• 0

Backup software that supports Windows ACLs


Question

We have a new backup server at the High School I work with (By new, I mean it's been there for three years and no one ever was bothered to set it up). The server contains three components:

1) Dell Poweredge 2850 with Windows 2003 SP2

2) Dell Powervault 124T LTO-2 Tape Drive attached via SCSI

3) Dell/EMC RAID Array attached via Fiber Optic

We want to get this thing set up, except that we realized that whoever originally ordered it never bought any software for it. So now we're looking for backup software that we can use to back up our two main file servers over the network. One server stores roaming profiles and redirected folders for the students/staff members of the school, and the second stores several network shares used by multimedia and computer courses.

I've looked into a few programs, but since one of these servers stores the profiles/redirected folders for users, we need something that will maintain Windows ACL Permissions (so that User A won't have access to User B's documents in the event of a restore). Only program I found that supported ACL perms was Amanda, but only their enterprise edition supports that.

The only real requirements:

1) Fit the budget of a public school's IT Department (Freeware/open source)

2) Maintains ACLs

3) Can write to tapes

Anyone know of any software like that?

Edit: Forgot to mention, it doesn't really matter if it is Windows or Linux based, nor does it matter to us if we have to install a client on the file servers.

9 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

We've tried ntbackup.exe for a few weeks, it just does not suit our needs at all. It performs very slowly (to backup one server with about 300Gb of data can take almost a whole weekend). Also, it doesn't work too well with our tape drives (It says it runs out of space after about 80Gb is written to tape, when these tapes have a capacity of 200Gb, and we specifically tell it to "overwrite existing data").

  • 0

And are you trying to backup this 300GB over the wire? What is your network connection? Even a 100Mbit connection could easy take 16 some hours to copy 300GB of data if your only seeing 5MBytes/sec - how many files -- thousands I would assume. Lets say your 100Mbit connection is screaming at sustained 9MBytes per second for the 1,000's of files. Highly unlikely your looking at like 10 hours.

How do you have the backups configured, are you using backup on the server your wanting to backup to write to the remote storage - or pulling the files with the server attached to the tape drive.

The backup software that comes with 2003 is more than capable of backing up your data. As to speed of the backup -- there are many many factors to this.. Which could come into play no matter what software your using. Quite often you can run a agent on the remote server your wanting to backup to speed up this process by indexing what needs to be backed up and then doing a stream to the backup software, etc.

Backup Exec and ArcServe are both common mid level backup software -- they are not FREE though, but maybe there is a academic discount? You might want to look at Yosemite as well the sbs version is only like $399 and supports backing up to 3 servers.

All of these companies have trials -- so you can see which one you like best. You already found prob the best free one out Amanda, as to it not backing up ACLs?? Have no idea what your talking about the FREE client clearly states it supports ACLs

http://wiki.zmanda.com/index.php/Zmanda_Windows_Client

# Backup of open files

# Backs up NTFS filesystem

# Backup of extended attributes (ACLs)

And is supported on windows 2003

Amanda Windows client has been tested with (all running on x86 32bit platforms)

* Windows XP Pro (Server pack 2)

* Windows 2003 server

* Windows Vista

* Windows 2008 server

  • 0
  Joey H said:
We've tried ntbackup.exe for a few weeks, it just does not suit our needs at all. It performs very slowly (to backup one server with about 300Gb of data can take almost a whole weekend). Also, it doesn't work too well with our tape drives (It says it runs out of space after about 80Gb is written to tape, when these tapes have a capacity of 200Gb, and we specifically tell it to "overwrite existing data").

Are your tapes 200GB capacity UNcompressed or compressed? What kind of tapes and tape drive are you using?

  • 0
  BudMan said:
And are you trying to backup this 300GB over the wire? What is your network connection? Even a 100Mbit connection could easy take 16 some hours to copy 300GB of data if your only seeing 5MBytes/sec - how many files -- thousands I would assume. Lets say your 100Mbit connection is screaming at sustained 9MBytes per second for the 1,000's of files. Highly unlikely your looking at like 10 hours.

How do you have the backups configured, are you using backup on the server your wanting to backup to write to the remote storage - or pulling the files with the server attached to the tape drive.

