Barclays Premier League Season 2009/2010


Premier League 2009/2010  

437 members have voted

  1. 1. Who will win the Premier League in 2010?

    • Arsenal
      20
    • Aston Villa
      2
    • Birmingham City
      0
    • Blackburn Rovers
      0
    • Bolton Wanderers
      3
    • Burnley
      2
    • Chelsea
      52
    • Everton
      0
    • Fulham
      0
    • Hull City
      2
    • Liverpool
      18
    • Manchester City
      6
    • Manchester United
      46
    • Portsmouth
      2
    • Stoke City
      0
    • Sunderland
      0
    • Tottenham Hotspur
      6
    • West Ham United
      2
    • Wigan Athletic
      1
    • Wolverhampton Wanderers
      1
  2. 2. Who will be relegated in 2010? [Select 3]

    • Arsenal
      16
    • Aston Villa
      1
    • Birmingham City
      19
    • Blackburn Rovers
      4
    • Bolton Wanderers
      12
    • Burnley
      57
    • Chelsea
      15
    • Everton
      3
    • Fulham
      2
    • Hull City
      49
    • Liverpool
      9
    • Manchester City
      6
    • Manchester United
      13
    • Portsmouth
      56
    • Stoke City
      32
    • Sunderland
      17
    • Tottenham Hotspur
      3
    • West Ham United
      22
    • Wigan Athletic
      28
    • Wolverhampton Wanderers
      73
  3. 3. Who will be top scorer?

    • Andrei Arshavin
      4
    • Carlos Tevez
      4
    • Didier Drogba
      34
    • Dimitar Berbatov
      5
    • Emmanuel Adebayor
      6
    • Fernando Torres
      39
    • Frank Lampard
      1
    • Gabriel Agbonlahor
      2
    • Nicolas Anelka
      6
    • Robin van Persie
      3
    • Robinho
      3
    • Roque Santa Cruz
      0
    • Steven Gerrard
      4
    • Wayne Rooney
      32
    • Yakubu Aiyegbeni
      2
    • Other
      18


Recommended Posts

He won't replace Alonso, that's for sure. He is a very different player. If he does get a solid first team place, it could force Gerrard wide or in centre mid with Mascherano, with Aquilani himself playing behind Torres in my opinion.

As for the game, I don't think any United fan can take anything positive from that game. The key was no Fletcher-esque player. I'm surprised Fergie hasn't noticed, against top teams Carrick and Scholes can't play together. Anderson to replace one of them might have done a better job. And no wonder Lucas and Mascherano both gave in terrific performances. Going to be very tight this season mind, though I don't think anybody will be fighting Chelsea (even with the African Nations coming soon).

We have a life. One day or another, you will get one too. Hopefully.

We played poorly, no doubt, we missed someone who can speed up even more the game, Nani and Valencia (who was very good on sunday) aren't like that yet.

But I still think 2-0 is not a fair result. We were technicaly far better than Liverpool. We didn't have enough goal opportunity.

We simply lost a battle, a battle every fan wants to win, sure, but it's no big deal. We don't need a tree to hide the forest, if you know what I mean. :shifty:

Technically better my arse. The only Man Utd player who showed an ounce of technique better than pub football level on Sunday was Berbatov. Lucas and Mascherano simply stopped you from playing, and your players could not deal with the atmosphere at Anfield.

Also, I think Frank was referring to Mail's absence from the thread btw.

Fans with an S, so I guess he means every United fans who participate in this thread. And I still believe, although it's clearly a fact and not a belief, that we were better technicaly. And about not dealing with the atmosphere at Anfield, please... We managed to win games in way more hostile atmosphere than Anfield, like Besiktas one month ago for example.

Fans with an S, so I guess he means every United fans who participate in this thread. And I still believe, although it's clearly a fact and not a belief, that we were better technicaly. And about not dealing with the atmosphere at Anfield, please... We managed to win games in way more hostile atmosphere than Anfield, like Besiktas one month ago for example.

La la la la la...

In the words of Slur Alex:

"We didn't handle the atmosphere of the game, I thought."

http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,11667_5652139,00.html

Facts MY ARSE.

Technically better my arse. The only Man Utd player who showed an ounce of technique better than pub football level on Sunday was Berbatov. Lucas and Mascherano simply stopped you from playing, and your players could not deal with the atmosphere at Anfield.

