Recommended Posts

What is wrong with the 32-bit version may I ask? I run Firefox 32-bit in Vista x64 fine, why you even need a 64-bit browser? I mean seriously, I don't get it? :unsure:

EDIT: However, should you still desire 64-bit Firefox please try here.

@OP

look here

http://www.mozilla-x86-64.com/

What is wrong with the 32-bit version may I ask? I run Firefox 32-bit in Vista x64 fine, why you even need a 64-bit browser? I mean seriously, I don't get it? :unsure:

Faster!

safer!

if it wasnt for the stupied flash ,i would had already moved to firefox x64

Thanks to all for the above links. :)

I am surprised that there is no flash support for x64 though!

Who is dragging their heels?

Adobe, they couldn't be bothered. However, they are working on 64-bit support for Linux so hopefully that means 64-bit support for Windows and OSX is also in the pipe lines, however, how long till they release anything is anyone's guess...

Adobe, they couldn't be bothered. However, they are working on 64-bit support for Linux so hopefully that means 64-bit support for Windows and OSX is also in the pipe lines, however, how long till they release anything is anyone's guess...

Last I heard, Flash x64 was going to be due out a few days after Duke Nukem Forever.

Adobe are looking to do a 64bit Win Flash 10, it's written on their website. However, as with most large corps, the 'work on/planning' timeframe are as ambiguous as those 'Copying files' dialogues in Vista.

With HTML5 flash (for video) wouldn't necessarily be needed but that's a long way off being implemented in many sites I think.

Apart from Flash, what else doesn't work? I don't need no stinking Quicktime/pdf/avi plugins, just google talk.

Adobe are looking to do a 64bit Win Flash 10, it's written on their website.

Yeah, there's been a message on their site about them "looking to do it" for five years now.

However, as with most large corps, the 'work on/planning' timeframe are as ambiguous as those 'Copying files' dialogues in Vista.

It just isn't a priority when 32-bit browsers work fine and the 32-bit support isn't going anywhere anytime soon. Most likely Adobe's code is a huge ****ty mess (it shows in their software) as well, which makes the work even harder and more expensive.

Apart from Flash, what else doesn't work? I don't need no stinking Quicktime/pdf/avi plugins, just google talk.

Well, there's the Microsoft plugins. Windows Media, .NET, Silverlight, etc. Their explanation is just "we couldn't be bothered, just run the 32-bit version."

...

Faster!

safer!

if it wasnt for the stupied flash ,i would had already moved to firefox x64

How is it safer?

64Bit doesn't offer any extra security over 32Bit by itself (Some extra security features that a 64Bit OS offers can be taken advantage of by 32Bit apps, and Firefox takes advantage of them)

Add in the fact that the Firefox codebase isn't 64bit compliant (there's still lots of code that assumes it's always running on a 32Bit OS/CPU), so I wouldn't use it myself (It'll be buggy, you might not run into bugs often, but when you do stuff will break)

From an earlier post of mine:

[...] 64-bit can end up increasing the testing burden for [browser makers]. Plus the deployment issues (imagine Mozilla offering a 32-bit and 64-bit download; how many regular users know if their system is 32-bit or 64-bit?) (not to mention all the issues that this would create with Mozilla's addon community with addons that have compiled components!)

So don't hold your breath; nobody really has any incentive to rock the boat here, esp. since there isn't much tangible benefit to going 64.

Browsers have become a sort of a platform (esp. Mozilla with its extensibility and huge addon community), and so a lot of care have to be taken with things like this.

Edit: Oops. I meant to post this in a different thread!

Edited by code.kliu.org
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • These features described above are good, but far from what developers will like the most. The main feature that developers will care and love the most it's called "Bring Your Own Models". It gives us the ability to connect to LOCAL AI models running on Ollama. The feature it's located on GitHub Copilot tab -> On the model picker where you can select "manage models" instead of paid models and then it will show you the "Bring your own models" window where you can now select Ollama and the endpoint of your local server. So if you have a beefy spec machine you can now use your own model 100% local inside Visual Studio 2026 18.7.0
    • Microsoft Teams is getting a controversial location tracking feature that users may hate by Usama Jawad Image generated with Microsoft Copilot Earlier this year, Microsoft planned to roll out a controversial location tracking feature in Teams, but following customer feedback, it decided to delay its release. The bad news is that the company has decided to launch it later this year, but it's based on roughly the same design that was shared earlier, which means that many users still have good reason to worry. Basically, Microsoft Places and Teams have received workplace check-ins via Wi-Fi. The idea is that if an employee arrives at the office and connects to their enterprise network, their profile status indicator will show them as being present in the office. For example, if you arrive at work, open Teams on your PC, and connect to the "Studio B" company Wi-Fi network, your Teams profile will indicate that you are present in "Studio B", as shown below: Microsoft says that this feature is basically a replacement for physical workplace check-in peripherals, it reduces the need to manually update your status, and it also enables co-workers to know that you're at work so that they can coordinate in-person meetings with you. IT admins can enable this workplace check-in capability at a tenant level, and users have the ability to control whether they want to enable it or not. Of course, all of that sounds great on paper, but naturally, many Teams customers may still have concerns, as they did before. This is because it enables your reporting manager and other members of the organization to track if you are at the office, when you arrive at the office, and where you are right now. This could be problematic for people who work in what they consider to be flexible work environments or hybrid setups, and this kind of location tracking could be considered an invasion of privacy. Microsoft has tried to alleviate some of these concerns by letting users know that they can manually set their location easily, which essentially overrides workplace check-in if they feel uncomfortable with it. However, that doesn't really solve the problem because your organization could enforce a workplace policy that mandates that this feature remains enabled. The Redmond tech giant has also assured users that this capability does not store historical data and is only a real-time indicator of location. Finally, it only generates a signal when you connect to a corporate network, which means that if you are working from home and connect your PC to your personal Wi-Fi, it won't broadcast your location to your employer; you will simply be shown as "Remote". Microsoft has encouraged IT admins to prepare for this change and begin informing users so they know what to expect once it begins rolling out later this year.
    • Wow, Microsoft IS cooking lately... This only shows that they COULD improve, they just chose not to for whatever reasons. That obsession with AI was destroying them from the inside out.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      AndrewSteel earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Veteran
      Taliseian went up a rank
      Veteran
    • One Month Later
      Clizby earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Timaximus earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Timaximus earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      516
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      162
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      82
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      81
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!