• 0

Is it possible to create an invisible watermark?


Question

20 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  GreenMartian said:
Honest question, what exactly is the point of a watermark if it's invisible?
  The Teej said:
You mean, like a watermark that's only invisible when you highlight over it?

A family member of mine is continually losing credit for work she is working on. Other people around her are saying they created this. She has to share the work she is doing, and I would like to give her the ability to have an invisible watermark, that isn't able to be edited.

The next time someone claims her work is their own, she can show her boss that they are stealing her work. I want it so no one besides her (until the time is needed) can know about it.

  • 0
  GreenMartian said:
Honest question, what exactly is the point of a watermark if it's invisible?

Watermarks can spoil an image/audio clip/video so if you only want to use it to prove ownership then why not make it invisible?

You can also use invisible watermarks to prove if something has been doctored. You can also create an invisible watermark which is destroyed when the file is altered making it possible to detect alterations.

I'm not too knowledgeable about the actual workings of this but I know it's possible to hide a watermark in an image and use an algorithm to recover it if you want to prove ownership. I suggest you take another look at google.

  • 0
  Unrealistic said:
If you look closer, all of those are for images. I need one specifically for microsoft word. My idea was to try to slip it in between the headers, where text is usually not there.

I would add an invisible text box (without a fill and without a boarder), placed it under the text (very bottom), added white text, set the properties of the text box to NOT shift with the text, and placed it on (example) very bottom right.

Put there my initials etc.

  • 0

Search for a thing called "Alternate Streams" for files. You need a little bit of coding experience to do this or get someone who has done this but it's not that hard to do. You can put whatever text you want there which is totally invisible unless you use a program to extract the text. But then again there is nothing stoping them from just copying and pasting the contents to a new document and leaving the old document as it is.

  • 0

The only issue I can see with the text field option (And I'm just throwing it out there), is that should your family member's coworkers have a need to use something that your family member has "touched" as a template or something, any derivative, related or not, would look like your family member's work...

I would recommend one of the following.

1) Make use of Microsoft Word's built in "Track Changes" or "Protect Document" tools. They're quite deep once you get used to using them a bit.

2) If you need something more hidden, you may want to look up something called "Steganography". I don't know that you can apply it to a Word document, but this allows you to place hidden watermarks in things. It may be an option for you.

  • 0
  njlouch said:
Or you could actually digitally watermark the file with some form of header manipulation or whatever. Metadata...

I know that basic metadata in MS word can be easily changed (although I honestly think they are too stupid to do this). Is there any kind of program you know about?

And I will look into M_Lyons10 two ideas...thanks guys. :)

http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/word/HP010446741033.aspx

This may be another option...Digital Signature. What do you guys think?

  • 0
  Unrealistic said:
Right, but the problem with using that is it's easy to remove. :/

As would metadata, or just about anything I could think out. Wouldn't a simple "Select All - Copy - Paste" defeat most of these solutions?

As far as I know, there's no way to stop copy-pasting in Word. Could she distribute the documents as PDF? PDF has security settings to prevent people from copying (or even printing). Although if they're really determined, they could still re-type everything :p

The good thing with watermarks in images is that it takes some effort to remove them, and with steganography, it's almost impossible to remove short of destroying the image.

  • 0

Well this thread got me curious. I remembered the PDF security options were available from Adobe's own Acrobat Pro (which isn't free). So I tried out some free products to see if any of them has this function.

  1. PDFCreator
  2. doPDF
  3. CutePDF
  4. PrimoPDF

Out of all four, PDFCreator & PrimoPDF allow you to do it without having to pay for a pro version. Both CutePDF and doPDF offer pro versions that do this, but they're $50 each.

So yeah, she could stop people from editing, copying, or printing her documents - for free - if she is willing to print them as PDF. There are ways to get past the encryption (e.g. bruteforcing the password) but I don't think your audience would know how anyway, as long as your aunt picked a password that is not easily guessed.

Edit: WTF, where did I get "aunt" from. I just re-read the thread and you only said family member. My apologies :p

  • 0
  GreenMartian said:
Well this thread got me curious. I remembered the PDF security options were available from Adobe's own Acrobat Pro (which isn't free). So I tried out some free products to see if any of them has this function.

  1. PDFCreator
  2. doPDF
  3. CutePDF
  4. PrimoPDF

Out of all four, PDFCreator & PrimoPDF allow you to do it without having to pay for a pro version. Both CutePDF and doPDF offer pro versions that do this, but they're $50 each.

So yeah, she could stop people from editing, copying, or printing her documents - for free - if she is willing to print them as PDF. There are ways to get past the encryption (e.g. bruteforcing the password) but I don't think your audience would know how anyway, as long as your aunt picked a password that is not easily guessed.

