how my iPod touch has switched me to a mac


Recommended Posts

One of his points, and the one you chose to criticize is that the MAC OS X is not as proprietary as many may think and that is correct up to some extent. Whether or not Windows is more or less proprietary is something very debatable and certainly not the main point of his argument.

All the parts that truly make OS X, OS X are completely proprietary and not available, as is the hardware platform which is also completely closed.

Calling Windows itself less proprietary is probably a bit silly (although more people have access to the Windows source code than have access to the OS X one), but the fact that the OS X kernel itself is open source is a bit of a "who cares" thing and not much of a selling point for the Mac.

The Mac is a more limited platform for the users because it has less hardware support and less software. It offers less choice. This is a better way to describe it than "proprietary."

Speaking from experience, any current Windows user out there that has literally said Out-Loud "to themselves" DAMN THIS MACHINE, will enjoy a Mac.

And with Boot-camp they will be Very happy, long as they can afford it all lol

I know I am

He never even mentioned Windows or its proprietary status.

As for OS X, Darwin (the underlying system) and XNU (the kernel) are open source, but neither the underlying code (Open Firmware) or the overlaying system (Aqua) are.

It is possible for something to be proprietary (closed source) and yet conforming to open standards. It is also possible for something to be open source and conforming to either little or none of the respective open standards in the given area of the piece of software.

Open Firmware is an IEEE 1275 specification that is free available for anyone to implement, along with the Forth programming language. Apple Mac's now use EFI which is an open specification that is managed by the UEFI Forum.

To say that Apple limits choice by locking Mac OS X to Apple computers - you must also criticise Microsoft whose agreement locks OEM installations to a given OEM's motherboard which inhibit one from moving an OEM version of Windows from, for example, a Dell computer to a HP one.

All the parts that truly make OS X, OS X are completely proprietary and not available, as is the hardware platform which is also completely closed.

Calling Windows itself less proprietary is probably a bit silly (although more people have access to the Windows source code than have access to the OS X one), but the fact that the OS X kernel itself is open source is a bit of a "who cares" thing and not much of a selling point for the Mac.

The Mac is a more limited platform for the users because it has less hardware support and less software. It offers less choice. This is a better way to describe it than "proprietary."

I agree with you on the first part.

Microsoft and Apple have different kind of strategy models. Microsoft believes in creating software and letting OEM's add the hardware. Apple believes in putting the hardware and software together, they don't believe in letting other people make it. That is one of the reasons why Apple can't rapidly increase their market share, their closed model.

the very first computer i purchased new Was a Dell Dimension 8250 paid $1300 for it and Lexmark AIO,came with XP, later upgraded to Vista.

upgraded Power supply to install a new nvidia GT 6800 OC and a X-fi extreme Pro (before the Fatal1ty series) i loved this computer but it rapidly became obsolete mostly because it had a very short lived type of memory wich became impossible to upgrade.

RDRAM / RamBUS? That was truly the betamax of the computing world.

FAIL

I agree with you on the first part.

Microsoft and Apple have different kind of strategy models. Microsoft believes in creating software and letting OEM's add the hardware. Apple believes in putting the hardware and software together, they don't believe in letting other people make it. That is one of the reasons why Apple can't rapidly increase their market share, their closed model.

I don't have any problems with Apple's strategy, and I don't think they should be like Microsoft. That the users have less choice with a Mac is a fact, but if they don't intend to use that choice (and it really isn't that important for most) then it makes no difference. If you've tried a Mac and it suits your needs, buy it. It might not meet my needs, but so? I'm not the one buying it.

I don't think he mentioned his operating system either. He could be using a GNU/Linux distribution or even one of the *BSD systems for all we know. Although his comment about games hints towards Windows, I don't believe he intended to push Windows as less proprietary.

Seeing as his posting history related to various Steam applications and DirectX, I doubt he's using Linux unless they've ported Steam, DX and everything else to it in the last 12 hours ;-)

To say that Apple limits choice by locking Mac OS X to Apple computers - you must also criticise Microsoft whose agreement locks OEM installations to a given OEM's motherboard which inhibit one from moving an OEM version of Windows from, for example, a Dell computer to a HP one.

Hold on, moving an installed version of Windows from one hardware setup to another is something impossible without errors. You can't just remove the hard disk and install on whatever motherboard you may please. As for OEM's limiting that, is it anything but the natural choice? Why would you want to allow your "own", customized system that sometimes is a selling point, to be freely moved to any rival configuration?

Microsoft Windows has no hardware limitations if that's what you were implying, you can install it on pretty much any hardware setup so long as it is supported by the current version of Windows. Moving it around to a totally different setup on the other hand is something that no operating system can do without producing errors.

I agree with you on the first part.

