Which of these 2 bags?


Recommended Posts

I can't decide, does anyone have either and can give me input?

http://www.radtech.us/Products/ShoulderBags/STMLoft.aspx

or

http://www.goincase.com/products/detail/CL55036

All it needs to do is hold my Macbook, the power supply, an issue or 2 of Wired, ipod and a pen or 2.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/787022-which-of-these-2-bags/
Share on other sites

Not sure about the colour, but the "STM Loft" looks like it has better structure/padding to me, so I'd go for that one.

Edit: This one looks quite interesting, shoulder bag and backpack. You never know when you might need to do some running/climbing Linky

Edited by DARKFiB3R

Are these vertical backpacks a big thing in the U.K.? I think they both look disgustingly ugly. If you want quality and versatility, plus something that looks like it took more than 2 seconds to design and some good taste, I'd look at these guys:

http://www.sfbags.com/

I personally like this one:

http://www.sfbags.com/products/cargo/cargo.htm

Hope this helped.

Are these vertical backpacks a big thing in the U.K.? I think they both look disgustingly ugly. If you want quality and versatility, plus something that looks like it took more than 2 seconds to design and some good taste, I'd look at these guys:

http://www.sfbags.com/

I personally like this one:

http://www.sfbags.com/products/cargo/cargo.htm

Hope this helped.

That looks an old lady's handbag.

Of those two, I like the second one better. It has a vintage look to it.

However, when I got my bag through Dell when I bought my first laptop, I got this bag (originally black and red, traded it with my boyfriend for a gray and blue). They come with a lifetime warranty, and when I discovered a slight flaw in the stitching of my original bag about a year after purchasing it, they traded it for a new one, no questions asked (I also noticed that the new one, and the one my boyfriend traded with me, were slightly different in the stitching so obviously they had fixed that flaw). I still use it now for my Macbook. It's wonderful, and I'd certainly recommend looking at this one, instead.

-Emily

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I have a Motorola, one of the lower end ones, it works fine. It is possible to get rid of the Gemini app and also to disable googles assistant , but A.i is still apps. I try to avoid all LLM A.I, is i can, I use no Ai duck duck go.
    • Free Software Foundation Europe pushes EU to force Google to allow AI uninstalls on Android by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels Users should be able to fully uninstall AI-based features from Android devices and be able to access interoperability functions, free from Google’s verification requirements, the European Commission has heard as part of an Android interoperability consultation under the Digital Markets Act. These measures were proposed by the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) last week when it submitted its documentation. The FSFE noted that Google had started silently installing AI models without telling users. It noted that the EU’s DMA requires companies like Google to allow users to uninstall pre-loaded software from their devices, but in the case of the AI models Google is installing, they reinstall if you delete them, contravening the DMA. To get Google back under control, the FSFE has told the European Commission that there needs to be improvements within the Android Open Source Project (AOSP). First, it said that users should be able to fully remove pre-loaded AI components from their devices, with companies being prohibited from silently reinstalling or reactivating them. Second, access to Android interoperability features should not be contingent on registration, authorization, or contractual relationships with Google. This pertains to Google’s attempt to force developers to register with Google, even to publish apps to alternative app stores like F-Droid. Discussing its submission, Lucas Lasota, FSFE Legal Programme Manager, said: Google is planning to roll out its Android Developer Certification in September 2026. This will force every Android app developer to register with Google before their software can be installed on certified Android devices, but it should affect those who have removed Google Apps from their device. The program is controversial because it entails the signing of contracts and payment of account fees to Google, as well as the handing over of the identities of developers. It said: The FSFE said that if the Commission’s draft measures remain unchanged, then Google will be allowed to make developers verify their identity. The FSFE believes that asking developers to register is contrary to the text and spirit of the law. In summary, the FSFE has told the Commission that no developer should need a Google account, a Play Store presence, or any agreement with Google to access Android’s interoperability features.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!