• 0

[JavaScript] onbeforeunload with exception


Question

I am working on a site that places orders and mgmt wants an alert when the user attempts to leave the site so that they don't lose their order. So of course the base answer is to use the "onbeforeunload" function. This is fine, except that there are "a href" tags that call JavaScript functions on the page (no way around this) So what I'm attempting to do is to find a way around. I have a variable (mbBeforeUnload) that is set when an item has been added to the order. But other than that I have not been able to find a way around this issue.

Code:

window.onbeforeunload = checkBeforeUnload;

function checkBeforeUnload(){

if (mbBeforeUnload){

return "The order will be lost if you navigate away from this page.";

}

}

Any thoughts?

10 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

you are defining checkBeforeUnload after calling it...

chk out this example:

<HTML>
<head>
<script>
function closeIt()
{
  return "Any string value here forces a dialog box to \n" + 
		 "appear before closing the window.";
}
window.onbeforeunload = closeIt;
</script>
</head>
<body>
  <a href="http://www.microsoft.com">Click to navigate to 
	  www.microsoft.com</a>;
&lt;/body&gt;
&lt;/html&gt;

  • 0

Thanks, but that's not it at all. The function works as it should, I would like to be able to avoid triggering the call in specific cases. The "onbeforeunload" function is called for any <a> link and I have a few links that are just JavaScript calls.

The code below is simply lines taken out of context to show everyone what is being done. The variable "mbBeforeUnload" is set to true when any item is added to the order. So when the user selects a link after an item has been added the variable is true and the call is made. I have tried to temporarily reset the variable in the called function such as:

function test():{

mbBeforeUnload=false;

//do some other code

mbBeforeUnload=true;

}

But this still causes onbeforeunload to fire.

Thanks kindly nihal for the input. Any other ideas? Anyone?

  • 0

Yes I am calling a function using the "onclick"

Code:

<a href="java script:void(0)" onclick="ShowReviewSubmit();">3. Review & Submit</a>

So by this time the user has added one or more items and they want to review before accepting the order. All that does is hide and show some divs.

Thanks again for the feedback. If you're ever in the VB world and need help, feel free to ask. I've used that for 16 years, but JavaScript is new to me.

  • 0

Try this:

&lt;html&gt;
&lt;head&gt;
&lt;script&gt;
var preventPrompt = false;

function closeIt() {
  if(needsPrompt) {
	return "You sure?";
  }
  preventPrompt = false;
}
window.onbeforeunload = closeIt;
&lt;/script&gt;
&lt;/head&gt;
&lt;body&gt;
  &lt;a href="http://www.google.com" onclick="preventPrompt=true;"&gt;A link that will be allowed regardless.&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/body&gt;
&lt;/html&gt;

We're using the onclick event to set a variable. This variable is checked in the closeIt() method to see whether we should allow the request to go through unhindered. Regardless of the outcome, we then set this variable to false again, so other browser actions will be intercepted.

  • 0

Rob,

Thanks but I'm using the onclick to run a javascript function. There is no real href.

&lt;a href="java script:void(0)" onclick="ShowReviewSubmit();"&gt;3. Review &amp; Submit&lt;/a&gt;

The first post mentions that I already use a variable "mbBeforeUnload" so that the unload only activates if the user has added items to the order. But unfortunatly the "window.onbeforeunload" function is activated on any a href, even if there is no url. (arg) I have tried resetting the variable in the called function such as:

function test():{
mbBeforeUnload=false;
//do some other code
mbBeforeUnload=true;
}

But that doesn't work. (double arg) So again, thanks kindly, but I need a diff answer.

Have a great long weekend (if you're here in the US, if not, well, ditch work/school, have some fun!)

  • 0

&lt;html&gt;
&lt;head&gt;
&lt;script&gt;
var preventPrompt = false;
var careAboutPrompting = true;

function closeIt() {
  if(!preventPrompt &amp;&amp; careAboutPrompting) {
	return "You sure?";
  }
  preventPrompt = false;
}

function specialEvent() {
  alert("Our special event has been called, without triggering the closeIt() method.");
  return false;
}

window.onbeforeunload = closeIt;
&lt;/script&gt;
&lt;/head&gt;
&lt;body&gt;

&lt;a href="#" onclick="preventPrompt=true;specialEvent();"&gt;Do something special.&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/body&gt;
&lt;/html&gt;

This really seems to do what you're asking unless I'm really mistaken. The careAboutPrompting variable in this example is basically akin to your mbBeforeUnload variable, set to true when you actually give a damn about the user possibly navigating away. The 'Do Something Special' link calls a JavaScript event, but the beforeunload event isn't acted upon.

Edited by Rob
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I agree with open rights group that the age check companies should be regulated but action does need to be taken imo, they may be called irresponsible parents but the fact is that many don't know how to set up blocks. Why should kids suffer because their parents don't know something? I think the UK has always been a bit like this. We don't say healthcare is your responsibility, we tax everyone and make people register with the NHS. We also don't expect everyone to brush their teeth to maintain dental health, we just put fluoride in their water assuming people aren't brushing enough, because some probably aren't or aren't doing it properly. In general, this way of doing things works.
    • Well that's the weird thing, the UK really isn't a very religious country at all and the same politicians that are backing this (basically all of them) also support things like assisted dying which various religions spoke out against. I don't think this is coming from religion, of course religious groups will support it but I don't think they've started it.
    • No.  The only thing you'll be able to capture with that is via antenna (your local NBC, CBS, etc) or if you had a regular cable box you could capture ClearQAM channels (if they are still a thing...probably not though).  Everything else will have encryption which those capture cards aren't meant for.   So yeah...you'll need Verizon's DVR (sucks if you have to pay for it).
    • I've gotta say Microsoft has lost the plot a long, long, long time ago.
    • How is it be technically implemented, I mean if you wanted to include this let's say on this website, at what point do you interrupt the user flow and say yo! Show me your ID or get the hell out? Please go into extreme technical detail. Is it using a third-party, how much information does neowin receive from that third-party, at what point would that information be abused? We all know it would be abused. So hypothetically what would neowin receive from that third-party company?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Falcon.ai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Falcon.ai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      EYEREX earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Electronic Person earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      CyberCeps666 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      628
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      235
    3. 3
      Xenon
      164
    4. 4
      neufuse
      142
    5. 5
      +FloatingFatMan
      123
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!