Microsoft and Apple have different kind of strategy models. Microsoft believes in creating software and letting OEM's add the hardware. Apple believes in putting the hardware and software together, they don't believe in letting other people make it. That is one of the reasons why Apple can't rapidly increase their market share, their closed model.

Not that there is anything wrong with the vertically integrated model. Nothing has ever stopped any of the other OEM's from creating their own software stack and integrate their hardware and software together.

Look at some of the greatest triumphs when it comes to reliability, functionality and speed - it has been from the vertically integrated business model. VAX with OpenVMS, Tandem with its NonStop operating system, POWER with AIX and so forth.

For me, I'd sooner see multiple operating systems vying for positions in the marketplace than having a large monoculture where a single security scare can result in major problems world wide. Mac OS X has its place, Windows having its own place, and maybe Linux, OpenSolaris and a BSD of some description filling in some of the other areas.

Hold on, moving an installed version of Windows from one hardware setup to another is something impossible without errors. You can't just remove the hard disk and install on whatever motherboard you may please. As for OEM's limiting that, is it anything but the natural choice? Why would you want to allow your "own", customized system that sometimes is a selling point, to be freely moved to any rival configuration?

Maybe there is a misunderstanding of the term move when used in the context of the post but it was in reference to moving the licence from one machine to another; reinstalling, if need be, the operating system on the new computer and using the licence key provided with the old computer.

I find it interesting in the final line you talk about customisation, differentiation and OEM wishing to protect that customisation. How is that any different to Apples own justification to differentiate their product from another and protecting that differentiation?

I don't have any problems with Apple's strategy, and I don't think they should be like Microsoft. That the users have less choice with a Mac is a fact, but if they don't intend to use that choice (and it really isn't that important for most) then it makes no difference. If you've tried a Mac and it suits your needs, buy it. It might not meet my needs, but so? I'm not the one buying it.

I then pray to ask, if you're not concerned with what people purchase for their own needs then why are you posting in the Mac section of Neowin? It seems rather silly to talk about personal freedom and choice when it comes to computer purchase but you seemed to be compelled to enter into a debate over something that you have stated you have no interest in.

Am I the only one who see's the apparent contradiction?

Maybe there is a misunderstanding of the term move when used in the context of the post but it was in reference to moving the licence from one machine to another; reinstalling, if need be, the operating system on the new computer and using the licence key provided with the old computer.

I find it interesting in the final line you talk about customisation, differentiation and OEM wishing to protect that customisation. How is that any different to Apples own justification to differentiate their product from another and protecting that differentiation?

Ah, you were talking about licenses. I really fail to see the problem here. If you purchase a copy of Windows, OEM or not, you can install it on any kind of hardware that you so wish, including other OEM's that you may have purchased. The hardware does not limit the software here.

As for the OEM customization part, the difference here is that Windows is not limited on that specific hardware or any hardware configuration from that manufacturer.

I then pray to ask, if you're not concerned with what people purchase for their own needs then why are you posting in the Mac section of Neowin? It seems rather silly to talk about personal freedom and choice when it comes to computer purchase but you seemed to be compelled to enter into a debate over something that you have stated you have no interest in.

Am I the only one who see's the apparent contradiction?

