• 0

Good Win32 (Windows API) Programming Book?


Question

I am looking for a good Win32 (Windows API) book. I would like it to be as recent as possible and include information about how I would program for Windows 7 as well. Any recommendations? I know .NET programming and want to learn to move on to systems level programming. Thank you in advance.

11 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  winlonghorn said:
*Bump. Anyone? :)

No need to bump. It's only been 18 minutes.

With Win7 not even reaching RTM yet, your best bet would be online resources instead of books..

Edit: Here's a good one from MS: Windows 7 RC Training Kit for Developers

  • 0
  GreenMartian said:
No need to bump. It's only been 18 minutes.

With Win7 not even reaching RTM yet, your best bet would be online resources instead of books..

The problem is that I need one resource to learn it and not a bunch of scattered resources. I need the organization to help me focus without hunting and pecking lol. That is why I like books for learning. :)

  • 0

Bumping after just 19 minutes? :rolleyes:

Programming Windows is a classic and is arguably the best book, though old. As for Win7, first, I'm not sure if there's a book for that, given that the APIs for Win7 were only recently documented; plus, MSDN provides a pretty good reference for the new APIs (almost all of them COM APIs) in Win7. Besides, the specific APIs of each Windows version are largely unimportant because the main concepts are fairly stable and are mostly unchanged through all versions, and that's what you'll get from Petzold. Get a feel for the Windows architecture and platform, and the APIs are just details that you can look up in the docs (which you have to refer to anyway for specifics on each function's parameters and return codes, etc).

Or you can just do what I did: look at the docs and look at sample code; programming isn't history class: books are not that important when it comes to learning this stuff.

  • 0
  code.kliu.org said:
Bumping after just 19 minutes? :rolleyes:

Get Petzold. Programming Windows is a classic and is arguably the best book. As for Win7, first, I'm not sure if there's a book for that, and MSDN provides a pretty good reference for the new APIs (almost all of them COM APIs) in Win7. Besides, the specific APIs of each Windows version are largely unimportant because the main concepts are fairly stable and are mostly unchanged through all versions. Get a feel for the Windows architecture and platform, and the APIs are just details that you can look up in the docs (which you have to refer to anyway for specifics on each function's parameters and return codes, etc).

Thank you. :) Sorry about the bump. I just needed to get an answer for the friend who is buying the book and they had to leave soon.

  • 0

http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_ss_gw_0_9?u...refix=win32+pro

Read reviews. Generally, MS books are very good when it comes to Win32 apps. The Windows via C/C++ is probably a good bet. Jeffery Richter is a very well-known resource for Win32 and Windows programming in general. the Petzold book is excellent, as well, but doesn't deal with newer APIs. It is invaluable, though.

  • 0
  azcodemonkey said:
http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_ss_gw_0_9?u...refix=win32+pro

Read reviews. Generally, MS books are very good when it comes to Win32 apps. The Windows via C/C++ is probably a good bet. Jeffery Richter is a very well-known resource for Win32 and Windows programming in general. the Petzold book is excellent, as well, but doesn't deal with newer APIs. It is invaluable, though.

Ok, great. Thank you. :)

EDIT: I am buying the petzold book. I read the amazon preview and it looks fantastic! :)

Edited by winlonghorn
  • 0

Petzold's book was good, but you people need to be realistic. It is an old book. Very old. Over a decade old, and very dated. I'm not so sure if it can be recommended anymore, even though the basics haven't changed that much.

If you're interested in online resources, http://www.winprog.org/tutorial/start.html is not bad, especially when combined with MSDN. Let's say you want some more in-depth details about Windows, you could just head over to http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms...28VS.85%29.aspx

If you look in the tree on the left, it also has sections explaining window procedures, window classes, input, the various controls, etc. Most parts have example code as well. It's the main reference site for the Windows APIs, so it's something you have to bookmark. As for Windows 7, it has many new things in various areas. Let's say you wanted to use the new API that gives you a progress bar in the task bar button, this is the method to do it (along with SetProgressValue). Only one problem though, it's a COM interface exposed by the shell (Explorer), which means you need to have a basic understanding of COM (which you'd have to get somewhere else). You also need this to do various other things like multimedia, image processing, etc.