Also, I think Frank was referring to Mail's absence from the thread btw.

I was mainly referring to Mail yes, but then he only comes into the thread to troll anyway. I guess nothuman just took my little joke a bit too personally xD

Childish and typical Liverpool supporter... That's why you can't talk with them.

:laugh: righto champ ;)

For being correct?

Typical Man Utd supporter: not from Manchester, never been to a game.

:rofl:

For being correct?

Typical Man Utd supporter: not from Manchester, never been to a game.

Thta's exactly why I will never take you seriously. For one, you support Liverpool, which is highly questionnable. Second, you seem to think that only you can be called a supporter. Do I need to point you that a f... lot of Liverpool supporters comes from other countries, and so never been to a game? So in your logic (then again, childish and stupid) those supporters in fact aren't? Please... grow a brain, and for once, get the f... out of your little head and go see further Liverpool (the city), you'll see, it's brighter outisde.

I never understood why Martyn always says that about other team and their fans. Hell, for example I support The All Blacks rugby team in New Zealand and I have never been to NZ or a professional Rugby match. However, I have close friends who played the sport for my university and we all started supporting them and watching them a few years back. Does that make me less of a fan? I really dont think so, I am probably more hardcore about it than a lot of "local" fans are.

gregb0b, it's because most fans who are 'local' to their team think they have a divine right to be the 'true' supporters of their football club. And they assume most of us who are not from the city,town etc... are just glory supporters who 'picked' the team who were doing well.

Thta's exactly why I will never take you seriously. For one, you support Liverpool, which is highly questionnable. Second, you seem to think that only you can be called a supporter. Do I need to point you that a f... lot of Liverpool supporters comes from other countries, and so never been to a game? So in your logic (then again, childish and stupid) those supporters in fact aren't? Please... grow a brain, and for once, get the f... out of your little head and go see further Liverpool (the city), you'll see, it's brighter outisde.

A guy supporting the team of his home town... yeah, so questionable :laugh:

The most questionable thing is you supporting man united, one could even speculate that you are in the generation that believes that football was invented by sky sports in 1993 and have hopped on the Man United glory train like most of their other supporters.

Until you have actually been to a town like Liverpool, Manchester, London, ETC you are not in the right place to comment about local passion, you are clearly clueless about it. Come over here, visit one of those places, then actually try getting a clue.

It is always good to see Liverfail lose :)

Until your team of bottlers can win a European cup I will be laughing just as hard in your direction :)

A guy supporting the team of his home town... yeah, so questionable :laugh:

The most questionable thing is you supporting man united, one could even speculate that you are in the generation that believes that football was invented by sky sports in 1993 and have hopped on the Man United glory train like most of their other supporters.

Until you have actually been to a town like Liverpool, Manchester, London, ETC you are not in the right place to comment about local passion, you are clearly clueless about it. Come over here, visit one of those places, then actually try getting a clue.

:huh:

I pretend not to see the lamest trial of intent* I've ever read and just said to you the same thing I've said to Martyn: grow a brain. Please.

With your logic you can say "why the f... do you support Liverpool and not Everton? You too are a glory hunter and not a real supporter. See? Pretty lame right? And that's exactly how you two sound, even one of you one day said so. Pathetic.

*I don't know if it's the right word, sorry if it's not, but you know, I'm french, and I'ver never been to England so my english is not so very good...

I support Liverpool because I grew up in a family of Liverpool supporters, and that has stuck with me. The time I started to personally support them was one of the worst in the club's history so i'd hardly call me a "glory hunter" :laugh:

And the difference is supporting Liverpool or Everton would be reasonable for a person from Liverpool. You aren't even from Manchester at all, in fact as you don't even live in this country, that makes your support of Man United far more questionable than Martyn's support of Liverpool.

Pretty disappointing result, but not overly surprising given a lot of our first teamers where not involved. Sounds like Aquilani had an impact though, which is promising

Same thing could be said about Arsenal not havingi its first team. >:D Then again, you guys had Babel, Voronin and others in the second half...

