Recommended Posts

-How did Hawkings seem to know so much all the time (desmonds time travel stuff, and the limbo stuff)

-Who actually built the statue etc - Even a brief flashback to some time before Jacob's mum to give a teaser would have been enough? Yes they're making out that it's not really part of "this story" but when they put so much emphasis on them in earlier seasons people expect some resolution on the Egyptian mythology

-Why was Walt special?

Why did pregnant women on the island die? When did it start happening?

What happened to Christian's body (in the original timeline)?

Why did Radzinsky shoot himself?

Jacob/MiB's mother, her past? Her powers, how did she kill all the people in the village for example?

Sooo many more but that's what I can think of to add atm.

and so it ends. the final episode was very touching, not only because of the story, which was well written despite some important omissions, but because a period in our lives ended. we had this show with us for five and a half years, that's a chunk of time. think of all that's happened to you in that time and to the people you know. that time is gone, never to be reclaimed. for those who cared about Lost, a constant has passed, for those who didn't - well, those years have still gone. will miss having an episode of Lost or a season to look forward to, for good and bad. here's to you and here's to lives and times.

EDIT: come on, Jacob's faux mom killed most of the original others because she was already in smoke monster form, duh.

just got done watching it. seems that black folks dont get to go to heaven. :rolleyes: all there but michael and walt. i remember walt was supposed to be this special little boy. the finale left more questions that it answered im afraid.

but that was already explained

Michael doesn't get to move on because he murdered two people

his spirit is trapped on the island

Harold Perrineau confirmed that on Jimmy Kimmel

Rose is black and she is at the church in the end.....

but that was already explained

Michael doesn't get to move on because he murdered two people

his spirit is trapped on the island

Harold Perrineau confirmed that on Jimmy Kimmel

Rose is black and she is at the church in the end.....

But many other people committed murder on the island... Sayid, Ben, Jack, Locke to name a few

or is it because Micheal was selfish, and not doing it for the island?

it was probably something personal/professional that got Harold out of the finale, or maybe he wanted nothing to do with it. who knows. it was an alarming omission, though. and the plane backing out with no pushback was a little disconcerting even though i guess it can be done, sort of.

At least it's better than the way The Sopranos ended :p

Fine episode, could've been better though. Nothing even measures to the way Six Feet Under ended.

Also, I personally think that if anyone starts watching Lost in a couple of months (instead of six years), the ending would have really sucked.

Can somebody please explain the following:

- How could the plane with kate, miles, lapidus, sawyer,.. 'just' fly home when there's clearly no way of leaving the island? For example, the boat Michael & Walt took had the follow a specific bearing 325 (if i remember correctly). The whole 6 seasons made us clear there's no 'just' leaving the island. What with that now?

- Why is widmore dragged in all this? Why did he want to destroy the island with his boat and stuff?

Thanks!

At least it's better than the way The Sopranos ended :p

Fine episode, could've been better though. Nothing even measures to the way Six Feet Under ended.

Also, I personally think that if anyone starts watching Lost in a couple of months (instead of six years), the ending would have really sucked.

funny you say that, I have seen alot of people on Twitter/Facebook today saying that.

Can somebody please explain the following:

- How could the plane with kate, miles, lapidus, sawyer,.. 'just' fly home when there's clearly no way of leaving the island? For example, the boat Michael & Walt took had the follow a specific bearing 325 (if i remember correctly). The whole 6 seasons made us clear there's no 'just' leaving the island. What with that now?

- Why is widmore dragged in all this? Why did he want to destroy the island with his boat and stuff?

Thanks!

The helicopter took a bearing of 305 degrees going too and from the freighter im guessing he took the same bearing in the plane.

Widmore wanted the island for himself, im guessing he knew about the light at the heart of the island and he wanted it. He wasnt trying to destroy the island he was just trying to kill everyone on it.

Can somebody please explain the following:

- How could the plane with kate, miles, lapidus, sawyer,.. 'just' fly home when there's clearly no way of leaving the island? For example, the boat Michael & Walt took had the follow a specific bearing 325 (if i remember correctly). The whole 6 seasons made us clear there's no 'just' leaving the island. What with that now?

- Why is widmore dragged in all this? Why did he want to destroy the island with his boat and stuff?

Thanks!

The island was "offline" or dead when Desmond pulled the plunger, along with its electromagnetic properties ;) Or.... you should also remember Lapedis fly to and back the island twice by helicopter, thus he knew the way.

- How could the plane with kate, miles, lapidus, sawyer,.. 'just' fly home when there's clearly no way of leaving the island? For example, the boat Michael & Walt took had the follow a specific bearing 325 (if i remember correctly). The whole 6 seasons made us clear there's no 'just' leaving the island. What with that now?

During the scene with Hurley and Ben, Ben says that it was Jacob's rule that you couldn't leave the island and the Hurley to can change the rules and do it right... so that's how they were able to leave.