If you go back to my first post, I was trying to make the point that it's important to make an informed decision. You shouldn't buy a Mac just because you like the iPhone, but if you try it and it meets your needs, then go ahead. If you strip out the irrelevancies, that is what I wanted to say.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • EU says AWS and Microsoft Azure should be treated as DMA gatekeepers by Pradeep Viswanathan Under the European Commission's Digital Markets Act (DMA), a company is presumed to be a gatekeeper if it meets certain quantitative thresholds. However, the Commission can still investigate and designate a company even if it does not meet the numeric thresholds, provided the service has a major market impact. The European Commission launched its investigations into AWS and Azure on November 18, 2025, to address unfair or anti-competitive practices in the cloud sector. Today, the European Commission has informed Amazon and Microsoft of its preliminary view that their cloud computing services, AWS and Azure, should be designated as gatekeepers under the DMA. The EC highlighted that Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Microsoft Azure are the largest and second-largest cloud computing services in the European Union. Both of these platforms act as important gateways between businesses and their customers in the EU. The EC further mentioned that AWS and Azure have reached significant turnover, built large and entrenched user bases, and benefit from high switching costs and customer lock-in. Furthermore, their operational capacity and investments appear to have outpaced those of competitors. Teresa Ribera, Executive Vice-President for Clean, Just and Competitive Transition, said the following: It is important to note that the findings are preliminary and do not decide the final outcome. Amazon and Microsoft can now review the findings and respond to the Commission. However, if the Commission confirms its preliminary findings, it will formally designate Amazon and Microsoft as gatekeepers for AWS and Azure. Once designated, Microsoft and Amazon will have six months to bring their cloud services into full compliance with the DMA’s rules and regulations.
    • will EU users be getting the extra 1yr update for free again?
    • Samsung announces Galaxy A27 5G with 120Hz AMOLED display, expanded AI features, and more by Fiza Ali Samsung has announced the Galaxy A27 5G, its latest mid-range smartphone, bringing a handful of upgrades over last year's Galaxy A26 5G. While the changes aren't dramatic, they touch several areas that people tend to notice most in day-to-day use, including the display, performance, and software support. One of the more noticeable updates is the screen. The Galaxy A27 5G comes with a 6.7-inch Super AMOLED display that now supports a 120Hz refresh rate, making scrolling and animations appear smoother. Samsung has also switched to an Infinity-O punch-hole camera design, which leaves more room for the display and gives the phone a cleaner look from the front. Under the hood, the Galaxy A27 5G is powered by Qualcomm's Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 processor. The company says the new chip brings improved responsiveness in multitasking, gaming, and media consumption. The company also highlights GPU performance improvements and faster memory technology, which should contribute to smoother graphics rendering, quicker data handling, and improved power efficiency. Furthermore, Samsung has equipped the Galaxy A27 5G with a 12-megapixel selfie camera that is capable of capturing a wider dynamic range and more accurate colours. Like many smartphones launched recently, the Galaxy A27 5G also places a strong focus on AI features. Circle to Search with Google now supports multi-object recognition, making it easier to search for different products or items at the same time. The tech giant says the feature can also support virtual outfit try-ons directly from compatible search results. Photo editing tools are getting some attention as well, with Object Eraser updated to deliver cleaner edits when removing unwanted objects or people from images. Meanwhile, the Voice Recorder app can now transcribe and translate speech simultaneously in one of the 22 supported languages, which could be useful for meetings, lectures, or interviews. Samsung is also expanding AI assistant options on the device, with support for Google Gemini and Perplexity alongside Bixby. The company says these assistants will work more closely with Galaxy apps, including Gallery, to simplify common tasks. Samsung continues to strengthen its long-term software support policy with the Galaxy A27 5G. The smartphone will receive up to six generations of Android OS and One UI updates, along with six years of security patches from its initial global launch. In terms of security, the device includes Samsung Knox and Knox Vault, which are designed to help protect sensitive information stored on the phone. On the flip side, while the company is positioning the Galaxy A27 5G as a step forward from its predecessor, not every change is necessarily an upgrade. One of the first things buyers may notice is the higher price tag. The device launches at $349, making it $50 more expensive than the Galaxy A26 5G's $299 starting price. The selfie camera has also been reduced from 13MP to 12MP, while the ultrawide camera drops from 8MP to 5MP. Samsung has further downgraded the phone's dust and water resistance rating from IP67 to IP64. The Galaxy A27 5G is also marginally thicker at 7.8mm. The Galaxy A27 5G will be available in select markets starting July 3 and will come in four colour options, including Black, Blue, Light Green, and Light Pink. The company will also offer Samsung Care+ coverage plans for customers seeking additional device protection.
    • Doogee and Ulefone regularly release phones with 10k-25k mAh batteries, but those are bricks. I don't understand how they could make it only weigh 220 grams with a battery that size.
    • Windows 10 quietly gets one more year of support and updates by Taras Buria Windows 10 reached its end of life at the end of 2025. Microsoft kicked off the Extended Security Updates program, aimed at giving regular consumers one more year of security-only updates. By doing so, Microsoft gave users more time and money to update their computers to a newer operating system or compatible hardware. Now, with the end of the Extended Security Updates program quickly approaching, Microsoft is making an important adjustment. Users discovered that the official support article for the program now lists a new end-of-support date: The Extended Security Updates program is not a new concept. It has been an official way for business consumers to continue receiving critical updates for unsupported Microsoft products for many years. However, all this time, it was a business-only, paid feature. With Windows 10, Microsoft brought ESU to regular consumers, allowing them to get security updates for Windows 10 past October 2025 essentially for free. When Windows 10 was approaching the end of support, many guessed that Microsoft might adjust its support timelines, and this is exactly what seems to be happening. Of course, Microsoft would love everyone to switch to new computers, such as its latest Surface devices, but in the days of ever-growing hardware prices, not everyone is lucky enough to have money for a new PC. Leaving hundreds of millions of customers with a Windows version that no longer receives security updates is a major risk that Microsoft is not willing to take. If you have a Windows 10 PC to enroll in the Extended Security Updates program, check out this guide to learn how to do so.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      437
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      168
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      133
    4. 4
      Xenon
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!