Recommended Posts

hello all. i hope someone can help me with this.

at my we have a comcast business class router plugged into a linksys SRW248G4 switch.

everything runs fine for a while but at times during the day i am locked out of our comcast router.

we have had comcast come out and look at it many times. they have replaced the router 3 times.

comcast tells me that it must be the switch.

the problem is that when i log into the router. 192.168.1.1 i get an error message

Document Error: Data follows

Access Error: Data follows

Can't get memory

if i go and unplugg the router and plug it back in, than i can log into it.

so, is it possible that the linksys switch has something to do with this? i have not changed any settings. the switch is just plugged in right out of the box.

is there something i can change or try?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/782048-router-problems-with-linksys-switch/
Share on other sites

"the switch is just plugged in right out of the box."

Thats a shame -- thats a $300 "managed" switch - why would you spend $300+ on managed switch if your just going to plug it in and not use any of its managed features??

It seems highly unlikely that switch could be causing any issues.. What router do you have? Does it have more than 1 lan interface? If so plug into the one its lan ports -- do you still have the problem? Then its not the switch.

Again -- its is VERY UNLIKELY that the switch would be causing you any issues -- especially if your not using any of its managed features, vlans, etc.

Well depends on what your doing - if your not using any vlans, or don't want to monitor any ports or setup aggregated connections between any other switches, or setup any type of ACLs or QoS then no.

But since your rebooting the router to fix the issue -- how does that point to the switch?

i don't know. i don't really think it does.

that's just what the tool at comcast was saying. he was trying to tell me that the switch is sending data back through the router. or some crap like that.

I didn't believe him but what was i going to say.

we have a static ip address and the switch is also set with a static address. if that means anything.

What router do you have? And how many users? Thats a 48 port switch -- do you have 48+ users?

If he is saying its sending crap to the router - its a managed switch, so you can take a look at the amount of traffic is being sent to the router (port router is connected too) and look at your other ports and see if its coming from one of your machines, etc.

What crap would it be sending that would crash the router? Internet Traffic ;) hehehe

If I had to take a wild ass guess, I would think your routers not able to support the amount of users you have, etc. Can you post the model number of your router.

But sure take a look on the switch to see how much traffic is being sent to the router -- you should also be able to setup a span or monitor port and watch all the traffic going to and from the router -- use your fav network analyzer -- say wireshark and see what could causing you problems.

Off the top -- the only thing I could think of that a managed switch would be sending to the router -- other than traffic the users are sending to the gateway would be spanning tree. You could always turn that off, or at least turn it off for that port connected to the router. You could also block IGMP (multicast) from going to the router, etc.

edit: hmmm other thing you could look at I guess would be the speed of the port connecting the switch to the router compared to your internet connection speed. Let say your wan side is 10mbit and your lan side is 100mbit -- with lots of users talking to the internet -- they could could just be overloading the router. Not much point to talking to the router at 100, if its wan is only 10, so you could adjust that.

Again these are just wild ass guesses.. If they are saying its the switch -- have them tell you what its doing that the router does not like ;)

Edited by BudMan

I had a similar issue at one of my clients. It ended up being a spywared up computer that was sending a ton of traffic to the pos crapcast modem. crapcast blamed it on everything under the sun. Unfortunatly I couldn't properly troubleshoot it being that the users laptop was never there when I was and everything was working properly. They (crapcast) were called out and they (crapcast) found the issue.

the router is....

Comcast business IP Gateway. model # SMC8014

we have about 25 to 30 users. most of the computers are just time clock in machines. they are on the internet but not much goes on with them. and i clean them from spyware if any whenever i can.

i have to say that i don't really know how to monitor the traffic on specific ports. i am not familiar with managed switches.

we have a bunch of dell machines. a lot of them have gigabyte nics in them. some also have 10/100 nics.

if you have a small hub and/or switch put it between your modem and your switch. hook up a computer/laptop to monitor traffic between the two. what ever is sending the most traffic to the modem disconnect it and see if the issue goes away, if it does look at the logs and see what it is connecting to and clean it up if they are malware related sites.

http://www.wireshark.org

if you have a small hub and/or switch put it between your modem and your switch. hook up a computer/laptop to monitor traffic between the two. what ever is sending the most traffic to the modem disconnect it and see if the issue goes away, if it does look at the logs and see what it is connecting to and clean it up if they are malware related sites.

http://www.wireshark.org

Just a note on this, this will only work if its a hub. Unless you configure a managed switch to forward a copy of all traffic out a specific switchport (the one your laptop is connected too)

works with unmanaged switches and out of the box managed switches. this would hold true for vlan'd switches, or switches that have been locked down only allowing certain traffic to pass between ports.

