How much did OLD computers cost in 1996?


Recommended Posts

Put it this way the average laptop that costs around ?350 -?400 now would have cost more than ?1500 back then.

I remember that having 512mb of ram was a luxury in those days.

512mb would have been the hard dis;) ;)

I reckon 512mb would have been unheard of before Windows 2000.

512mb would have been the hard disk. ;)

I reckon 512mb would have been unheard of before Windows 2000.

Exactly most mobo's went upto 196 max.

Are we talking about old computers then, so anything prior to 1990 is old?

I purchased a Sinclair spectrum for ?4 in 1993 with floppy drive, from a boot market.

In 1996 time would do a computer windows 95 with all bells and whistles, 32mb r.a.m. cd rom and floppy + for free ?1,000 worth of software.

Total cost ?1,200.

In June 1993 I purchased the following system:

  • 486 DX 33 MHz
  • 8 MB RAM
  • 162 MB HDD
  • Oak VGA card with 0.5 MB graphics RAM
  • 14" CRT monitor
  • MS-DOS 6, Windows 3.1, Lotus SmartSuite bundled

for roughly 3000 DM, or about $2000 at the time. Mind you, this was a relatively low end system from a budget retailer (the older German users among us will still remember Escom).

Probably 2k for a computer like that, 486 with 8MB was pretty top line back then... although I can't remember when back then was, might've been before 1996. :s

512mb would have been the hard disk. ;)

I reckon 512mb would have been unheard of before Windows 2000.

512MB would've been a pretty good hard disk :p, I had to stack a couple SCSIs to get to 512MB.

Like 486/66 MHZ, with only 8MB memory.

I forgot was it over $500-1000 on Average?

PCs were a lot more expensive back then.

I purchased an Acer 486DX2 with 16Mb RAM and a multimedia kit (cd-rom + sound card) for $2,500USD back in 1995.

NB: with time value of money taken into account, $2500 back then is like 5K+ nowadays. The purchasing power of $100 ten years ago was a lot more than $100 today.

In 1995 my family bought a 386/9mhz that had a 50mb hd and 4mb ram. Cost a little over $3k. I loved that computer...overclocked it to 25 mhz.

Sorry about that. In 95 we bought the compaq Pentium 200 with MMX. It had 256 mb of ram and a 500 mb HD. Had an 8x cd-rom. That was a top of the line then and I swear the tower looked like a space ship. This machine was a little over $2K. My parents were still using it until last summer.

The 386 was bought in August 1989.

As other people have said, most computers were over $1000 in 1996. I remember my family purchasing a new computer in April or May 1997 for about $2500 CDN... it was pretty high-end for the time. Sad that I remember the specs:

-Intel Pentium MMX 166MHz

-32Mb EDO RAM

-2Gb Western Digital IDE hard disk

-ATI 3D Xpression+ PC2TV 2Mb PCI video card (ATI Rage II chipset... one of the early and useless 3D cards)

-Creative Labs Sound Blaster AWE32 sound card

-AOpen 33.6kbps internal dial-up modem

-12X Panasonic CD-ROM (went through 2 of these in 2 weeks before the store realized they had a bad batch and replaced it with an AOpen 18X)

-3.5" 1.44mb floppy

-14" AcerView 34T monitor

-Windows 95 OSR2

I remember this computer as being ridiculously fast for about a year until games started supporting 3D accelerators. That ATI card claimed to be Direct3D compatible but never really worked with any Direct3D games.

Edited by hitman05

my first "family computer" was bought in 1993. it was a Packard Bell Pentium (90MHz) w/ an 800MB hd and 8MB ram. it had a monitor, so im just guessing it was upwards of $3k.

several years later we finally put a 32MB DIMM in it (total of 40MB!), an upgraded hd, and a 4MB PCI video card. Amazing.

i think we kept that machine for 6-7yrs.

We bought in 1997 a

166mhz P1 with MMX (haha)

32mb ram

3.2GB Hard drive.

32x CDrom (was a big thing back then)

15ins ADI CRT Monitor

Cost us around ?1400. Nowadays the average system is ?40:s:s

Around the same time, we bought a 200 MHz Pentium 1 (MMX) machine with 16 MB RAM, a 2.1 GB HDD and a 20x CD-ROM drive. Was between ?700 and ?900 (can't remember).

They were about the same costs as today's computers. Remember those computers were once the high end in the days.

My family bought an Osbourne pc running win 3.11. Can't remember the specs. My own first PC was a 500mhz CPU, 64mb RAM, 8GB HD running Win98. Got that back in 2000. 9 years later I have a PC 1000 times powerful than that. but cost is the same. I got that 98 computer for $1999. This computer (the second one I built) I have now costs me $2000 with a video card to come yet.

