Recommended Posts

The ONLY reason that I do not use Google Chrome is for one reason and one reason only. The font smoothing, it's is horrid. Even when I run GDI++ in the background (software that makes fonts very smooth) the fonts are still sharp and choppy. Is there any way I can get Google Chrome's fonts smoother? Like in FireFox or Safari?

It seems like the 3rd party software only helps Firefox and Safari a little, seeing how Safari already has a built in font smoother. You can see what I mean below.

Google Chrome:

2mzwffc.png

Firefox:

14nn2ud.png

Safari:

jv2cuv.png

Any and all help will be greatly appreciated!

Unlike Safari (which uses its own Text renderer [which itself is ported from Mac OSX]), and Firefox (which again, now uses Cairo I believe to handle Text rendering), Chrome uses the native OS's Text renderer. Check to see if you have ClearType enabled and see if that makes a difference.

Unlike Safari (which uses its own Text renderer [which itself is ported from Mac OSX]), and Firefox (which again, now uses Cairo I believe to handle Text rendering), Chrome uses the native OS's Text renderer. Check to see if you have ClearType enabled and see if that makes a difference.

Yeah I got ClearType, I even downloaded the power toy from Microsoft's website to even make the ClearType more noticable. Google Chrome still has problems with font smoothing.

I feel like the font rendering in Chrome looks so much better than the others (from the screenshot at least).

What you see on Chrome is the expected result with ClearType enabled. You will notice the difference if you disable ClearType. I think you must have done something to Firefox to change its default font rendering (the font is shorter as well).

The latest versions of GDI++ work with Chrome natively. Before then you had to set Chrome to run as a single process with some commandline option that I can't remember. Just get a newer version from http://free.flop.jp/gdi++/ (I'm using gdi0885.7z which has the nifty gditray.exe) and you should be good to go.

This thread confuses me.

1) I'm on Firefox right now. My fonts look nothing like the ones in your screenshot. My font rendering looks like your Google Chrome screenshot. Are you sure that's a screenshot from Firefox? If so, what version?

2) I'm a little confused by what your request is. Do you WANT those bold, blurry fonts from your Firefox and Safari screenshots? They look absolutely terrible, so I'm assuming that this isn't the case. I'm guessing that your fonts are blurry for some reason, and you're trying to fix it? I dunno.

So, did you get your screenshots mixed up or something? Nothing about the OP makes sense to me.

The latest versions of GDI++ work with Chrome natively. Before then you had to set Chrome to run as a single process with some commandline option that I can't remember. Just get a newer version from http://free.flop.jp/gdi++/ (I'm using gdi0885.7z which has the nifty gditray.exe) and you should be good to go.

Do you know if there's anyway to get GDI++ working with a 64bit operating system?

32 bit applications work fine, but things like windows explorer and what not obviously don't.

Thanks

@ Hitchhiker427

Quartz renders text truer to the font at the cost of looking blurrier than Cleartype.

There are people who like it this way and some that don't. It's all a matter of personal preference.

Yeah, I've known that OSX has blurrier fonts, but I didn't know that the screenshot was showing the OSX rendering. I didn't remember the OSX fonts being THAT blurry, so I was thrown off, thinking something was unintentional with the font rendering. Additionally, I've never seen a side-by-side shot before. It's quite a stark difference.

If he was aiming for Windows style smoothing, then yes it would be correct, but he's not.

Even then, we're talking about the wrong thing really, the screenshots show the same style of smoothing but different kinds of hinting (Windows hinting, some Freetype configuration and then OS X hinting).

The hinting people prefer is subjective, I prefer OS X's since it keeps the letter forms more accurate while not being overly fuzzy (i.e. no hinting), but then again at the distance I'm sitting from my monitor the glyphs still look "crisp".

I have the same problem. I have clear type enabled and my font settings are identical in firefox & chrome. I use winxp. Here are some screenshots which you can clearly see the difference in, you will have to click on the images to view them full size otherwise you won't see the differences...

Any suggestions?

post-305952-1248619944_thumb.jpg

post-305952-1248619954_thumb.jpg

  • 2 weeks later...
I have the same problem. I have clear type enabled and my font settings are identical in firefox & chrome. I use winxp. Here are some screenshots which you can clearly see the difference in, you will have to click on the images to view them full size otherwise you won't see the differences...

Any suggestions?

Looks like Chrome is using the old Windows font smoothing technique, and Firefox is using ClearType.

The only browser in those screenshots that is actually using ClearType is Chrome (that's the whole point of the thread, he doesn't want Chrome to use GDI font rendering and instead use GDI++)

Firefox is using GDI++, and Safari is using it's own font rendering system.

  • 6 months later...

How on earth do you download it? :p

Thanks

The zip file:

http://free.flop.jp/gdi++/src/gdi0909.zip

I use this config, though - the ones with it are a bit weird:

http://gist.github.com/328005

In main gdi++.ini put this in general section

[General]
HookChildProcesses=1
AlternativeFile=.\ini\blah.ini

After putting blah.ini (From gist) into the ini folder.

HTH

Found another program that supports 32/64 bit

http://code.google.com/p/gdipp/

I have high hopes for that project but at present it doesn't seem to hook anywhere near as many apps as gdi0909 :(

  • 1 year later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • He has planned to file a lawsuit in small claims court so it'll only be a $1000 lesson assuming he wins. That's likely a fraction of what Samsung spends on toilet paper on a daily basis.
    • Windows Server gets DNS over HTTPS (DoH) support by Usama Jawad For the past few months, Microsoft has been previewing DNS over HTTPS (DoH) for Windows DNS Server, touting it as a foundational upgrade for zero-trust enterprise networks. It essentially introduces encrypted, authenticated DNS for the networks rather than transmitting DNS traffic in clear. Now, the company has introduced the general availability (GA) of this feature. The GA of DoH encourages organizations to deploy the solution in production environments without implementing a new client-to-resolver architecture. DoH helps improve the overall security of the network and reduces the risk of spoofing due to its zero-trust design. This is a significant change because pretty much every interaction with the network requires interfacing with DNS. DoH offers several advantages over standard DNS traffic, such as encryption using HTTPS, preventing unauthorized inspection, man-in-the-middle attacks, and traffic analysis. Since it leverages TLS certificates so that clients can verify the identity of the DNS server, it prevents spoofing through this authentication mechanism. Additionally, it's built on the DoH standard defined by the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), which means that it should work with modern RFC 8484-compliant clients. Finally, it integrates into the existing network architecture seamlessly and can even run in parallel with standard DNS, so that customers can migrate to the new technology at their own pace. Microsoft says that in the past few months of preview, DoH has become more stable, and customers can confidently deploy it in production environments with proper guidance. Microsoft has emphasized that migrating to DoH is necessary for organizations that are moving toward zero-trust DNS solutions. Windows clients already support DoH, but the latest availability on Windows Server provides encrypted DNS to all endpoints. The company has also mentioned that "while this release focuses on encrypting client-to-resolver communication, support for encrypted communication between Windows DNS Server and upstream DNS resolvers is planned for a future update." You can follow Microsoft's guidance to deploy DoH here, but keep in mind that you need a Windows Server 2025 installation with the latest Patch Tuesday updates installed.
    • Lol I had one of these turn faulty in Jan, guess it wasn't just bad luck lol
    • I'm team Rossmann all the way. I have the exact same NVME, altough not in an array like him.
    • It had gone weeks ago. Although thinking about it I'm on the beta.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      Marzoid went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Community Regular
      coch went up a rank
      Community Regular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      511
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      184
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      159
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!