Edit: WTF, where did I get "aunt" from. I just re-read the thread and you only said family member. My apologies :p

Of course, you could just have a super secure password like $*/@10HPNP%$^╔╔?1Inzq+-

There's no WAY they're brute-forcing that door down anytime soon;))

(Of course, you'd write it down on a piece of paper and keep it safe, you don't want to forget your own password LOL)

  • 0

pdf is the way to go as you can digitally sign it and prohibit editing/saving as....

though you should be able to do the same with word, even so that the document couldnt even be copied or printed. As im not well versed in word youre on your own to find those functions.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I think that the last game I bought on day-one was something like Ghost of Tsushima. I've come to realise that I don't have enough time (or sometimes inclination) to game as much as I used to, and I've got plenty of games to keep me occupied if I do decide to play. So I don't see the need to buy a game when it first releases - I wait until it goes on sale. If I'm really excited about a game and the price is under £50 then I would consider it, but anything over that price point gets ignored until the price comes down.
    • For the foreseeable that is your choice. I'm interested tom try one, my wife was very pleased because one she is anti-social and driver chat annoys her and two more seriously there is a long history of drivers abusing women, it's rare, but it happens and more than it should. Sometimes she needs to get a late taxi and she says it may make her feel safer.
    • 5800x3d was chopped because it was too good, why bother releasing a new mid range.
    • Was it bad, sure, but I got it on PC so it was nowhere near as bad as the PS4/XBO versions. Besides, I spent around 200hrs in there and have yet to play the expansion for it. All in all I think I got my monies worth. Maybe I was lucky and didn't run into anything game breaking like others. Either way, $60 is my limit for a game, the point is I'm not going over that no matter what the title is or how much I want to play it. Thank god I don't suffer from FOMO.
    • spwave 0.9.0-1 by Razvan Serea spwave is a cross-platform audio editor designed for research and advanced analysis. It supports a wide range of audio formats, including WAV, AIFF, MP3, Ogg Vorbis, FLAC, ALAC, raw PCM, and more via plug-ins. spwave offers precise editing tools such as zoom, crop, fade in/out, gain adjustment, and region extraction. It enables detailed spectral and phase analysis and supports unlimited undo/redo. Users can drag and drop files, edit metadata, save labeled regions, and view multiple synchronized waveforms. Internally, spwave processes audio in 64-bit precision, ensuring high accuracy. It runs on Windows, macOS, and Linux, making it a reliable and flexible tool for audio research and editing. spwave has following features: Support for multiple platforms: Windows, macOS, Linux (Motif, gtk), etc. Support for WAV, AIFF, MP3, Ogg Vorbis, FLAC, ALAC, raw, and text files by using plug-ins. Support for many bits/samples: 8bits, 16bits, 24bits, 32bits, 32bits float, 64bits double. Converting the sampling frequency and the bits/sample of a file. Playing, zooming, cropping, deleting, extracting, etc. of a selected region. Fade-in, fade-out, gain adjustment, channel swapping, etc of a selected region. Editing file information that supports comments of WAV and AIFF, and ID3 tag of MP3. Analysis of a selected region using several analysis types, e.g. spectrum, smoothed spectrum, phase, unwrapped phase and group delay. Undoing and redoing without limitation of the number of times. Waveform extraction by drag & drop. Opening files by drag & drop. Autosaving of selected regions (you can do this by drag & drop also). Saving positions and regions as labels. Viewing some waveforms and setting regions synchronously. Almost all processing is 64 bits processing internally. Supported Formats: Read/Write: WAV, AIFF, AIFC, CAF, MP3, Ogg Vorbis, FLAC, ALAC (.caf, .mp4), WMA (Windows), APE, AU/SND, PARIS, NIST, IRCAM, raw PCM, text. Read-only: MPEG-2 Layer 3 MP3, RMP files with VBR support. With 64-bit internal processing, autosave capabilities, and synchronized multi-view waveform editing, spwave is a solid tool for anyone handling complex audio editing or acoustic research. spwave 0.9.0-1 changelog: Implemented CQT spectrum and CQT spectrogram (beta version). Implemented piano-key display for spectrum/spectrogram view. Implemented indication of musical note name in cursor information for spectrum/spectrogram view. Fixed a bug that spectrogram view after zoom-in with large factor sometimes freezes. Fixed a bug that scroll and zoom-out in spectrogram view after zoom-in with large factor do not work correctly. Fixed a bug that spectrogram view provides sometimes wrong time information. Fixed a bug that plugin errors sometimes cause a crash. Fixed a bug that the color of grid lines is wrong in printing. Optimized layout of spectrogram view for printing. Enhanced the function of waveform cropping from label information. Fixed a bug that some items in the preference dialog related to labels do not work. Added some items related to the region label in the preference dialog. Fixed a bug that drawing selected region in the log-frequency axis does not work correctly. Added partial support for the dark mode of Windows (the menu bar and the menus). Fixed a bug that the cursor to indicate current calculation position of spectrogram is sometimes not shown. Changed drawing of cursor information into that with white background so as to make the information legible. Fixed a bug that moving to the head by scrolling the overview display sometimes fails. Added feature of alignment of the view region between spectrum view and spectrogram view. Download: spwave 64-bit | spwave 32-bit | ~3.0 MB (Freeware) Download: spwave ARM64 | 2.9 MB Links: spwave Home page | Other OSes | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Apprentice
      Wireless wookie went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Week One Done
      bukro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      Wulle earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Wulle earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Simmo3D earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      595
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      277
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      181
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      148
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      111
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!