Dell Support Recommends Users turn OFF Automatic Updates


Recommended Posts

I just got back from a call were I had to repair someones vista machine. The problem was a stuck service and a 3rd party add-on crashing internet explorer 8. I got both those problems fixed as well as Service pack 2 for Vista installed. While I was waiting for Sp2 to install he was telling me about his experience with dell support. He then proceeds to tell me that the support guy on the other end of the phone recommended that he turn off automatic updates. He said that "they" as in everyone else doing support recommends that for their customers, because Windows update can cause issues.

So when I got home I did a google search for "Dell recommends turning off automatic updates". I then found this post

http://en.community.dell.com/forums/p/19247820/19393112.aspx

"I recently called Dell Tech Support and worked with them to resolve a USB issue I was having with my XPS. We were able to get the issue resolved and everything was working fine. Then, again after everything was fixed, he said something like "I have a note here that says we are supposed to get all of our Vista users to disable Windows Update". I went back and forth with him for a while on this one trying to figure out why anyone would ever give this sort of advice. Just to appease the guy, I said I would do it and he responded "You will be much safer now!”

First off there is not much I can say about this without having most of my post filled with *'s. So I'll just say "What a bunch of morons".

What are your thoughts?

Edited by warwagon

"What a bunch of morons" is right. Yes, there have been a few occasions when an update has caused some issues but it was generally rectified within a day or two at most. Turning Windows Update off is like putting a fresh copy of Windows XP RTM on a high-speed internet connection, you're pretty much screwed.

If you want to avoid issues with Windows Update, set the automatic update schedule to the end of the week. Any issues are generally fixed by then (or the patches pulled until issues are fixed).

Dell Support aren't the brightest at times. They claimed the 9 dead pixels along the bottom of my laptop LCD were normal after receiving it back from the repair depot (when it previously had no dead pixels at all). It wound up being sent in again to have the screen replaced along with the casing and the motherboard. Ugh.

This has to be one of the dumbest things I've ever read. Updates keep you safer. Yes, they may be issues, because not even Microsoft can test for every single configuration out there. I haven't had any issues in a long, long time but your mileage may vary. I'm rather be safe, myself.

I was laughing by the time I finished reading the statement by Dell Support. What a bunch of morons is right! They should know that keeping your computer up to date helps protects the user. Yeah, there may be issues, but they're rare, and like Kristan said, they're usually resolved anyway.

While I understand the risks of disabling AUTOMATIC updates, it is the users responsibility to keep their system updated when the options are disabled. Dell didn't mean to stop updating, just disable the auto updates as a trouble-shooting step. But that doesn't mean you can't go to Windows Update (via Start) and still download updates. Disabling updates is one of the common trouble shooting steps. Once you have solved the problems,...then yeah enable automatic updates.

Some IT workers are just lazy and just tell people to do this or that but never tells them to redo this or that after problems has been solved.

But then again, Windows automatic updates shouldn't be called "Automatic" Updates...it still needs your input to restart the PC in some cases.

While I understand the risks of disabling AUTOMATIC updates, it is the users responsibility to keep their system updated when the options are disabled. Dell didn't mean to stop updating, just disable the auto updates as a trouble-shooting step. But that doesn't mean you can't go to Windows Update (via Start) and still download updates. Disabling updates is one of the common trouble shooting steps. Once you have solved the problems,...then yeah enable automatic updates.

Some IT workers are just lazy and just tell people to do this or that but never tells them to redo this or that after problems has been solved.

But then again, Windows automatic updates shouldn't be called "Automatic" Updates...it still needs your input to restart the PC in some cases.

It goes something like this.

1) A regular person buy's Windows XP back in 2001.

2) Dell support tells them to turn off Automatic Updates.

3) The user never installs a single update ever again, and in 2009 is still running Windows XP RTM.

Edited by warwagon

dell are garbage and you wonder why i don't like anything called a dell as they are complete crap and if autoupdates are turned off the user wont get new updates automaticaly thought they can check manualy but to them thats a hassle, dell just tells you that so when the pc has problems they get more money which to them is all they care about, i prefer quality of service over a price tag so do it right the first time and resolve issues when needed instead of being forced to fix something that could have been avoided earlier.

There was a time when an anti-virus was absolutely essential. I have not needed any anti virus on my windows XP gig for the last 3 years (Of course with Windows XP, the windows update took care of the security).

There was a time when windows update was absolutely essential. I have not needed Windows Update on my Windows Vista gig for the last 2.5 years. (With Windows Vista, Service Packs took care of the security).

Btw I have disabled automatic updates; But i do a manual check of available updates and usually install only updated drivers and IE related security fixes.

I have liked my Dell machines, but this story doesn't surprise me at all about their customer support. I have had some really mind boggling issues with them in the past. They've never told me to turn off automatic updates, but they have said a LOT of stupid or ignorant things.

