(More) Ads Coming To Xbox 360 Dashboard?


Recommended Posts

There's no ads in the guide either, which is the equivalent. The dashboard is practically all live stuff, and you never have to actually use the dashboard.

you can can start up right into a game, you can use the guide for anything, even grabbing addons for the game you're playing. and to shut of the console or play background music. You never actually HAVE to use the dashboard on the 360. Wich is the way it should be. After all why should you need to use an operating system on a gaming machine.

in Any case, if you don't want to see ads, that's easy enough. just use the guide. Not the dashboard which is just a XBLM portal anyway.

Well said, I rarely play xbox so I don't know all the details, I assumed the Dashboard was the term they used for their in navigation like XMB for the PS3. I do remember seeing ads when browsing around on it for headsets and stuff. While its not awful by any stretch I just think if I pay for something I shouldn't have to see any ads. Frankly I'm surprised the PS3 doesn't have any considering it doesn't cost anything to use their network. Even the PS Store only advertises popular content in the store.

Yes I know what Bhav was doing AB, been reading his comments for many years now and his tune never changes. He was the Playstation daddy long before you were on the scene :p
Speaking of someone's tune that never changes... ;)

Don't try to sound innocent in the "daddy of..." department :p

Yes I know what Bhav was doing AB, been reading his comments for many years now and his tune never changes. He was the Playstation daddy long before you were on the scene :p

Like I've been saying, what and see what "partners" they are, but you can bet it won't be McDonalds and the like. Microsoft must have one of the longest lists for partners out there, but they aren't stupid and they won't flood gamers with ads that aren't relevant. Hell, they've already told us they're not going to flood us full stop. My opinion is we'll not see any new areas of the NXE used for ads, but instead it'll just be the same location with different companies. We'll need to wait and see.

I'm still going to pay for XBL because it offers a superior over the rest, and until that changes (if that changes) then I'll continue paying for it.

The money we pay for XBL goes towards more than bandwidth costs, that's always been the case, not sure who you are referring to in your last argument. The money goes towards the special deals like Facebook, Twitter, Last.fm, Sky etc etc. All the exclusive DLC they secure like GTA4 and FO3. It's not like Apple where shareholders is just sitting around in a vault while Steve Jobs jumps off a diving board swimming in it.

People would be daft to stop paying for it over this if they enjoy Live (unless the ads were seriously unreasonable and you wanted to make a "stance"). However I don't think it's unfair to prod MS about the ads, remind them you are paying a subscription and if anything advertisement should be focussed more on Silver, not paying Gold members.

No one is attacking the 360 or Live or saying another service is better, we're discussing advertisement, something everyone here knows fine well is very topical (Neowin has a topic over 100 pages on adblock and Neowin doesn't cost anything :laugh:). Neowin needs the ads for survival, people are asking MS what they need them from when Gold users are paying already.

If they release the dash update this fall with the ability for Gold users only to boot on My Xbox instead of the spotlight, you'd see a lot less whining. As long as whatever these Silverlight ads are integrate themselves in a similar way to the spotlight (even just replacing it with fancier ads), as opposed to being ads you can see anywhere else on the dashboard.

The only other thing I wouldn't mind come of this is free games/applications that are ad supported, like LastFM, but you'll just get grumbles from me because MS limit Silver users when they come around :laugh:

The money we pay for XBL goes towards more than bandwidth costs, that's always been the case, not sure who you are referring to in your last argument. The money goes towards the special deals like Facebook, Twitter, Last.fm, Sky etc etc. All the exclusive DLC they secure like GTA4 and FO3.

That's a fair point, apart from the exclusive DLC malarkey (I'll never agree 50 million for GTA4 DLC was a "good deal" for MS).

I still ask the question of advertisement though, as while our subscriptions are used for more than just bandwidth, they still are used for bandwidth as well.

Edited by Audioboxer
No but really, do you even own a 360 yet?