All three servers in question (the two file servers and the backup server), all have dual 1Gb/s NICs. There is only one hop through the core switch, and the backups are taking place during the weekend, when network traffic is at the lowest.

File Server----(2x 1Gb/s Wired)----Core Switch----(2x 1Gb/s Wired)----Backup Server

The actual backups are pulled by the backup server. Bascially there is a script running on the backup server that loads ntbackup.exe and creates a backup of shares such as \\filesrv01\D$\Redirected\Staff.

  BudMan said:
All of these companies have trials -- so you can see which one you like best. You already found prob the best free one out Amanda, as to it not backing up ACLs?? Have no idea what your talking about the FREE client clearly states it supports ACLs

Well... I feel kinda foolish. I googled "Amanda Windows ACLs", and found several forum posts on Amanda's forums saying "enterprise edition only". Probably should've paid attention to when those posts were made. Thanks man :)

  Joel said:
Are your tapes 200GB capacity UNcompressed or compressed? What kind of tapes and tape drive are you using?

The tapes are LTO-2 tapes supporting 200Gb uncompressed, 400Gb compressed. The drive is an Ultrium LTO-2 drive.

  • 0
  Joey H said:
The tapes are LTO-2 tapes supporting 200Gb uncompressed, 400Gb compressed. The drive is an Ultrium LTO-2 drive.

You do not want to try getting 300GB on those tapes. At least, not all on 1 tape. I wouldn't trust the state of the backup at more than 10% compressed.

  • 0

If you want a faster backup you are better off backing up to a san then to tape. This way you don't have the slowness of the tape to contend with. I am seeing about 914 MB/min over the line with veritas going to a dell jukebox, I can backup a 249 GB environment in about 4hrs and 29 min doing a full backup, this is without a verify, this is doing a backup of 6 servers, 1 being a sql server and another being an exchange server (total of 8).

Here is my job summary from last Tuesday

Byte count : 249,419,642,113 bytes

Job rate : 913.56 MB/Min (Byte count of all backup sets divided by Elapsed time for all backup sets)

Files : 572,166

Directories : 16,208

Skipped files : 0

Corrupt files : 0

Files in use : 0

Original start time : June 30, 2009 10:00:00 PM

Job started : July 07, 2009 10:00:04 PM

Job ended : July 08, 2009 2:25:46 AM

Elapsed time : 04:25:42

  • 0

2x1 gig does not always mean your going to have that kind of speed.. Are they actually teamed? Does your switch support this? I would be curious to see a bandwidth test between your backup server and the file servers.

Iperf is great for this.. And just do a file copy of say 1 large say 600MB is size, using robocopy how long does it take?

Like I said lots a variables involved.

As SC302 mentions you can get some great speeds. You don't have to do it to the san either.. Using arcserve in my last location using multiplexing of the backups were screaming backups directly to the tapes at well over 1GB/min.. Some were see rates well over 1.5GB/min And there were drastic differences in speed using the agent vs not using the agent.

As mentioned don't always count on the compression to allow 300GB to fit on a 200GB tape -- would set your jobs to use multiple tapes. And compression can lower bandwidth, etc.

I would suggest you look into something like yosemite -- very reasonable price for your setup. There might even be an academic discount off that, etc. But sure grab armada, grab some of the other ones arcserve, backup exec, etc they most always have a free trial for 30 to 60 days and see which one you like best and which one gives you the best performance, etc.

