Recommended Posts

http://www.cnn.com/2010/SHOWBIZ/TV/05/20/end.lost.next/index.html

"There's a lot of respect the show has for its viewers ... and it flies in the face of the so-called dumbing down of America. And I think that level of respect that the programmers extended is reciprocated by the love of the viewers," he says. "That level of intimacy and familiarity has been helped along by their very canny use of social media." He believes that the broadcast networks can have success by using the same strategies.

As the finale approaches, the wisdom of the decision is obvious. The show is earning the kind of attention most shows never get: a huge cover story in EW, a New York Times-hosted chat with producers Carlton Cuse and Damon Lindelof, expansion of the finale -- which will air in theaters in some locales -- to 2½ hours, with 30-second ads selling for $900,000, which approaches Oscar territory. Even the show's soundtrack composer, Michael Giacchino, was the subject of a major story in The New Yorker's "Innovators" issue.

ABC isn't skimping on "Lost" programming in general: the pilot will re-air Saturday and a two-hour retrospective will precede the finale, which will be followed by a special "Jimmy Kimmel Live." Moreover, the network is auctioning the props this summer, an event that should gather a pretty penny.

"I often wonder if the appeal of 'Lost' [is due to] some giant metaphorical structure -- people feeling marooned in their own lives, cut off," he says. "I think there's something about that show people can identify with and emotionally bond with over their own situation as well."

Jensen is getting ready to cut the cord. Once Sunday night is a memory and he's posted his last "Lost" blog, he's going to join a Time Inc. Habitat for Humanity house-building project in the Los Angeles, California, area.

"After being so in my head for so long about 'Lost,' this is a way to almost ritualistically honor the end of 'Lost,' " he says. "I can get out of my head and do something good."

He confesses he'll miss it, though. He can't help it. He's saying goodbye to friends, and he's hoping for a worthy send-off.

"As much as sometimes the mysteries have frustrated us, what has remained true through it all is these core characters -- we love them, and we're really invested in them, and we want to see how they end up," he says. "They're just really compelling people in a really exotic world."

Here's a line that still makes absolutely no sense:

Richard Alpert: Yes, I was here 30 years ago and yes I do remember these people. I remember meeting them very clearly because...I watched them all die.

Also, regarding the whole 'MiB vs buried/unburied bodies, on/off the island, etc'

Jack: Why John Locke?

The Man in Black: Because he was stupid enough to believe he had been brought here for a reason. Because he pursued that belief until it got him killed. And because you were kind enough to bring his body back here in a nice little wooden box.

Jack: And he had to be dead before you could look like him?

The Man in Black: That's right.

Here's a line that still makes absolutely no sense:

Richard Alpert: Yes, I was here 30 years ago and yes I do remember these people. I remember meeting them very clearly because...I watched them all die.

yeah that was an interesting line :pinch:

Here's a line that still makes absolutely no sense:

Richard Alpert: Yes, I was here 30 years ago and yes I do remember these people. I remember meeting them very clearly because...I watched them all die.

Also, regarding the whole 'MiB vs buried/unburied bodies, on/off the island, etc'

Jack: Why John Locke?

The Man in Black: Because he was stupid enough to believe he had been brought here for a reason. Because he pursued that belief until it got him killed. And because you were kind enough to bring his body back here in a nice little wooden box.

Jack: And he had to be dead before you could look like him?

The Man in Black: That's right.

I was meant to ask about that Richard Albert quote. Does he mean that when they time traveled after Juliet made the bomb go off? :/

About the MIB and dead bodies, it's too confusing..

Q&A from the NY Times hosted event. Very interesting answers from D&C, nothing spoilerish:

http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/05/17/your-lost-questions-answered/

http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/05/19/more-lost-answers/

God, they didn't give a single freaking thing in those answers.

Q&A from the NY Times hosted event. Very interesting answers from D&C, nothing spoilerish:

http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/05/17/your-lost-questions-answered/

http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/05/19/more-lost-answers/

Jedi, please take note of this:

Q: In your 2005 interview with The Times you said, ?There can be things that are happening that are quote, phenomenal, but there?s always a scientific answer to it.? With ghosts and immortals (to name but two), you have clearly moved out of the realm where a scientific answer is possible for everything. Did you know that back in 2005 or realize it as the series went on?

?Alex, Seattle

DAMON LINDELOF: While we certainly don?t want to rewrite history (or do we?), the context of that quote applied to the show at the time. Certainly, the pilot strongly hinted at supernatural elements and by the end of Season 1, we saw ?the monster? was a being made of black smoke. Since that time, we?ve gone on record as ?letting our freak flag fly? into the realm of the supernatural, and although it has probably cost us some members of our audience, from the moment Locke got out of his wheelchair (in the fourth episode of the series) we knew the reason behind it was not going to be ?scientific.?

