The Cygnet - Astpn Martin's "iQ" Test


Recommended Posts

It's official; they've lost the plot

post-151617-1246542718.jpg

This is the Cygnet, Aston Martin's new city car based on the Toyota iQ.

Seriously. We're not joking about this one. This is real.

At the moment, Aston is describing the Cygnet as a concept, but it seems very, very likely to reach production next year.

So what's the idea? Let's ask Aston's chief exec Ulrich Bez.

"This concept - akin to an exclusive tender to a luxury yacht - will allow us to apply Aston Martin design language, craftsmanship and brand values to a completely new segment of the market," says Bez.

"The offering of a ?Cygnet' with a DBS, DB9 or Vantage is a unique combination of opposites and a novel transport solution allowing intelligent and sensitive mobility."

Which means, we think, that the Cygnet will be the short-range dinghy to the millionaire's DBS yacht. Makes some sort of sense, but can it really be an Aston?

If you're thinking, "well, maybe if it's powered by a big V8...", afraid not. We'd expect the underpinnings to be pure iQ - so a 1.0- or 1.3-litre petrol engine - though with Aston's own wheels, tyres and, of course, deeply plush interior.

As you can see from the photo, it'll get a One-77-inspired front end, complete with wide, angry grille and bonnet vents. We're told that the Cygnet could cost around ?20,000 - which is a hell of a lot for an iQ, though very reasonable for an Aston, if you want to look at it that way.

You'll only be able to buy a Cygnet if you're an existing Aston owner, so any of you thinking it's a cheap way into Aston ownership, think again.

What?s your opinion, TGers? To give Aston the benefit of the doubt, imagine the Cygnet with this paintjob and a big set of shiny alloys. Is it more of an Aston than, say, that bizarre Lagonda-thing?

More pictures:

post-151617-1246542726.jpg

post-151617-1246542733.jpg

post-151617-1246542740.jpg

post-151617-1246542746.jpg

post-151617-1246542752.jpg

post-151617-1246542759.jpg

post-151617-1246542768.jpg

post-151617-1246542774.jpg

post-151617-1246542782.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/792156-the-cygnet-astpn-martins-iq-test/
Share on other sites

Aston + "city car" does not mix! :(

When I first saw it, I thought it would have something to do with the European legislations, because I remember reading in Autocar last year that in a year or two, all car manufactures have to have the average CO2 levels of all their productions models combined below a certain limit. It was around this time, it was also announced that Gordon Murray (the man behind the McLaren F1) was creating a new revolutionary city car called the T25 that was about the same size as a Smart car, but could seat four full adults, and be small enough to park nose on the kerb, and fit three of them in one parking space. His plan was to outsource the cars to popular makes like Porsche, to reduce their CO2 levels.

Wow, first Pontiac, then Subaru, and now Aston Martin. Toyota sure has a lot of partnerships.

It's not too surprising, as Toyota are the second biggest car manufacturer in the world; and they'll be #1 when GM go down. They also have a partnership with PSA Peugeot Citro?n to create a city car in the Czech Republic which is sold in all three manufacturers; the Peugeot 107, the Citro?n C1, and the Toyota Aygo.

Err, yeah, I know that, but it's still a hatchback all the same. AM doesn't do hatchbacks.

AM does luxury sports cars for super spies. Aston Martin should ask themselves one question before they design a car, would James Bond drive this and James Bond would surely not drive this car.

Even though we're all bashing it. Just think for a second...

Aston Martin rely on a high profit, low sales business model. This isn't really going to pay dividends in the state the economy is in at the moment. Having this car available, maybe at a price similar to the iQ, would give them more income, keep them afloat, and let you see the new DBx.

Personally I think it looks alright.

Having this car available, maybe at a price similar to the iQ, would give them more income, keep them afloat, and let you see the new DBx.

Not gonna happen though. It's possibly gonna cost around ?20k, and they're not selling it to the public. It's only available to people who already own an Aston Martin.

Not gonna happen though. It's possibly gonna cost around ?20k, and they're not selling it to the public. It's only available to people who already own an Aston Martin.

Well if that's the case...I couldn't care less about this car:rofl::

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Free Software Foundation Europe pushes EU to force Google to allow AI uninstalls on Android by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels Users should be able to fully uninstall AI-based features from Android devices and be able to access interoperability functions, free from Google’s verification requirements, the European Commission has heard as part of an Android interoperability consultation under the Digital Markets Act. These measures were proposed by the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) last week when it submitted its documentation. The FSFE noted that Google had started silently installing AI models without telling users. It noted that the EU’s DMA requires companies like Google to allow users to uninstall pre-loaded software from their devices, but in the case of the AI models Google is installing, they reinstall if you delete them, contravening the DMA. To get Google back under control, the FSFE has told the European Commission that there needs to be improvements within the Android Open Source Project (AOSP). First, it said that users should be able to fully remove pre-loaded AI components from their devices, with companies being prohibited from silently reinstalling or reactivating them. Second, access to Android interoperability features should not be contingent on registration, authorization, or contractual relationships with Google. This pertains to Google’s attempt to force developers to register with Google, even to publish apps to alternative app stores like F-Droid. Discussing its submission, Lucas Lasota, FSFE Legal Programme Manager, said: Google is planning to roll out its Android Developer Certification in September 2026. This will force every Android app developer to register with Google before their software can be installed on certified Android devices, but it should affect those who have removed Google Apps from their device. The program is controversial because it entails the signing of contracts and payment of account fees to Google, as well as the handing over of the identities of developers. It said: The FSFE said that if the Commission’s draft measures remain unchanged, then Google will be allowed to make developers verify their identity. The FSFE believes that asking developers to register is contrary to the text and spirit of the law. In summary, the FSFE has told the Commission that no developer should need a Google account, a Play Store presence, or any agreement with Google to access Android’s interoperability features.
    • You could disable this "functionality/feature/whatever" with 2 registry keys, ages ago.
    • My Photos app is version 2026.11050.1001.0 and it remembers the window size and position. My Snipping Tool is version 11.2602.49.0 and it can capture the taskbar.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      187
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!