Microsoft holds back the web again


Recommended Posts

I can understand why people are saying that emails should be plain text, however i like having sales emails etc.. from amazon.co.uk and play.com, laid out with images of latest releases.

Emails started as plain text, however that does not mean it should not be extended. It's a real shame that html emails have been exploited so much by virus writers and spammers, as it gives people the opportunity to send information in a formatted function, which makes it easier for groups of people to work together.

Everybody who makes use of the internet uses their inbox as a mind dump / storage, it contains vasts amount of information which they use for their daily lives, businesses especially.

Again like IE, Microsoft is in a different position to many other email clients, simply because it's the most used email client, when looking at businesses it has an even bigger slice of the market. When you own the market you have to ensure that others have access to the market and can compete.

People like Firefox, thunderbird, linux etc.. all ensure you the consumer have greater choice in the market place. They also push and try to ensure that when you purchase something from a supplier other than microsoft you can still have access to your media / information etc..

I think Microsoft owe it to the computing industry not to go back on it's self and start trying to lock users in again, they need to continue their good work and keep their products standardized.

I've never cared much for HTML formatted e-mail. I set my clients to force the display as plain text.

I do hope that Microsoft invests some effort in improving web rendering in the Office suite however.

But is the situation as bad as people would want us to believe?

http://www.istartedsomething.com/20090626/...in-perspective/

Well of course, if you limited e-mails to plain text and disallowed any attachments you couldn't send any viruses because you couldn't send anything.

Uhhh, I hate it break it to you, but people had been exchanging email for decades before somebody had the bright idea of using HTML in email, and it worked just fine.

Because you apparently don't see it doesn't mean that all of a sudden plain text email would become useless.

Uhhh, I hate it break it to you, but people had been exchanging email for decades before somebody had the bright idea of using HTML in email, and it worked just fine.

Because you apparently don't see it doesn't mean that all of a sudden plain text email would become useless.

Because that's exactly what I claimed.

If you removed the ability to send anything other than plain text (that is, any type of attachment) then you couldn't send any viruses.

The format the e-mail is in doesn't help or hinder the format it's attachments are in, plain text e-mails aren't more or less likely to have viruses than HTML e-mails are.

Can't this company do anything right?

Find out how many computers around the world run at least one piece of Microsoft software and then get back to us with the answer. Don't forget to count mobile phones, media players, and video game consoles.

Post your findings and we'll help you answer the question if you're still confused.

Because that's exactly what I claimed.

If you removed the ability to send anything other than plain text (that is, any type of attachment) then you couldn't send any viruses.

The format the e-mail is in doesn't help or hinder the format it's attachments are in, plain text e-mails aren't more or less likely to have viruses than HTML e-mails are.

Attachments are just one vector common to all clients. You must've missed all the viruses that propagated over email by using exploits in IE. No need for attachments at all.

Take out a huge complex rendering engine and replace it with a simple one that only displays plain text, and suddenly your attack surface is reduced significantly.

I'm completely failing to see what the problem is here apart from it being an obvious troll thread.

So MSFT doesn't use IE as a rendering engine in Outlook 2K7, it uses Word instead. What does that prove?

When you compose the email you'll be composing it in Word as well and since most businesses use Office I really don't see what this thread is about.

As stated by someone previously, most HTML emails coming from the web are spam. Most intra and inter office communications in a business will be typed up and read within Outlook/Word. This has absolutely nothing at all to do with web standards or holding back the web.

Please troll somewhere else.

As stated by someone previously, most HTML emails coming from the web are spam.
the business sector uses html mail ? well yeah they do, for the spam and ad mails....

Can you possibly give your source of figures for that? I have worked in 4 independent companies where we had paid users (in one instance 40,000) who expected to receive HTML newsletters.

I'm completely failing to see what the problem is here apart from it being an obvious troll thread.

