• 0

[JavaScript] onbeforeunload with exception


Question

I am working on a site that places orders and mgmt wants an alert when the user attempts to leave the site so that they don't lose their order. So of course the base answer is to use the "onbeforeunload" function. This is fine, except that there are "a href" tags that call JavaScript functions on the page (no way around this) So what I'm attempting to do is to find a way around. I have a variable (mbBeforeUnload) that is set when an item has been added to the order. But other than that I have not been able to find a way around this issue.

Code:

window.onbeforeunload = checkBeforeUnload;

function checkBeforeUnload(){

if (mbBeforeUnload){

return "The order will be lost if you navigate away from this page.";

}

}

Any thoughts?

10 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

you are defining checkBeforeUnload after calling it...

chk out this example:

<HTML>
<head>
<script>
function closeIt()
{
  return "Any string value here forces a dialog box to \n" + 
		 "appear before closing the window.";
}
window.onbeforeunload = closeIt;
</script>
</head>
<body>
  <a href="http://www.microsoft.com">Click to navigate to 
	  www.microsoft.com</a>;
&lt;/body&gt;
&lt;/html&gt;

  • 0

Thanks, but that's not it at all. The function works as it should, I would like to be able to avoid triggering the call in specific cases. The "onbeforeunload" function is called for any <a> link and I have a few links that are just JavaScript calls.

The code below is simply lines taken out of context to show everyone what is being done. The variable "mbBeforeUnload" is set to true when any item is added to the order. So when the user selects a link after an item has been added the variable is true and the call is made. I have tried to temporarily reset the variable in the called function such as:

function test():{

mbBeforeUnload=false;

//do some other code

mbBeforeUnload=true;

}

But this still causes onbeforeunload to fire.

Thanks kindly nihal for the input. Any other ideas? Anyone?

  • 0

Yes I am calling a function using the "onclick"

Code:

<a href="java script:void(0)" onclick="ShowReviewSubmit();">3. Review & Submit</a>

So by this time the user has added one or more items and they want to review before accepting the order. All that does is hide and show some divs.

Thanks again for the feedback. If you're ever in the VB world and need help, feel free to ask. I've used that for 16 years, but JavaScript is new to me.

  • 0

Try this:

&lt;html&gt;
&lt;head&gt;
&lt;script&gt;
var preventPrompt = false;

function closeIt() {
  if(needsPrompt) {
	return "You sure?";
  }
  preventPrompt = false;
}
window.onbeforeunload = closeIt;
&lt;/script&gt;
&lt;/head&gt;
&lt;body&gt;
  &lt;a href="http://www.google.com" onclick="preventPrompt=true;"&gt;A link that will be allowed regardless.&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/body&gt;
&lt;/html&gt;

We're using the onclick event to set a variable. This variable is checked in the closeIt() method to see whether we should allow the request to go through unhindered. Regardless of the outcome, we then set this variable to false again, so other browser actions will be intercepted.

  • 0

Rob,

Thanks but I'm using the onclick to run a javascript function. There is no real href.

&lt;a href="java script:void(0)" onclick="ShowReviewSubmit();"&gt;3. Review &amp; Submit&lt;/a&gt;

The first post mentions that I already use a variable "mbBeforeUnload" so that the unload only activates if the user has added items to the order. But unfortunatly the "window.onbeforeunload" function is activated on any a href, even if there is no url. (arg) I have tried resetting the variable in the called function such as:

function test():{
mbBeforeUnload=false;
//do some other code
mbBeforeUnload=true;
}

But that doesn't work. (double arg) So again, thanks kindly, but I need a diff answer.

Have a great long weekend (if you're here in the US, if not, well, ditch work/school, have some fun!)

  • 0

&lt;html&gt;
&lt;head&gt;
&lt;script&gt;
var preventPrompt = false;
var careAboutPrompting = true;

function closeIt() {
  if(!preventPrompt &amp;&amp; careAboutPrompting) {
	return "You sure?";
  }
  preventPrompt = false;
}

function specialEvent() {
  alert("Our special event has been called, without triggering the closeIt() method.");
  return false;
}

window.onbeforeunload = closeIt;
&lt;/script&gt;
&lt;/head&gt;
&lt;body&gt;

&lt;a href="#" onclick="preventPrompt=true;specialEvent();"&gt;Do something special.&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/body&gt;
&lt;/html&gt;

This really seems to do what you're asking unless I'm really mistaken. The careAboutPrompting variable in this example is basically akin to your mbBeforeUnload variable, set to true when you actually give a damn about the user possibly navigating away. The 'Do Something Special' link calls a JavaScript event, but the beforeunload event isn't acted upon.

Edited by Rob
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • "A Microsoft spokesperson said that it had been in contact with the court since February “throughout the process that resulted in the disconnection of its sanctioned official from Microsoft services.” The spokesperson added that “at no point did Microsoft cease or suspend its services to the ICC.” Microsoft declined to comment further in response to questions regarding the exact process that led to Khan's email disconnection, and exactly what it meant by “disconnection.” The ICC declined to comment. However, German business magazine WirtschaftsWoche reported Tuesday that Microsoft's lawyers have now reached the view that it merely provides a technical platform and that its customers decide whether to give their employees access to its services. Microsoft would no longer intervene in scenarios similar to the ICC case, WirtschaftsWoche wrote." Source: https://www.politico.eu/articl...ump-tech-icc-amazon-google/ So while they haven't targeted the ICC, they seem to have targeted a sanctioned individual and cut that individual off from their services. At least I cannot read the statement from their spokesperson in any other way. It can however be understood as they did this on behalf of the ICC, which would line up with Smith's statements that they never cut off services to the ICC. But I don't know if there is any confirmed sources back that up.
    • Oof, that's a pretty glaring issue. They seem to be consistently proving that they don't do the necessary QA before sending things out.
    • They have removed th way to download directly the iso of windows from rufus ? i have tried the version 4.9, the button selection isn't a select list to choose download
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      patrickft456 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      patrickft456 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Jdoe25 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Explorer
      Legend20 went up a rank
      Explorer
    • One Month Later
      jezzzy earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      617
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      281
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      174
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      153
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      125
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!