I could be wrong on this, and Budman can correct me. But it has always been my understanding and I have always been taught that a switch even a dumb switch forwards traffic out the appropriate port only (based on the dest MAC address that the switch learns). However a hub will broadcast traffic out all ports regardless of destination.

look at your endpoints. see who is transmiting the most. look at your conversations see who is communicating to what.

I could be wrong on this, and Budman can correct me. But it has always been my understanding and I have always been taught that a switch even a dumb switch forwards traffic out the appropriate port only (based on the dest MAC address that the switch learns). However a hub will broadcast traffic out all ports regardless of destination.

you are absolutly right.

doubtful doubter, why don't you try wireshark and see what spits out.

look at your endpoints. see who is transmiting the most. look at your conversations see who is communicating to what.

you are absolutly right.

doubtful doubter, why don't you try wireshark and see what spits out.

With a switch, unless it is configured otherwise, you should only be seeing the traffic destined for the client that is running wireshark itself.

well just to check it out i installed wireshark on my machine. it is running and putting up all kinds of data. but i don't know how to read this or what i'm even looking for.

i am running wireshark.. but i don't know what it is telling me.

i just got this

wirelog.jpg

extremely untrue. again, it is simple to see for yourself so why don't you.

I did, and I see traffic destined for my machine only.

Here is a description of methods for capturing traffic from machines other then your own.

http://wiki.wireshark.org/CaptureSetup/Eth...65ffc8160f6f3a6

As for reading the output of wireshark...

http://openmaniak.com/wireshark.php

Another really good link:

users.rowan.edu/~shetty/classes/ece402/tutorial/Wireshark-Tutorial.pdf

Edited by Sophism

"Switched Networks

A switched network is also a good deterrent. In the non-switched environment, packets are visible to every node on the network, in a switched environment, packets are only delivered to the target address. While more expensive than hubs, the cost of switches have fallen over time, bringing them within reach of most budgets. Unlike hubs, switches only send frames to the designated recipient; therefore a NIC in promiscuous mode on a switched network will not capture every piece of local traffic. But programs such as dsniff, allow an attacker to monitor a switched network with a technique known as arp-spoofing. Although it uses different methods, arp-spoofing can provide results similar to sniffing, i.e. compromised data. Is there anything that can truly protect your data once it reaches the network?"

Edited by sc302

This is just a guess, but I am thinking that your router cannot handle the traffic that is comming from your network.

What kind of connection do you have?

WHen you did that wireshark capture... Did you place a hub between the router and the switch and then plug your computer into that hub? How long did that capture run before you ran into issues.

Switched Networks

A switched network is also a good deterrent. In the non-switched environment, packets are visible to every node on the network, in a switched environment, packets are only delivered to the target address. While more expensive than hubs, the cost of switches have fallen over time, bringing them within reach of most budgets. Unlike hubs, switches only send frames to the designated recipient; therefore a NIC in promiscuous mode on a switched network will not capture every piece of local traffic. But programs such as dsniff, allow an attacker to monitor a switched network with a technique known as arp-spoofing. Although it uses different methods, arp-spoofing can provide results similar to sniffing, i.e. compromised data. Is there anything that can truly protect your data once it reaches the network?

If the switched is configured in a way that blocks arp spoofing and broadcast traffic being sent to other ports then you are absolutly right.

Of course, you can also do MAC flooding as well. But both subjects our probably outside the scope of this user, therefor, recommending him to use a switch is a bad idea because he would run into issues. If your switches are spamming traffic (including unicast which is what we are most interested in) then you have some serious configuration/security issues on your network.

I dont know how his network is configured but most likely he is going to be receiving broadcast traffic anyway. Unicast is what you would want to look at.

