[winxp] GUIDE: Making your windows folder smaller!


Recommended Posts

I have a fairly extensive list I've been compiling for the past couple of years. Deleting files is really a hobby for me. I've attached it for your viewing. This list is not for everyone; just me. But maybe it can answer a few things for people who have always been interested in this topic of discussion.

Bold_Fortune, does deleting the Default User and Network Services affect login-type PCs?

Not to my knowledge. I don't login, so I couldn't really say for sure. I run a single-user PC. It would seem to me, though, that "All Users" would be more important for that.

The only thing I can say is to backup, and then give it a try.

What I laid out in my list of files I delete list works for me. I know that deleting everything on that list won't work for everyone.

I do know that for most people I know who delete any of these folders you asked about, Default User is the first to go. Network Service I have to take as its name implies...if your computer is on a network of computers.

I'm far from an expert with computers. My file deleting is all trial and error. This topic is generally a put off by the experts. Why I have know idea. Most responses I get from experts on forums goes something like, "With the size of hardrives today, why bother deleting files?"

Funny, though, after getting to know one of these experts better, I discovered that even though he wasn't a professed proponent of deleting files, he himself always deletes the Default User folder.

Go around from deleting by moving and compressing:

Copy ServicePackFiles, Driver Cache, RegisteredPackages and DLLCache to your slowest hard drive (thus making greate use of it) or anywher You like and change all the paths in registry. For DLLCache You have to add the key manually:

Hive: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE

Key: Software\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Winlogon

Name: SFCDllCacheDir

Data Type: REG_EXPAND_SZ

Value: Path

Reboot and delete those folders from theire original locations.

For other folders mentioned in this thread use compressing couse there would be too much registry editing for INF-folder for example.

A friend and I were playing around on another site one day. These were the results of our goofing with deleting files:

2McAbre:

Windows Directory (all files and sub-folders)?

(2855) Files (96) Folders. 361MB

System32 Folder?

(1968) Files (96) Folders. 228MB

Bold:

Windows Directory (all files and sub-folders)?

(2304) Files (144) Folders. 419MB Size on disk

System32 Folder?

(1881) Files (72) Folders. 305MB Size on disk

I could have gone further with this, but it really takes a lot of time and thought once I get into deleting individual system32 dlls and exe and other files, as i don't have what I usually delete cataloged. 2McAbre is one of those "real" pros when it come to computing. He could beat me hands down on his worst day.

Oh, plus I think 2Mcabre cheats, and uses file compression on old files...lol.

This is a nifty little utility I use to help me decern many individual files my system doesn't use. It's small, and free. http://kanadepro.com/findunusedfiles/

To give you an example. Right at this moment I am working out of a drive image I had saved shortly after installing XP. I haven't deleted very many files from at all. Find Unused Files shows me 5,782 files which have not been used in the last 100 days, which take up 433.77MB of space.

When you run Find Unused files you'll get an error. This error only tells you that it cannot access System Volume Information. Just click no and proceed with "View the Report".

You can't just walk in there and start deleting every file you see. (You can actually delete files from within the utility and send them to the recycle bin.) Many files it shows are actually used by your system. Like the hal.dll. You delete the hal.dll and your system won't restart.

I just use this utility as a pointer, so to speak. I still want to know what exactly each individual file is before I delete it.

After using safe mode, I got the WiNDOWS folder down to 1.46GB.

(nothing compared to you guys)

I deleted all the pnf but after restart or installing stuff some came back.

Is there a list of inf the PC will surely use?

The use of an inf file will depend on your particular use of your computer. For example, if you never go into Disk Cleanup, you won't need the info files that are required to access Disk Cleanup.

Try this. Maybe this can explain it to you better by seeing what happens. Delete, or save to another location, all the .PNF file in the inf folder. Now access Disk Cleanup. Then look inside your inf folder again. You will now see some new .PNF files created buy the inf files that Disk Cleanup used when you accessed it.

A .PNF file is created when the inf file is used. It's sort of like a cache file.

Bold_fortune, i'm geting a 404

I can't help you with that 404. I'm sorry. My computer knowledge is very limited. I'm not a pro or an expert. Matter-of-fact, most pros and experts would know right off that I'm really just a novice...which I am...because it would show to them without me saying much.

