How much did OLD computers cost in 1996?


Recommended Posts

Put it this way the average laptop that costs around ?350 -?400 now would have cost more than ?1500 back then.

I remember that having 512mb of ram was a luxury in those days.

512mb would have been the hard dis;) ;)

I reckon 512mb would have been unheard of before Windows 2000.

512mb would have been the hard disk. ;)

I reckon 512mb would have been unheard of before Windows 2000.

Exactly most mobo's went upto 196 max.

Are we talking about old computers then, so anything prior to 1990 is old?

I purchased a Sinclair spectrum for ?4 in 1993 with floppy drive, from a boot market.

In 1996 time would do a computer windows 95 with all bells and whistles, 32mb r.a.m. cd rom and floppy + for free ?1,000 worth of software.

Total cost ?1,200.

In June 1993 I purchased the following system:

  • 486 DX 33 MHz
  • 8 MB RAM
  • 162 MB HDD
  • Oak VGA card with 0.5 MB graphics RAM
  • 14" CRT monitor
  • MS-DOS 6, Windows 3.1, Lotus SmartSuite bundled

for roughly 3000 DM, or about $2000 at the time. Mind you, this was a relatively low end system from a budget retailer (the older German users among us will still remember Escom).

Probably 2k for a computer like that, 486 with 8MB was pretty top line back then... although I can't remember when back then was, might've been before 1996. :s

512mb would have been the hard disk. ;)

I reckon 512mb would have been unheard of before Windows 2000.

512MB would've been a pretty good hard disk :p, I had to stack a couple SCSIs to get to 512MB.

Like 486/66 MHZ, with only 8MB memory.

I forgot was it over $500-1000 on Average?

PCs were a lot more expensive back then.

I purchased an Acer 486DX2 with 16Mb RAM and a multimedia kit (cd-rom + sound card) for $2,500USD back in 1995.

NB: with time value of money taken into account, $2500 back then is like 5K+ nowadays. The purchasing power of $100 ten years ago was a lot more than $100 today.

In 1995 my family bought a 386/9mhz that had a 50mb hd and 4mb ram. Cost a little over $3k. I loved that computer...overclocked it to 25 mhz.

Sorry about that. In 95 we bought the compaq Pentium 200 with MMX. It had 256 mb of ram and a 500 mb HD. Had an 8x cd-rom. That was a top of the line then and I swear the tower looked like a space ship. This machine was a little over $2K. My parents were still using it until last summer.

The 386 was bought in August 1989.

As other people have said, most computers were over $1000 in 1996. I remember my family purchasing a new computer in April or May 1997 for about $2500 CDN... it was pretty high-end for the time. Sad that I remember the specs:

-Intel Pentium MMX 166MHz

-32Mb EDO RAM

-2Gb Western Digital IDE hard disk

-ATI 3D Xpression+ PC2TV 2Mb PCI video card (ATI Rage II chipset... one of the early and useless 3D cards)

-Creative Labs Sound Blaster AWE32 sound card

-AOpen 33.6kbps internal dial-up modem

-12X Panasonic CD-ROM (went through 2 of these in 2 weeks before the store realized they had a bad batch and replaced it with an AOpen 18X)

-3.5" 1.44mb floppy

-14" AcerView 34T monitor

-Windows 95 OSR2

I remember this computer as being ridiculously fast for about a year until games started supporting 3D accelerators. That ATI card claimed to be Direct3D compatible but never really worked with any Direct3D games.

Edited by hitman05

my first "family computer" was bought in 1993. it was a Packard Bell Pentium (90MHz) w/ an 800MB hd and 8MB ram. it had a monitor, so im just guessing it was upwards of $3k.

several years later we finally put a 32MB DIMM in it (total of 40MB!), an upgraded hd, and a 4MB PCI video card. Amazing.

i think we kept that machine for 6-7yrs.

We bought in 1997 a

166mhz P1 with MMX (haha)

32mb ram

3.2GB Hard drive.

32x CDrom (was a big thing back then)

15ins ADI CRT Monitor

Cost us around ?1400. Nowadays the average system is ?40:s:s

Around the same time, we bought a 200 MHz Pentium 1 (MMX) machine with 16 MB RAM, a 2.1 GB HDD and a 20x CD-ROM drive. Was between ?700 and ?900 (can't remember).

They were about the same costs as today's computers. Remember those computers were once the high end in the days.

My family bought an Osbourne pc running win 3.11. Can't remember the specs. My own first PC was a 500mhz CPU, 64mb RAM, 8GB HD running Win98. Got that back in 2000. 9 years later I have a PC 1000 times powerful than that. but cost is the same. I got that 98 computer for $1999. This computer (the second one I built) I have now costs me $2000 with a video card to come yet.

when people say computers are getting cheaper, they actually meant that old hard ware are getting cheaper, not new hardware.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
    • So how did you solve the problem? Disabling Secure Boot isn’t a solution.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!