Nope. There are quite a few games I'd like to try if I'm honest. However, I can barely afford to buy all the games I want on PS3...and this sort of news doesn't convince me to save my money for it.

From a neutral-as-possible perspective...the idea that I have to pay to play online and have to view ads doesn't rub well with me.

And yes, of course if the ads aren't intrusive then there's no problem etc etc, but surely you agree that you'd prefer not to have ads especially if you're already paying for Xbox Live...

People would be daft to stop paying for it over this if they enjoy Live (unless the ads were seriously unreasonable and you wanted to make a "stance"). However I don't think it's unfair to prod MS about the ads, remind them you are paying a subscription and if anything advertisement should be focussed more on Silver, not paying Gold members.

No one is attacking the 360 or Live or saying another service is better, we're discussing advertisement, something everyone here knows fine well is very topical (Neowin has a topic over 100 pages on adblock and Neowin doesn't cost anything :laugh:). Neowin needs the ads for survival, people are asking MS what they need them from when Gold users are paying already.

That's a fair point, apart from the exclusive DLC malarkey (I'll never agree 50 million for GTA4 DLC was a "good deal" for MS).

Sometimes reading PS owners comments it's like they are a vampire reacting to sunlight when it comes to ads. I wouldn't be surprised if they jumped ship and went back to the PSN.

Put it this way though, you pay for a tv license and have to put up with adverts on the BBC channels still. You still have to watch ads when you go to a cinema. You still need to sit through trailers on your dvds before the film starts. They are there to support the subscription/price of the product, otherwise they would charge a lot more than we do currently.

Not going to get involved if you think the DLC is a bad deal or not. I know your stance on it. I was just clarifying the money goes towards more than bandwidth and it's not a secret where it goes either.

Nope. There are quite a few games I'd like to try if I'm honest. However, I can barely afford to buy all the games I want on PS3...and this sort of news doesn't convince me to save my money for it.

From a neutral-as-possible perspective...the idea that I have to pay to play online and have to view ads doesn't rub well with me.

And yes, of course if the ads aren't intrusive then there's no problem etc etc, but surely you agree that you'd prefer not to have ads especially if you're already paying for Xbox Live...

And I understand your concerns and standpoint but your comment earlier doesn't help the GH any.

And honestly I would like to see the ads removed from Gold members, but they barely bother me and I actually sit down to watch the content quite a lot these days. Right now it's usually trailers or Xbox staff related segments, if that were to change to ads for soft drinks and fast food places I would definitely kick up a fuss.

Edit: also, not sure if it was this thread or the other, I'm too sleepy today to keep up, but someone mentioned the price of XBL. Microsoft dropped the price months ago due to the economy. I think it's ?30 or so now instead of ?40. Too lazy to chec:p:p

Sometimes reading PS owners comments it's like they are a vampire reacting to sunlight when it comes to ads. I wouldn't be surprised if they jumped ship and went back to the PSN.

Put it this way though, you pay for a tv license and have to put up with adverts on the BBC channels still. You still have to watch ads when you go to a cinema. You still need to sit through trailers on your dvds before the film starts. They are there to support the subscription/price of the product, otherwise they would charge a lot more than we do currently.

Not going to get involved if you think the DLC is a bad deal or not. I know your stance on it. I was just clarifying the money goes towards more than bandwidth and it's not a secret where it goes either.

You can't compare Xbox Live to TV though....

On a TV you're paying towards all the TV shows/films that get made and shown to you for free through adverts (and your TV license). On BBC as well there is no adverts or commercial breaks during a show due to you paying a TV license.

It's almost like saying it's okay if you turned on your TV without an aerial in and you seen advertisements on your TVs menu/settings pages. Or if all TVs had an advertisement channel built in with one of those annoying sales people that shout really loud that gets defaulted to every time you turn your TV on.

