• 0

Is it possible to create an invisible watermark?


Question

20 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  GreenMartian said:
Honest question, what exactly is the point of a watermark if it's invisible?
  The Teej said:
You mean, like a watermark that's only invisible when you highlight over it?

A family member of mine is continually losing credit for work she is working on. Other people around her are saying they created this. She has to share the work she is doing, and I would like to give her the ability to have an invisible watermark, that isn't able to be edited.

The next time someone claims her work is their own, she can show her boss that they are stealing her work. I want it so no one besides her (until the time is needed) can know about it.

  • 0
  GreenMartian said:
Honest question, what exactly is the point of a watermark if it's invisible?

Watermarks can spoil an image/audio clip/video so if you only want to use it to prove ownership then why not make it invisible?

You can also use invisible watermarks to prove if something has been doctored. You can also create an invisible watermark which is destroyed when the file is altered making it possible to detect alterations.

I'm not too knowledgeable about the actual workings of this but I know it's possible to hide a watermark in an image and use an algorithm to recover it if you want to prove ownership. I suggest you take another look at google.

  • 0
  Unrealistic said:
If you look closer, all of those are for images. I need one specifically for microsoft word. My idea was to try to slip it in between the headers, where text is usually not there.

I would add an invisible text box (without a fill and without a boarder), placed it under the text (very bottom), added white text, set the properties of the text box to NOT shift with the text, and placed it on (example) very bottom right.

Put there my initials etc.

  • 0

Search for a thing called "Alternate Streams" for files. You need a little bit of coding experience to do this or get someone who has done this but it's not that hard to do. You can put whatever text you want there which is totally invisible unless you use a program to extract the text. But then again there is nothing stoping them from just copying and pasting the contents to a new document and leaving the old document as it is.

  • 0

The only issue I can see with the text field option (And I'm just throwing it out there), is that should your family member's coworkers have a need to use something that your family member has "touched" as a template or something, any derivative, related or not, would look like your family member's work...

I would recommend one of the following.

1) Make use of Microsoft Word's built in "Track Changes" or "Protect Document" tools. They're quite deep once you get used to using them a bit.

2) If you need something more hidden, you may want to look up something called "Steganography". I don't know that you can apply it to a Word document, but this allows you to place hidden watermarks in things. It may be an option for you.

  • 0
  njlouch said:
Or you could actually digitally watermark the file with some form of header manipulation or whatever. Metadata...

I know that basic metadata in MS word can be easily changed (although I honestly think they are too stupid to do this). Is there any kind of program you know about?

And I will look into M_Lyons10 two ideas...thanks guys. :)

http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/word/HP010446741033.aspx

This may be another option...Digital Signature. What do you guys think?

  • 0
  Unrealistic said:
Right, but the problem with using that is it's easy to remove. :/

As would metadata, or just about anything I could think out. Wouldn't a simple "Select All - Copy - Paste" defeat most of these solutions?

As far as I know, there's no way to stop copy-pasting in Word. Could she distribute the documents as PDF? PDF has security settings to prevent people from copying (or even printing). Although if they're really determined, they could still re-type everything :p

The good thing with watermarks in images is that it takes some effort to remove them, and with steganography, it's almost impossible to remove short of destroying the image.

  • 0

Well this thread got me curious. I remembered the PDF security options were available from Adobe's own Acrobat Pro (which isn't free). So I tried out some free products to see if any of them has this function.

  1. PDFCreator
  2. doPDF
  3. CutePDF
  4. PrimoPDF

Out of all four, PDFCreator & PrimoPDF allow you to do it without having to pay for a pro version. Both CutePDF and doPDF offer pro versions that do this, but they're $50 each.

So yeah, she could stop people from editing, copying, or printing her documents - for free - if she is willing to print them as PDF. There are ways to get past the encryption (e.g. bruteforcing the password) but I don't think your audience would know how anyway, as long as your aunt picked a password that is not easily guessed.

Edit: WTF, where did I get "aunt" from. I just re-read the thread and you only said family member. My apologies :p

  • 0
  GreenMartian said:
Well this thread got me curious. I remembered the PDF security options were available from Adobe's own Acrobat Pro (which isn't free). So I tried out some free products to see if any of them has this function.

  1. PDFCreator
  2. doPDF
  3. CutePDF
  4. PrimoPDF

Out of all four, PDFCreator & PrimoPDF allow you to do it without having to pay for a pro version. Both CutePDF and doPDF offer pro versions that do this, but they're $50 each.

