• 0

Is it possible to create an invisible watermark?


Question

20 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  GreenMartian said:
Honest question, what exactly is the point of a watermark if it's invisible?
  The Teej said:
You mean, like a watermark that's only invisible when you highlight over it?

A family member of mine is continually losing credit for work she is working on. Other people around her are saying they created this. She has to share the work she is doing, and I would like to give her the ability to have an invisible watermark, that isn't able to be edited.

The next time someone claims her work is their own, she can show her boss that they are stealing her work. I want it so no one besides her (until the time is needed) can know about it.

  • 0
  GreenMartian said:
Honest question, what exactly is the point of a watermark if it's invisible?

Watermarks can spoil an image/audio clip/video so if you only want to use it to prove ownership then why not make it invisible?

You can also use invisible watermarks to prove if something has been doctored. You can also create an invisible watermark which is destroyed when the file is altered making it possible to detect alterations.

I'm not too knowledgeable about the actual workings of this but I know it's possible to hide a watermark in an image and use an algorithm to recover it if you want to prove ownership. I suggest you take another look at google.

  • 0
  Unrealistic said:
If you look closer, all of those are for images. I need one specifically for microsoft word. My idea was to try to slip it in between the headers, where text is usually not there.

I would add an invisible text box (without a fill and without a boarder), placed it under the text (very bottom), added white text, set the properties of the text box to NOT shift with the text, and placed it on (example) very bottom right.

Put there my initials etc.

  • 0

Search for a thing called "Alternate Streams" for files. You need a little bit of coding experience to do this or get someone who has done this but it's not that hard to do. You can put whatever text you want there which is totally invisible unless you use a program to extract the text. But then again there is nothing stoping them from just copying and pasting the contents to a new document and leaving the old document as it is.

  • 0

The only issue I can see with the text field option (And I'm just throwing it out there), is that should your family member's coworkers have a need to use something that your family member has "touched" as a template or something, any derivative, related or not, would look like your family member's work...

I would recommend one of the following.

1) Make use of Microsoft Word's built in "Track Changes" or "Protect Document" tools. They're quite deep once you get used to using them a bit.

2) If you need something more hidden, you may want to look up something called "Steganography". I don't know that you can apply it to a Word document, but this allows you to place hidden watermarks in things. It may be an option for you.

  • 0
  njlouch said:
Or you could actually digitally watermark the file with some form of header manipulation or whatever. Metadata...

I know that basic metadata in MS word can be easily changed (although I honestly think they are too stupid to do this). Is there any kind of program you know about?

And I will look into M_Lyons10 two ideas...thanks guys. :)

http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/word/HP010446741033.aspx

This may be another option...Digital Signature. What do you guys think?

  • 0
  Unrealistic said:
Right, but the problem with using that is it's easy to remove. :/

As would metadata, or just about anything I could think out. Wouldn't a simple "Select All - Copy - Paste" defeat most of these solutions?

As far as I know, there's no way to stop copy-pasting in Word. Could she distribute the documents as PDF? PDF has security settings to prevent people from copying (or even printing). Although if they're really determined, they could still re-type everything :p

The good thing with watermarks in images is that it takes some effort to remove them, and with steganography, it's almost impossible to remove short of destroying the image.

  • 0

Well this thread got me curious. I remembered the PDF security options were available from Adobe's own Acrobat Pro (which isn't free). So I tried out some free products to see if any of them has this function.

  1. PDFCreator
  2. doPDF
  3. CutePDF
  4. PrimoPDF

Out of all four, PDFCreator & PrimoPDF allow you to do it without having to pay for a pro version. Both CutePDF and doPDF offer pro versions that do this, but they're $50 each.

So yeah, she could stop people from editing, copying, or printing her documents - for free - if she is willing to print them as PDF. There are ways to get past the encryption (e.g. bruteforcing the password) but I don't think your audience would know how anyway, as long as your aunt picked a password that is not easily guessed.

Edit: WTF, where did I get "aunt" from. I just re-read the thread and you only said family member. My apologies :p

  • 0
  GreenMartian said:
Well this thread got me curious. I remembered the PDF security options were available from Adobe's own Acrobat Pro (which isn't free). So I tried out some free products to see if any of them has this function.