when people say computers are getting cheaper, they actually meant that old hard ware are getting cheaper, not new hardware.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Samsung is shutting down yet another app used by millions by David Uzondu Samsung has announced that it is shutting down Samsung Max, its VPN service used by more than 50 million people, effective today. Samsung Max VPN, if you don't know, was an Android app born on February 23, 2018, out of the ashes of Opera Max, a very popular data-saving VPN that Opera had discontinued the previous year. Samsung bought the discontinued service, rebranded it, and added a native Samsung UI to fit the Galaxy ecosystem. The app could do things like compress images, help you manage background data on a per-app basis, reduce video data consumption, shrink music files, optimize webpages, block advertisement trackers in incognito mode, and encrypt your internet traffic on public Wi-Fi networks. Image via SammyGuru If you open the app now, you'd be greeted by a shutdown banner warning that all VPN, data saving, and privacy services stopped functioning on June 15, 2026. The creators failed to provide a reason for the shutdown, instead publishing a farewell note that read: "Thank you for being with us over the years. Your support and activity truly meant a lot to us and helped shape this app into what it became." This same message appears on the Google Play Store listing for the app as well. Max VPN is the latest service from Samsung to join the list of discontinued applications from the company. Just two months ago, the Korean tech giant announced that it is completely shutting down Samsung Messages, forcing millions of users to migrate to Google Messages by next month. The only devices that the shutdown won't affect are older smartphones running Android 11 or lower. Some of the features of Google Messages that Samsung hopes will entice users include AI-powered scam detection to block suspicious links, integrated Gemini AI tools to generate quick replies, custom chat bubbles, and universal RCS compatibility for sharing high-quality media with iOS users. The platform also offers seamless syncing across tablets and smartwatches. In addition to that, users gain access to message scheduling, smart classification, and automated category sorting. Via: SammyGuru
    • 1. Define "better". 2. It's still more expensive than equivalent PCs so... And there is not one Windows platform. This is the mistake ALL Apple oriented people make. Apple is one OEM. You could reasonably compare them to one PC OEM, say Dell or HP. But you can't compare them to ALL PC OEMs. Case in point, Apple has NO touch screen MacBooks. No tablet Macs. There are no rugged Macs. The variety of PC OEM design is insane. With Apple, you have... Apple. The problem is that you're starting with Apple as the definition of "good" then filtering out anything that isn't close to an existing Apple product, then trying to homogenise all of those left into a fictional product line and then ignore any innovations to create a minimal feature subset so you can say "See! Apple better!" PS: I was an Apple dev for 17 years and helped develop MacInTalk and disability solutions for Apple, and worked on Microsoft Office for MacOS - and I have several Macs and MacBooks - so tread very carefully.
    • Major Xbox layoffs may claim South of Midnight developer Compulsion entirely by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Microsoft has been making major changes in its gaming wing Xbox for a few months now, including the appointment of a new CEO, a large number of leadership changes, and strategy shifts. However, the company is seemingly also looking at initiating a major layoffs wave at Xbox and perhaps even a studio closure. The new report lands from Kotaku, Xbox first-party developer Compulsion Games is being shuttered soon by Microsoft. For those unfamiliar with the studio, it's the team behind Contrast (2013), We Happy Few (2018), and South of Midnight (2025). Its latest game was quite well received, even winning a Peabody Award for its writing. It even received a 9/10 in Neowin's own review, highlighting its engaging storyline, gorgeous world, and curious characters. The studio joined Xbox Game Studios in 2018, just as Microsoft announced it is acquiring Playground Games, Undead Labs, and Ninja Theory. Despite recent listings for new staff roles, according to the new report, Compulsion Games is being closed entirely, with over 90 staff being let go. Kotaku also added that the studio's leadership is in negotiations with Microsoft about this decision, but no official details have been revealed yet. The report lands just as two senior managers of Xbox leave their posts at Microsoft Gaming. Head of Xbox Game Studios Craig Duncan and chief of staff Louise O'Connor originally began their journey in Rare and have been a part of Xbox for over two decades. Dunkan has been responsible for games like Kinect Sports and Sea of Thieves, while O'Connor was primarily working on Rare's Everwild project before its cancelation. If this report about the studio shutdown is accurate, this may just be the start of a major new layoffs wave at Xbox Game Studios. There are also rumors of Arkane Studios being heavily affected. As always, take all these reports with a grain of salt until something official materializes from Microsoft or the studios.
    • The flaw with this analysis is that this laptop has a cellphone CPU in it. In the Intel world, that would be an N150 and those are everywhere, even in low end laptops. You can get an N150 based NUC with 16GB RAM and 256GB-512GB SSD... NOT soldered in... for < $500 Canadian (around US$360). The problem is two fold: tech bloggers/writers on most tech site (like this one, ironically) overvalue Apple and apparently aren't in the same earnings class as most regular people. As a result, we get breathless articles about how everyone needs a folding phone when most people just cannot afford one... or really need one. And we get Apple used as the baseline metric regardless of whether that comparison makes any sense. If Dell or HP released a retail laptop with a cellphone motherboard, you'd be all over them for doing that - but Apple does it and it's genius. I see articles suggesting what Samsung - a company that basically started the foldable phone market and has built them for eight years - needs to do to compete with Apple's unreleased, unspecced and unseen folding phone. Sorry, no - if the Neo (really creative name there BTW - still, better than the Go, the other "creative" product name everyone's using) encourages PC makers to make cellphone laptops using lower end ARM processors, we all lose. It's a step backwards and a capitulation to the fact that semiconductor makers and computer OEMs (and tech bloggers) have totally lost the plot.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      ThatGuyOnline earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Jeroen Wilms earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      507
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      197
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      127
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      82
    5. 5
      neufuse
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!