Recommended Posts

Hey all,

We all know how annoying Windows UAC is, and how annoying it is to turn it off, so may I introduce to you, Windows UAC Control.

Windows UAC Control presents you with two buttons, On/Off. Obviously doing what they say.

screenshot.png

The download is available here.

Note: Windows UAC Control still requires a restart after changing a setting. This is just Windows behaviour.

Regards,

James

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/790784-windows-uac-control/
Share on other sites

in windows 7 it is not annoying and you can turn it off or on in vista but then in window s7 ya can silent it so why bother

You're right, you can turn it off in Windows 7, but still, a quick solution is always nice.

Why bother? Because this method is faster. In Windows itself you need to go to Control Panel etc etc, with this, you run and change the setting. Done.

An entire app just to save, what, three keystrokes and mouse clicks (Start -> Control Panel -> type UAC -> Turn UAC on or off) for an operation that you will do once in perhaps an entire month seems kinda pointless.

It would have been better if it did other things - like, instead of a just turn on/off, why not snooze for a specific period? Or a notification area widget/desktop gadget instead of a separate window?

No point when there is TweakUAC (which doesn't need a restart).

TweakUAC-main-screen.png

I wonder how that works (with no restart).

An entire app just to save, what, three keystrokes and mouse clicks (Start -> Control Panel -> type UAC -> Turn UAC on or off) for an operation that you will do once in perhaps an entire month seems kinda pointless.

It would have been better if it did other things - like, instead of a just turn on/off, why not snooze for a specific period? Or a notification area widget/desktop gadget instead of a separate window?

Snooze for what for a period? Notification widget to display what?

I wonder how that works (with no restart).

This is how. It just disables the prompts for Admin users by the looks of it.

Snooze for what for a period? Notification widget to display what?

I just gave some pointers, didn't write the entire spec!

Anyways, you can present a slider to the user to select the snooze duration.

And instead of a separate application window, use a notiification area widget to choose between the various states of UAC (silent, verbose and snoozed) much like the power plan selection widget works. Or use a desktop gadget for the same. Normally that will just show the UAC status with buttons to switch states. And when snoozed, a timer, perhaps? IMO, rather than opening an app to do this, if it were already present in some unobtrusive way as gadget or hidden in notification area, it would be better in terms of usability.

I just gave some pointers, didn't write the entire spec!

Anyways, you can present a slider to the user to select the snooze duration.

And instead of a separate application window, use a notiification area widget to choose between the various states of UAC (silent, verbose and snoozed) much like the power plan selection widget works. Or use a desktop gadget for the same. Normally that will just show the UAC status with buttons to switch states. And when snoozed, a timer, perhaps? IMO, rather than opening an app to do this, if it were already present in some unobtrusive way as gadget or hidden in notification area, it would be better in terms of usability.

Now you're just talking in terms of HCI (Human Computer Interaction), all you're doing is tricking the user into thinking it's already part of the system - which is good!

An entire app just to save, what, three keystrokes and mouse clicks (Start -> Control Panel -> type UAC -> Turn UAC on or off) for an operation that you will do once in perhaps an entire month seems kinda pointless.

Once a month? I was trying 7 in a dual boot alongside XP the other day and had UAC prompts like 10+ times in a session, it prompts every time i start cpu-z or my evga precision app. Shouldn't UAC at least remember the programs I've accepted cos its annoying as hell.

Want to write us a sandboxing program to replace the one that you're disabling with this program?

Erm, no. Sandboxing requires a lot of experience with memory allocations and ASM.

Once a month? I was trying 7 in a dual boot alongside XP the other day and had UAC prompts like 10+ times in a session, it prompts every time i start cpu-z or my evga precision app. Shouldn't UAC at least remember the programs I've accepted cos its annoying as hell.

I thought all accepted programs were stored in the registry?

Hey all,

We all know how annoying Windows UAC is, and how annoying it is to turn it off,

Ah? is NOT annoying at all, besides in Windows 7 turning off UAC is the easiest thing in the world, In fact what is annoying to me is the stupid idea of getting less protected by turning UAC OFF, you can even make it silent for god's sake!

Ah? is NOT annoying at all, besides in Windows 7 turning off UAC is the easiest thing in the world, In fact what is annoying to me is the stupid idea of turning UAC OFF, you can even make it silent for god's sake!

Might not be annoying to you.

I know what each program does when I run it, I tend to have made them myself OR they were made by Microsoft. I don't want a warning asking me AGAIN if I am sure I want to run it.

You're right, you can turn it off in Windows 7, but still, a quick solution is always nice.

Why bother? Because this method is faster. In Windows itself you need to go to Control Panel etc etc, with this, you run and change the setting. Done.

Erm, you can turn it on and off in the control panel on both Vista and 7, and you can even configure it in detail through the policy editor (to do things like disable the admin approval prompt while still keeping UAC enabled).

