Recommended Posts

The ONLY reason that I do not use Google Chrome is for one reason and one reason only. The font smoothing, it's is horrid. Even when I run GDI++ in the background (software that makes fonts very smooth) the fonts are still sharp and choppy. Is there any way I can get Google Chrome's fonts smoother? Like in FireFox or Safari?

It seems like the 3rd party software only helps Firefox and Safari a little, seeing how Safari already has a built in font smoother. You can see what I mean below.

Google Chrome:

2mzwffc.png

Firefox:

14nn2ud.png

Safari:

jv2cuv.png

Any and all help will be greatly appreciated!

Unlike Safari (which uses its own Text renderer [which itself is ported from Mac OSX]), and Firefox (which again, now uses Cairo I believe to handle Text rendering), Chrome uses the native OS's Text renderer. Check to see if you have ClearType enabled and see if that makes a difference.

Unlike Safari (which uses its own Text renderer [which itself is ported from Mac OSX]), and Firefox (which again, now uses Cairo I believe to handle Text rendering), Chrome uses the native OS's Text renderer. Check to see if you have ClearType enabled and see if that makes a difference.

Yeah I got ClearType, I even downloaded the power toy from Microsoft's website to even make the ClearType more noticable. Google Chrome still has problems with font smoothing.

I feel like the font rendering in Chrome looks so much better than the others (from the screenshot at least).

What you see on Chrome is the expected result with ClearType enabled. You will notice the difference if you disable ClearType. I think you must have done something to Firefox to change its default font rendering (the font is shorter as well).

The latest versions of GDI++ work with Chrome natively. Before then you had to set Chrome to run as a single process with some commandline option that I can't remember. Just get a newer version from http://free.flop.jp/gdi++/ (I'm using gdi0885.7z which has the nifty gditray.exe) and you should be good to go.

This thread confuses me.

1) I'm on Firefox right now. My fonts look nothing like the ones in your screenshot. My font rendering looks like your Google Chrome screenshot. Are you sure that's a screenshot from Firefox? If so, what version?

2) I'm a little confused by what your request is. Do you WANT those bold, blurry fonts from your Firefox and Safari screenshots? They look absolutely terrible, so I'm assuming that this isn't the case. I'm guessing that your fonts are blurry for some reason, and you're trying to fix it? I dunno.

So, did you get your screenshots mixed up or something? Nothing about the OP makes sense to me.

The latest versions of GDI++ work with Chrome natively. Before then you had to set Chrome to run as a single process with some commandline option that I can't remember. Just get a newer version from http://free.flop.jp/gdi++/ (I'm using gdi0885.7z which has the nifty gditray.exe) and you should be good to go.

Do you know if there's anyway to get GDI++ working with a 64bit operating system?

32 bit applications work fine, but things like windows explorer and what not obviously don't.

Thanks

@ Hitchhiker427

Quartz renders text truer to the font at the cost of looking blurrier than Cleartype.

There are people who like it this way and some that don't. It's all a matter of personal preference.

Yeah, I've known that OSX has blurrier fonts, but I didn't know that the screenshot was showing the OSX rendering. I didn't remember the OSX fonts being THAT blurry, so I was thrown off, thinking something was unintentional with the font rendering. Additionally, I've never seen a side-by-side shot before. It's quite a stark difference.

If he was aiming for Windows style smoothing, then yes it would be correct, but he's not.

Even then, we're talking about the wrong thing really, the screenshots show the same style of smoothing but different kinds of hinting (Windows hinting, some Freetype configuration and then OS X hinting).

The hinting people prefer is subjective, I prefer OS X's since it keeps the letter forms more accurate while not being overly fuzzy (i.e. no hinting), but then again at the distance I'm sitting from my monitor the glyphs still look "crisp".

I have the same problem. I have clear type enabled and my font settings are identical in firefox & chrome. I use winxp. Here are some screenshots which you can clearly see the difference in, you will have to click on the images to view them full size otherwise you won't see the differences...

Any suggestions?

post-305952-1248619944_thumb.jpg

post-305952-1248619954_thumb.jpg

  • 2 weeks later...
I have the same problem. I have clear type enabled and my font settings are identical in firefox & chrome. I use winxp. Here are some screenshots which you can clearly see the difference in, you will have to click on the images to view them full size otherwise you won't see the differences...

Any suggestions?

Looks like Chrome is using the old Windows font smoothing technique, and Firefox is using ClearType.

The only browser in those screenshots that is actually using ClearType is Chrome (that's the whole point of the thread, he doesn't want Chrome to use GDI font rendering and instead use GDI++)

Firefox is using GDI++, and Safari is using it's own font rendering system.

  • 6 months later...

