No LAN Play For Starcraft II


Recommended Posts

A Blizzard rep has told Kotaku:

We don't currently plan to support LAN play with StarCraft II, as we are building Battle.net to be the ideal destination for multiplayer gaming with StarCraft II and future Blizzard Entertainment games. While this was a difficult decision for us, we felt that moving away from LAN play and directing players to our upgraded Battle.net service was the best option to ensure a quality multiplayer experience with StarCraft II and safeguard against piracy.

Several Battle.net features like advanced communication options, achievements, stat-tracking, and more, require players to be connected to the service, so we're encouraging everyone to use Battle.net as much as possible to get the most out of StarCraft II. We're looking forward to sharing more details about Battle.net and online functionality for StarCraft II in the near future.

http://kotaku.com/5304113/no-lan-play-for-starcraft-ii

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/791084-no-lan-play-for-starcraft-ii/
Share on other sites

"We found that by offering LAN gaming to people, not everyone was donating their hard earned pennies to our coffers. We found that having to drive a month old Lamborghini was getting to our CEO and causing him rash around his balls."

I know where this'll lead tho' - local area server emulators.

but I thought SC2 battle.net was supposed to be free? or at least for the basic gameplay modes?

ya, i thought battle.net was completely free.... :huh:

the only way i could see this decision profiting them, is that since there doing the game as a 3 pack, if everyones all playing on battle.net, it will be a lot more obvious if you only have 1 pack, and will be limited to game types and the amount of matches available, making you want to upgrade.

ya, i thought battle.net was completely free.... :huh:

the only way i could see this decision profiting them

If most people (of course there willk be workarounds) are forced to play on Battle.net even for LAN games, Blizzard will make more money off the ads that it places there.

but I thought SC2 battle.net was supposed to be free? or at least for the basic gameplay modes?

It is and will be free. It's just that connecting to Bnet to play someone sitting next to you is at best inconvenient, and at worst impossible if you have a slow connection and/or lots of computers.

But yeah, I'm sure some kind of emulator/hack will be made before SC2 is even out of beta.

Blizzard is really turned into quite the money hungry company. Although now that I think about it, I will bet you a hundred to one that Activision is the one really pulling the strings on this one.

I highly doubt that Blizzard would do such a crazy thing to their fans. They have always been good at listening and responding to fan feedback. I'm assuming Activision saw what people would pay to play Wow, so they are capitalizing on the idea. Piracy or not, I don't think that is the real reason.

If I recall correctly, the original Starcraft was quite the shareware game anyhow. You could pretty much play the entire game on a friends CD key, but they had to start the game, etc. Not to mention you could use it up to 5 times. Me and my friends all played on the same CD key for years. Sure there were some restrictions, but we always made it fun.

..This Blizzard acquisition by Activision is getting worse and worse every day.

Blizzard is really turned into quite the money hungry company. Although now that I think about it, I will bet you a hundred to one that Activision is the one really pulling the strings on this one.

I highly doubt that Blizzard would do such a crazy thing to their fans. They have always been good at listening and responding to fan feedback. I'm assuming Activision saw what people would pay to play Wow, so they are capitalizing on the idea. Piracy or not, I don't think that is the real reason.

If I recall correctly, the original Starcraft was quite the shareware game anyhow. You could pretty much play the entire game on a friends CD key, but they had to start the game, etc. Not to mention you could use it up to 5 times. Me and my friends all played on the same CD key for years. Sure there were some restrictions, but we always made it fun.

..This Blizzard acquisition by Activision is getting worse and worse every day.

Starcraft was released in 98, before most people were completely desensitized to actually handing over money for a PC game through easier methods of obtaining things (eg torrents) and fast internet.

It'll still sell millions but one thing you're right about is the Activision CEO's probably did have a good say in this. Activision are turning into a bunch of fat bankers.

..This Blizzard acquisition by Activision is getting worse and worse every day.

Actually Blizzard bought Activision, or rather their parent company Vivendi did - not the other way around.

It does not lessen the fact that this is purely a cash cow decision.

I suppose we can thank all the pirates for this. Abusing Hamachi, Garena and other LAN-over-Internet software for internet play with pirated copies.