  1. PDFCreator
  2. doPDF
  3. CutePDF
  4. PrimoPDF

Out of all four, PDFCreator & PrimoPDF allow you to do it without having to pay for a pro version. Both CutePDF and doPDF offer pro versions that do this, but they're $50 each.

So yeah, she could stop people from editing, copying, or printing her documents - for free - if she is willing to print them as PDF. There are ways to get past the encryption (e.g. bruteforcing the password) but I don't think your audience would know how anyway, as long as your aunt picked a password that is not easily guessed.

Edit: WTF, where did I get "aunt" from. I just re-read the thread and you only said family member. My apologies :p

Of course, you could just have a super secure password like $*/@10HPNP%$^╔╔?1Inzq+-

There's no WAY they're brute-forcing that door down anytime soon;))

(Of course, you'd write it down on a piece of paper and keep it safe, you don't want to forget your own password LOL)

  • 0

pdf is the way to go as you can digitally sign it and prohibit editing/saving as....

though you should be able to do the same with word, even so that the document couldnt even be copied or printed. As im not well versed in word youre on your own to find those functions.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Just hope it will not be as bad as History of the World: Part II...
    • +1 for LibreOffice. At least you should try it. The one from M$ is just a bloated turd at this point.
    • Yeah, I've had a Recycle Bin on my taskbar since XP and till last year when I got a new laptop with Windows 11. It was especially useful for touch workflow - I could drag files into Recycle Bin from anywhere because my Taskbar is always visible, unlike desktop icons.
    • Not after SP1. There was a legitimate file copy issue prior.
    • Microsoft 365 security in the spotlight after Washington Post hack by Paul Hill The Washington Post has come under cyberattack which saw Microsoft email accounts of several journalists get compromised. The attack, which was discovered last Thursday, is believed to have been conducted by a foreign government due to the topics the journalists cover, including national security, economic policy, and China. Following the hack, the passwords on the affected accounts were reset to prevent access. The fact that a Microsoft work email account was potentially hacked strongly suggests The Washington Post utilizes Microsoft 365, which makes us question the security of Microsoft’s widely used enterprise services. Given that Microsoft 365 is very popular, it is a hot target for attackers. Microsoft's enterprise security offerings and challenges As the investigation into the cyberattack is still ongoing, just how attackers gained access to the accounts of the journalists is unknown, however, Microsoft 365 does have multiple layers of protection that ought to keep journalists safe. One of the security tools is Microsoft Defender for Office 365. If the hackers tried to gain access with malicious links, Defender provides protection against any malicious attachments, links, or email-based phishing attempts with the Advanced Threat Protection feature. Defender also helps to protect against malware that could be used to target journalists at The Washington Post. Another security measure in place is Entra ID which helps enterprises defend against identity-based attacks. Some key features of Entra ID include multi-factor authentication which protects accounts even if a password is compromised, and there are granular access policies that help to limit logins from outside certain locations, unknown devices, or limit which apps can be used. While Microsoft does offer plenty of security technologies with M365, hacks can still take place due to misconfiguration, user-error, or through the exploitation of zero-day vulnerabilities. Essentially, it requires efforts from both Microsoft and the customer to maintain security. Lessons for organizations using Microsoft 365 The incident over at The Washington Post serves as a stark reminder that all organizations, not just news organizations, should audit and strengthen their security setups. Some of the most important security measures you can put in place include mandatory multi-factor authentication (MFA) for all users, especially for privileged accounts; strong password rules such as using letters, numbers, and symbols; regular security awareness training; and installing any security updates in a timely manner. Many of the cyberattacks that we learn about from companies like Microsoft involve hackers taking advantage of the human in the equation, such as being tricked into sharing passwords or sharing sensitive information due to trickery on behalf of the hackers. This highlights that employee training is crucial in protecting systems and that Microsoft’s technologies, as advanced as they are, can’t mitigate all attacks 100 percent of the time.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Jdoe25 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Explorer
      Legend20 went up a rank
      Explorer
    • One Month Later
      jezzzy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      CSpera earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      MIR JOHNNY BLAZE earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      618
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      277
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      179
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      151
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      116
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!