Recommended Posts

Pretty sure this video has every possible question in it, makes me think that their is a crap load unanswered. A lot more than I originally thought!

http://www.collegehumor.com/video:1936291

Jesus, even though some of those questions could be answered, it's still a hell of a lot of questions! :wacko:

There's a guy posting on the IMDb boards claiming to be Damon Lindelof and answering some questions...doubt it would be him but he is posting some plausible responses...lol

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0411008/board/thread/163666244?p=1

Not him. His first post he calls Carlton Cuse 'Cuse'. He has never done that. In fact, its always 'Carlton' not even 'Carl'.

Anyone else felt this same way for the finale... ? :rolleyes:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XFKoxKQHOk4

(Sorry, I couldn?t find it in English)

I thought the 'Hitler' videos were banned off Youtube?

You should ban the entire movie too :rofl:

And all the other stuff that make fun of him.

Your avatar just raised an interesting question, how did Desmond's monk know Ms. Hawking?!

Your avatar just raised an interesting question, how did Desmond's monk know Ms. Hawking?!

Well, I could start asking some previous things about her ...

For example, "who" is she, why is so special, what's her role

(remember the last talk with Desmond, asking who is prepared or not ...)

But, from a more "behind the scenes" note: the reason Ben's not in the church, and the reason no one is in the church but for Season 1 people is because they wrote the ending to the show after writing the pilot. And never changed it. The writers always said (and many didn't believe them) that they knew their ending from the very first episode. I applaud them for that. It's pretty fantastic. Originally Ben was supposed to have a 3 episode arc and be done. But he became a big part of the show. They could have easily changed their ending and put him in the church ? but instead they problem solved it. Gave him a BRILLIANT moment with Locke outside the church ... and then that was it. I loved that. For those that wonder ? the original ending started the moment Jack walked into the church and touches the casket to Jack closing his eyes as the other plane flies away. That was always JJ's ending. And they kept it.

I'm not buying it. If this was the case, then why was Libby, Juliet, Desmond, and Penny all in the church? We first saw Libby in season 2, Juliet in season 3, Desmond in season 2, and Penny in season 2.

There's a guy posting on the IMDb boards claiming to be Damon Lindelof and answering some questions...doubt it would be him but he is posting some plausible responses...lol

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0411008/board/thread/163666244?p=1

His profile says his information is verified. Hmmm...

Still fishy though.

Out of all places - IMDB? Comon.

What answers he gave was good?

Pretty sure this video has every possible question in it, makes me think that their is a crap load unanswered. A lot more than I originally thought!

http://www.collegehu...m/video:1936291

After watching that, it kind of takes away what I found great about the finale.

Awesome Dharma themed phone backgrounds:

http://bestbookmarks.co.cc/amazing/lost-dharma-stations-series-by-neil-richards

4619077647_62449c3f8d_b.jpg

Also awesome? No wait, way beyond awesome:

'Lost': Michael Emerson promises an 'epilogue' on the DVD

http://blog.zap2it.com/frominsidethebox/2010/05/lost-michael-emerson-promises-an-epilogue-on-the-dvd.html

indeed awesome stuff!

After watching that, it kind of takes away what I found great about the finale.

its just mentioning the truth really, the stuff that was not answered...but yeah watching that taints the finale's meaning.

following on from episodes post! this quote made me squeal like a fanboy!

"For those people that want to pony up and buy the complete Lost series, there is a bonus feature, which is...you could call it an epilogue," explained Emerson. "A lost scene. It?s a lot. It?s 12 or 14 minutes that opens a window onto that gap of unknown time between Hurley becoming number one and the end of the series. It?s self-contained, although it?s a rich period in the show?s mythology that ?s never been explored, so who knows what will come of it."

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft's fast coding model MAI-Code-1-Flash comes to Copilot Business and Enterprise by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft’s recently announced MAI-Code-1-Flash model is now generally available to GitHub Copilot Business and Copilot Enterprise customers. With this support, organizations can have more centralized policy controls and billing while finally being able to use Microsoft’s lightweight, first-party coding model. According to GitHub’s announcement, Business and Enterprise plan administrators must enable the MAI-Code-1-Flash policy in Copilot settings before developers can access the model. Microsoft says that MAI-Code-1-Flash is for fast, iterative coding work rather than the most demanding architectural or debugging tasks. GitHub’s official model comparison page says that the model is great for "general-purpose coding and writing," while it excels at fast, accurate code completions and explanations Microsoft introduced MAI-Code-1-Flash on June 2 as part of a broader collection of internally developed MAI models. GitHub subsequently expanded support to Copilot CLI, the Copilot cloud agent, GitHub.com chat, GitHub Mobile, Visual Studio, JetBrains IDEs, Eclipse, and Xcode, but said support for managed Business and Enterprise customers was still on the way. In Microsoft’s own benchmark testing, MAI-Code-1-Flash scored 51.2% on SWE-Bench Pro, compared with 35.2% for Anthropic’s Claude Haiku 4.5. Microsoft also claimed that the model used up to 60% fewer tokens on SWE-Bench Verified. Do note that these are vendor-run results rather than independent measurements. The model is billed at provider list pricing under GitHub’s usage-based system. GitHub currently lists MAI-Code-1-Flash at $0.75 per million input tokens, $0.075 per million cached input tokens, and $4.50 per million output tokens. For organizations, the main incentive to use MAI-Code-1-Flash is likely to be efficiency rather than maximum capability. A smaller model that responds quickly and limits unnecessary output is quite useful for repetitive agent tasks at scale, especially after GitHub Copilot’s move toward usage-based billing. The "Flash" model is recommended for fast work and not necessarily for huge repositories with loads of context. It's better if teams compare their output with other larger models, especially if they're working on security-sensitive changes and complex, multi-file work.
    • yes AND no the "original" or plain/normal Optiplex 7010 won't be getting any more new firmware updates BUT the Optiplex SFF/SFF Plus {small form factor}, Micro/Micro Plus & Tower/Tower Plus 7010 editions DO get new updates such as this new one   and here are similar guides from the Dell web site for Dell systems: https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000390990/secure-boot-transition-faq https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000347876/microsoft-2011-secure-boot-certificate-expiration
    • AT&T has been spying on US citizens with the NSA for decades.. they just know how to keep it more under wraps.. the evil level is still there.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      462
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      213
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!