You don't get fed content live on your Dashboard, you need to go view content. Adverts should be on the marketplace and within applications that provide you with content, free (like demos or lastfm/twitter) or paid like XBLA games.

Sky on the other hand are money grabbers, don't get me started on them. Subscription prices are ridiculous.

Our lives are surrounded by ads as it is, the next step is ads starting to be put in our own personal spaces...

I disagree with the BBC argument. It's no secret I hate them and their programs, but bias aside you have to sit through adverts for their tv shows. An advert is an advert, it doesn't have to be for a retail product. Just like XBL you get ads (as it is today) for games and movies, which is the content available to buy. It's not a 1:1 comparison obviously, for starters you don't even have to watch the ads on XBL, the most you get is a thumbnail on the slides which you have to press a button to view them. That's far better than say watching Top Gear and having no control over watching an advert for EastEnders when it finishes.

Still, like I was saying, the subscription price is a lot lower than what it would be if there was no ads.

I disagree with the BBC argument. It's no secret I hate them and their programs, but bias aside you have to sit through adverts for their tv shows. An advert is an advert, it doesn't have to be for a retail product. Just like XBL you get ads (as it is today) for games and movies, which is the content available to buy. It's not a 1:1 comparison obviously, for starters you don't even have to watch the ads on XBL, the most you get is a thumbnail on the slides which you have to press a button to view them. That's far better than say watching Top Gear and having no control over watching an advert for EastEnders when it finishes.

Still, like I was saying, the subscription price is a lot lower than what it would be if there was no ads.

Adverts are the main way TV makes money though for all the shows they create.

MS make money through accessories (hard drive/wifi adaptor anyone?/controllers/memory cards), console sales themselves (once under manufacturing cost), and software (XBLA and retail games) to name the big ones.

You can get a TV broadcast in as many of your rooms have a TV at no extra cost other than the hardware (TV itself) and everyone can watch different channels/same channels. If you have two Xbox 360's in your house, you need two gold accounts if they've to be used simultaneously. Understandably you need two accounts, but I'm just pointing out trying to compare XBL to a TV is a not a great argument.

The shows that you watch on your TV are a 3rd party delivering content to you, MS aren't a 3rd party to their own Xbox. You can buy a TV and never once watch TV broadcasts, but still watch dvds/blu rays/play games consoles all without adverts.

Adverts are the main way TV makes money though for all the shows they create.

MS make money through accessories (hard drive/wifi adaptor anyone?/controllers/memory cards), console sales themselves (once under manufacturing cost), and software (XBLA and retail games) to name the big ones.

You can get a TV broadcast in as many of your rooms have a TV at no extra cost other than the hardware (TV itself) and everyone can watch different channels/same channels. If you have two Xbox 360's in your house, you need two gold accounts if they've to be used simultaneously. Understandably you need two accounts, but I'm just pointing out trying to compare XBL to a TV is a not a great argument.

Ok nevermind you editted your last sentence before I could reply :p But yes I was going to say that's a constraint on any system which requires logging in and not only a "flaw" of XBL. A tv doesn't require you to log on or calls home to the BBC. Even something like Spotify will only allow you to play music on one computer at a time. It's to stop abuse more than anything.

And yeah I agree and said it's not 1:1 comparison, but like I also mentioned, can you really agree with watching trailers/ads when you pay for a dvd or go to the cinema either.

Even after reading Major Nelson's post, I still think they better not put more ads on my dash. The current ads are good enough. I am left wondering if the "more ads" will show up in add-ons such as last.fm, twitter etc. If that's the case, I am fine with it.

this will make the prem themes pretty much useless, same as how the ads make the origional 360 themes useless as it blocked the theme itself.

if ads come again, i might just start buying more PS3 games, as there are no ads that i know of

Edited by Hell-In-A-Handbasket
Well said, I rarely play xbox so I don't know all the details, I assumed the Dashboard was the term they used for their in navigation like XMB for the PS3. I do remember seeing ads when browsing around on it for headsets and stuff. While its not awful by any stretch I just think if I pay for something I shouldn't have to see any ads. Frankly I'm surprised the PS3 doesn't have any considering it doesn't cost anything to use their network. Even the PS Store only advertises popular content in the store.

