• 0

Is it possible to create an invisible watermark?


Question

20 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  GreenMartian said:
Honest question, what exactly is the point of a watermark if it's invisible?
  The Teej said:
You mean, like a watermark that's only invisible when you highlight over it?

A family member of mine is continually losing credit for work she is working on. Other people around her are saying they created this. She has to share the work she is doing, and I would like to give her the ability to have an invisible watermark, that isn't able to be edited.

The next time someone claims her work is their own, she can show her boss that they are stealing her work. I want it so no one besides her (until the time is needed) can know about it.

  • 0
  GreenMartian said:
Honest question, what exactly is the point of a watermark if it's invisible?

Watermarks can spoil an image/audio clip/video so if you only want to use it to prove ownership then why not make it invisible?

You can also use invisible watermarks to prove if something has been doctored. You can also create an invisible watermark which is destroyed when the file is altered making it possible to detect alterations.

I'm not too knowledgeable about the actual workings of this but I know it's possible to hide a watermark in an image and use an algorithm to recover it if you want to prove ownership. I suggest you take another look at google.

  • 0
  Unrealistic said:
If you look closer, all of those are for images. I need one specifically for microsoft word. My idea was to try to slip it in between the headers, where text is usually not there.

I would add an invisible text box (without a fill and without a boarder), placed it under the text (very bottom), added white text, set the properties of the text box to NOT shift with the text, and placed it on (example) very bottom right.

Put there my initials etc.

  • 0

Search for a thing called "Alternate Streams" for files. You need a little bit of coding experience to do this or get someone who has done this but it's not that hard to do. You can put whatever text you want there which is totally invisible unless you use a program to extract the text. But then again there is nothing stoping them from just copying and pasting the contents to a new document and leaving the old document as it is.

  • 0

The only issue I can see with the text field option (And I'm just throwing it out there), is that should your family member's coworkers have a need to use something that your family member has "touched" as a template or something, any derivative, related or not, would look like your family member's work...

I would recommend one of the following.

1) Make use of Microsoft Word's built in "Track Changes" or "Protect Document" tools. They're quite deep once you get used to using them a bit.

2) If you need something more hidden, you may want to look up something called "Steganography". I don't know that you can apply it to a Word document, but this allows you to place hidden watermarks in things. It may be an option for you.

  • 0
  njlouch said:
Or you could actually digitally watermark the file with some form of header manipulation or whatever. Metadata...

I know that basic metadata in MS word can be easily changed (although I honestly think they are too stupid to do this). Is there any kind of program you know about?

And I will look into M_Lyons10 two ideas...thanks guys. :)

http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/word/HP010446741033.aspx

This may be another option...Digital Signature. What do you guys think?

  • 0
  Unrealistic said:
Right, but the problem with using that is it's easy to remove. :/

As would metadata, or just about anything I could think out. Wouldn't a simple "Select All - Copy - Paste" defeat most of these solutions?

As far as I know, there's no way to stop copy-pasting in Word. Could she distribute the documents as PDF? PDF has security settings to prevent people from copying (or even printing). Although if they're really determined, they could still re-type everything :p

The good thing with watermarks in images is that it takes some effort to remove them, and with steganography, it's almost impossible to remove short of destroying the image.

  • 0

Well this thread got me curious. I remembered the PDF security options were available from Adobe's own Acrobat Pro (which isn't free). So I tried out some free products to see if any of them has this function.

  1. PDFCreator
  2. doPDF
  3. CutePDF
  4. PrimoPDF

Out of all four, PDFCreator & PrimoPDF allow you to do it without having to pay for a pro version. Both CutePDF and doPDF offer pro versions that do this, but they're $50 each.

So yeah, she could stop people from editing, copying, or printing her documents - for free - if she is willing to print them as PDF. There are ways to get past the encryption (e.g. bruteforcing the password) but I don't think your audience would know how anyway, as long as your aunt picked a password that is not easily guessed.

Edit: WTF, where did I get "aunt" from. I just re-read the thread and you only said family member. My apologies :p

  • 0
  GreenMartian said:
Well this thread got me curious. I remembered the PDF security options were available from Adobe's own Acrobat Pro (which isn't free). So I tried out some free products to see if any of them has this function.

  1. PDFCreator
  2. doPDF
  3. CutePDF
  4. PrimoPDF

Out of all four, PDFCreator & PrimoPDF allow you to do it without having to pay for a pro version. Both CutePDF and doPDF offer pro versions that do this, but they're $50 each.

So yeah, she could stop people from editing, copying, or printing her documents - for free - if she is willing to print them as PDF. There are ways to get past the encryption (e.g. bruteforcing the password) but I don't think your audience would know how anyway, as long as your aunt picked a password that is not easily guessed.