Some things I delete aren't going to work for you. I only know they work for me.

It's very important to backup your system before you do start deleting system files.

The really weird thing about tweaking your system, deleting files, or even making certain changes to the interface is, that everyone's system reacts differently. It's really weird. I've even heard it said that regarding your own installations, that no two installations are exactly the same.

For example. I know of 525 DLLS in my system32 folder that I always delete. But for some reason, with this particular installation, I can't delete them all without something going wrong. So I have to go through them and find out what the problem is. (Not looking forward to that.)

Good Luck, buddy.

  • 2 weeks later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I think it depends on what you're looking for to do, and the time you have to spare. With my Dwarf 3, I easily spend 3-4 hour sessions; half an hour driving to an un-light polluted place, unpacking and setting up the smart scope + tripod for equatorial tracking, mucking around with settings, maybe shoot some calibration frames, spending a few hours shooting, merging with past photo sessions, etc. It's crazy how time flies and I often get home later than I expected. It's something I still need to set aside a good part of an evening to do, all in all. For one session, where you often need like four for best results when it comes to deep space objects. With practice, I can probably begin cutting time here but I think where smart scopes find their home is among people who love to shoot the night sky but don't have the spare time to go deep with the "navigator level" attunement to the night sky itself. Having said this, _if_ you have even more time to spend on this hobby, it will probably be even more rewarding to do it more by hand and learn the skies and the details of how it all works.
    • I misread the title and thought Teams itself would be redesigned. Imagine having this one as a native WinUI app.
    • Dell, HP PCs ran into endless reboot, BitLocker recovery loops but Windows 11 isn't to blame by Sayan Sen Last month Neowin reported on a major issue on Dell systems wherein a bug in its official support tool was leading to endless blue screen of death (BSOD) and restarts. Following our report, Dell officially acknowledged its SupportAssist-related crash issue, confirming that the culprit is not Microsoft's operating system but rather a faulty version of its own remediation software. In a newly published support advisory, Dell stated that version 5.5.16.0 of Dell SupportAssist Remediation and Alienware SupportAssist Remediation can trigger blue screen errors and unexpected system restarts. The company notes that the problematic component operates independently of the main SupportAssist application, meaning users should not remove the primary SupportAssist software when troubleshooting the issue. According to Dell, the crashes are linked specifically to the SupportAssist Remediation service, which is bundled with SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools, and as such it has since released an updated version, 5.5.16.1, which is said to resolve the problem. Affected users are advised to first verify whether version 5.5.16.0 is installed by checking the Installed Apps section in Windows Settings. If so, Dell recommends updating SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools through either SupportAssist's "Update Software" feature or Dell Command Update. Dell also advises users to back up important data before performing the update and to ensure systems remain connected to power throughout the installation process. If you are still having issues though make sure to report to the Dell support forum. As it turns out though Dell is not the only PC maker currently dealing with update-related headaches as HP is also facing a separate but probably equally frustrating issue involving recent Windows Secure Boot updates that were released with recent Windows 11 Patch Tuesdays. Similar to Dell, HP also put up its own support article where it explains the issue. The company says that affected devices could hit a brick wall when booting as they run into a BitLocker recovery loop after the April 2026 updates. The problem appears to affect systems wherein the new UEFI Secure Boot CA 2023 certificates fail to apply properly. As such affected users will find themselves entering their recovery key over and over again despite the system otherwise functioning normally. HP says such PCs should be updated to the latest available BIOS version and configured with the necessary Secure Boot certificates before installing Microsoft's Windows 11 Patch Tuesday updates. Systems that are already experiencing the problem may require BIOS configuration changes to restore normal boot behavior. Admins can find information regarding that in the support article here on HP's official website.
    • Getting further away from the artistic study of mental disease that was the first game... (which never needed any sequels to begin with) But I get it, a company has to make money. And the second was at least visually impressive, if not in any other way.
    • If its the devs fault you would think Unreal would help M$ take full advantage of Unreal and work with them to fix the performance issues. Otherwise they are catching unwarranted bad press.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      246
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!