How on EARTH is it faster to visit your web page, download this program, and run it? Seriously? Who turns UAC on and off every five minutes so they'd need a program like this? No sane person.

I'm sure it's a nice program that does exactly as advertised, but what the hell?

Erm, you can turn it on and off in the control panel on both Vista and 7, and you can even configure it in detail through the policy editor (to do things like disable the admin approval prompt while still keeping UAC enabled).

How on EARTH is it faster to visit your web page, download this program, and run it? Seriously? Who turns UAC on and off every five minutes so they'd need a program like this? No sane person.

I'm sure it's a nice program that does exactly as advertised, but what the hell?

Once it's downloaded, it's on your hard drive, so a couple of extra clicks are needed for the FIRST run.

I never said anyone had to use it, I don't even expect anyone to use it.

Might not be annoying to you.

I know what each program does when I run it, I tend to have made them myself OR they were made by Microsoft. I don't want a warning asking me AGAIN if I am sure I want to run it.

How does one know that it's still the same program that will still bring in the exact same third-party code (DLLs, shell extensions, etc) and won't be hijacked by something else? There's no way to know, and that is why there is no "remember this" option. Accepting a UAC prompt manually is already extremely risky as it is because you do not have enough information to make an informed decision. Making it automatically consent is even worse. Now you could argue that you personally never ever run any third-party code at all, but Windows isn't made specifically for you.

Once it's downloaded, it's on your hard drive, so a couple of extra clicks are needed for the FIRST run.

Well, if I drag the User Accounts control panel to the desktop or task bar, it now takes me just two clicks to open the UAC settings. I really don't see how it's something people would do so frequently that they'd need a tool.

Nothing wrong with having one if there's two or three people that want it though, sure, but it's still a bit weird.

I know what each program does when I run it, I don't want a warning asking me AGAIN if I am sure I want to run it.

The problem will arise when some maleware gets you silentely and you WON'T know what it does and nothing will protect you by asking you IF you want to allow SomeHiddenWierd.EXE to do finish up your PC.

How does one know that it's still the same program that will still bring in the exact same third-party code (DLLs, shell extensions, etc) and won't be hijacked by something else? There's no way to know, and that is why there is no "remember this" option. Accepting a UAC prompt manually is already extremely risky as it is because you do not have enough information to make an informed decision. Making it automatically consent is even worse. Now you could argue that you personally never ever run any third-party code at all, but Windows isn't made specifically for you.

Well, if I drag the User Accounts control panel to the desktop or task bar, it now takes me just two clicks to open the UAC settings. I really don't see how it's something people would do so frequently that they'd need a tool.

Nothing wrong with having one if there's two or three people that want it though, sure, but it's still a bit weird.

Because the people that use my software know it's safe, I have been programming for 11 years now. I had some spare time and made this. Don't use it, if you don't want to.

I have Windows 7, exactly how I like it. I made this in Vista. Every OS I use is configured for my personal needs. I have made applications to change settings on a hotkey/mouse click.

The problem will arise when some maleware gets you silentely and you WON'T know what it does and nothing will protect you by asking you IF you want to allow SomeHiddenWierd.EXE to do finish up your PC.

I would say I have anti-virus, but even though I do, it doesn't always make us safe.

I don't visit that many different websites. If I try a program I am unsure about, it's in a Virtual PC/Sandboxie. I have automatic backups which allow me to install everything back on to my hard drive easily.

Because the people that use my software know it's safe, I have been programming for 11 years now.

Er? I haven't said that your software isn't safe? I'm saying that the problem is that malware can hijack a program and ride its elevation request. That is why you can't tell it to always elevate a certain program.

Heck, it's why you don't even know what you could be getting half the time even when you manually consent (the only setup that is actually safe is where you have a completely separate administrator account that you have to log onto to make changes and never touch any executable code that other users have access to from it).

I'm trying to explain to you why having an "always elevate this program" option is a lot more dangerous than you seem to think.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
    • For me, the fundamental problems with these "smartglasses" is that they really don't work well for people with significant prescriptions and massively up the price if you use attached lenses if they have displays, and if they don't, then they're not actually "smart" anything, rather just connecting to your phone and relaying voice to an AI. In a few cases like this, they throw in small cameras to feed video to the AI. All around, these feel like both a solution looking for a problem, and the problems it tries to solve seem more easily solved by different approaches and designs. Oddly, if the rumours are true, Apple may actually have invented something for once and it kind of does this right: put cameras in ear buds and manage the interface to AI exactly as most of us do: tapping on an ear bud and saying "Hey Google" or "Hey Siri." That makes them compatible with almost everyone, can double up as a hearing assist device, an impaired vision assist device, a "smart" device... and answer your phone and play music. That just seems like a better solution all around.
    • Usually the bigger ones with many fixes/changes take a few, theyre an exception to the rule most likely
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      452
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      84
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!