[Spoilers] Lost - Season 6

By Rappy
in The Media Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

Rising Star

pepo

Posted
Posted

Episode already aired. Most of those are not spoiler questions.

1. He didn't. We just saw Desmond falling... water could have stopped him. Hell, Juliet survived a similar fall. Jacob lending a hand perhaps? He did see that boy, i.e.

young jacob

2. When Charlotte Lewis said "This place is death", she was right. I suppose dead people are trapped just like MIB. Jacob is keeping them there.

3.

young jacob, I think.

4. Plot development?? We know one of them is a candidate... if both of them came together, one might end up dying? Since one isn't necessary for the Island.

5. To get the spinal surgery by Jack. Remember in a previous episode he offered to help him. Desmond is probably making that happen.

6. They're protected by the fence.

1. No reference of Jacob lending a hand, it's a TV show, falls like that don't kill people.

2. Hurley saw dead people off the island, it's just a common theory that people with unfinished business or unsettled ghosts still inhabit this world after they die, I don't think it has anything to do with Jacob either.

3. Me too.

4. That doesn't make sense, they aren't together just because of the way things have gone, not because if they came together one would have to die...

5. That is a theory a lot of people seem to think, but I find it senseless, Des didn't know about Jack offering to help Locke or any of that. I prefer the theory that MiB's escape would be to alternate reality and since he is stuck as Locke then he would escape into alternate Locke's body, so Des is trying to kill alternate Locke...

6.Yep, and no one knows yet what Witmore has to do with anything but it might just be the theory I pointed out above.

Grand Master

ATGC

Posted
Posted

2. Hurley saw dead people off the island, it's just a common theory that people with unfinished business or unsettled ghosts still inhabit this world after they die, I don't think it has anything to do with Jacob either.

Either way, they are trapped. Only explanation so far of someone being trapped on the Island is MIB. So, same theory can be applied to the ghosts as well. If you died on the Island, you're probably stuck just like MIB because of whatever Jacob did to keep him there.

4. That doesn't make sense, they aren't together just because of the way things have gone, not because if they came together one would have to die...

Well, people are going to die. I think either one of them will. No happy ending :p Just my theory

5. That is a theory a lot of people seem to think, but I find it senseless, Des didn't know about Jack offering to help Locke or any of that. I prefer the theory that MiB's escape would be to alternate reality and since he is stuck as Locke then he would escape into alternate Locke's body, so Des is trying to kill alternate Locke...

We'll see soon enough.

Next week promo:

Song used:

Grand Master

Mathachew Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

Got to see the episode, an hour later than I originally planned as my assumption on air time was off, but I saw it nonetheless and loved it. I like some of the ideas being tossed around on here as well. Keep it up (Y)

Grand Master

Yusuf M. Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

I think MiB is already in Locke's body in the other timeline. Think about it: He influenced Ben-2 (alternate timeline Ben) into trying to be in charge. And being in charge means being in a position of power. Ben-2's position of power would've been school principal had he not seen the e-mail. If you remember, MiB Locke-1 wanted Ben-1 to be in charge of the island. That meant staying back after everyone leaves. Also, MiB Locke-2 referred to himself as "the substitute". Could that be a reference of him replacing the original Locke? Perhaps. From what we've seen, the new timeline is connected with the old one (as indicated by the returning memories). Of course, my theory will be blown out of the water if Locke-2 starts remembering things.

And damn, it took awhile to catch up. I stopped watching the show after the 1st season. I'm all caught up now. :)

Veteran

HilariousNinja

Posted
Posted

Wow, great episode. The death was totally wtf though. I kinda expected it to happen though when she grabbed the bag full of the explosives. Couple of nice answers.

And all this about Desmond running Locke over... wasn't that just to get Locke to have a near-death experience like Desmond and Charlie and remember his island life.

Grand Master

SuperJediMedia

Posted
Posted

Wow, great episode. The death was totally wtf though. I kinda expected it to happen though when she grabbed the bag full of the explosives. Couple of nice answers.

And all this about Desmond running Locke over... wasn't that just to get Locke to have a near-death experience like Desmond and Charlie and remember his island life.

She is so STUPID. People keep warning her about the explosives, but she ignores them. LOL

Community Regular

MrChuang

Posted
Posted

Just before I explain how much time is being wasted in this season I do agree this weeks episode and last weeks were very good. A few answers this episode but the whispers answer didn't seem the best, kind of unexpected but maybe that is just me. It seems this season so much time has been wasted with scenes of the group just talking in the jungle about where they are going to go next, or how they leave to walk through the jungle to the place they are heading but it takes nearly a whole episode to get their and when they finally do arrive in the last few minutes of the episode their is a big 'wow!' moment and the episode ends. It doesn't feel like the final season, and definitely not like the final episodes of the show.

