular hosting services. Additionally, it can upload directly to your own FTP, SFTP, or WebDAV server. After upload, the tool automatically generates sharing codes in HTML, BBCode, and Markdown, with support for custom output templates tailored to your needs. Video Frame Grabbing and Screenshot Tools You can extract multiple frames from video files in a wide range of formats including AVI, MP4, MKV, WMV, and more. It supports both system-installed codecs and built-in ones. The extracted frames can be uploaded individually or compiled into a single mosaic image. It also includes screenshot capabilities for the full screen or selected regions, along with a simple image editor for annotations, highlights, and blurring. Advanced Integration and Usability Image Uploader supports drag-and-drop, clipboard monitoring, and can be accessed via Windows Explorer’s context menu. It also features URL shortening, multi-account support, reuploading, and the ability to upload images embedded in text while retaining formatting. The app is available in several languages, including English, Russian, Turkish, Korean, Arabic, and more. Image Uploader 1.4.3 Build 5352 changelog: New Features Screen Recording: Added two powerful capture methods: DirectX (Desktop Duplication API) FFmpeg-based recording Expanded Hosting Services: Added support for new file hosting platforms: TeleBox (linkbox.to) take-me-to.space ranoz.gg webshare.cz lobfile.com imgpx.com freeimghost.net radikal.cloud anonpic.org fotozavr.ru imgtr.ee thumbsnap.com 8upload.com filemail.com Others Video Uploads: Added Flickr.com support for video uploads Localization: New French translation added Context Menu: Added "File Information" option to video file context menus DPI Support: Improved support for: Screen DPI changes Mixed-DPI multi-monitor setups Improvements Disabled application window animations during screenshot/screen recording initiation Updated API and documentation Improved overall stability Bug Fixes Fixed network client error that could cause application crashes Resolved unauthorized startup registration issue Fixed upload functionality for pixeldrain.com Restored tray icon balloon notifications visibility Various minor bug fixes Download: Image Uploader 64-bit | Portable 64-bit | ~16.0 MB | (Open Source) Download: Image Uploader 32-bit | Portable 32-bit | ~15.0 MB Download: Image Uploader ARM64 | Portable ARM64 | ~11.0 MB Links: Image Uploader Home Page | Screenshot | GitHub Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      SteveJaye earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Uranus_enjoyer earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Philsl earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Jaclidio hoy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      430
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      156
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      149
    4. 4
      Nick H.
      64
    5. 5
      +thexfile
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!