If you get a chance -- please do some testing with iperf, takes no more than a couple of seconds to test.. Very curious what bandwidth your seeing ;)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Fresh leak suggests OnePlus Pad Lite in the works, key specs revealed by Sagar Naresh Bhavsar OnePlus recently unveiled the mid-range OnePlus 13s and the OnePlus Pad 3 Android tablet in India (the tablet is also coming to the U.S.). Now, it appears that the company is working on another tablet, this time, a budget model called the OnePlus Pad Lite. Supposedly, it will be the successor to the OnePlus Pad Go, which launched in the U.K., India, and European countries. According to the leaked images, OnePlus Pad Lite follows the same design elements as earlier OnePlus tablets. The tablet is shown to have a circular camera at the center of the rear panel, with the logo sitting in the middle. The USB-C port and speaker grills are located on the right side frame of the tablet. The alleged OnePlus Pad Lite measures 254.9 x 166.5 x 7.4mm and weighs 539 grams, which is slightly taller, wider, and thinner, but weighs less compared to the OnePlus Pad Go. The tablet, courtesy of 91Mobiles and OnLeaks, is displayed in blue, which could be the only color option. One image shows the tablet with a cover that doubles as a kickstand, but may be sold separately. Gallery: OnePlus Pad Lite Based on the leaked specs, the OnePlus Pad Lite could feature an 11-inch LCD 1920x1080 resolution 90Hz display. It could be powered by the MediaTek Helio G100 processor and paired with the Mali G57 GPU. The tablet may come with 6GB of RAM and 128GB of onboard storage, with more storage and RAM options available at launch. Reportedly, the OnePlus Pad Lite could feature a 5MP primary camera and a 5MP selfie camera. Under the hood, it could be juiced by a 9,340 mAh battery. On the software side, OnePlus Pad Lite may come with OxygenOS 15.0.1 based on Android 15 out of the box. There is no clarity on which market OnePlus plans to launch the OnePlus Pad Lite in. However, the report suggests that it could be priced under ₹20,000 (roughly $231). Images by 91mobiles x OnLeaks
    • Zen Browser 1.13b by Razvan Serea Zen Browser is a privacy-focused, open-source web browser built on Mozilla Firefox, offering users a secure and customizable browsing experience. It emphasizes privacy by blocking trackers, ads, and ensuring your data isn't collected. With Zen Mods, users can enhance their browser experience with various customization options, including features like split views and vertical tabs. The browser is designed for efficiency, providing fast browsing speeds and a lightweight interface. Zen Browser prioritizes user control over the browsing experience, offering a minimal yet powerful alternative to traditional web browsers while keeping your online activity private. Zen Browser’s DRM limitation Zen Browser currently lacks support for DRM-protected content, meaning streaming services like Netflix and HBO Max are inaccessible. This is due to the absence of a Widevine license, which requires significant costs and is financially unfeasible for the developer. Additionally, applying for this license would require Zen to be part of a larger company, similar to Mozilla or Brave. Therefore, DRM-protected media won't be supported in Zen Browser for the foreseeable future. Zen Browser offers features that improve user experience, privacy, and customization: Privacy-Focused: Blocks trackers and minimizes data collection. Automatic Updates: Keeps the browser updated with security patches. Zen Mods: Customizable themes and layouts. Workspaces: Organize tabs into different workspaces. Compact Mode: Maximizes screen space by minimizing UI elements. Zen Glance: Quick website previews. Split Views: View multiple tabs in the same window. Sidebar: Access bookmarks and tools quickly. Vertical Tabs: Manage tabs vertically. Container Tabs: Separate browsing sessions. Fast Profile Switcher: Switch between profiles easily. Tab Folders: Organize tabs into folders. Customizable UI: Personalize browser interface. Security Features: Inherits Firefox’s robust security. Fast Performance: Lightweight and optimized for speed. Zen Mods Customization: Deep customization with mods. Quick Access: Easy access to favorite websites. Open Source: Built on Mozilla Firefox with community collaboration. Community-Driven: Active development and feedback from users. GitHub Repository: Contribute and review the source code. Zen Browser 1.13b changes: New Features There's a new way to manage spaces, which brings a more intuitive and user-friendly experience Updated to firefox 139.0.4 Added support for Google safebrowsing for better security Collapsed toolbarr gets a slight UI redesign Fixes Fixed issues related to glance and split view Fixed performance issues and high GPU usage for some users Other small fixes and improvements Breaking Changes Customizable UI buttons at the bottom has been reset to a new default state Download: Zen Browser | 73.6 MB (Open Source) Download: Zen Browser ARM64 | Other Operating Systems View: Zen Browser Home Page | Screenshots 1 | 2 | Reddit Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • TBF, it has had PST support for quite a while now. But I still want them to add the ability to drag & drop between accounts / PSTs.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      julien02 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      Drewidian1 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Explorer
      Case_f went up a rank
      Explorer
    • Conversation Starter
      Jamie Smith earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      NeoToad777 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      544
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      227
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      160
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      113
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      102
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!