Recommended Posts

Hey all,

We all know how annoying Windows UAC is, and how annoying it is to turn it off, so may I introduce to you, Windows UAC Control.

Windows UAC Control presents you with two buttons, On/Off. Obviously doing what they say.

screenshot.png

The download is available here.

Note: Windows UAC Control still requires a restart after changing a setting. This is just Windows behaviour.

Regards,

James

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/790784-windows-uac-control/
Share on other sites

in windows 7 it is not annoying and you can turn it off or on in vista but then in window s7 ya can silent it so why bother

You're right, you can turn it off in Windows 7, but still, a quick solution is always nice.

Why bother? Because this method is faster. In Windows itself you need to go to Control Panel etc etc, with this, you run and change the setting. Done.

An entire app just to save, what, three keystrokes and mouse clicks (Start -> Control Panel -> type UAC -> Turn UAC on or off) for an operation that you will do once in perhaps an entire month seems kinda pointless.

It would have been better if it did other things - like, instead of a just turn on/off, why not snooze for a specific period? Or a notification area widget/desktop gadget instead of a separate window?

No point when there is TweakUAC (which doesn't need a restart).

TweakUAC-main-screen.png

I wonder how that works (with no restart).

An entire app just to save, what, three keystrokes and mouse clicks (Start -> Control Panel -> type UAC -> Turn UAC on or off) for an operation that you will do once in perhaps an entire month seems kinda pointless.

It would have been better if it did other things - like, instead of a just turn on/off, why not snooze for a specific period? Or a notification area widget/desktop gadget instead of a separate window?

Snooze for what for a period? Notification widget to display what?

I wonder how that works (with no restart).

This is how. It just disables the prompts for Admin users by the looks of it.

Snooze for what for a period? Notification widget to display what?

I just gave some pointers, didn't write the entire spec!

Anyways, you can present a slider to the user to select the snooze duration.

And instead of a separate application window, use a notiification area widget to choose between the various states of UAC (silent, verbose and snoozed) much like the power plan selection widget works. Or use a desktop gadget for the same. Normally that will just show the UAC status with buttons to switch states. And when snoozed, a timer, perhaps? IMO, rather than opening an app to do this, if it were already present in some unobtrusive way as gadget or hidden in notification area, it would be better in terms of usability.

I just gave some pointers, didn't write the entire spec!

Anyways, you can present a slider to the user to select the snooze duration.

And instead of a separate application window, use a notiification area widget to choose between the various states of UAC (silent, verbose and snoozed) much like the power plan selection widget works. Or use a desktop gadget for the same. Normally that will just show the UAC status with buttons to switch states. And when snoozed, a timer, perhaps? IMO, rather than opening an app to do this, if it were already present in some unobtrusive way as gadget or hidden in notification area, it would be better in terms of usability.

Now you're just talking in terms of HCI (Human Computer Interaction), all you're doing is tricking the user into thinking it's already part of the system - which is good!

An entire app just to save, what, three keystrokes and mouse clicks (Start -> Control Panel -> type UAC -> Turn UAC on or off) for an operation that you will do once in perhaps an entire month seems kinda pointless.

Once a month? I was trying 7 in a dual boot alongside XP the other day and had UAC prompts like 10+ times in a session, it prompts every time i start cpu-z or my evga precision app. Shouldn't UAC at least remember the programs I've accepted cos its annoying as hell.

Want to write us a sandboxing program to replace the one that you're disabling with this program?

Erm, no. Sandboxing requires a lot of experience with memory allocations and ASM.

Once a month? I was trying 7 in a dual boot alongside XP the other day and had UAC prompts like 10+ times in a session, it prompts every time i start cpu-z or my evga precision app. Shouldn't UAC at least remember the programs I've accepted cos its annoying as hell.

I thought all accepted programs were stored in the registry?

Hey all,

We all know how annoying Windows UAC is, and how annoying it is to turn it off,

Ah? is NOT annoying at all, besides in Windows 7 turning off UAC is the easiest thing in the world, In fact what is annoying to me is the stupid idea of getting less protected by turning UAC OFF, you can even make it silent for god's sake!

Ah? is NOT annoying at all, besides in Windows 7 turning off UAC is the easiest thing in the world, In fact what is annoying to me is the stupid idea of turning UAC OFF, you can even make it silent for god's sake!

Might not be annoying to you.

I know what each program does when I run it, I tend to have made them myself OR they were made by Microsoft. I don't want a warning asking me AGAIN if I am sure I want to run it.

You're right, you can turn it off in Windows 7, but still, a quick solution is always nice.

Why bother? Because this method is faster. In Windows itself you need to go to Control Panel etc etc, with this, you run and change the setting. Done.

Erm, you can turn it on and off in the control panel on both Vista and 7, and you can even configure it in detail through the policy editor (to do things like disable the admin approval prompt while still keeping UAC enabled).

How on EARTH is it faster to visit your web page, download this program, and run it? Seriously? Who turns UAC on and off every five minutes so they'd need a program like this? No sane person.

I'm sure it's a nice program that does exactly as advertised, but what the hell?

