Recommended Posts

hello all. i hope someone can help me with this.

at my we have a comcast business class router plugged into a linksys SRW248G4 switch.

everything runs fine for a while but at times during the day i am locked out of our comcast router.

we have had comcast come out and look at it many times. they have replaced the router 3 times.

comcast tells me that it must be the switch.

the problem is that when i log into the router. 192.168.1.1 i get an error message

Document Error: Data follows

Access Error: Data follows

Can't get memory

if i go and unplugg the router and plug it back in, than i can log into it.

so, is it possible that the linksys switch has something to do with this? i have not changed any settings. the switch is just plugged in right out of the box.

is there something i can change or try?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/782048-router-problems-with-linksys-switch/
Share on other sites

"the switch is just plugged in right out of the box."

Thats a shame -- thats a $300 "managed" switch - why would you spend $300+ on managed switch if your just going to plug it in and not use any of its managed features??

It seems highly unlikely that switch could be causing any issues.. What router do you have? Does it have more than 1 lan interface? If so plug into the one its lan ports -- do you still have the problem? Then its not the switch.

Again -- its is VERY UNLIKELY that the switch would be causing you any issues -- especially if your not using any of its managed features, vlans, etc.

Well depends on what your doing - if your not using any vlans, or don't want to monitor any ports or setup aggregated connections between any other switches, or setup any type of ACLs or QoS then no.

But since your rebooting the router to fix the issue -- how does that point to the switch?

i don't know. i don't really think it does.

that's just what the tool at comcast was saying. he was trying to tell me that the switch is sending data back through the router. or some crap like that.

I didn't believe him but what was i going to say.

we have a static ip address and the switch is also set with a static address. if that means anything.

What router do you have? And how many users? Thats a 48 port switch -- do you have 48+ users?

If he is saying its sending crap to the router - its a managed switch, so you can take a look at the amount of traffic is being sent to the router (port router is connected too) and look at your other ports and see if its coming from one of your machines, etc.

What crap would it be sending that would crash the router? Internet Traffic ;) hehehe

If I had to take a wild ass guess, I would think your routers not able to support the amount of users you have, etc. Can you post the model number of your router.

But sure take a look on the switch to see how much traffic is being sent to the router -- you should also be able to setup a span or monitor port and watch all the traffic going to and from the router -- use your fav network analyzer -- say wireshark and see what could causing you problems.

Off the top -- the only thing I could think of that a managed switch would be sending to the router -- other than traffic the users are sending to the gateway would be spanning tree. You could always turn that off, or at least turn it off for that port connected to the router. You could also block IGMP (multicast) from going to the router, etc.

edit: hmmm other thing you could look at I guess would be the speed of the port connecting the switch to the router compared to your internet connection speed. Let say your wan side is 10mbit and your lan side is 100mbit -- with lots of users talking to the internet -- they could could just be overloading the router. Not much point to talking to the router at 100, if its wan is only 10, so you could adjust that.

Again these are just wild ass guesses.. If they are saying its the switch -- have them tell you what its doing that the router does not like ;)

Edited by BudMan

I had a similar issue at one of my clients. It ended up being a spywared up computer that was sending a ton of traffic to the pos crapcast modem. crapcast blamed it on everything under the sun. Unfortunatly I couldn't properly troubleshoot it being that the users laptop was never there when I was and everything was working properly. They (crapcast) were called out and they (crapcast) found the issue.

the router is....

Comcast business IP Gateway. model # SMC8014

we have about 25 to 30 users. most of the computers are just time clock in machines. they are on the internet but not much goes on with them. and i clean them from spyware if any whenever i can.

i have to say that i don't really know how to monitor the traffic on specific ports. i am not familiar with managed switches.

we have a bunch of dell machines. a lot of them have gigabyte nics in them. some also have 10/100 nics.

if you have a small hub and/or switch put it between your modem and your switch. hook up a computer/laptop to monitor traffic between the two. what ever is sending the most traffic to the modem disconnect it and see if the issue goes away, if it does look at the logs and see what it is connecting to and clean it up if they are malware related sites.

http://www.wireshark.org

if you have a small hub and/or switch put it between your modem and your switch. hook up a computer/laptop to monitor traffic between the two. what ever is sending the most traffic to the modem disconnect it and see if the issue goes away, if it does look at the logs and see what it is connecting to and clean it up if they are malware related sites.

http://www.wireshark.org

Just a note on this, this will only work if its a hub. Unless you configure a managed switch to forward a copy of all traffic out a specific switchport (the one your laptop is connected too)

works with unmanaged switches and out of the box managed switches. this would hold true for vlan'd switches, or switches that have been locked down only allowing certain traffic to pass between ports.

I could be wrong on this, and Budman can correct me. But it has always been my understanding and I have always been taught that a switch even a dumb switch forwards traffic out the appropriate port only (based on the dest MAC address that the switch learns). However a hub will broadcast traffic out all ports regardless of destination.

look at your endpoints. see who is transmiting the most. look at your conversations see who is communicating to what.

