Love Firefox but sorry it's slower!


Recommended Posts

Seeing as the majority of people do not depend on such features, I think the trade off between speed and such features is acceptable.

Well, as I was careful to point out in my post, different people have different needs, and that my assessment that the tradeoff doesn't work is mine. The goal of my post was to (1) nit about multiprocessing and (2) point out what the tradeoffs are. As for whether the majority of people need such things... well, the majority of people don't really care which browser they use and will be happy to use whatever they are given, so yes, I would say that the majority of people don't care about such things or about what anyone has to say in this thread, for that matter. :D

Well, as I was careful to point out in my post, different people have different needs, and that my assessment that the tradeoff doesn't work is mine. The goal of my post was to (1) nit about multiprocessing and (2) point out what the tradeoffs are. As for whether the majority of people need such things... well, the majority of people don't really care which browser they use and will be happy to use whatever they are given, so yes, I would say that the majority of people don't care about such things or about what anyone has to say in this thread, for that matter. :D

Yeah that's true also. The majority of people are fine with IE, whether due to ignorance, apathy, convenience, preference or whatever. But if we go by the majority of people who use Firefox (and therefore are likely know the advantages Firefox brings), most will (eventually, hopefully) be able to find an equivalent extension for google chrome to those they depend on through greasemonkey alone.

And I hope we shall never see such a dark day. :p A web browser made by Microsoft Version 2 powered by an engine made by Apple is not my idea of a rosy future, even if they are nominally open-source.

Well it is true that the motive of Mozilla is much more noble that Google. Mozilla is non-profit while Google isnt. I'm sure this influences some people to use one or the other. But I think the majority of us are more concerned with the product itself. Same goes for the engine they use. People who prefer Mozilla over Apple may disapprove of the use of webkit instead of gecko for that reason alone, while others may only care about the engine itself. Same goes for the SDK used too, I guess.

Once Firefox add 1 process per tab (they said they will for 4.0 or before), it will be better, for now minor updates should fix little regressions. If you don't remember guys, the same thing have been said with 2.0 to 3.0 and if you try them now, 3.0 is faster than 2.0. But having a 200mb history DB like mine does not help, but I love the AwesomeBar completion so more entry I get better it is.

Once Firefox add 1 process per tab (they said they will for 4.0 or before), it will be better, for now minor updates should fix little regressions. If you don't remember guys, the same thing have been said with 2.0 to 3.0 and if you try them now, 3.0 is faster than 2.0. But having a 200mb history DB like mine does not help, but I love the AwesomeBar completion so more entry I get better it is.

I thought Firefox and Chrome (and IE) all had similar functionality with their address bars now. What are the differences?

I never said that they don't, I was just pointing that it work like a charm with a 200mb database, but it slow down the browser (SQLite is a slow beast). And every browser have variant. Chrome integrate Google in the main address bar, not Firefox and so on. I did not test IE8 that much yet, I just used it to install Firefox and Chrome (I am not a Windows user).

  • 3 weeks later...

What's this about creating a new profile? How do you do it?

I've tried clearing my cache, but it's still slow. I don't remember FF ever being this slow (I'm using FF 2.0.0.20).

I used to have 20-30 tabs open and whizzing through, opening and closing tabs without so much as a hiccup. Lately (past few months) I've noticed a serious lag.

A friend suggested I update to FF 3, but then I'm afraid that some of my add-ons will no longer be supported, and from what I've heard - it's a real PITA to go back to FF 2.

Even some Youtube videos load extra slow. I've resorted to having to use IE 8 *blegh* to open some text and graphic "heavy" pages, such as eBay.

I've read this thread: https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=634949

and I'm willing to give Tencent traveler a whirl for tab intensive sessions. I'd rather get FF 2 back on its feet though. I've shut down a lot of non-essential add-ons, but haven't noticed an improvement. 15 tabs open, using a steady 188mb,

This machine's specs:

Intel core 2 duo x6800 2.93ghz

3.25gb ram

512mb video ram

winxp sp2

Creating a new profile:

http://kb.mozillazine.org/Creating_a_new_F...file_on_Windows

Also backing up a profile:

http://kb.mozillazine.org/Backing_up_your_...s,_and_settings

and FWIW, Firefox 3.x has greatly improved in memory usage and IMO is faster (especially 3.5).

  • 3 weeks later...
I hate how Mozilla is moving aware form what Firefox was, barebones and very quick(compared to the competition). They keep ADDING things.