How on earth do you download it? :p

Thanks

The zip file:

http://free.flop.jp/gdi++/src/gdi0909.zip

I use this config, though - the ones with it are a bit weird:

http://gist.github.com/328005

In main gdi++.ini put this in general section

[General]
HookChildProcesses=1
AlternativeFile=.\ini\blah.ini

After putting blah.ini (From gist) into the ini folder.

HTH

Found another program that supports 32/64 bit

http://code.google.com/p/gdipp/

I have high hopes for that project but at present it doesn't seem to hook anywhere near as many apps as gdi0909 :(

  • 1 year later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Visual Studio finally gets long-awaited feature that developers will love by Usama Jawad Visual Studio Code is Microsoft's popular, lightweight, open-source code editor, it is actually Visual Studio that is the company's flagship integrated development environment (IDE). Although the IDE already offers a boatload of useful features for developers, Microsoft has finally introduced a long-requested capability that will be loved by many. While developers have already been able to create Git pull requests (PRs) directly within Visual Studio for the past couple of years, it had not been possible to review a PR without switching to the browser, until now. Microsoft revealed in December 2025 that it is working on UX that enables developers to do just that, and fast-forward to June 2026, and Visual Studio finally has native capabilities to open and inspect a PR, discuss feedback, and wrap up the review, all without switching to the browser. This integration works for both GitHub and Azure DevOps (including on-prem). Developers have access to multiple surfaces to open a PR, including Git Repository, Git Changes, and the Git menu in Visual Studio. Once you open a PR, all the important details will be immediately visible to you, from where you can navigate to various levels of granularity and branch states, depending on the reviews that you are engaged in. As you would expect, you also get a diff view that enables you to see code changes inline or side-by-side in a separate panel. You can also review commit-by-commit. Additionally, this UX fosters collaboration as you can leave comments, reply to threads, and resolve conversations easily. Naturally, you can also leverage Copilot to apply a code suggestion to fix a potential issue. When you are done, you have the ability to approve, complete, and merge the PR. This is a pretty major feature as it has been requested heavily for the past few years. You can try it out in Visual Studio 2026 version 18.7, made available here recently. Microsoft plans to enhance this experience further in future releases with comment filtering, a timeline of PR activity, and more.
    • This AdGuard Family lifetime deal is still only $15.97 by Steven Parker Today's highlighted Neowin Deal comes via our Apps + Software section, where you can get a lifetime subscription and save 90% on a lifetime AdGuard Family Plan. AdGuard is a unique program that has all the necessary features for what they claim to be "the best web experience." The software combines the an advanced ad blocker, a privacy protection module, and a parental control tool—all working in one app. This software deals with annoying ads, hides your data from a multitude of trackers, protects you from malware attacks, and even lets you restrict your kids from accessing inappropriate content. Install AdGuard and see the internet as it was supposed to be: clean and safe. Get rid of annoying banners, pop-ups & video ads once and for all Hide your data from the multitude of trackers & activity analyzers that swarm the web Avoid fraudulent and phishing website and malware attacks Protect your kids online by restricting them from accessing inappropriate & adult content Good to know Family Plan Length of access: lifetime This plan is only available to new users Redemption deadline: redeem your code within 30 days of purchase Max number of devices: 9 Access options: desktop & mobile Software version: AdGuard Family Updates included A lifetime subscription of AdGuard Family Plan normally costs $169.99, but this deal can be yours for just $15.97, that's a saving of $157.02. For full terms, specifications, and license info please click the link below. Get this AdGuard Family lifetime deal for just $15.97 (was $169.99) Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. As an online publication, Neowin too relies on ads for operating costs and, if you use an ad blocker, we'd appreciate being whitelisted. In addition, we have an ad-free subscription for $28 a year, which is another way to show support! Support queries If you have queries or need support for any of the Neowin Deals, please use the contact form here. Neowin Deals are managed and sold by StackCommerce who represent Neowin on an affiliate basis. Why we post these deals We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. So for those that keep moaning and complaining, be thankful we're still online for you to even do that. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Make a donation to support our day to day running costs Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
    • the MCT currently downloads 26200.8653, so not completely up to date.
    • Around 68% of developers are now using AI to generate code during development, and some experts are saying that a single developer using AI tools can now do the work of an entire team of 4 to 5 engineers.  According to Figma's State of the Designer 2026 report, 72% of designers now use generative AI in their workflows and 91% say it improves the quality of their work, not just their speed.  But does this mean web developers and designers are becoming less relevant, or are they simply evolving into a different kind of role? Would love to hear from developers and designers here has AI made your job easier, or do you feel threatened by how fast these tools are improving
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Timaximus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Timaximus earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      FBSPL went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      507
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      179
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      160
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!