God, they didn't give a single freaking thing in those answers.

oh jeeze....this is going to be one massive mind **** come sunday night leaving you wanting more and not getting it :pinch: at least this thread will certainly continue with fan videos yay </sarcasm>

Perfect quote to sum up all 6 seasons of the show. I posted my similar thoughts on the show in the Finale thread. I'm surprised that they're revealing this before the finale:

Damon and Carlton spoke a LOT on the struggle of faith, reason, religion, empiricism, etc. Damon summarized the show in this way ?you have the Bible, it tells you, you do this and this, or there are consequences? and at the end of the day, you have to choose to have faith in that book, or not. So it really isn?t about that book, it?s about whether or not you decide to trust it.

http://darkufo.blogspot.com/2010/05/ny-times-talk-lost-live-event-writeup.html

Here's a line that still makes absolutely no sense:

Richard Alpert: Yes, I was here 30 years ago and yes I do remember these people. I remember meeting them very clearly because...I watched them all die.

Just because Richard is now dead, doesn't mean he isn't still on the island in some form.

VAGUE - haha. That reminds me of when Matrix Revolutions came out.

God, they didn't give a single freaking thing in those answers.

Q. Will those of us who watched ?Lost? faithfully over the years have our faith rewarded like the characters of the show? Locke died confused and without answers.

?Clay, Brooklyn

A. MR. LINDELOF Clay, excellent question. Really, REALLY excellent question.

I wish we could know more of whats on this map, I mean I know alot has been explained but some hasn't like the closed off stations

Was the map before or after the purge? It could of been a planned map (like with the cross out stations etc)

Is the center spot the light perhaps ?

They said it was the 'Pearl' Station. But I've always said, the question mark below it is the 'Pearl' Station. But how would Stuart know about 'Light' you have to be taken to it by the protector.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Surprise Execs are dumb. I hope the rehired engineers said were not coming back until we get 2x our salary.
    • Ford execs say they made a mistake when they replaced human engineers with AI by David Uzondu Ford recently announced that over the last three years, it's had to rehire about 350 "gray beard" engineers to mentor younger staff and reprogram diagnostic systems and AI tools that were failing to meet up to quality expectations. The company's VP of vehicle hardware engineering, Charles **** said that leaders overlooked the deep experience of veterans who survived many product cycles. **** admitted that simply replacing them with AI was a huge mistake, and that while AI is "a fantastic tool," it remains "only as good as the information you use to train it." The rehired engineers now run mandatory meetings to troubleshoot vehicles and reprogram automated engineering software and AI tools to prevent glitches before production. These technical specialists hunt for failure points before parts ever reach the plant floor, helping prevent the massive recalls and defects that previously cost the company billions as it aims to cut one billion dollars in expenses this year. In last year's JD Power Quality Survey, an annual study that measures the quality of a car during the first three months of ownership, Ford finished 10th among mainstream brands and scored below the industry average. But this year, JD Power ranked the automaker as the top mainstream brand, placing it above the likes of Toyota Motor Corp. and Honda Motor Co. Ford attributed this massive improvement directly to the expertise of these returned engineers. Ford's realization that AI cannot magically design and test quality vehicles without senior human oversight is just the tip of the iceberg. When Careerminds looked at companies that conducted AI-driven layoffs, researchers found out that 35.6% of those companies had to rehire more than half of the employees they previously fired. Another 32.7% had to rehire between 25% and 50% of them. In 2024, Sebastian Siemiatkowski, CEO of Klarna, proudly announced that its new chatbot was doing the work of 700 full-time customer service agents. As a result, the fintech company froze hiring and cut hundreds of positions. But by mid 2025, and into 2026, Klarna was scrambling to recruit human agents again because customer satisfaction had plummeted. It turns out, while AI is very good at answering basic questions like how to check an account balance, when faced with complex customer issues that require nuance, the thing usually resorts to the unhelpful, robotic corporate jargon we all know and love.
    • Free AI in IDEs is shifting to paid models Or you know, you could just learn to actually design and code apps, use frameworks to handle the repetitive parts and not use AI at all - and voila... free for life!
    • In a sane world US antitrust laws wouldn't even allow these companies to be in the position to be subjected to EU directives. As you say, better than oligarch nothing.
    • Apple reportedly has a second-generation iPhone Fold planned for 2027 Good grief, Apple hasn't even released a first folding phone and the Apple faithful is already obsessing over the sequel? Seriously people, go out and touch grass... because this level of obsession is borderline stalkery/neurotic.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      xvvxcvv earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      xvvxcvv earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Enthusiast
      Xonos went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      405
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      169
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      129
    4. 4
      neufuse
      69
    5. 5
      Xenon
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!