No LAN Play For Starcraft II

By (Spork)
in PC Gaming

 Share

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

(Spork)

Posted
Posted

A Blizzard rep has told Kotaku:

We don't currently plan to support LAN play with StarCraft II, as we are building Battle.net to be the ideal destination for multiplayer gaming with StarCraft II and future Blizzard Entertainment games. While this was a difficult decision for us, we felt that moving away from LAN play and directing players to our upgraded Battle.net service was the best option to ensure a quality multiplayer experience with StarCraft II and safeguard against piracy.

Several Battle.net features like advanced communication options, achievements, stat-tracking, and more, require players to be connected to the service, so we're encouraging everyone to use Battle.net as much as possible to get the most out of StarCraft II. We're looking forward to sharing more details about Battle.net and online functionality for StarCraft II in the near future.

http://kotaku.com/5304113/no-lan-play-for-starcraft-ii

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/791084-no-lan-play-for-starcraft-ii/
Share on other sites
Grand Master

Miuku.

Posted
Posted

"We found that by offering LAN gaming to people, not everyone was donating their hard earned pennies to our coffers. We found that having to drive a month old Lamborghini was getting to our CEO and causing him rash around his balls."

I know where this'll lead tho' - local area server emulators.

Grand Master

Berserk87

Posted
Posted
but I thought SC2 battle.net was supposed to be free? or at least for the basic gameplay modes?

ya, i thought battle.net was completely free.... :huh:

the only way i could see this decision profiting them, is that since there doing the game as a 3 pack, if everyones all playing on battle.net, it will be a lot more obvious if you only have 1 pack, and will be limited to game types and the amount of matches available, making you want to upgrade.

Grand Master

Slimy

Posted
Posted
ya, i thought battle.net was completely free.... :huh:

the only way i could see this decision profiting them

If most people (of course there willk be workarounds) are forced to play on Battle.net even for LAN games, Blizzard will make more money off the ads that it places there.

Community Regular

drbobiii

Posted
Posted
but I thought SC2 battle.net was supposed to be free? or at least for the basic gameplay modes?

It is and will be free. It's just that connecting to Bnet to play someone sitting next to you is at best inconvenient, and at worst impossible if you have a slow connection and/or lots of computers.

But yeah, I'm sure some kind of emulator/hack will be made before SC2 is even out of beta.

Neowinian

Sean Adlerr

Posted
Posted

Blizzard is really turned into quite the money hungry company. Although now that I think about it, I will bet you a hundred to one that Activision is the one really pulling the strings on this one.

I highly doubt that Blizzard would do such a crazy thing to their fans. They have always been good at listening and responding to fan feedback. I'm assuming Activision saw what people would pay to play Wow, so they are capitalizing on the idea. Piracy or not, I don't think that is the real reason.

If I recall correctly, the original Starcraft was quite the shareware game anyhow. You could pretty much play the entire game on a friends CD key, but they had to start the game, etc. Not to mention you could use it up to 5 times. Me and my friends all played on the same CD key for years. Sure there were some restrictions, but we always made it fun.

..This Blizzard acquisition by Activision is getting worse and worse every day.

Grand Master

+Audioboxer Subscriber²

Posted
  • Subscriber²
Posted
Blizzard is really turned into quite the money hungry company. Although now that I think about it, I will bet you a hundred to one that Activision is the one really pulling the strings on this one.

I highly doubt that Blizzard would do such a crazy thing to their fans. They have always been good at listening and responding to fan feedback. I'm assuming Activision saw what people would pay to play Wow, so they are capitalizing on the idea. Piracy or not, I don't think that is the real reason.

If I recall correctly, the original Starcraft was quite the shareware game anyhow. You could pretty much play the entire game on a friends CD key, but they had to start the game, etc. Not to mention you could use it up to 5 times. Me and my friends all played on the same CD key for years. Sure there were some restrictions, but we always made it fun.

..This Blizzard acquisition by Activision is getting worse and worse every day.

Starcraft was released in 98, before most people were completely desensitized to actually handing over money for a PC game through easier methods of obtaining things (eg torrents) and fast internet.

It'll still sell millions but one thing you're right about is the Activision CEO's probably did have a good say in this. Activision are turning into a bunch of fat bankers.

Grand Master

Miuku.

Posted
Posted
..This Blizzard acquisition by Activision is getting worse and worse every day.