There's "ads" in the Dashboard, wich is what you are talking about. But the dashboard is and allways will be a portal to XBLM. and you never actually have to use the Dashboard.

on the 360 the guide (equivalent of the in game XMB) can do everything the Dashboard can do, and you don't ever have to leave a game to do things, and there's no ads.

Still confirms the ads are coming even if they replace the spotlight. They better be tucked away on a tab like the spotlight, or on the spotlight itself... Saying they want to make them more organic suggests it's not a simple replacement of the spotlight ads for ones that move or are animated like what silverlight could do.

Doesn't say it's gaming ads only, says it's ads relevant to the LIVE community. Could be for anything related to Xbox, adverts for movies/music/peripherals. Hence "work directly with our partners".

And for stifler saying no one would backlash, look at the comments on Major Nelsons blog...

*sigh* Those signed up on MN's blog are just like us AB, not at all representative of the market. Also, "ads relevant to the Live community" sound exactly like the ads we have now, so there's no change. You're making something out of nothing and I really don't know why.

-Spenser

*sigh* Those signed up on MN's blog are just like us AB, not at all representative of the market. Also, "ads relevant to the Live community" sound exactly like the ads we have now, so there's no change. You're making something out of nothing and I really don't know why.

-Spenser

How can we know what the "market" thinks without

a) making them aware of these changes (which they may not be unless they know about these gaming sites/MN blog)

and

b) asking them about their opinions on ads on their 360

?

You're acting like you know what the market thinks, when no one can without some sort of survery/research/feedback poll.

There's general camps that get sided when it comes to advertisement, and you're seeing that with these online discussions about it. This is the best idea you'll get about what 360 owners and bystanders think with the feedback tools in place. Which is why MN replied on his blog thanking people for the feedback, he didn't just say "but you guys aren't the market, we don't care".

People aren't going to cancel their Live accounts over this, but it doesn't mean you have to sit sidelined and not give your opinions on the receiving of ads whilst paying for a subscription just because you like the service/Live itself.

^^^See, I'm fairly certain that most people in the market won't notice the changes and that's why there won't be a backlash. Most of the market isn't like us - they don't keep close watch on what's going on. MN said the only thing that's changing is that they're bringing Silverlight to the 360 for these ads. There aren't going to be noticeable changes.

I make assumptions about the market based on past changes and their effect on the market. In the past, there really hasn't been backlashes for anything Microsoft has done regarding the 360, even if there was on these forums or on MN's blog. That's because the general market doesn't give a damn about any of this stuff (and probably the fact that Microsoft has a pretty good track record of getting things right when it comes to the 360). You also can't pretend like you don't act like you know what the market does because you do it just as much as I do, and you seem to think that they're going to react like we do to everything when that's just not true.

-Spenser

^^^See, I'm fairly certain that most people in the market won't notice the changes and that's why there won't be a backlash. Most of the market isn't like us - they don't keep close watch on what's going on. MN said the only thing that's changing is that they're bringing Silverlight to the 360 for these ads. There aren't going to be noticeable changes.

I make assumptions about the market based on past changes and their effect on the market. In the past, there really hasn't been backlashes for anything Microsoft has done regarding the 360, even if there was on these forums or on MN's blog. That's because the general market doesn't give a damn about any of this stuff. You also can't pretend like you don't act like you know what the market does because you do it just as much as I do, and you seem to think that they're going to react like we do to everything when that's just not true.

-Spenser

I'm talking about the people we get feedback from online. When I said there would be a backlash, I meant around the internet, not in New York City center with boards and riots and soccer moms with SUVs.