This is just a guess, but I am thinking that your router cannot handle the traffic that is comming from your network.

What kind of connection do you have?

WHen you did that wireshark capture... Did you place a hub between the router and the switch and then plug your computer into that hub? How long did that capture run before you ran into issues.

no hub. i just ran it from my machine. my machine plugs in to the router and not the switch.

My vote is on a crappy router although I would wait on a second opinion from budman.

FYI looking at that screenshot you have users on your network who are downloading with Bittorrent. Probably a good idea to squash that if its not being used for legal purposes.

from that picture i would look at x.200. I would recommend getting a $10 hub and put it in between. it seems that you are getting a lot of data to that modem in a short amount of time, overloading it.

save a log, zip it, post it and lets see what we can help with.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I've owned nothing but ATi/AMD GPUs since 2002, after my last nVidia GPU in 2001 (3dfx before that), IIRC, and in all of that time I recall getting this error maybe once, certainly no more than twice. Despite all the scuttlebutt as to how poor AMD drivers are supposed to be that has certainly not been my experience at all... Usually it has been a configuration problem of some kind. Then again, since we're dealing with OS versions that are EOL, it could easily be an OS version discrepancy. It's still weird to think that Win11 has been officially out for more than five years!
    • AI will never be the jobs panacea some companies fantasize about today. Oracle is likely using it as an excuse, which we will see a lot of companies doing, I'm certain. They love their "plausible" excuses for their downturns. A couple of weeks ago my wife asked me to call Krogers about some discrepancy in a online grocery order, and it will be the last time either of us does that. I'll just do emails with humans from now on... The AI experience was horrible--the obviously recorded voice started asking a bunch of questions about our orders six months prior(!) and saying, "Is this in reference to your order on January 6, for $****?" You say "No!" and immediately the next question is "Is this in reference to your order on January 29th, for $****?" again, I answered "No!"--and it was incredible--on and on it went like that for fully 20 minutes until we finally got to the present, and only then was I put through to a human with authentic intelligence... I wondered why on Earth the idiot AI didn't start with the most recent orders and work back from there, as it was something anyone with a functioning brain would have done. And why didn't the AI have enough sense to ask me what the problem was in the first place? It didn't take too much deduction to understand that the goal of this "AI" was to cause the person on the phone to hang up in disgust, with no resolution of the problem. That begs another question: why pay for a tool-free problem line if the goal is to avoid solving your customer's problems?... Fortunately, Krogers does have real humans capable of reading an email and understanding it, and if she sees another situation in the future that's route she or I will take. The online grocery delivery service from Krogers has been great, over all, but their AI truly sucks.
    • AI is the justification that company administrators use to lay people off; it is not the end all, be all touted in the media (many of whom can't tell a microchip from a potato chip). Greed is main driving factor behind its adoption; the other is remaining relevant in the face of competition from other entities.
    • Firefox 152.0.2 is out with fixes for performance, translation, and cloud storage services by Taras Buria A new bug-fixing update is now rolling out to Firefox users in the Release Channel. Less than a week ago, Mozilla fixed crashes on Intel Raptor Lake processors with version 152.0.1. Now, Mozilla has prepared yet another set of fixes that address problems with localization, playback issues of certain MP4 files, and performance issues on website that perform various encryption operations at once. Here is the full changelog: Firefox 152.0.2 is now available for download from Mozilla's FTP. Existing installations will get the update over the next several hours. The latest version will also be available soon on the official website, the Microsoft Store, and Neowin's Software page. You can find Firefox 152.0.2 release notes in the official documentation. In case you missed it, Mozilla released Firefox 152 earlier this month. The latest feature update brought reworked settings with a more streamlined user interface, JPEG XL support, new features for Private mode, a new way to mute a tab (just type "mute" in the address bar), and many more. You can find the complete changelog here. In other Firefox news, Mozilla recently published its roadmap, where the company detailed the upcoming Nova redesign and other features it plans to implement. Mozilla wants to make the new user interface easier to navigate and more modern, with a heavy focus on its privacy tools, such as its built-in VPN. If you are curious, you can already enable the new UI as described here.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      481
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      103
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      88
    5. 5
      neufuse
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!