Just as a little example, you'd set the progress bar to 20% and turn it red to indicate an error like this (without any error checking or autopointers):

ITaskbarList3 *tl3 = NULL;
hr = CoCreateInstance(CLSID_TaskbarList, NULL, CLSCTX_INPROC_SERVER,
	__uuidof(ITaskbarList3), IID_PPV_ARGS(&tl3));

hr = tl3->HrInit();

hr = tl3->SetProgressValue(hwnd, 20, 100);
hr = tl3->SetProgressState(hwnd, TBPF_ERROR);

tl3->Release();

It's not that complex, you just create an instance of the class with CoCreateInstance, and then call the various methods it exposes as you see fit. Of course, you have to learn this somewhere.

  • 0
  hdood said:
even though the basics haven't changed that much.

Well, that's what he needs, though. An understanding of the platform. Knowing the difference between SendMessage and PostMessage. That kind of stuff.

  Quote
Of course, you have to learn this somewhere.

Yes, and the MSDN library contains plenty of documentation and code samples for the new features and APIs introduced in the past decade.

Developing for any platform can be separated into understanding the platform (e.g., how does the message queue work, or what exactly are windows?) and knowing the specific incantations needed to invoke feature XYZ. The former is fairly static and is mostly timeless and is thus book-worthy. OTOH, it doesn't make sense to have the latter in a book (what would a book do, beyond a dry, hard-to-search regurgitation of documentation and sample code found in the MSDN library?).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • "When Live Activities launched with iOS 16, Apple gave iPhone users a dynamic way to track stuff like sports scores and food deliveries right on the lock screen." No.... Just no... Life is already noisy enough to have my phone ADD notifications to the existing ones all day long.
    • Samsung Electronics has multiple subsidiaries. Samsung Display is a subsidiary that deals in screen manufacturing, it's a supply chain-based company where the staff solely care about manufacturing displays. Samsung Electronic's TV and Phone division may have other priorities, for example Samsung TV didn't want to go in on OLED because margins were lower when building the entire TV. Samsung Display's entire existence however now depends on OLED as they couldn't undercut Chinese LCD manufacturers but could compete against LG Display who is the only competitor in that market. Samsung Display has this screen manufacturing investment, but Samsung Mobile may not be willing to reduce their margins for going with a display technology that eats into the phone margins.
    • The weather looks gorgeous, I love the atmosphere of this new area.
    • Similar to what started me on the path to switching to Linux... for the first 6mo of Win10 it was installing an AMD GPU driver that broke audio over HDMI which was essential to me. Driver from AMDs site was fine.
    • I have avoided many deer, a few moose, and other smaller animals during my years of driving and have managed just fine with only ABS and ESP, both of which can also be problematic depending on circumstance. I have never feared driving and I live in a rural area with a lot of deer and other animals. Winter or summer, heavy rain or sunshine, night or day, I always prefer and like to drive myself, and I drive constantly in my job. People die in accidents and they always will, that is a fact of life. Something like self-driving busses I can advocate for because they can be set to drive on static routes that always stay the same - i.e. those routes can be specially designed and maintained for them. I've already seen enough idiots doing random idiotic things with their Tesla autodrives that I would rather see them crash and burn because of their own stupidity instead of their "computer failing". I've also been a PC and tech enthusiast of over 25 years so I I'm fine with tech but I want to be the one who uses it, and decides how much of it I use. I also do not want it to make my hands, feet and brain obsolete. For me it's not really about if a computer can do it but about people not having to do things themselves (responsibly). I think that basic driving education should be done with a manual car and these "automatic only" cards should not exist (yes, I'm European and we drive a lot of manual cars, I even prefer them). If a person doesn't have enough coordination to manage a steering wheel, shitfer and pedals, how on Earth are they able to react to any unforseen situation on the road? And giving them autodrive doesn't make me feel any better if the person behind the wheel can't manage even basic driving themselves. One of the things I hate most in today's society (in general) is how pretty much everything that is considered even a bit dangerous is eliminated instead of educating people to assess risks and avoid problems themselves. Instead we make brains obsolete by building systems that do everything for us.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Crunchy6 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      KynanSEIT earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      gowtham07 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Collaborator
      lethalman went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Wayne Robinson earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      674
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      274
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      219
    4. 4
      +FloatingFatMan
      170
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      161
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!