Any way to change color of "selected items" in Menus & Explor


Recommended Posts

Vista Home Premium SP1 64-bit.

In XP, it was easy to change color of Selected Items (on menus and in Explorer windows.)

I find the Vista default pale-blue glassy selection marker to be very difficult to see on my laptop screen. There just isn't enough contrast for my antique eyes.

It seems to be hard-coded in the Vista msstyle, and is one of the Advanced Appearance settings that has no effect.

Is there a tweak that can do this, or does it have to be coded in a style?

  • 1 month later...

Ok, apparantly not.

Is there then any way to change the window color of Windows Explorer?

Using Display Properties > Appearance > Advanced > window color ---- changing the window color here only seems to affect applications, such as notepad, Word, etc, etc. Explorer seems to be hard-coded to be a blindingly bright white, and I can't get it to change. The "selected" highlight is almost invisible.

I can't believe that I am the only user in the world who finds this color combination difficult to use. :x

I'm getting more desparate.

Is there a registry hack?

I haven't used Vista in quite a while (XP at work, 7 at home), so bear with me here.

Can't you do something like, right click the desktop, get properties, Window Color and appearance, then there should be a link at the bottom of that dialog that lets you open the "classic properties" dialog, and then under advanced you should be able to change the color of the "Window" item to alter your white background problem and Selected Items for your other issue?

Or maybe just disable Aero and basic, go back to Windows Classic (my personal preference for everything between 2000 and 7, because all the themes have looked butt-ugly).

Thanks for responding, I was starting to feel like the Invisible Woman :-)

under advanced you should be able to change the color of the "Window" item to alter your white background problem and Selected Items for your other issue?

Nope.

it seems to be hard-coded for Explorer. I can change the colors, but they affect notepad, Word, etc, etc. Explorer refuses to change. I'm using FreeCommander as a file-manager, but sometimes I'm forced to Explorer, such as opening folders from my search utility FileSeeker.

Or maybe just disable Aero and basic, go back to Windows Classic (my personal preference for everything between 2000 and 7, because all the themes have looked butt-ugly).

Yup, I think you're right. I'm dusting off my old copy of 3dcc, and gonna get far away from all that "baby-blue" (what were they thinking!)

Nope.

it seems to be hard-coded for Explorer. I can change the colors, but they affect notepad, Word, etc, etc. Explorer refuses to change. I'm using FreeCommander as a file-manager, but sometimes I'm forced to Explorer, such as opening folders from my search utility FileSeeker.

You may be able to change that within explorer itself then, hold down Alt in an explorer view to bring up the menubar if it's concealed, then select Tools:Options. In 7 you can set a background (colors or wallpapers) by folder view type (music, documents, video, etc), and you should probably be able to do the same thing in Vista. It may not be in that specific location though (again, no access directly to a Vista system, so I'm not certain).

I'll give that a try. But if it really is by folder "Type", then I am doomed.

I posted at another forum about Vista's insistance to classify almost every folder as a different type --- I was trying to set Details View as the default for all folders, like in XP, but almost every folder I opened would be back at default Icons (grrrrr) view. Then I would go to Tools > Folder Options > View > Apply to All Folders. Then Vista would ask for confirmation to apply settings to files of THIS TYPE. Even though all my folders have mixed content, vista keeps considering almost every folder as a different type. Highly frustrating.

I'll give that a try. But if it really is by folder "Type", then I am doomed.

I posted at another forum about Vista's insistance to classify almost every folder as a different type --- I was trying to set Details View as the default for all folders, like in XP, but almost every folder I opened would be back at default Icons (grrrrr) view. Then I would go to Tools > Folder Options > View > Apply to All Folders. Then Vista would ask for confirmation to apply settings to files of THIS TYPE. Even though all my folders have mixed content, vista keeps considering almost every folder as a different type. Highly frustrating.

There is a registry hack to fix that. Vista's type detection is very much flawed. 7 is better (still not perfect).

http://www.vistax64.com/tutorials/70819-wi...w-settings.html

  • 4 weeks later...

