Recommended Posts

To me it was pretty obvious that it wasn’t *Olivia* after the grenade went off after when William Bell was unconscious

Same here, I finally got around to watching it. Decent finale with Olivia sadly in Walternate's prison (Y) :(

I really hope Nimoy comes back for the next season in some form.

Same here, I finally got around to watching it. Decent finale with Olivia sadly in Walternate's prison (Y) :(

I really hope Nimoy comes back for the next season in some form.

I'd say he will probably in a flash back.. or something.. it's like we didn't expect Charlie back at all. lol.

A scene cut from the Fringe season finale is available as a "Ford exclusive." Which makes sense, considering it's mostly product placement for the Taurus. But don't be fooled - there are clues about Violet Sedan Chair here too.

Great finale, but honestly how did they not realise that it wasn't Olivia

Yeah, I have a little problem with that, too - (after returning (with Broyles somehow knowing when they would show up)) "Boy! That was weird! Well, gotta go - see ya! Umm, where do I live?" I only started watching with season two, but, for Fringe, certain aspects of the two-part-finale seemed a bit on the weak side (starting with the previous episode's seemingly simple crossing over for Walternate and Peter).

What would be a twist is that we're being duped - the switcheroo was NOT successful. Maybe Fringe got enough intel to begin to infiltrate the alt-universe's operations from this side, with Olivia posing as Altivia over here, and Altivia in trouble with Walternate over there for botching up the switch and/or losing Peter (Olivia/Altivia and Walternate didn't really say much at the holding cell that would discount this). Dunno, this show seems to be too young, and the writers too creative to be resorting to the old evil-twin-switcheroo ploy, even if it is Fringe-style.

Great finale, but honestly how did they not realise that it wasn't Olivia

They didn't realize it wasn't her because they both looked pretty much identical (thanks to the real Olivia's disguise).

Yeah, but I think the point CCoil was trying to make is that the two worlds are so different that Altlivia couldn't have known enough to not give it away.

Yes, she must've got out of the theater pretty quick, without saying much (if it was Altivia). You would figure Broyles would want some details, and she's the only real FBI agent of those three. I'm sure Peter wouldn't have just let her leave after their exchange in the alt-universe.

speaking on Olivia-

The only real differences is the tattoo on the other world -- but I would almost bet that it is going to be her niece that exposes her.. (just a big hunch) When she gives the alternate Olivia the necklace back and the alternate does not respond back. However the alternate only knows the name of counterpart (the real Olivia's) niece but does not know what she looks like. The alternate Olivia could probably fake it with Peter since she had some knowledge that the two of them had a relationship or that she might actually fall in love with Peter and expose herself and hope that Peter will take her.

Though I found the death of the three people who crossed over was a surprise.

Walternate has the orignal olivia captive, looking at the tech on the other side dont you feel walternate can feed Altivia all the info she needs to survive the disguise.

Though the alter olivia-- may actually fall in love with the niece and decide to free our Olivia so she can reunite the two of them together--- I still say she won't be able to fool the child... perter maybe with all the world jumping......though they may surprise us even more. or she may miss her mother and want to go home.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • >defenders of AI-generated artworks often claim that AI is just a tool It is not. It is the inhuman artist replacement. The human writing the prompt is the employer/manager requesting the work product of the artist -- a supervisory/descriptive job that doesn't carry with it any rights to the copyright of that work product at all. And since AI is not human itself, it can't gain copyright for anything it is asked to regurgitate or hallucinate, so it can't transfer that copyright to the employer/manager/human who asked for the output. This was all legally reaffirmed last year. So, no, while there are AI tools, AI slopware generation is NOT a "tool" in the legal definition of that word.
    • As long as i get to play GTA 6 before it ends 😂😂
    • Google is opening the world's first AI museum in Los Angeles by Ivan Jenic Image via: Google Ever since AI image generators went mainstream, the debate over whether AI-generated art is real art hasn't let up. Those who don’t consider AI to be art say that if a machine does the creating and anyone can prompt it, there’s no skill involved, and therefore no art is produced. The counter-argument is equally persistent, as defenders of AI-generated artworks often claim that AI is just a tool, and that every major technological breakthrough, like the camera or the computer, was met with the same skepticism before eventually being accepted as a legitimate creative medium. Google’s position in this debate is clear. Which is no surprise, as the company is investing billions in AI infrastructure. And now, in efforts to encourage people to use its AI even more, Google is opening Dataland on June 20, which it's calling the world's first AI arts museum. Located inside The Grand LA, a Frank Gehry-designed building in Los Angeles, the museum spans 25,000 square feet. The museum is built around a collaboration with media artist Refik Anadol, who has worked with Google since 2016. The inaugural exhibition is called Machine Dreams: Rainforest, and is powered by an AI model trained on “an extensive dataset of the natural world.” It generates 1.2 billion pixels of visuals in real time and reacts to visitors dynamically. The space also generates soundscapes, real-time emotion sensing, and algorithmically produced scents. Image via: Refik Anadol Studio / Google Google says that the museum is powered by its Gemini models, which run on Google Cloud. So, everything is generated inside one of Google’s AI data centers and is streamed to the museum. Alongside the museum opening, Google Arts & Culture is funding an AI Artist Residency, giving four artists $25,000 grants each, along with mentorship from Refik Anadol Studio and access to Google's machine learning tools. Their work will be shown at Dataland and on the Google Arts & Culture website later this year. Google’s AI museum will undoubtedly initiate a fired-up debate on social media, and we can’t wait to see the first reactions. Via: Smithsonian Magazine
    • Calling GTA 6 overhyped crap doesn’t make you edgy, it just makes you sound like someone who hasn’t enjoyed anything since the PS2 era.
    • I’m not arguing whether Rockstar likes money. Obviously, they do, they’re a business. I’m saying this isn’t new. They’ve always launched console first. This is just how Rockstar operates.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      570
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      178
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!