Why do Europeans say 1000 million instead of 1 billion?


Recommended Posts

At school in the 80s, we were originally taught:

1,000 * 1,000 = Million = 1,000,000.

1,000,000 * 1,000,000 = Trillion = 1,000,000,000,000

And it would be possible to express the grouping in between as 1,000 million.

1,000,000 * 1,000 = One thousand million = 1,000,000,000

The switch happened somewhere in the early nighties I remember when it was decided for us to adopt the US / other way of expressing such a high number.

The logic with the British way is that it's possible to use the current grouping all the way up to the next highest grouping.

So you could say, One hundred thousand million or 100, 000, 000, 000

Both have some element of logic, I actually prefer the British way as I was taught that way. But whatever, I never ever have to say these number out loud.

I can't think of a reason I would need to... no...not ever, not in a billion years.

I don't know why each grouping cant just have its own name like we do use in america.....

0 - ones

10 - tens

100 - hundreds

1 000 - thousands

10 000 - ten thousands

100 000 - hundred thousands

1 000 000 - millions

10 000 000 - ten millions

100 000 000 - hundred millions

1 000 000 000 - billions

10 000 000 000 - ten billions

100 000 000 000 - hundred bllions

1 000 000 000 000 - trillions

Many languages use compound numbers to make up numbers that we have grouping for in English. In French, the number 97 translates as 4 times 20 and 10 and 7. Quatre-vingt-dix-sept.

Same could be asked about the Americans and the metric system; why not use it, like the rest of the world?

True.

Many languages use compound numbers to make up numbers that we have grouping for in English. In French, the number 97 translates as 4 times 20 and 10 and 7. Quatre-vingt-dix-sept.

So they're like the danes, who can only count to twenty and decided to create a completely illogical way to count.

97 in danish would be something like "syv og halv fems" or "seven and half fives" (roughly ish) wich translates to 7 and fives twenties, one of wich is half, by some mysterius logic.

Here in Mexico we say:

One Thousand Millions = 1 Billion = 1,000,000,000

One Billion = 1 Trillion = 1,000,000,000,000

So they're like the danes, who can only count to twenty and decided to create a completely illogical way to count.

97 in danish would be something like "syv og halv fems" or "seven and half fives" (roughly ish) wich translates to 7 and fives twenties, one of wich is half, by some mysterius logic.

And I thought that french numbers were complicated to learn how to speak...

I have a question:

Why do Europeans say 1000 million instead of 1 billion?

(The amount we are talking about is:

1,000,000,000

or

1.000.000.000

)

I am from Europe and I hardly ever hear people refer to a billion as a thousand million

So they're like the danes, who can only count to twenty and decided to create a completely illogical way to count.

97 in danish would be something like "syv og halv fems" or "seven and half fives" (roughly ish) wich translates to 7 and fives twenties, one of wich is half, by some mysterius logic.

Shhh :p

Personally I've never heard of 1000 million being used..

Wait, what year did England become part of Europe again?
No, but politically there is a separation. It seems to go back and forth. Sometimes England is a part of Europe, and other times there is a distinction.
All of Europe is different countries. Why distinguish the UK from the rest?

It depends on the phase of the moon and the year and location of the next solar eclipse. It really does just depend on what mood people are in, but I'd be surprised if anyone but UK'ers make any distinction.

The only political ties I know of are the European Union, which was originally set up for the purposes of trade. It now has the single currency and a bunch of laws and we pay loads of money into its black hole.. not all European countries were originally in the EU, though it grows every year (and I have no idea who is or isn't part of it).

The EU is rather unpopular in the UK and gets a lot of complaints and such. Our physical distance also plays a part .. it's easy to have a "us (UK) and them (rest of Europe)" attitude.

The UK always had beef with us. Pun intended.

><

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I'm not unblocking my camera for this crapola. Sorry, Google.
    • Ummmm that is what is it supposed to do. Just turn if off in settings if you do not want it analyzing your open tabs. Chrome does the same thing with Gemini. Sarfari will do the samething after Apple's AI and even more so with the release of their 27 versions that is now powered by Googles LLM/ML models. Understanding why it is doing it and how it can help you vs jumping to some conspiracy theroy is a much better approach. As long as it can be turned off, all is good. Yes the default should be off but the a lot of people would never discover these features.
    • Just another reason (aside from many others) not to use Edge. Firefox 153.0b5 DEx64 has a similar feature added recently in prior builds that I will turn off at some point when I get around to it. It's the new "Something looks suspicious" page that pops up here and there. It cleverly hides itself between web pages that I've actually visited; as a result, you know, of selecting a web page and telling the browser where to go. The interesting thing is that it does not produce these warnings from pages that I, as the only intelligent user of the browser in my system, have ever directed the browser to open! What seems to be happening is that the browser looks at all the goofy ad links on a web page I do actually open and selects one that "looks suspicious" and then creates the "something looks suspicious" web page, which is neatly inserted, as mentioned, between web pages my RB ("real brain") has directed the browser to load in a session. The thing is, I usually look at links I am considering to follow before I ask the browser to load them, and in cases I have noticed where the link does indeed look suspicious, most of the time I will choose to not follow the link at all. Doesn't everyone do this or something similar? I am picky about what I voluntarily load... (I don't like links that start off fine, with a site designaiton that seems normal enough but then is followed by indecipherable alphanumeric strings many, many lines long, etc. I tend to reject those because they look suspicious. They may not be, but I don't care... I'll stay with Firefox, of course, if for no other reason than they usually let you turn off the junk you don't like. And because it isn't Edge... But at some point Microsoft will come to realize that putting your bookmarks on the left side is a Good Thing for a lot of people, just as Microsoft discovered when it had the bright idea of nailing the Windows taskbar to the bottom of the screen, when for decades Microsoft browsers had left that placement up to the user. They have finally reversed the obscenity of that decision. Finally.
    • Google was using the old CATPCHAs data to train their LLMs. What is the say they won't use this camera data of users to train their LLM? these companies need some strict regulations!
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      carols23 earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      Tom Willson earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      259
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      94
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!