Building up Ilana's character then killing her in a split second was kinda odd but I guess nobody even liked her anyway

. Still I love lost and love most of these episodes but it's not feeling like the last season. Only Richard's episode felt fulfilling out of this season.

Grand Master

+Peewee210 Subscriber¹

Posted
  • Subscriber¹
Posted

Woah. Trying to digest that episode. So many moments to pick up on. Since maybe the Side-ways and the actually timeline seem to be having similarties, maybe Desmond trying to kill Locke can stop the MiB. Locke's life couldn't get much worse :laugh:

Grand Master

Noveed

Posted
Posted

I dont think ghost Michael was MIB, Michael pointed to lock/MIB down in the distance as Hurley needed to know where he was, so he pointed him out and you could see him walking with his Torch in the distance.

Another giveaway was Lockes expression when he say Hurley for the first time... it was almost as if he didnt expect them there.

Mentor

Pallab

Posted
Posted
<br />we will agree to disagree, that along with SOS and Nikki/Paulos episode are the worst episodes ever<br />

Please don't shoot me, but I loved Expose. The ending was wtf and the entire episode was entertaining. It was course-correction for the show and they did it in style.

Also, am I not the only one who is unsatisfied with the explanation dished out for the whispers. I kind of wish it was a side-effect of time travel and stuff as it was theorotised in the past, instead of just souls trapped in the island. Hopefully, future episodes will shed more light on this issue.

Ilana's death was awesome, but kind of dissapointed how she never really managed to achieve something. I was confident that she is gonna turn out to be really important.

<br />I'm always so excited to watch the show and every time I do it's the same damn thing.. i'm left feeling like "wtf just happened".??I'm just not piecing this together.. I need to find a website or something that explains wtf is going on cause i'm very "lost".<br /><br />Here are a few of my questions.. maybe someone can help me out.<br /><br />

1.??Why did smoke/locke kill desmond?

<br />

2.??What the **** are the voices.. people that are trapped???What did Michael do to be trapped.??He made reference that he was there because of what he did.

<br />

3.??What's up with the kid that locke seen, that made him quite upset.

<br />

4.??Someone had mentioned this before in this thread but never explained it, why are Jin and Sun not able to be together?

<br />

5.??Why did desmond hit locke with his car???I didn't get this at all.

<br />

6.??Wtf does widmore have to do with anything.??If he made it to the island, why can't smokie kill them all and hop in the sub.

<br /><br /><br />that's it for now.. i'm soo confused...lol<br />

Check out Erica's recaps if you feel confused about what happened in a episode. They are pretty good.

http://www.longlivelocke.com/

Grand Master

Rappy Veteran

Posted
  • Author
  • Veteran
Posted

Please don't shoot me, but I loved Expose. The ending was wtf and the entire episode was entertaining. It was course-correction for the show and they did it in style.

oh dear :rofl: your forgiven because you like other shows I like :p

Grand Master

Richard Hammond

Posted
Posted

First half was boring but i got goosebumps once

hurley remembered libby and another question solved seems that the whispers are the souls/essence of dead people who are still holding onto something, at first i thought all the whispers were the dead people who were evil which would tie into them being trapped on the island like MiB who is also evil but people who arent evil like Jacob have also appeared to him, but then the whispers dont happen a lot so it still could be that the whispers are the souls of people who have done bad/wrong on the island, also poor ilana halfway through speaking and BOOM vaporised, i couldnt help but laugh

, lost makes my brain hurt.

Grand Master

ThePitt

Posted
Posted

I like better when locke take desmond to that hole. Make me laught hard too. The whole thing, I meam, desmond was like he was in love, with the life, penny and stuff and suddenly he ends in that hole with the locke evil face, HAHA. He was in love and he finally "face" the reality, LOL

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • Limited time Prime Day deal cuts price of this Hisense 65" 4K smart TV in half