Edited by maskedforever
Thta's exactly why I will never take you seriously. For one, you support Liverpool, which is highly questionnable. Second, you seem to think that only you can be called a supporter. Do I need to point you that a f... lot of Liverpool supporters comes from other countries, and so never been to a game? So in your logic (then again, childish and stupid) those supporters in fact aren't? Please... grow a brain, and for once, get the f... out of your little head and go see further Liverpool (the city), you'll see, it's brighter outisde.

How is it questionable that I support Liverpool? I am from Liverpool, my family supports Liverpool and I actually go to games and stand on The Kop. Unless of course, it was a 'humourous' comment from you that I support Liverpool, in which case that makes you a hypocrite for in turn calling me childish.

FYI, I have seen more of the real world than 'Liverpool', I'm studying a degree in another city you bad mong. Supporting a team is either done through location or family, it's people like you who stop 9 year old Scousers or Mancunians actually getting a ticket these days.

blablabla lame blabla I lulz

FYI, I have seen more of the real world than 'Liverpool', I'm studying a degree in another city you bad mong. Supporting a team is either done through location or family, it's people like you who stop 9 year old Scousers or Mancunians actually getting a ticket these days.

How could I stop a 9 year old Scousers or Mancunians actually getting a ticket these days by living so far away from Old Trafford? :huh: :x

Do you even listen to yourself? God I am bored... It's the last time I said to you, please GROW A F...... BRAIN! Don't try to make me feel guilty for doing nothing more than supporting the team I love. And don't add racism and hatefulness to your stupidity. Seriously, "Supporting a team is either done through location or family"? :blink: You crossed a line, it ain't funny anymore.

Do you even listen to yourself? God I am bored... It's the last time I said to you, please GROW A F...... BRAIN! Don't try to make me feel guilty for doing nothing more than supporting the team I love. And don't add racism and hatefulness to your stupidity. Seriously, "Supporting a team is either done through location or family"? :blink: You crossed a line, it ain't funny anymore.

You chat total crap lad. Go away you queg.

How could I stop a 9 year old Scousers or Mancunians actually getting a ticket these days by living so far away from Old Trafford? :huh: :x

Do you even listen to yourself? God I am bored... It's the last time I said to you, please GROW A F...... BRAIN! Don't try to make me feel guilty for doing nothing more than supporting the team I love. And don't add racism and hatefulness to your stupidity. Seriously, "Supporting a team is either done through location or family"? :blink: You crossed a line, it ain't funny anymore.

Racism... laughable :rofl:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Guess it's one of those things best used by devs to thoroughly test stuff.
    • is it all upside down there? traffic lights reverted too?
    • Bluesky COO warns social media regulations could destroy competition from small startups by Paul Hill Fears that increasing government control of social media risks regulatory capture by the biggest social media firms were raised again recently. Bluesky’s chief operating officer said in an interview that social media bans for children and tighter regulations for social media firms risk creating a world where there are only a few social media platforms run by companies with the deepest pockets. Regulations on social media firms have been very lax since they appeared for mainstream users in the 2000’s. This gave Meta, Snapchat, and Google time to build up their user bases and get entrenched, with Meta being the most successful. Now that Meta has succeeded, it has been attempting regulatory capture. By pushing for more regulations of social media, Meta hopes to make it more difficult for rivals to challenge it. For its part, it doesn’t need to worry about the cost of regulation because it has a lot of money to spend, whereas startups do not. Speaking to CNBC, Rose Wang, Bluesky’s chief operating officer, said: “I support the protection and the safety of youth, the question that we have then is at what cost, because essentially what I’m scared of is in the long term, we’re headed to a world where there’s about three to five platforms, and extreme heavy regulation of those platforms, and basically the whole compliance teams of these platforms are 10 times the size of our entire team. So, basically, we’re living in a world where it’s almost impossible for smaller entrants to come in and build healthier spaces. These platforms have led to a place where the bottom line is the thing that drives what they do... so I understand why governments have to step in and regulate, because the platforms have done nothing right.” She said that while she is not against regulation, there needs to be more channels between the small to mid-sized players and regulators to help protect them. She says that big tech players, on the other hand, “who we know are circumventing regulation,” need to be regulated. Essentially, the Bluesky position is one of nuance, rather than absolutes. While Bluesky’s proposal may preserve competition in the social media space, it still doesn’t address the massive privacy implications these age verification measures introduce, such as handing over sensitive identity documents to access age-gated content. Source: CNBC
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      249
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      70
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!