One time I was only able to connect to my home wireless network using the built in wireless card. I couldn't connect to any other wireless networks including the one at the office, which I previously could. The technician at Dell told me that was how wireless cards work, they only connect to one network. I told him that maybe it could only connect to one wireless network AT A TIME, but not just one network EVER, but they insisted that that was not the case and once I set it up with my network at the house that was the only network I would EVER be able to connect to and that if I needed to be able to connect to the network at the office I should have chosen to set it up on that network instead. WTH?? LOL I rarely lose my cool, but that time I did...

There was a time when an anti-virus was absolutely essential. I have not needed any anti virus on my windows XP gig for the last 3 years (Of course with Windows XP, the windows update took care of the security).

There was a time when windows update was absolutely essential. I have not needed Windows Update on my Windows Vista gig for the last 2.5 years. (With Windows Vista, Service Packs took care of the security).

Btw I have disabled automatic updates; But i do a manual check of available updates and usually install only updated drivers and IE related security fixes.

Huh? :|

There was a time when an anti-virus was absolutely essential. I have not needed any anti virus on my windows XP gig for the last 3 years (Of course with Windows XP, the windows update took care of the security).

There was a time when windows update was absolutely essential. I have not needed Windows Update on my Windows Vista gig for the last 2.5 years. (With Windows Vista, Service Packs took care of the security).

Btw I have disabled automatic updates; But i do a manual check of available updates and usually install only updated drivers and IE related security fixes.

I just hope you don't complain about Windows problems or issues that are fixed with updates between every service pack release.

I do agree that, for people doing safe surfing or knowing all they are doing, security applications like AV's or Firewalls can be of little to no use. However, everyone is sharing files/info/documents with other people (be it for fun or work) and thus, I can't recommend anyone to live without at leas some security application in their computer.

I just hope you don't complain about Windows problems or issues that are fixed with updates between every service pack release.

I do agree that, for people doing safe surfing or knowing all they are doing, security applications like AV's or Firewalls can be of little to no use. However, everyone is sharing files/info/documents with other people (be it for fun or work) and thus, I can't recommend anyone to live without at leas some security application in their computer.

Oh, absolutely. Because if someone you share a network with or something makes the poor choice of not running antivirus software or installing updates then happens to browse somewhere and get something, there's nothing now stopping it from getting on your machine...

I will not let let Windows Update automatically download and install updates.

I prefer to go to the website on my own and choose to download which updates I want.

What bugs me is when Microsoft puts IE8 as a high-priority update as an example as to why I do this.

That is an upgrade or new version, not a high-priority "update"

I have definitely had crashes from Updates, in the past.

I tend to prefer adding Updates one at a time, or wait for the cumulative Update.

I also like to know just what Microsoft is deciding to add to my hard drive.

I don't want needless crap. :laugh:

I have definitely had crashes from Updates, in the past.

I tend to prefer adding Updates one at a time, or wait for the cumulative Update.

I also like to know just what Microsoft is deciding to add to my hard drive.

I don't want needless crap. :laugh:

^ And that's exactly the point. In any corporate environment where downtime costs money, Automatic Updates are DISABLED. In fact, you don't download the patches from Microsoft, your System Admin has a WSUS server configured and a test machine where they make sure the patches will not impact the business. They put the patches through a Quality Assurance cycle, and then if they pass, they are rolled out to all the domain users.

Home users who are not technically sound, may actually experience more problems with Automatic Updates than without. Patches can make significant changes to the O/S, and there is just not enough Microsoft can do to account for all the hardware configurations and operating conditions a home user can have.

It is a double-edge sword, but I'll bet it reduces the number of support calls Dell receives. But remember, this is for non-techie consumers. If you know what you're doing, you can risk automatic updates, because you can rollback, or worst-case reinstall.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
    • For me, the fundamental problems with these "smartglasses" is that they really don't work well for people with significant prescriptions and massively up the price if you use attached lenses if they have displays, and if they don't, then they're not actually "smart" anything, rather just connecting to your phone and relaying voice to an AI. In a few cases like this, they throw in small cameras to feed video to the AI. All around, these feel like both a solution looking for a problem, and the problems it tries to solve seem more easily solved by different approaches and designs. Oddly, if the rumours are true, Apple may actually have invented something for once and it kind of does this right: put cameras in ear buds and manage the interface to AI exactly as most of us do: tapping on an ear bud and saying "Hey Google" or "Hey Siri." That makes them compatible with almost everyone, can double up as a hearing assist device, an impaired vision assist device, a "smart" device... and answer your phone and play music. That just seems like a better solution all around.
    • Usually the bigger ones with many fixes/changes take a few, theyre an exception to the rule most likely
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      452
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      84
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!