So yeah, she could stop people from editing, copying, or printing her documents - for free - if she is willing to print them as PDF. There are ways to get past the encryption (e.g. bruteforcing the password) but I don't think your audience would know how anyway, as long as your aunt picked a password that is not easily guessed.

Edit: WTF, where did I get "aunt" from. I just re-read the thread and you only said family member. My apologies :p

Of course, you could just have a super secure password like $*/@10HPNP%$^╔╔?1Inzq+-

There's no WAY they're brute-forcing that door down anytime soon;))

(Of course, you'd write it down on a piece of paper and keep it safe, you don't want to forget your own password LOL)

  • 0

pdf is the way to go as you can digitally sign it and prohibit editing/saving as....

though you should be able to do the same with word, even so that the document couldnt even be copied or printed. As im not well versed in word youre on your own to find those functions.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The viewing figures in season 2 plummeted after 1 of the main characters died in season 2 episode 1. I think hbo is regretting listening to him so they got rid of him.
    • Google Workspace now lets you use custom AI Gems directly in Docs, Gmail, and more by Paul Hill Google Workspace users can now access Gems from the side panel of Google Docs, Slides, Sheets, Drive, and Gmail. Previously, Gems could only be accessed from the Gemini app directly. For anyone not familiar with Gems, they’re a more advanced feature in Gemini where you can make your own chatbots, powered by Gemini, with custom instructions. If you’re interested in learning more about them, check out my editorial from April, where I argue custom AI bots are the best thing about generative AI and how to create your own bots. The decision to make Gems available across Google Workspace has the potential to significantly speed up people’s workflows if they’ve started using Gems already. If you’ve never made a Gem, Google has several pre-made ones including a Brainstormer, Writing editor, Coding partner, and Learning guide. Google Workspace users can leverage Gems in an almost infinite number of ways. For example, imagine if you’re a teacher in whatever country and you have to make lesson plans for your class that must follow a certain structure, you can use natural language to program a gem to expect certain inputs from you (such as grade, subject, topic etc) and get an output that follows the required guidelines. If you’re a journalist, you could create a gem to quickly strip out the key bits of news from a press release or if you’re a student you can create a bot to break down complicated subjects into something easier to understand. The possibilities are nearly endless and now the Gems you make are even more accessible. Google mentioned that Gems can be accessed via the side panel of all supported Workspace applications and can be used across Workspace capabilities including @ mentioning, accessing files and folders, and more. If you need to create a Gem, you’ll still need to do that on the Gemini website. To get started with Gemini in Google Workspace, just click the “Ask Gemini” (spark button) in the top-right corner. Google said that the Gems feature rollout is an extended rollout which means it might take more than 15 days to get the feature. Admins out there do not need to do anything and there are no specific admin controls in the side panel for Gems or Gemini.
    • Microsoft changes hit Teams Android devices: Disable Entra ID policy to restore sign-in by Paul Hill As part of its Secure Future Initiative, Microsoft has deployed a new Entra ID Conditional Access policy targeting Device Code Flow authentication. Unfortunately, it has led some Microsoft Teams-certified Android devices (Teams Rooms on Android, Teams Phones, Teams Panels, and Teams Displays) to be logged out and signing back in can be a bit fiddly so guidance has been shared. Microsoft said that it shared previous guidance which explained how to exclude Android devices, but it seems some admins didn’t catch this as many devices were not excluded and have been signed out. It’s important to realize that this is not a bug, it’s a security feature. However, the move could have been better communicated. To sign the devices back in, you can do so manually. However, if the devices are remote you’ll need to follow these steps: By disabling the “Block device code flow” policy in step 1, it will change everything back to how it was before Microsoft decided to enable it to boost security. This will allow you to get those affected Android devices logged back in again. Also pay special attention to step 2 which says you might need to reboot your device three times. Once you have your Android devices logged in again, it’s probably a good idea to follow Microsoft’s previous guidance and add these to an exclusion list before re-enabling the “Block device code flow” policy. Microsoft recommends only allowing DCF where it’s absolutely necessary and then blocking it elsewhere. The best thing to do is to add your Teams Android device to the exclusion list - this will allow these devices to operate normally, while boosting overall security. If you’re an admin and have been impacted by this, be sure to take proactive measures to avoid disruptions in the future.
    • Can someone help me with writing a batchfile using notepad to tell me to start a vpn plz? I would greatly appreciate any help  
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      SteveJaye earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Uranus_enjoyer earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Philsl earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Jaclidio hoy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      436
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      158
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      147
    4. 4
      Nick H.
      65
    5. 5
      +thexfile
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!