Yup.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • 1. Define "better". 2. It's still more expensive than equivalent PCs so... And there is not one Windows platform. This is the mistake ALL Apple oriented people make. Apple is one OEM. You could reasonably compare them to one PC OEM, say Dell or HP. But you can't compare them to ALL PC OEMs. Case in point, Apple has NO touch screen MacBooks. No tablet Macs. There are no rugged Macs. The variety of PC OEM design is insane. With Apple, you have... Apple. The problem is that you're starting with Apple as the definition of "good" then filtering out anything that isn't close to an existing Apple product, then trying to homogenise all of those left into a fictional product line and then ignore any innovations to create a minimal feature subset so you can say "See! Apple better!" PS: I was an Apple dev for 17 years and helped develop MacInTalk and disability solutions for Apple - and I have several Mac and MacBooks - so tread very carefully.
    • Major Xbox layoffs may claim South of Midnight developer Compulsion entirely by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Microsoft has been making major changes in its gaming wing Xbox for a few months now, including the appointment of a new CEO, a large number of leadership changes, and strategy shifts. However, the company is seemingly also looking at initiating a major layoffs wave at Xbox and perhaps even a studio closure. The new report lands from Kotaku, Xbox first-party developer Compulsion Games is being shuttered soon by Microsoft. For those unfamiliar with the studio, it's the team behind Contrast (2013), We Happy Few (2018), and South of Midnight (2025). Its latest game was quite well received, even winning a Peabody Award for its writing. It even received a 9/10 in Neowin's own review, highlighting its engaging storyline, gorgeous world, and curious characters. The studio joined Xbox Game Studios in 2018, just as Microsoft announced it is acquiring Playground Games, Undead Labs, and Ninja Theory. Despite recent listings for new staff roles, according to the new report, Compulsion Games is being closed entirely, with over 90 staff being let go. Kotaku also added that the studio's leadership is in negotiations with Microsoft about this decision, but no official details have been revealed yet. The report lands just as two senior managers of Xbox leave their posts at Microsoft Gaming. Head of Xbox Game Studios Craig Duncan and chief of staff Louise O'Connor originally began their journey in Rare and have been a part of Xbox for over two decades. Dunkan has been responsible for games like Kinect Sports and Sea of Thieves, while O'Connor was primarily working on Rare's Everwild project before its cancelation. If this report about the studio shutdown is accurate, this may just be the start of a major new layoffs wave at Xbox Game Studios. There are also rumors of Arkane Studios being heavily affected. As always, take all these reports with a grain of salt until something official materializes from Microsoft or the studios.
    • The flaw with this analysis is that this laptop has a cellphone CPU in it. In the Intel world, that would be an N150 and those are everywhere, even in low end laptops. You can get an N150 based NUC with 16GB RAM and 256GB-512GB SSD... NOT soldered in... for < $500 Canadian (around US$360). The problem is two fold: tech bloggers/writers on most tech site (like this one, ironically) overvalue Apple and apparently aren't in the same earnings class as most regular people. As a result, we get breathless articles about how everyone needs a folding phone when most people just cannot afford one... or really need one. And we get Apple used as the baseline metric regardless of whether that comparison makes any sense. If Dell or HP released a retail laptop with a cellphone motherboard, you'd be all over them for doing that - but Apple does it and it's genius. I see articles suggesting what Samsung - a company that basically started the foldable phone market and has built them for eight years - needs to do to compete with Apple's unreleased, unspecced and unseen folding phone. Sorry, no - if the Neo (really creative name there BTW - still, better than the Go, the other "creative" product name everyone's using) encourages PC makers to make cellphone laptops using lower end ARM processors, we all lose. It's a step backwards and a capitulation to the fact that semiconductor makers and computer OEMs (and tech bloggers) have totally lost the plot.
    • Everyone should install this extension and ignore games that use AI. https://chromewebstore.google....nnigaaeelfkeomjcngmnh?pli=1 https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/ai-warning-for-steam/
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      ThatGuyOnline earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Jeroen Wilms earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      199
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      127
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      74
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!