789093746.jpg

Back in late January we reported all the details about ABC/Disney's August 24th releases of Lost - The Complete 6th and Final Season on DVD and on high-def Blu-ray Disc' date=' along with (on the same day) a release of Lost - The Complete Collection (with "one full disc of bonus exclusive to the Complete Collection...at least two hours of content" per the studio), also on both DVD and high-def Blu-ray Disc.

There hasn't been much to say since then, because everything's been kept covert leading up to last night's big event with the series finale. That's included final package art for the DVDs and Blu-rays of the upcoming titles named above. Following the show's wrap-up last night, though, Jimmy Kimmel (Jimmy Kimmel Live) hosted an "Aloha to Lost" special, featuring live interviews with much the cast, plus some fun videos (montages and parody "alternate endings", etc.) that were a nice bit of icing on the cake. Near the end of the special, as they went to commercial, a picture came up showing the finalized package art at last! We've got a quick screen capture of that for you below; it's not the sharpest/clearest picture you'll find, but it's the best we could come up with at short notice (note that we cropped off the sides of this picture to make it fit better in our limited space, but the rest of the image was just more jungle).

Also, rumors have been flying around the 'net that the DVDs and Blu-rays may contain MORE explanations than the show had time to explore on-air. Material not mentioned in the original announcement info last January (because even showrunners Damon Lindelof and Carlton Cuse wouldn't have known yet that they wanted to do it). Material that they couldn't even squeeze into a 2-and-a-half hour finale. Some rumors say "10-15 minutes", others say "upwards of 20". Some of the websites passing this info along are very reliable, but please keep in mind that this has NOT been officially announced by the studio, so we're not certain yet that this is for-sure.

However, Jimmy Kimmel seems to have heard the same rumors: after the special, he conducted an online Q&A session between the cast and members of the audience, which can be found at his official site as well as on Hulu. It's 11 minutes long, and the first 9.5 minutes of it are full of spoilers for people who haven't seen the show's entire run yet. But the last minute-and-a-half only contain the mildest of spoilers, where cast members admit that even they don't have all the answers to some fan questions. Kimmel responds, "I've heard, and I don't know if I'm supposed to say this, but I've heard that on the Blu-ray there are explanations for certain things that weren't in the finale." So there you go![/quote']

Great finale. I think I preferred the actual ending to the the rest of the episode to be honest though. When it first finished it took a while to sink in, but overall it couldn't have been done much better.

Bit disappointing about the lack of answers, but ultimately it does show that Lost was about the characters and their journeys.

from BBC

"It ended as it had begun with Jack lying in the same bamboo forest in which we first met him in episode one. Back then Jack opened his eyes for the first time on the island, this time around he closed them for the last.

Yes, the finale could be accused of being a bit melodramatic and certainly there were many issues left unaddressed.

Whatever happened to Michael and Walt? What was the significance of the Egyptian statue on the island? What about the temple? Why, at the beginning of this series, was the island underwater?

Discussions will likely rage for years to come but if there is any lesson from the final episode, then it is that sometimes you just have to let go."

- every single solitary event from S1-S6 happened, with the exception of the S6 flashsideways

- Jack died in the jungle, Kate/Sawyer/Miles/Frank/Richard/Claire flew away, Ben and Hurley stayed on the island

- Kate and Co. went home, led their lives, grew old, died

- Hurley and Ben eventually died

- Once they all died, they arrived in the flashsideways, which is your purgatory

- They all needed to find eachother and be together again before they could move on

- They did at the end

Do You think Kate and Sawyer got back home safe, and they had MORE sex and they maybe married?

From the sideways, I don't think or got the impression Kate and Sawyer really want each other. It was Jack, who Kate want/miss.

Jate!!!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Stellarium 26.2 by Razvan Serea Stellarium is a free open source planetarium for your computer. It shows a realistic sky in 3D, just like what you see with the naked eye, binoculars or a telescope. It is being used in planetarium projectors. Just set your coordinates and go. Stellarium key features: Realistic simulation of the sky, sunrise and sunset Default catalogue of over 600,000 stars Downloadable additional catalogues for up to 210 million stars Catalog data for all New General Catalogue (NGC) objects Images of almost all Messier objects and the Milky Way Artistic illustrations for all 88 modern constellations More than a dozen different cultures with their constellations Solar and lunar eclipse simulation Photorealistic landscapes (more are available on the website) Scripting support with ECMAScript (a few demo scripts are included) Extendable with plug-ins: 8 plug-ins installed by default, including: artificial satellites plug-in (updated from an on-line TLE database) ocular simulation plug-in (shows how objects look like in a given ocular) Solar System editor plug-in (imports comet and asteroid data from the MPC) telescope control plug-in (Meade LX200 and Celestron NexStar compatible) The major changes of this version: Added new sky culture Added new plugin: Planes Many improvements in plugins Many improvements in Core and GUI Many updates in sky cultures. [full release notes] Download: Stellarium 26.2 (64-bit) | 456.0 MB (Open Source) View: Stellarium Home Page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
    • I had a feeling this was coming. Picked up my first Mac ever last Saturday. Glad I did.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      418
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!