Features != slowdown

and 3.5 was a major performance improving release as was 3., firefox has been improving speed every release. Comments like this make no sense.

Features != slowdown

and 3.5 was a major performance improving release as was 3., firefox has been improving speed every release. Comments like this make no sense.

I suggest you take a look at mozillazine or support.mozilla.com forums. You'll see that tons of people are having speed problems. In fact, FF 3.5.1 was released to fix the "sluggish" performance that everyone said wasn't there.

I love firefox.. my favorite browser.. and it's always been some what speedy to me.. but the 3.5 release just seems very slow and some what laggy(slow loading menu's, start up/exit). Has anyone else noticed things like this? Also I'm not running any Extensions.

mines running super fast in windows 7 rtm. go under "about:config" in your browser setting and disable ipv6, should speed things up a bit.

mines running super fast in windows 7 rtm. go under "about:config" in your browser setting and disable ipv6, should speed things up a bit.

Only if you're behind a router that has bad IPv6 support (if you aren't there won't be any difference)

I love firefox.. my favorite browser.. and it's always been some what speedy to me.. but the 3.5 release just seems very slow and some what laggy(slow loading menu's, start up/exit). Has anyone else noticed things like this? Also I'm not running any Extensions.

I totally agree with you, love Firefox :) but it ain't that fast. I've compared it against IE8, Chrome, Safari 4 and Opera (on my personal computers) and Firefox was one of the slowest (with Chrome and Safari being the fastest). Don't get me wrong, Firefox is still my default browser but it just isn't blazing fast for me like many others claim it is.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • If you look around on Amazon, some of these are available for $9
    • I’m still using an Xbox One S, so time for an upgrade to play this but as much as I hate Sony, I think I’ll get the ps5 pro
    • I bought this game. Played it for an hour, and then got a refund from Steam. Not a fun game at all.
    • Nothing Ear buds with active noise cancellation are at their lowest price ever with 51% off by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the Nothing Ear wireless earbuds at their lowest price ever with 51% off limited prime deal. The earbuds feature an 11mm dynamic drivers with a ceramic diaphragm, and support high-resolution audio codecs including AAC, SBC, LDAC, and LHDC 5.0. They support active noise cancellation of up to 45dB across a frequency range of up to 5000Hz, and include a smart ANC algorithm, adaptive noise cancellation, and a transparency mode that allows surrounding sounds to be heard when needed. Connectivity is provided via Bluetooth 5.3, with support for multiple profiles including HFP, A2DP, AVRCP, and others. The earbuds also support dual connection, allowing them to be paired with two devices at the same time. Additional features include IP54 water and dust resistance for the earbuds and IP55 for the charging case, in-ear detection, pinch controls, low-latency mode, Google Fast Pair, Microsoft Swift Pair, and a three-microphone system per earbud for clearer voice calls. The Nothing X app, available on Android and iOS, provides access to custom EQ settings, bass enhancement, personal sound profiles, ear tip fit testing, firmware updates, customisable controls, dual-device management, and a find-my-earbuds feature. In terms of battery performance, each earbud has a 46mAh battery and the charging case has a 500mAh capacity. With active noise cancellation (ANC) turned off, the earbuds should offer up to 8.5 hours of playback on a single charge and up to 40.5 hours in total with the charging case. With ANC enabled, playback should last up to 5.2 hours on the earbuds and up to 24 hours with the case. For calls, talk time should reach up to 5 hours on the earbuds and 23 hours with the case when ANC is off, while ANC on should provide up to 4 hours on the earbuds and 18 hours with the case. Finally, fast charging should deliver up to 10 hours of playback from 10 minutes of charging when ANC is disabled. Nothing Ear Wireless Earbuds Bluetooth: $73.15 (Amazon US) - 51% off Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Microsoft officially launched its Copilot Cowork enterprise AI agent on June 16, 2026, switching to usage-based pricing on the same day it disclosed it is considering a Microsoft-hosted version of China's DeepSeek V4 as a lower-cost engine for the platform — a pairing that puts the company on a collision course with both its enterprise customers' security teams and a White House that has spent months trying to wall off Chinese AI from American infrastructure.................... https://www.techtimes.com/articles/318647/20260618/microsoft-eyes-deepseek-v4-copilot-cowork-what-azure-hosting-cannot-fix.htm  
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      590
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!