      By Ivan Jenic · Posted

      Limited time Prime Day deal cuts price of this Hisense 65" 4K smart TV in half by Ivan Jenic It’s Amazon Prime Day, and brands are offering great deals to consumers. One of the best deals of the day is definitely this Hisense 65" U7, which is currently $799.99 on Amazon, down from $1,499.99. That's nearly 50% off and $700 saved on this feature-packed 4K TV (purchase link down below). The U7 uses Mini-LED backlighting with up to 3,000 local dimming zones and up to 3,000 nits of peak brightness. That means blacks are truly deep and highlights are punchy enough to hold up even in bright rooms. The screen is covered with a dual-layer anti-reflection coating, which prevents the afternoon overhead lights from washing the picture. For gaming, the native 165Hz refresh rate and VRR 330 support make this one a great TV option for PS5 and Xbox Series X. The TV even features a native game mode, which should help minimize the input lag for a better gaming experience. Audio is handled by a 2.1.2 channel system tuned by Devialet, which is a notable partnership for a TV at this price. Additionally, Dolby Vision IQ, Dolby Atmos, and IMAX Enhanced are all supported. It runs Fire TV with Alexa+ built in. So, if you’re looking for a sharp, large screen to watch the World Cup on, the U7 at this price is definitely an attractive option. Speaking of which, Hisense is the official sponsor of the World Cup, which should mean absolutely nothing to you, and isn’t the reason why you should by this TV. The reason why you should buy it is that it’s “la bella televisione, HDTV-compatible, beautiful,” and available at half the price. Hisense 65" U7 Mini-LED 4K Smart Fire TV - $799.99 | 47% off on Amazon Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • eM Client 10.4.5600.0

      By Copernic · Posted

      eM Client 10.4.5600.0 by Razvan Serea eM Client is a full featured e-mail client with a modern and easy to use interface. eM Client also offers calendar, tasks, contacts and chat. eM Client supports all major services including Gmail, Exchange, iCloud, and Outlook.com. You can easily import your data from most of the other e-mail clients. This includes Microsoft Outlook, Outlook Express, Windows Mail, Windows Live Mail, Thunderbird, The Bat and more. eM Client fully supports touch devices like touch-enabled laptops, tablets and hybrid devices. Use your email client easily in a modern way. eM Client PRO vs. Free version While the Free license allows you to set up the maximum of two accounts in the application, it is possible to add an unlimited number of accounts with the PRO license. The PRO license also enables you to use eM Client for commercial purposes. Commercial use is any activity that helps you make profit, the Free license therefore cannot be used in company settings or on personal computers for business correspondence. PRO users also gain access to the dedicated support system and to the licensing manager. eM Client has been fully optimized to run smoothly on Windows Vista, 7, 8, 10 and 11. eM Client 10.4.5600.0 changelog: Improved memory management Improved MS Teams support A lot of other fixes Download: eM Client 10.4.5600 | 128.0 MB (Free, paid upgrade available) View: eM Client Website | eM Client Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • EU says AWS and Microsoft Azure should be treated as DMA gatekeepers

      By Nas · Posted

      Re: Capitalism. It's just 1 of dozens of economic models currently-adopted worldwide; most national models separate money from politics thereby limiting the influence wealth carries over the economy (due to limited tentacles wealth politics has over the broader economy). The "American model" of unfettered financial influence should NOT be the variant of pure capitalism adopted worldwide. More regulations formulated within this variant is effectively useless due to the misalignment between regulatory objectives and fundamental influence wealth politics carry over the market. Re: enough money. Without constraining the breadth/depth/scope/scale that any measure of money/wealth can have within a market, there will always inherently be those who have "enough money" and those who do not. Those without "enough money" will always lose -- regardless if a bedroom DJ, indie developer, or million-dollar corporation going against a billion-dollar mega-corporation. The evil is the absence of guardrails against the influence of wealth; not the mere existence of wealth. Re: dragged through the courts. The liberalist nature of litigation does not exclude anyone, anywhere, for any reason for getting dragged through the courts. Rather than formalize remediation pathways for various perceived ills, everything is left up to flawed interpretations... and this is where a litigation-averse community fails to thrive (thus a losing proposition when dragged to courts). Everyone should have more protections and clear remediation strategies! Going to an alternate remediation arbitration is OK so long as the case review and remediation processes are clear and transparent. For corporations, hit them where it hurts: automatic financial penalties. (PS: This is where corporate risk management strategies would do well to behave more ethically.) Overall, failure to truly shake-up the incentive core and regulatory extremities of the economic market will necessarily mean that all other actions are simply applying lipstick on a pig. Change begins from the inside. Is the root cause of the problem that a majority of consumers within a market goes for Option Brand-name versus Option Indie? Or that brand-name is spending foreign money to control domestic markets? Or that money is the objective measure for success across all walks of life? Or that deep pockets dictate the moral and ethical rights/wrongs of entire societies? Regardless of the answer (and there's nothing inherently wrong with being a socialist or communist or whatever label your surroundings deem 'cool' or 'uncool') there's a common thread: If a market truly wants to nurture domestic innovation, then performative finger-wagging will do nothing to that end.
    • Researchers claim Microsoft's quantum breakthrough is flawed by basic Python errors

      By +pmrd · Posted

      Lol, I won't even bother explaining the joke to you.
    • Microsoft updates Visual Studio Code with chat cost tracking and multi-agent chats

      By Fleet Command · Posted

      Does anyone remember the time when VSCode was a lightweight solution, just shy of 40 MB? No?

  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      404
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      164
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      71
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!