I could be wrong on this, and Budman can correct me. But it has always been my understanding and I have always been taught that a switch even a dumb switch forwards traffic out the appropriate port only (based on the dest MAC address that the switch learns). However a hub will broadcast traffic out all ports regardless of destination.

you are absolutly right.

doubtful doubter, why don't you try wireshark and see what spits out.

look at your endpoints. see who is transmiting the most. look at your conversations see who is communicating to what.

you are absolutly right.

doubtful doubter, why don't you try wireshark and see what spits out.

With a switch, unless it is configured otherwise, you should only be seeing the traffic destined for the client that is running wireshark itself.

well just to check it out i installed wireshark on my machine. it is running and putting up all kinds of data. but i don't know how to read this or what i'm even looking for.

i am running wireshark.. but i don't know what it is telling me.

i just got this

wirelog.jpg

extremely untrue. again, it is simple to see for yourself so why don't you.

I did, and I see traffic destined for my machine only.

Here is a description of methods for capturing traffic from machines other then your own.

http://wiki.wireshark.org/CaptureSetup/Eth...65ffc8160f6f3a6

As for reading the output of wireshark...

http://openmaniak.com/wireshark.php

Another really good link:

users.rowan.edu/~shetty/classes/ece402/tutorial/Wireshark-Tutorial.pdf

Edited by Sophism

"Switched Networks

A switched network is also a good deterrent. In the non-switched environment, packets are visible to every node on the network, in a switched environment, packets are only delivered to the target address. While more expensive than hubs, the cost of switches have fallen over time, bringing them within reach of most budgets. Unlike hubs, switches only send frames to the designated recipient; therefore a NIC in promiscuous mode on a switched network will not capture every piece of local traffic. But programs such as dsniff, allow an attacker to monitor a switched network with a technique known as arp-spoofing. Although it uses different methods, arp-spoofing can provide results similar to sniffing, i.e. compromised data. Is there anything that can truly protect your data once it reaches the network?"

Edited by sc302

This is just a guess, but I am thinking that your router cannot handle the traffic that is comming from your network.

What kind of connection do you have?

WHen you did that wireshark capture... Did you place a hub between the router and the switch and then plug your computer into that hub? How long did that capture run before you ran into issues.

Switched Networks

A switched network is also a good deterrent. In the non-switched environment, packets are visible to every node on the network, in a switched environment, packets are only delivered to the target address. While more expensive than hubs, the cost of switches have fallen over time, bringing them within reach of most budgets. Unlike hubs, switches only send frames to the designated recipient; therefore a NIC in promiscuous mode on a switched network will not capture every piece of local traffic. But programs such as dsniff, allow an attacker to monitor a switched network with a technique known as arp-spoofing. Although it uses different methods, arp-spoofing can provide results similar to sniffing, i.e. compromised data. Is there anything that can truly protect your data once it reaches the network?

If the switched is configured in a way that blocks arp spoofing and broadcast traffic being sent to other ports then you are absolutly right.

Of course, you can also do MAC flooding as well. But both subjects our probably outside the scope of this user, therefor, recommending him to use a switch is a bad idea because he would run into issues. If your switches are spamming traffic (including unicast which is what we are most interested in) then you have some serious configuration/security issues on your network.

I dont know how his network is configured but most likely he is going to be receiving broadcast traffic anyway. Unicast is what you would want to look at.

This is just a guess, but I am thinking that your router cannot handle the traffic that is comming from your network.

What kind of connection do you have?

WHen you did that wireshark capture... Did you place a hub between the router and the switch and then plug your computer into that hub? How long did that capture run before you ran into issues.

no hub. i just ran it from my machine. my machine plugs in to the router and not the switch.

My vote is on a crappy router although I would wait on a second opinion from budman.

FYI looking at that screenshot you have users on your network who are downloading with Bittorrent. Probably a good idea to squash that if its not being used for legal purposes.

from that picture i would look at x.200. I would recommend getting a $10 hub and put it in between. it seems that you are getting a lot of data to that modem in a short amount of time, overloading it.