Actually Blizzard bought Activision, or rather their parent company Vivendi did - not the other way around.

It does not lessen the fact that this is purely a cash cow decision.

Grand Master

Nagisan

Posted
Posted
I suppose we can thank all the pirates for this. Abusing Hamachi, Garena and other LAN-over-Internet software for internet play with pirated copies.

I disagree.....any game that has been any good and has multiplayer (as well as LAN) I have bought. There are a few games I used LAN only to play with a friend, but I have never bothered getting into large servers through hamachi and what not. I would rather buy a game to play online than download a game to play over LAN (even if that means using Hamachi to play with loads of other people).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • Classic 7 is Windows 10 LTSC cosplaying as Windows 7

      By Skyfrog · Posted

      Seems to be working fine for me.
    • Latest Rufus update improves new Windows 11 install method

      By TarasBuria · Posted

      Latest Rufus update improves new Windows 11 install method by Taras Buria Pete Batard, the maker of Rufus, a very popular app for creating bootable Windows (and other OS) media, has released a new beta version of its app. Rufus 4.15 beta is now out, and while it offers no new features, there are all sorts of improvements and fixes, including for the new Windows 11 installation method that was introduced in version 4.14 in early May. The "Silent Windows 11 installation" is a new feature whose goal is to automate operating system installation. All you have to do is boot from the drive, and then Rufus takes over, doing all things for you, such as setting up a new account, skipping ads and prompts, and more. It is a very handy tool, but initially, it had some bugs and issues that required addressing. With version 4.15 beta, Rufus is fixing that, particularly a bug with installation failing at 75%, crashes on Snapdragon X-based PCs, and more. Here is the changelog: Rufus 4.15 beta is now available for download from its GitHub repository. If you have never used Rufus before, you can check out our guide here. It is a very useful utility to have, as it allows you to deal with plenty of Windows 11's annoyances, which are still there, despite Microsoft's ongoing efforts to fix them.
    • Microsoft fixes one of Excel Copilot's most frustrating limitations

      By Usama Jawad96 · Posted

      Microsoft fixes one of Excel Copilot's most frustrating limitations by Usama Jawad Microsoft began integrating Copilot into Excel a couple of years ago and has been upgrading it with new functionalities since then. While some changes have been controversial, Microsoft is hoping to win over users by allowing them to be more productive via Copilot. To that end, it has now announced a Copilot improvement that may actually be appreciated by people who use it regularly. Excel customers often use the Copilot prompt box to issue instructions to format and customize their data, but it can become quite tiring to keep repeating the same instructions again and again. Microsoft now allows you to define Copilot personalization rules for formatting, naming conventions, formulas, and report styles. These can be accessed via Settings > Personalization, where you can explain your rules in natural language like "Always format currency in USD with no decimals", and just let Copilot take care of the rest. Microsoft is going a step further in this direction by allowing you to set workbook rules too. These rules are stored as a .Rules sheet, and are preserved while the workbook is shared. This fosters collaboration while making sure that standard rules govern the Copilot editing experience across the organization. Other advantages of this capability include pointing it to specific examples, defining dynamic formulas, and referencing an entire sheet and asking Copilot to infer rules based on that. You can leverage this feature by opening Copilot in Excel, clicking on "+", and selecting Create workbook rules. If you have an existing .Rules sheet, you can simply start listing the rules in column A as well. Personalization features are available to all Copilot in Excel users across the web, Mac, and Windows. Meanwhile, workbook rules are currently being previewed for Windows and Mac customers on the Insiders channel. General availability is scheduled after a few weeks, but a concrete date is currently unknown. Overall, the Excel capability is quite similar to ChatGPT's memory features, which allow you to permanently store items in the AI model's context window.
    • My favorite file manager for Windows 11 finally gets a long-requested feature

      By Slackerr · Posted

      Imagine you still haven't discovered Total Commander that is doing all those things for three decades already...
    • Millions of users to benefit from Windows 11's new performance boost on Adobe Photoshop

      By thartist · Posted

      This sounds like underneath the nice marketing spin, either someone at Adobe got tired of their lazy devs and asked Microsoft to help them sort at least some of Adobe's ancestral spaghetti code to make it go faster, or Microsoft wanted Adobe's crap to run better on Windows to make it look better when compared to Apple, so they offered to intervene. Either way, GOOD.

  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Vincian earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      509
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      90
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      77
    5. 5
      neufuse
      68
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!