Edit: WTF, where did I get "aunt" from. I just re-read the thread and you only said family member. My apologies :p

Of course, you could just have a super secure password like $*/@10HPNP%$^╔╔?1Inzq+-

There's no WAY they're brute-forcing that door down anytime soon;))

(Of course, you'd write it down on a piece of paper and keep it safe, you don't want to forget your own password LOL)

  • 0

pdf is the way to go as you can digitally sign it and prohibit editing/saving as....

though you should be able to do the same with word, even so that the document couldnt even be copied or printed. As im not well versed in word youre on your own to find those functions.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Meta explains how EU's "unlawful" ad-free choice ruling hurts users and businesses by Paul Hill Meta has decided to appeal a European Commission (EC) decision announced back on April 23 that saw the firm hit with a €200 million fine for violating the Digital Markets Act (DMA). The decision from the Commission was about the binary choice the social media firm was offering to users in the bloc - that they either see personalized ads, or pay a subscription fee to go ad-free. The EC said it wanted Meta to offer an ad-supported version with less personalization. Now, Meta has hit back at the decision, calling it incorrect and unlawful. Under the Digital Markets Act rules, big companies like Meta with significant platforms were labeled as Gatekeepers (large digital platforms with significant market power) and given specific rules to follow, including requiring GDPR consent in relation to DMA-specific personal data use for showing ads to users. Meta believes that the Commission’s April decision against Meta ignored a Grand Chamber of the European Court of Justice (CJEU) ruling from July 2023, which, according to Meta, supports offering users the choice between a subscription or receiving a free service supported by personalized ads. The social media giant believes that the EC’s decision flies in the face of the CJEU judgment and precedents and makes Meta the only company in Europe that is not allowed to use the business model in question. The company says that if it was forced to show ads with reduced personalization, then users, advertisers, and platforms would get “poorer outcomes” - it would also likely hurt Meta’s revenues. While Meta may believe what it says, it’s not the only company operating as a Gatekeeper under the Digital Market Act, many other big tech firms are coming under increasing scrutiny as the EC tries to establish a more level playing field so that big firms don’t take advantage of smaller competitors. Meta says that the mandated Less Personalized Ads service from the EC is unviable and ignores commercial realities. It said that the LPA uses around 90% less data than personalized ads resulting in less user engagements and less sales. While users may say they do not want their data used for personalized ads, Meta believes that without personalization, user experience declines with an almost 800% rise in ads being marked as “irrelevant” or “repetitive”. It is important to note that Meta has not provided an actual number for the amount of complaints it receives. Meta also said that the LPA also leads to worse outcomes for EU advertisers with small and medium-sized enterprises most impacted. It said: Meta has called on the EC to “return to a better system of regulation” after expressing concern about a lack of consistent feedback and the shifting of “goalposts” by the Commission while Meta has tried to comply. It has called on the EC to stick to the text of the DMA and not make it about fines.
    • Idiotic Teams strickes again. "Teams, Teams, I was not joking when I said I'd like to smash every tooth in your head Oh Teams Teams, I was not joking when I said By rights you should be bludgeoned in your bed"
    • KB5060829: Microsoft confirms new upcoming Windows 11 24H2 feature is triggering Firewall by Sayan Sen At the end of June, Microsoft released Windows 11 setup and recovery updates (KB5062233/ KB5060843/ KB5062197/ KB5061090) following the month's non-security previews for 24H2 (KB5060829) and 23H2/22H2 (KB5060826). Today, the company has confirmed that KB5060829 is causing some troubles for systems in regards to Firewall. Microsoft says that IT admins and system admins may notice a recurring error entry in the Security event log related to Windows Firewall With Advanced Security wherein the Event Viewer records event ID 2042, labeled “Config Read Failed” with the message “More data is available” each time the device restarts. Although logged as an error, the tech giant notes that this entry does not indicate a malfunction of the Windows Firewall and as such it can be "safely ignored and disregarded," and that Windows Firewall continues to enforce rules and filter network traffic normally as intended. Microsoft assures that "there is no impact to Windows processes associated to this event." IT support teams and even general users often rely on error-level event entries to detect misconfiguration and other issues (Microsoft itself recommends you do so), so unexpected log noise can trigger unnecessary alerts like these. Interestingly, in this case, the logged event stems from an upcoming feature as Microsoft notes that the "event is related to a feature that is currently under development and not fully implemented." No additional information regarding this new feature has been provided at this time. For those who prefer a cleaner log, administrators can filter out event 2042 in Event Viewer or via PowerShell. In Event Viewer, create a custom view filtering out ID 2042 under the Security log and in PowerShell, use the Get-WinEvent -FilterHashtable parameter. Microsoft says that the team is currently working on a fix and an update will be released later. However, no ETA has been shared today. You can find the issue entry here on Microsoft's official Windows Health dashboard website.
    • Concerning the situation at XBOX (title cancellations, studio closures and firing employees): The management at MS gaming division (Booty, Spencer etc.) has to go. Money and time has been wasted in such amounts that those people have to be held accountable and better managers can take the lead. In most other businesses this would have happened ten years or so ago.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      filminutz earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      SteveJaye earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Uranus_enjoyer earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Philsl earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      433
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      158
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      146
    4. 4
      Nick H.
      65
    5. 5
      +thexfile
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!