Steve Jobs nearly died and lied about it


Recommended Posts

For daring to steal fire from the Gods, it is said, Prometheus was chained to a rock and sentenced to having his liver pecked out by birds.

Steve Jobs can relate.

Not only did Apple come awfully close to losing Jobs over the last few months, but he will never be truly out of the woods.

The bottom line is that Jobs is very lucky to be alive following a liver transplant. The first took place in 1967, but it did not become common until the 1980s, with the introduction of cyclosporine.

About 6,000 liver transplants are now done each year in the U.S., but the waiting list for organs averages 17,000. Those waiting lists could be reduced as more donors can now survive having part of their liver removed for transplant.

How and why did Jobs jump the queue? He was dieing faster than others, the company now admits.

Paul Argenti of Dartmouth?s business school says Apple deserves to face SEC action for lieing about Jobs? condition, which is the outgrowth of his 2004 pancreatic cancer.

I hate to be one of those birds pecking at Prometheus, but I agree.

This would not be the first time for Jobs on the SEC?s operating table. He was questioned in a scandal over the backdating of stock options, with Jobs later telling Forbes ?nobody loves me.?

That?s not true at all. What we don?t like, and what we shouldn?t be made to like, is a lie material to our investment. Apple is as dependent on Jobs as any U.S. company since Walt Disney, and he spent months denying he was knock, knock, knockin on heaven?s door.

Jobs? January letter, calling his condition a ?nutritional problem,? was a lie from beginning to end. A straight-out, bald-faced lie. I complained about this possibility a year ago, and repeat the complaint.

Why, Steve? Were you embarrassed? Not want us to make a fuss? Don?t like get well cards? Or were you trying to boost your own fortunes in case the liver didn?t come and you actually did die?

It?s hard to have to ask these questions, even though Jobs is reportedly back at work, because he is, and will remain, a very sick man. Jobs will have to take drugs that suppress his immune system for the rest of his life. He?s got a 9 in 10 chance of still being with us in 2014.

But a bird?s got to peck where a bird?s got to peck. And if the journalism gods tell you to peck at Prometheus? liver, that?s what you do.

Source: ZdNet HealthCare

C'mon if he had died they'd be no way any blowback would ever occur. He's been already deified over and over the last 7months so if he croaked there would've been a lot of revisionist hype and mourning that would drowned out any criticism.

It's still astounds me that they got away releasing that obvious BS letter about his nutrition and then announcing a week later he's in need for time off.

Also don't forget this a company that masterful at handling the press. Right before WWDC, 'unnamed sources' told WSJ that he might grace the world with his presence and that ended up being the press meme the whole week running up to the event. Then on the day of iPhone 3GS launch another 'leak' to the WSJ about his 'successful' 'non-eventful' surgery and speculation he'll be back by months end.

Did he lie or just exercise his personal privacy? The media is speculating that "no one knew" but I'd be willing to bet the "right people" knew and also the Apple legal dept and key board members. Additionally, I would not under estimate Jobs importance to Apple, but there are a lot of smart folks in the company and I'm sure as soon as Steve was sick there were contingency scenarios being built.

Is Apple a public company? If yes, he should not have lied. Apple is impelled by Jobs just as Microsoft was by Gates. He is the public face of the company and the share holders should not have been lied to as a sudden death would have adversely affected the share prices. He could have denied comments on his health stating that it was a private matter, but the article insinuates that he actually lied about it.

Jobs is under no obligation to reveal his personal medical situation, past or present. He could say whatever he wants or as little as he wants. Medical privacy is held higher than any business regulations.

If he were to go to the doctor, there would be reporting on it. He could say nothing, he could say he had a hangnail, or he could say he is having liver issues. It's up to him. But, no matter what he says, he is not beholden to the stockholders to reveal his personal medical records.

The whole point to investing in the stock market is to boost the economy while providing high gain to those that take the risk. More and more every year, we see investors trying to reduce the risk without giving up their previous gains.

This is the kind of crap that you get... cheap investors whining about their investment.

Jobs' health is personal... end of story. If you want to continue siphoning money into a company where the CEO is rumored to be ill, you're taking a risk... plain and simple.

What does Steve Jobs personal health problems have to do with me and my Apple products? Nothing? I thought so.

Steve Jobs is not a celebrity, he's the Apple CEO.

+1

Exactly!

While I enjoy the man's keynotes, charisma and personality, he is not the reason I buy their products.

Furthermore, he is just one person, give me man some friggin privacy. Cripes!

Medical confidentiality is above just about any other law here in the US. Including just about every law relating to business. Only way around it really is to have a judge order the medical condition to be disclosed, which is extremely uncommon. If they don't want to talk about it, they don't have to. Jobs is under no legal obligation to disclose any medical condition to anyone. Should he have disclosed it? That is debatable, but he has the right to decide that for himself.

What does Steve Jobs personal health problems have to do with me and my Apple products? Nothing? I thought so.

Steve Jobs is not a celebrity, he's the Apple CEO.

He's more than a CEO. If you need evidence of that, just look back at Apple's performance in that period when he wasn't.

He's a one-man marketing machine. When he leaves, there will be a lot more impact on Apple than there was at Microsoft when Gates retired.

He's more than a CEO. If you need evidence of that, just look back at Apple's performance in that period when he wasn't.

He's a one-man marketing machine. When he leaves, there will be a lot more impact on Apple than there was at Microsoft when Gates retired.

You can't compare the team Steve has built now with what was in place in those days, I think it will be traumatic to Apple when he leaves, but not the end of the world.

While I believe that it was wrong to "deceive" the public, Steve Jobs does have a right to privacy. This isn't a secret product or insider stock trading we're talking about, this is his personal health. I feel bad for him, with everyone picking and digging at his personal life.

So what if he did lie? has the man got a right for some privicy? ok im not the biggest fan of Apple and that bloke, but even still even if he did lie, im sure it was warrented, so back of telling people he lied when all he wanted was some privicy

I think that he should have had to disclose something...he disclosed something about a nutrition problem that turned out to be a lie and there is no cover for that, he knew he needed a new liver and he lied to the public and more importnatly the shareholders....

when your the CEO of a publicly traded company you sacrafice many freedoms, something should have been reported to the SEC as Steve Jobs is Apple....

Warren Buffett puts in context.

I think that if I have any serious, uh, i dont know, something serious coming up of an important nature, an operation or anything like that, i think the thing to do is just tell the American, (pause) Berkshire shareholders about it. Ya know, I work for them, uh, some people might think I’m important to the company. They certainly see Jobs as important to Apple and so it’s a material fact. Whether he is facing serious surgery or not is a material fact. Whether I’m facing surgery is a material fact… I think that’s important to get out… They’re gonna find out about it anyway so I don’t see a big privacy issue or anything of the sort.
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
    • Compared to the 7735HS it is around 25-30% slower in multi-threaded tasks (according to Google search) I did a review of the 7735HS Beelink SER6 Max in 2023, but thinking about it, it's not comparable to the 7730U. For the example you gave about how it will be used, the 7730U is actually an excellent choice for its power and battery efficiency.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      194
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!