Recommended Posts

Some Casting News!

[LUCY TOMPKINS] 22-year-old first year med-student, very attractive all-American girl, from a close-knit family of commercial fishermen. Grew up working class in a very rich town (a la the Hamptons). The entire family has sacrificed and placed all their hopes and dreams on her success. She's the first one to go to college, let alone med school. Lucy is bright and has learned impressive surgical skills from gutting fish, but is overwhelmed by the pressure of the workload, the new environment and her family's expectations. She constantly contemplates quitting, but she never will. She has a nervous habit of lying about trivial things to connect with people, then immediately copping to the lie out of guilt. Despite the competitive nature of the school, Lucy has a positive view of people to the point of na?vet?. She will also reveal herself to be tougher than everyone thinks. SERIES REGULAR. PLEASE SUBMIT ALL ETHNICITIES.

[DREW SUFFIN] 30-year-old med student, scruffy but attractive with sex appeal, and charisma. A Bill Murray-type. This is his second and probably last shot at medical school. He had been-ten years earlier-a top candidate at Harvard Medical school with perfect scores, a perfect fianc? and a photographic memory until he crashed in a spectacular fashion. Hiding his dark past, he's bounced around for most of the last decade and now finally has it all together... or does he? On a day-to-day basis he has to resist those situations and bad habits that triggered his famous flame-out. Drew is obviously a generation older than the other students and, although he has a tendency to fight for the underdog, he is not happy about being given the role of de facto "mentor" to the young students and completely resists any friendships that may come out of that. His cool, wise-ass demeanor masks a tightly-wound and terrified former self sptv050769. SERIES REGULAR. PLEASE SUBMIT ALL ETHNICITIES.

[COLE MCCALLISTER] 22-year-old med student, very handsome, charming, conservative, confidently stupid, impeccably-dressed and incredibly entitled. His family donated a wing to the med school and he has a residency slot waiting for him at Sacred Heart when he graduates. Cole seems like a sweet, nice guy at first but is quickly revealed to be a gigantic ass. He's competitive, manipulative, tries to psyche people out and never pulls his weight in labs or study groups. Although still four years away from being a doctor, he recklessly delivers explicit and erroneous medical advice to patients. His attitude and pedigree are an enormous irritant to Dr. Cox. Cole has shades of a young George W. Bush, someone who was born on third base but thinks he hit a triple. SERIES REGULAR. PLEASE SUBMIT ALL ETHNICITIES.

Edited by Rappy
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/802844-scrubs-med-school/
Share on other sites

This is going to get wired. :( It's just not going to be the same. :no:

I will watch it though and see if I like it when it starts. :)

Yeah same but I think its going to be ok if there's a new cast with the old cast occasionally coming back! :)

  • 3 weeks later...

6a00d83451b92469e20120a.jpg

Sacred Heart University -- that's what we've dubbed it for now -- has just accepted a new first year med student.

Sources tell me Dave Franco has been cast as a "Scrubs"' series regular, the first of three new actors to join the show later this year.

You may recognize Franco from "Privileged" on which he played Rose (Lucy Hale)'s boyfriend Zach. Or, perhaps, you see the resemblance between him and his big brother, James.

Either way, if you're a "Scrubs" fan, you'll get to know Dave later this year when he takes on the role of "Cole," a 22-year-old medical student, who might rub people the wrong way. I'm hearing he's a crazy entitled, rich kid whose family has no problem using their money to give him an edge.

As you can imagine, Dr. Cox will be a huge fan of his. Or just hate him with a nasty vengeance... which I very much look forward to seeing.

Source: Korbi

OK, so Turk and Dr. Cox are the teachers on the new Scrubs; who are the students?

MICKEY: Well, you may have read that this guy has been cast as Cole, a "charming, conservative, confidently stupid and incredibly entitled" medical student. He'll be joined by the yet-to-be-cast Drew, who's kind of a mini-J.D. ? in that he immediately inspires Dr. Cox's ire ? and the well-meaning Lucy, whose bedside manner, unfortunately, includes pathological lying.

virtualitybishegalleryp.jpg

In Bill Lawrence's interview with our own Joel Keller, he said: "There's going to be a new young lady with a voice over and she's either going to be funny and talented and great, or the show's gonna crater."

Well, now we know who that young lady is and I'm sure Kerry Bishe (Virtuality) will be thrilled to find out that Lawrence is hinging the entire success of Scrubs 2.0 on her. No pressure! She joins Dave Franco, cast earlier this week, and Michael Mosley to complete the new faces of Scrubs (Med School?).

Besides being the new narrative voice for the show, and presumably the lead, Bishe will be a 22-year old first-year med student. She's the first in her family of fisherman to go to college. Mosley, the other new cast member signed today, is ten years older than the rest of the students, the result of a major meltdown a decade earlier when he was at Harvard. So this is his second chance.

It's also the second chance for Scrubs, as it tries to re-brand itself as a medical school comedy rather than a hospital comedy. With a largely new cast, and largely new classroom sets, even Bill Lawrence isn't thrilled that ABC wants to continue calling it Scrubs (you did read that interview, right?). It's not like this is ER, where they're just shifting out cast members and bringing in new ones. They're changing the whole tone and focus of the series.

I don't see why a subtitle like Scrubs: Med School would be such a big deal; I've got my fingers crossed that Lawrence can at least pull that off. The new show's going to find a much better chance of success if potential new viewers aren't seeing at the ninth season of a show they already didn't watch, but rather the first season of something spinning out of something they've always heard about. Curiosity would at least be a little higher.

Unfortunately, Lawrence is right about one thing. In order for this to work, Eliza Coupe, Bishe and the rest of the newcomers are going to have to step up and carry this show. Here's hoping they can pull it off.

Source: TV Squad

Did they move the set or is it in the same spot?

My friend lives a 5 minute drive away from the hospital where they film Scrubs.

I think its the same place but they changed around so it looks different

  • 1 month later...

"Scrubs" 2.0 will premiere Dec. 1.

ABC on Wednesday announced the premiere date for the upcoming ninth season of the veteran comedy series, which is going through a major transformation, ditching its hospital its setting and introducing a largely new cast.

"Scrubs" will launch with back-to-back episodes Dec. 1 at 9 p.m., moving to its regular Tuesday 9 p.m. time slot the following week.

The show's companion, sophomore "Better Off Ted," will debut Dec. 8 following "Scrubs."

thr

about the new set:

In the world of the show, the decaying Sacred Heart building has been torn down and replaced by a new facility on the same campus as its affiliated medical school.

"The idea is that they ran out of money because of the economy," Lawrence explains, "so there's doors that go to nowhere and half-finished operating rooms and stuff."

http://www.nj.com/entertainment/tv/index.s...ews_next_s.html

  • 2 weeks later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
    • So how did you solve the problem? Disabling Secure Boot isn’t a solution.
    • Another devilish issue surrounding these certificates is what can happen with old, unsuspecting PCs that nevertheless have Secure Boot enabled. In my case, it was a Dell with a 3rd-gen Core chip (so about 13 years old). As of the last few weeks, it was suddenly BSOD'g within about 5 minutes of booting. Turns out it was because of MS's "Secure-Boot-Update" scheduled task, which is scheduled to run 5 minutes after login. It's explained in gory detail here (this is not my post, but it was where I found the answer), but the short version is that this legacy system would need fairly elaborate, manual certificate intervention since MS's automatic cert update method cannot work. How to do that is linked late in the thread. https://www.bleepingcomputer.c...od-caused-by-scheduled-task Secure Boot wasn't at all important for this particular PC, so I disabled it to be done with the problem.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      95
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!