Everyone is part of the market, did you notice how quickly MS got a clarification out from MN about this after news sites starting running articles about more ads and showing off unfavourable mockup pictures? The media is online based, the media are the ones who run articles on and cover our favourite consoles. They shape what people think and can do damage to companies reputations.

If there's one thing I love it's when people manipulate those that aren't on message boards to favour their argument because these people aren't expressing their thoughts in the same way we are, online.

I'm pretty sure some of us could go up to our less internet saavy friends and say MS are planning on bringing silverlight to the 360 for use with advertisements and they'd ask similar questions

a) probably first of all, wtf is silverlight

b) what do you mean by ads

c) what kind of ads

d) where will these ads be

?

It's just curiosity in regards to the announcement. Especially when the news articles are running quotes saying "regular ads".

*sigh* Those signed up on MN's blog are just like us AB, not at all representative of the market. Also, "ads relevant to the Live community" sound exactly like the ads we have now, so there's no change. You're making something out of nothing and I really don't know why.

-Spenser

So you're new around here and have never met AB before... right ? :p

Whatever dude. You're still making something out of nothing. The changes aren't going to be very noticeable, if at all. The new ads aren't going to be any more invasive than the old ones and are going to be just as relevant, so I don't know what you're complaining about.

-Spenser

Well I hate the more ads too, whatever it means, but TBH Major Nelsons responses sounded like some canned marketing response, nothing genuine about it at all, so that scares me a bit more honestly, as I think he may have been fed that response.

Whatever dude. You're still making something out of nothing. The changes aren't going to be very noticeable, if at all. The new ads aren't going to be any more invasive than the old ones and are going to be just as relevant, so I don't know what you're complaining about.

-Spenser

I don't think anyone can be this confident till we see them, but I certainly hope so.

Silverlight will help make those ads a more organic part of the dashboard, like we’ve done with some of the NXE slots in the past.

You look at both parts of that response.

Silverlight will help make those ads a more organic part of the dashboard

Sounds like Silverlight will change the way the current ads work, more organic part of the dashboard (clearly says dashboard) hints at that. But what do they mean by more organic?