Let me clear this up antiq, is it this background selection color, the so-called "condom" selection in Vista that makes it impossible to "deselect" a number of items in one mouse keystroke selection ? See the tiny space in between the selected items.

th.52250ffecc.jpg

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • With the current hardware prices Microsoft should lift the restriction. Then if you have the correct TPM then allow you to use X feature, if you don't have the correct TPM then don't but still actually let you run windows. 11. With a disclaimer during install that X features would be unavailable.
    • It's good for recycling of course. But commence inflation of a second hand RAM bubble and price gouging on DDR 4 inventory in 3... 2... 1...
    • Bypassed Windows 11 shows surprising stability on ancient, completely unsupported hardware by Sayan Sen When Windows 11 was first released, one of the most complained-about issues with the new desktop Microsoft OS was its higher system requirements, which pushed many relatively modern and powerful processors and devices onto the officially unsupported list. Thankfully, they have not been updated again for the base OS, though systems require four times the memory and storage if they want to run AI-powered apps and features. As such, Windows 11 technically runs on 4GB of memory, and there is no imposed restriction on the generation of memory it supports. Speaking of memory, prices are extremely high nowadays for hardware, especially DDR5 and DDR4 kits due to the current silicon shortage, and there are also reports of it affecting DDR2 as well, and it might only be a matter of time before even DDR1 gets affected. Before that could happen, an enthusiast took an ancient DDR1-based system and decided to try out Windows 11 on it to see how well the modern OS would fare on such hardware. The system runs an outdated graphics card interface standard based on AGP, or Advanced Graphics Port, called AGP 3.0 or AGP8x. AGP was essentially succeeded by the modern PCI Express (PCIe) bus standard. The user behind the experiment is retro hardware enthusiast Omores, who built the system around an ASRock ConRoe865PE motherboard based on Intel's i865PE chipset from way back in 2003, around the time when AGP was still in fashion. What made this board special back in the day was its unusual support for newer Core 2 Duo and even Core 2 Quad processors while still retaining older DDR1 memory support and an AGP8X graphics slot, making it an ideal bridge or link between two vastly different generations. Powering the machine was Intel's Core 2 Quad Q6600 alongside 3GB of DDR1 RAM and an ATI Radeon HD 4650 AGP graphics card, one of the final and most capable GPUs released for the aging AGP interface. While installing Windows 11 itself was relatively easy by bypassing Microsoft's hardware checks, getting the graphics card fully functional proved to be some challenge. Microsoft had quietly dropped native AGP support after the earliest releases of Windows 10, meaning newer versions of Windows no longer include the necessary Graphics Address Remapping Table (GART) drivers required for proper AGP acceleration. Without them, AGP graphics cards typically boot up, though with limited functionality, and can often throw a Code 43 error in Device Manager. To work around the limitation, Omores extracted Intel's legacy AGP440 SYS driver from an early Windows 10 release and paired it with a modified INF file so Windows 11 would correctly recognize the chipset. Following this and combined with AMD's final 64-bit Catalyst AGP drivers from 2012, the Radeon HD 4650 was able to operate with full AGP 8X acceleration intact. The result was said to be surprisingly usable for hardware that is over two decades old. Hardware-accelerated H.264 video playback worked correctly and benefited apps like Firefox, while legacy applications and games ran without major graphical issues. The system also successfully completed the 3DMark 2001 benchmark, although performance naturally lagged behind what the same hardware achieves under Windows 7, which is significantly lighter than Windows 11. There was, however, one unavoidable limitation as Microsoft's Windows 11 version 24H2 introduces a mandatory SSE4.2 CPU instruction requirement that cannot be bypassed through installer modifications or registry tweaks. Since no AGP-era processor supports SSE4.2, Windows 11 version 23H2 effectively becomes the final release capable of running on such systems. Regardless, it is still a very cool feat and quite fascinating to see just how stable Windows 11 turned out to be on such unfamiliar hardware. Source: Omores (Patreon) via O_MORES (Reddit)
    • That will only really help other players that are also responsible for creating the problem.
    • Well, it's good to know that they have found a workaround to a problem that they helped create, I guess...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      539
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!