Erm, you can turn it on and off in the control panel on both Vista and 7, and you can even configure it in detail through the policy editor (to do things like disable the admin approval prompt while still keeping UAC enabled).

How on EARTH is it faster to visit your web page, download this program, and run it? Seriously? Who turns UAC on and off every five minutes so they'd need a program like this? No sane person.

I'm sure it's a nice program that does exactly as advertised, but what the hell?

Once it's downloaded, it's on your hard drive, so a couple of extra clicks are needed for the FIRST run.

I never said anyone had to use it, I don't even expect anyone to use it.

Might not be annoying to you.

I know what each program does when I run it, I tend to have made them myself OR they were made by Microsoft. I don't want a warning asking me AGAIN if I am sure I want to run it.

How does one know that it's still the same program that will still bring in the exact same third-party code (DLLs, shell extensions, etc) and won't be hijacked by something else? There's no way to know, and that is why there is no "remember this" option. Accepting a UAC prompt manually is already extremely risky as it is because you do not have enough information to make an informed decision. Making it automatically consent is even worse. Now you could argue that you personally never ever run any third-party code at all, but Windows isn't made specifically for you.

Once it's downloaded, it's on your hard drive, so a couple of extra clicks are needed for the FIRST run.

Well, if I drag the User Accounts control panel to the desktop or task bar, it now takes me just two clicks to open the UAC settings. I really don't see how it's something people would do so frequently that they'd need a tool.

Nothing wrong with having one if there's two or three people that want it though, sure, but it's still a bit weird.

I know what each program does when I run it, I don't want a warning asking me AGAIN if I am sure I want to run it.

The problem will arise when some maleware gets you silentely and you WON'T know what it does and nothing will protect you by asking you IF you want to allow SomeHiddenWierd.EXE to do finish up your PC.

How does one know that it's still the same program that will still bring in the exact same third-party code (DLLs, shell extensions, etc) and won't be hijacked by something else? There's no way to know, and that is why there is no "remember this" option. Accepting a UAC prompt manually is already extremely risky as it is because you do not have enough information to make an informed decision. Making it automatically consent is even worse. Now you could argue that you personally never ever run any third-party code at all, but Windows isn't made specifically for you.

Well, if I drag the User Accounts control panel to the desktop or task bar, it now takes me just two clicks to open the UAC settings. I really don't see how it's something people would do so frequently that they'd need a tool.

Nothing wrong with having one if there's two or three people that want it though, sure, but it's still a bit weird.

Because the people that use my software know it's safe, I have been programming for 11 years now. I had some spare time and made this. Don't use it, if you don't want to.

I have Windows 7, exactly how I like it. I made this in Vista. Every OS I use is configured for my personal needs. I have made applications to change settings on a hotkey/mouse click.

The problem will arise when some maleware gets you silentely and you WON'T know what it does and nothing will protect you by asking you IF you want to allow SomeHiddenWierd.EXE to do finish up your PC.

I would say I have anti-virus, but even though I do, it doesn't always make us safe.

I don't visit that many different websites. If I try a program I am unsure about, it's in a Virtual PC/Sandboxie. I have automatic backups which allow me to install everything back on to my hard drive easily.

Because the people that use my software know it's safe, I have been programming for 11 years now.

Er? I haven't said that your software isn't safe? I'm saying that the problem is that malware can hijack a program and ride its elevation request. That is why you can't tell it to always elevate a certain program.

Heck, it's why you don't even know what you could be getting half the time even when you manually consent (the only setup that is actually safe is where you have a completely separate administrator account that you have to log onto to make changes and never touch any executable code that other users have access to from it).

I'm trying to explain to you why having an "always elevate this program" option is a lot more dangerous than you seem to think.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
    • Apple Watch Series 11 GPS just crashed to 30% off in this fast-moving Prime Day deal by Karthik Mudaliar The Apple Watch Series 11 is available for $279, down from its $399 list price, saving buyers $120, or 30%. Amazon labels the offer as selling fast, so the current price may not remain available for long. This GPS model features a 42mm aluminum case, an Always-On Retina LTPO3 OLED display capable of reaching up to 2,000 nits, and an Ion-X glass surface with improved scratch resistance. Apple rates Series 11 for up to 24 hours of normal use or up to 38 hours in Low Power Mode, with fast charging providing up to eight hours of use from a 15-minute charge. Health and fitness tools include sleep scoring, temperature sensing, ECG support, heart-rate alerts, workout tracking, sleep apnea notifications, and hypertension notifications, where available. The watch also carries IP6X dust resistance and 50-meter water resistance. This configuration is best suited to iPhone owners who want comprehensive health tracking, notifications, contactless payments, and workout data without stepping up to a larger or cellular-equipped model. The smaller case should also appeal to buyers who prefer a lighter watch, while the S/M band fits wrists measuring 130mm to 180mm. With the current generation now significantly below its usual retail price, this is a strong time to replace an aging Apple Watch or buy a first model without compromising on Apple’s newest health and display features. Grab the discounted Apple Watch Series 11 (sold and shipped by Amazon) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      460
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!