like we’ve done with some of the NXE slots in the past

NXE slots in the "past". It definitely sounds like they're going forward with a different approach, so we'll need to be the judge on how organic the new ads are compared to the old. If this means a change you cannot blame people for discussing it.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why you need to take back control of your synced passwords and how to go about doing that by Paul Hill Credit: Pixabay Last month, when Google decided to introduce daily and weekly caps for Gemini, it reignited an anxiety of mine, that you can’t really depend on service providers to maintain features forever, and it got me looking into free software (as in freedom) in other areas too. One app I quickly came across was KeePassXC on desktop and KeePassDX on Android as an alternative to password manager lock-in within the Chrome or Firefox ecosystems. I personally like to switch around with browsers, and using either password manager is inconvenient, so something like KeePassXC was interesting to me. The main issue with it now is syncing; I was not sure how to do that. After a bit of research, I came across Syncthing, a tool I was vaguely familiar with but had never used because it seemed complicated. However, I was completely wrong, and honestly, I think everyone should use it if they use multiple devices. It essentially lets you share folders peer to peer across all of your devices, no cloud services that you don’t control necessary! And it was fairly simple to set up, if not a bit clunky. Since setting it up, I’ve also started using Syncthing to back up other apps too, so don’t think it’s limited to just saving password databases. You can use it for pretty much anything you use Dropbox or Google Drive for. Before continuing to talk about those apps a bit more, let’s walk back a bit and talk about browser sync. Ever since the late 2000s and early 2010s, really, since we have been using smartphones, browser sync has been a necessity of life. I don’t know about you, but I have hundreds of passwords saved. For the most part, they’re all unique, so I don’t remember them and rely on software to manage them for me. Until recently, I’ve relied on password managers in Chrome and Firefox, but what I always found annoying was that it can be hard to transfer them between browsers. Sure, on Windows it is simple enough, but on Linux, exporting bookmarks has been temperamental. It works OK nowadays, but not too long ago, Chrome required you to enable exporting passwords in chrome://flags. The situation is even worse on mobile; there is no exporting or importing of passwords of any kind. You literally have to do it on a desktop, which is incredibly annoying in our mobile-first world. Sync also lets us take out bookmarks, history, tabs, and autofill data easily. To enable sync, it’s just a matter of signing into the browser once, and it handles the rest. It’s nice and easy. Obviously, all this has some issues, including those I’ve outlined above about it being hard to transfer data between browsers, but also things such as account suspension, lost account passwords, and other lock-in mechanisms, such as passkeys, being tied to a specific browser. On a sidenote, I have just removed all of my passkeys because they can make it harder to move browsers. I think the biggest threat to your synced passwords, especially if doing this with Google, is having your account suspended. I don’t ever expect mine to be suspended, but you do hear horror stories on Reddit where people lose access to their Google accounts. Imagine if you have hundreds of passwords, then suddenly lose access to them because Google froze your account, what would you do? So yes, it can be nice to use these syncing services for their convenience, but they also have risks. You may have seen me going on about free software quite a bit in my editorials. It’s essentially a concept championed by the Free Software Foundation. It’s software under particular licenses that grant you four freedoms: run the program for any purpose (0), study and change the source code (1), redistribute copies to others (2), and the freedom to distribute modified copies to others (3). For example, if there is an app I use and one day it gets abandoned by the developer, I can keep running it or even clone the software and continue developing it. Look at the myriad of cool services Google has run over the years before killing them. You can’t take the source code for those because they are proprietary, for the most part. Both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so I get the freedoms listed above. In my use case where I’m syncing a database full of my passwords, I also get proper ownership over my data, there is no losing access to the database due to a frozen account, I can access the code of the tools I’m using, and I can get support from real people online if I run into issues, rather than having to consult a vague help page from an opaque company. With the KeePassXC password manager, you create a .kdbx file, which is what will be synced between devices. KeePassXC has cross-platform apps and also has browser extensions so that the browser can fetch passwords from the database once it is unlocked. Meanwhile, Syncthing is a peer-to-peer file sync tool where you can select folders to sync between your devices. Just pop files in the folders you choose, and then they will be available across your other devices whenever they come online. Syncthing is resilient as it works over both LAN and the internet and only ever sends content between your devices, never to a third-party server somewhere else. By combining these two pieces of software, you can essentially replicate the browser sync functionality. I have had a weird, conflicting issue where a new file is appearing, but it doesn’t seem to be impacting