I disagree.....any game that has been any good and has multiplayer (as well as LAN) I have bought. There are a few games I used LAN only to play with a friend, but I have never bothered getting into large servers through hamachi and what not. I would rather buy a game to play online than download a game to play over LAN (even if that means using Hamachi to play with loads of other people).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Waymo recalls self-driving software after cars enter closed freeway work zones by Paul Hill Waymo, the self-driving car maker owned by Alphabet – the parent company of Google –, has recalled some of its fifth-generation Automated Driving Systems (ADS). It did so after some of its cars drove through closed construction zones. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), the affected vehicles were capable of driving through a closed freeway construction zone and continuing to drive at speed. The listing on the NHTSA website says that Waymo is currently developing a solution to fix this issue, but in the meantime, freeway driving is being restricted. Waymo will update its ADS software so that vehicles can detect when they can avoid entering construction zones. According to the Safety Recall Report, on April 20, 2026, Waymo’s Field Safety Committee began meetings reviewing an event from April 11, 2026, and five events from April 19, 2026, where Waymo’s autonomous vehicles didn’t recognize and drove past ramp closure signs into the pre-planned freeway construction zones. This took place in Phoenix, Arizona. Separately, on May 18, 2026, seven Waymo vehicles entered freeway lanes with active construction in the San Francisco Bay Area by driving between cones that were placed to show the lane was closed. On the back of both of these events, Waymo restricted freeway driving until it could address the issue. In June, Waymo’s Safety Board reviewed the issue and additional information related to ADS performances around construction zones; then, as a result, it decided to conduct a recall. This development is not good for Waymo as it adds to a growing list of technical hiccups its cars have experienced. Ultimately, it will lead to more scrutiny from lawmakers around the world who will be more cautious about letting autonomous vehicles on their roads without tighter regulation. For readers in areas where Waymo operates, does this news make you more wary about stepping into one of these vehicles?
    • I'm still on Windows 10 22H2 because I didn't want to deal with all the issues in Windows 11, so I waited almost a week before installing the latest Patch Tuesday update (KB5094127), I went ahead and did it, and it was a huge mistake—ever since then, my File Explorer has seen a performance drop of about 30% when transferring large files... Once again, Microsoft has outdone itself! This update cannot be uninstalled, either through the Control Panel (via Settings) or by accessing Advanced Startup Options. The only possible alternative would be to use system restore points, but I’d have to reinstall all app and driver updates (and there’s no guarantee it would work). Or there’s the “nuclear option” of a in-place repair without losing files or apps, but even then, all my customizations would be lost! Microsoft just can’t help but mess everything up! Way to go, Microsoft! But I still don’t want your c****y Windows 11!
    • Microsoft: Windows 11 could finally solve a major issue across AMD, Nvidia, and Intel GPUs by Sayan Sen While Microsoft has been trying to improve it, Windows 11 is definitely not flawless, as even today some issues are taking a year to publicly acknowledge. However, one area of trouble that may finally see much better results soon is graphics driver crashes. Work on graphics driver timeouts, also called Timeout and Detection Recovery (TDR), is not new as the latest WDDM 3.2 also has specific improvements regarding it. Windows Display Driver Model (WDDM) version 3.2 is supported on Windows 11 24H2 and 25H2. However, with the upcoming version 26H2, TDR crash diagnosis could go to the next level as Microsoft is introducing a new DirectX 12 API feature called "DirectX Dump Files". Similar to how system memory dump files work when a system crashes or freezes or encounters any such major issue, DirectX Dump Files (DDF) will essentially record a snapshot of the GPU execution right at the moment a graphics-related crash or hang or freeze occurs, so that developers can better understand and diagnoze these TDR and timeout detection errors. The dump will be available as a .dxdmp file for analysis and it will be a comprehensive dump file generated with detailed insights about the hardware, drivers, Windows, as well as the affected application. This should be another welcome change in this department. Earlier at GDC 2026, when the technology was first debuted, Microsoft had shared more details regarding it. The company had explained how DDF is designed to gather data from every layer of the graphics stack into a single file, eliminating the need for developers to manually correlate logs from multiple tools. As mentioned above, the dump can contain a lot of useful details like GPU hardware state information such as register values, shader program counters, page fault virtual addresses, shader memory data, and command buffers. Alongside that, it also captures DirectX runtime and kernel information, including D3D objects, pipeline state objects, device error data, adapter details, and CPU call stacks. Microsoft says the feature has been built around two primary use cases: retail device removals and local device removals. The former allows developers to collect crash information from end users' systems in the field, while the latter helps QA teams and developers investigate issues on test machines. Developers will also be able to include up to 2 MB of custom application data through new D3D12 APIs, providing additional context for troubleshooting. In addition, Microsoft is introducing three dump collection modes ranging from zero-overhead capture, which has no runtime performance impact on supported hardware, to higher-detail modes that collect more vendor-specific debugging data. On compatible Tier 2 hardware, zero-overhead dumps will be enabled by default, meaning developers may begin receiving useful crash diagnostics without making any code changes. The table below explains the three tiers: Tier Description NO_OVERHEAD Enables crash capture with no runtime cost and is suitable for broad deployment MEDIUM_OVERHEAD Provides a balance, capturing additional diagnostic data with moderate impact HIGH_OVERHEAD Collects the most detailed GPU and driver state available, enabling deeper investigation at the cost of higher runtime overhead In terms of availability, the company expects broader release to be around the fall of 2026, which should be right around the time when Windows 11 version 26H2 lands. Right now, DirectX Dump Files are available as a preview and currently, only AMD has the compatible AgilitySDK Developer Preview driver version 26.10.07.02. You can find the official announcement post here on Microsoft's website.
    • And with SO much better perf than the laggy mess that is Files.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      BizSAR earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      598
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      190
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      79
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      76
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!