save a log, zip it, post it and lets see what we can help with.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • There is a default resolution setting in Settings > Display that can be changed with a click. You can also change the settings on a per-game basis. No CLI needed. Also, Steam has countless games that are not "[perpetual] alpha/beta games", so no need for the straw man. Plus you can use other stores as well. And console games (e.g. PS5) cost a fortune, which itself more than negates the price subsidy on the system, unless you plan on exclusively playing 1 or 2 games. It's true that you shouldn't buy a system that doesn't support the game(s) you want to play, but I think that's kinda obvious, and applies to every console as well as PC. I don't game in the living room and have no need of a Steam Machine, but there is a clear market segment that would find it useful.
    • RSS Guard 5.2.0 by Razvan Serea RSS Guard is a simple (yet powerful) feed reader. It is able to fetch the most known feed formats, including RSS/RDF and ATOM. It's free, it's open-source. RSS Guard currently supports Czech, Dutch, English, French, German, Italian. RSS Guard will never depend on other services - this includes online news aggregators like Feedly, The Old Reader and others. RSS Guard is developed on top of the Qt library and it supports these operating systems: Windows GNU/Linux OS/2 (eComStation) Mac OS X xBSD (possibly) Android (possibly) other platforms supported by Qt The core features of RSS Guard are: support for online feed synchronization via plugins, Tiny Tiny RSS (from RSS Guard 3.0.0). multiplatform, support for all feed formats, simplicity, import/export of feeds to/from OPML 2.0, downloader with own tab and support for up to 6 parallel downloads, message filter with regular expressions, feed metadata fetching including icons, simple Adblock functionality, customized popup notifications, Google-based auto-completion for internal web browser location bar, ability to cleanup internal message database with various options, enhanced feed auto-updating with separate time intervals, multiple data backend support, SQLite (in-memory DBs too), MySQL. is able to specify target database by its name (MySQL backend), “portable” mode support with clever auto-detection, feed categorization, drap-n-drop for feed list, automatic checking for updates, ability to discover existing feeds on websites, full support of podcasts (both RSS & ATOM), ability to backup/restore database or settings, fully-featured recycle bin, printing of messages and any web pages, can be fully controlled via keyboard, feed authentication (Digest-MD5, BASIC, NTLM-2), handles tons of messages & feeds, sweet look & feel, fully adjustable toolbars (changeable buttons and style), ability to check for updates on all platforms + self-updating on Windows, hideable main menu, toolbars and list headers, KFeanza-based default icon theme + ability to create your own icon themes, fully skinnable user interface + ability to create your own skins, “newspaper” view, plenty of skins, support for "feed://" URI scheme, ability to hide list of feeds/categories, open-source development model based on GNU GPL license, version 3, tabbed interface, integrated web browser with adjustable behavior + external browser support, internal web browser mouse gestures support, desktop integration via tray icon, localizations to some languages, Qt library is the only dependency, open-source development model and friendly author waiting for your feedback, no ads, no hidden costs. RSS Guard 5.2.0 changelog: Added: Feed auto-fetch can now also be delayed while Feral GameMode is active on Linux and startup auto-fetch is skipped when GameMode is already active. (#2265) WebEngine builds can now use RSS Guard generated proxy auto-config (PAC) rules so article/web browsing follows per-account and per-feed proxy settings more closely. (#2273) Generated PAC rules now also cover related subdomains and use Public Suffix List data, so feeds such as feeds.bbc.co.uk can also proxy resources from images.bbc.co.uk. (#2273) Standard feeds can now define extra proxy domains, useful when article images, stylesheets or other page resources are loaded from a CDN or another domain that should use the same feed proxy. (#2273) RSS Guard now asks for proxy credentials when a WebEngine page needs proxy authentication and can fill credentials from the current feed proxy when available. (#2273) Network settings again include an option to ignore all cookies, which clears stored cookies and prevents new cookies from being accepted. Standard RSS/ATOM feeds can now individually ignore cookies while downloading feed data. Stored cookies can now be deleted from the Tools menu. Custom skin colors can now override the feed list article count color separately from feed titles, including a separate highlighted color. (#2275) Settings dialog can now search across available settings and highlight matching controls. (#1754) Standard RSS/ATOM feeds can now optionally be reported as broken when they are valid but contain no articles. (#2039) Standard RSS/ATOM feeds can now override the application-wide feed connection timeout per feed. (#1023) Tray icon can now use a custom background color and unread-count text color, with an option to reuse the generated icon as the application icon. (#1973) Support for more benevolent parsing of Gemlog entries (#2295). Article list can now show when an article was received by RSS Guard. (#947) Feed deep discovery now actually scrapes all links found in the website and checks if they are feeds or not. This greatly enhances usability of the deep discovery mode and discovers many more feeds than before. (#2306) Search boxes now show a small dot when the feed or article list is hiding some items because of active filtering. (#873) Articles now have a shortcut-assignable action to open the homepage of the feed they belong to. (#2060) Fixed: Parallel feed updates no longer crash when multiple update results are processed at the same time. (64cf521) Links in WebEngine articles opened from feeds such as Kill the Newsletter now open correctly instead of being swallowed by the embedded page. (#2272) Relative article URLs resolution was kinda broken. (#2282) Clicking article URL did not work when the URL had "fragment" set. (#2293) The default proxy setting now uses Qt/system default proxy behavior instead of forcing no proxy. (e0263ad) WebEngine article loading now keeps the current feed context, so feed-specific proxy credentials remain available while the article page loads. (fdd0f00) Download: RSS Guard 5.2.0 (64-bit) | Portable | ~ 130.0 MB (Open Source) Link: RSS Guard Home Page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • This is gonna separate the creeps from the rest of the crowd.
    • "Claude, is our CEO a compete and utter fool by wasting money on AI in this already worthless Teams chat?"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      DaviKar went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      462
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      110
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      83
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!