my main password database, which is updating between devices just fine. If you want to get a setup similar to what I have, you will need to go here to download KeePassXC for your computer. Once you have that, you will need to download your passwords from your web browser to a CSV file. In Chrome, you can type chrome://password-manager/settings into the URL bar, and you should see an option to download your passwords under Export Passwords. This will give you the CSV file you need for importing into KeePassXC. If you use a different browser, just use a search engine and type “browser-name export passwords” and muddle along. In KeePassXC, you’ll want to press Import File from the home screen, select the CSV file, and create a new database from it. On one of the screens of the wizard, there will be a Title field with a drop-down selected to none. Change this to Title and continue. You’ll select a name for the database, the encryption level (the defaults are fine), and then you will pick a password. I would choose four unrelated words that are easy for you to remember, as you’ll be typing them fairly often to access your passwords. When you have all your passwords in your new database, you will want to set up the browser extension so that your browser can fetch passwords from KeePassXC. Rather than explain how to do that here, refer to KeePassXC’s guide on how to set it up properly. Once you’ve got that set up, you want to install KeePassDX on Android. You can grab it on the F-Droid store and the Google Play Store. For iPhone users, there are other .kdbx-supporting apps, but I haven’t tried any of them, so have a look around and use what suits you. Once you have that done, you will want to install Syncthing on your computer and find a third-party app for your mobile device. On Android, I use an app called BasicSync; there are also options for iOS, but again, I’ve not tried these. Once you’ve got SyncThing, you’ll want to set it up and connect all of your devices together and share a folder between your gadgets. PCWorld has a good tutorial on setting up a synchronized file between your devices using SyncThing. Once you’ve set it up, congrats, you’ll never have to touch that stuff again except for adding or removing devices. I’ll be honest, I didn’t particularly like setting up Syncthing. It didn’t take me a massive amount of time, but I think I had to check online because I found it a bit confusing. That said, I’ve had it running for several weeks now and never need to touch the Syncthing settings, so that’s very nice. I also mentioned a conflicting file. I’m not sure why this is appearing, but the main .kdbx file seems to be updating and syncing just fine. What’s nice is that both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so they won’t just vanish one day; you can take the code and fork the project or use a range of alternative implementations that others have made. It’s also nice that it works over LAN, so even if your ISP is having problems, your passwords will still sync. One area where you will want to be a bit more careful with this setup is if you only have one device. I am OK because I have a computer and two phones, all synced up. If you just have one device, you will probably want to store a backup of your .kdbx file somewhere else. Obviously, you’ll also want to remember your password really well, too. If you get locked out, it's game over. Overall, if you want to take back control of your computing from big tech, taking control of your passwords is an important part of this. You don’t need to immediately clear out your browser’s password manager; try running KeePassXC and the password manager concurrently for a while to see if you run into any problems. If you do try this out, let us know some other creative ways to use Syncthing. I haven’t really come up with a solution about what to do with my bookmarks, for example.
    • If the price was a dollar, someone would complain "Why isn't it free?" If it was free, someone would complain they weren't being paid to play it.
    • That lens of history will burn if you hold it at the right angle... Warn users too late: Shame, Microsoft! That extremely minor update to an obscure Control Panel widget required 2 years of warning. Warn users too early: Shame, Microsoft! We've got better things to do. Pipeline and process be damned, we'll just always be disappointed, eh?
    • Microsoft Paint used to be my favorite Windows app as a kid, and it's still pretty good by Usama Jawad I have been using Windows since the early 2000s, when I was around 10 years old or so. I vaguely remember playing around with Windows 98 and Windows 2000, but that may have been on school PCs which had old operating systems installed. My main OS on the home PC, and the one I recall spending most time with, was Windows XP. At that time, I used the home PC to create Word and PowerPoint documents for school, but a lot of the time, I simply used it to play games. My dad would bring game discs which we would try and install on the PC, sometimes unsuccessfully, and sometimes, we would rely on flash games in the browser, like Bubble Trouble on Miniclip. However, the problem with the latter approach was the internet speed. On a good day, our dial-up internet would offer us speeds of 56 kbps, but on most days, it was closer to 33 kbps. This did not facilitate online gaming as I would often have to wait minutes for a game to load or "draw" on the screen, and trying to download pirated games wasn't simple either. I remember getting tired of waiting for online games to load and just downloading simulator games from the Big Fish Games website instead, only to be disappointed after finding out that I was just being given access to trial versions of the title, and I needed to fork out money to pay for the full version. All of this is to say that it wasn't very easy to find entertainment options on the home PC when I was a kid, due to a number of reasons, mostly outside of my control. This situation pushed me towards a rather unconventional ally: Microsoft Paint. Whenever the internet wasn't working as good as I expected, I would simply spin up Paint and draw complete rubbish on the canvas. Of course, that wasn't always the intention, but it usually happened when I messed up drawing a straight line or something, and then I would give up on that particular piece and simply draw a random collection of objects. Microsoft Paint was extremely accessible and easy to use. Even if you weren't an artist, you could quickly understand the tools at your disposal and how to leverage them on a canvas. The absolute breadth on offer ensured that each painting was truly unique, as you could utilize various combinations of tools like the pencil, paint, spray paint, and more to truly personalize your creation. Since I wasn't particularly good at drawing both on digital screen or a physical screen, I remember that my main style of art would be to insert a bunch of randomly intersecting lines and then fill them with random colors through the paint can. I have trying to replicate that art style in the latest version of Paint below, and as you can see, it's truly Pablo Picasso-esque. The human imagination truly knows no bounds Microsoft Paint kept me occupied for hours and was my best friend when video games on the home PC were inaccessible for one reason or the other. There was no academic or professional reason for which I would need to use Paint, but I still loved using it in my personal time, even if what I created wasn't worth being shown to anyone. It was simply fun. Fast-forward to today, and the situation is mostly the same. Now that I am almost 29 years old, and I still have no reason to use Microsoft Paint in a professional capacity. In fact, I don't even use it in a personal capacity, except to dabble with it from time to time, just to see if core functionalities are still intact. And I'm happy to say that I think Microsoft Paint still offers the same accessibility and inviting experience that it did to me a couple of decades ago, even though its UX has been refreshed and it's been integrated with Copilot features. Interestingly, things could have been a lot different, had Microsoft had its way. Microsoft Paint was marked for deprecation with the Windows 10 Fall Creators Update in 2017, and even began displaying a product retirement alert, urging customers to shift to Paint 3D instead. Fortunately, after consumer backlash, Microsoft reversed course on this decision, and Paint continues to be a native app inside Windows installations that can also be updated quite frequently through the Microsoft Store. Instead, Paint 3D ended up on the chopping block, which is for the better, I think. I have intermittently played around with Microsoft's refreshed Paint experience in the past few years, and I do think it has received worthwhile upgrades. the UI and the UX has been modernized while retaining core functionality, and the app is still fairly easy to use. It doesn't meet any of my use-cases, but I've never really had any use-cases ever, as described previously. Of course, the elephant in the room is the Copilot integration. Personally, I believe that this is one place where Copilot does make sense, environmental concerns aside. I know that a lot of creatives use AI to generate images, and while some may be using professional alternatives, Paint still offers a decent casual experience, with the power of Copilot. Of course, you do need to have a valid Microsoft 365 Copilot license and available credits to use it, but even if you don't, you still get the big Copilot button in the toolbar, unfortunately. All in all, I am glad that Microsoft Paint continues to be a native feature in Windows 11, and a piece of software that has evolved to meet modern needs without cutting off its own roots. It's just an iconic piece of Windows history that was an essential part of my childhood, and while I don't use it anymore, I'm just glad it is still there.
    • 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD drops to its lowest price in over three months by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the 2TB WD_Black SN7100 internal solid-state drive at its lowest price in over three months, so you may want to check it out, if you have been considering a storage upgrade, before the deal dries up (purchase link is toward the end of the article). Featuring a PCIe Gen 4.0 interface and M.2 2280 form factor, the SN7100 promises to deliver sequential read speeds of up to 7,250MB/s and sequential write speeds reaching 6,900MB/s, offering as much as a 35% improvement in performance compared with the previous generation. It also achieves random read speeds of 1,000,000 IOPS and random write speeds of 1,400,000 IOPS. The drive uses Western Digital’s TLC 3D NAND technology for reliable performance and is further supported by a five-year limited warranty. It also offers strong endurance, rated at up to 1,200TBW, making it suitable for demanding workloads such as gaming, content creation, and high-speed recording. Moreover, its DRAM-less architecture claims to improve power efficiency (the SSD relies on system memory for caching via HMB), while the WD_Black Dashboard software enables users to monitor drive health, install firmware updates, and activate Game Mode for potentially better performance. Finally, it operates within an operating temperature range of 0°C to 85°C, and can withstand storage temperatures from -40°C to 85°C. 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD: $242.96 (Amazon US) Check this deal out if you want a 4TB option. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      514
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!