GPOS and removing stale settings via GPO


Recommended Posts

Current Situation. New DC replacing old DC which is GONE no access to it what so ever.

So users have an old GPO setting for Folder Redirection. So the paths are now different on the new server. So create a new GPO it should take presidence and life should be good right? As long as your setting is not set to "not" configured it should be fine. Well when these users log off their old GPO setting with folder redirection and File syncing is still in place. So they get an error that states path cannot be found.

Besides going to each machine what way do you guys think I can force the machines to inherit policies from the new machine and not use the old.

One other google resource stated that I should just simply create a GPO that disables folder redirection and syncing have all users update then go back after this happens and force a new GPO that enables the correct path and it should remove the old tattooing.

Second situation is this weird NumLock issue.

Some Dell machines have NUMlock Enabled in the bios but when they get to windows no numlock when they go to log in. After they log in I have created a script that enables numlock but it doesnt apply till after they login. Since they use strong alpha numeric passwords they want the NUMlock enabled before they login.

Any ideas?

you are going to have to play with gpupdate on the pc's and use your rsop to be able to verify gpo changes.

to use gpupdate:

start

run

cmd

gpupdate

to force gpupdate:

start

run

cmd

gpupdate /force

to use rsop:

start

run

mmc

file

add/remove snap ins

add

resultant set of policy

right click resultant set of policy

generate rsop data

you are going to have to play with gpupdate on the pc's and use your rsop to be able to verify gpo changes.

to use gpupdate:

start

run

cmd

gpupdate

to force gpupdate:

start

run

cmd

gpupdate /force

to use rsop:

start

run

mmc

file

add/remove snap ins

add

resultant set of policy

right click resultant set of policy

generate rsop data

come on SC302 I got all these commands bud.. This is actually a known issue with folder redirect. The old ones stay stale. Im trying to find a way to remove it. The whole tattooing issue..

I ll see if I can come up with a work around.

do the new gpo's work on new computers? I apologize for that not being helpful, but if you are applying a new gpo it should show up in there. Esp if you are micromanaging your gpo's and not using 1 or 2 gpo's for everything (like putting everything in your default domain gpo).

My gpo structure is broken down like this:

default domain controller gpo

disable microsoft firewall gpo

redirect users folder gpo

push adobe acrobat gpo

push antivirus gpo

lock taskbar gpo

user logon script gpo

enable logoff in start menu gpo

You get the idea with that. I don't use 1 gpo to do all of that, it is broken up. If I make a change to the folder redirect I can delete the gpo, and create a new one and verify that the pc's then take the new one. I do not have the issue you do with this.

Edit: Also remember gpo's get applied top down when using in conjunction with ou's.

Edited by sc302
Why not? And then why not just name the new one the same name as the old?

Joel, Lots of Red tape. We had no access to the old dc. It was removed when we walked in and due to the other company managing the previous DC they wouldnt allow us to access it.. Bunch of BS.

SC302

Im with you, I always split up the GPO's, I usually have at least 10 on each server. Its just where the machines have some retained info in the reg poiting to an old method. The whole "tattooing" is what I keep coming across in Google.

The recent trouble I just had with folder redirection is that the machines want the old folder as a reference point to move FROM. You could always push the registry entries back to the defaults.

Back to my original question; why not just name the new machine and domain the same as the old? You don't need the old server to accomplish that. I can think of a host of GUID issues you may get, but it doesn't hurt to try as a step of solving your redirection problem.

  • 3 months later...
Wont the old ones be removed if you just goto the machine, make a local admin, remove its connection to AD by switching it to workgroup mode. Then just rejoin the new domain?

that is a lot of work (in comparison to other methods), and really not the best way to go around it. You are better off deleting the pointers in the registry.

HKLM->Software->Policies

HKLM->Software->Microsoft->Windows->CurrentVersion->Policies

HKCU->Software->Polcies

HKCU->Software->Microsoft->Windows->CurrentVersion->Policies

and if any exist delete the policies in here

%windir%\System32\GroupPolicy

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I hope this encodes in to AV1 or AV2 as currently tiktok uses h265 and h264.
    • Qualcomm reportedly in talks to build custom video chips for TikTok parent ByteDance by Karthik Mudaliar Qualcomm is reportedly in advanced discussions to provide custom chip-design services to Chinese tech giant ByteDance, the same company behind TikTok. According to a report from Reuters, Qualcomm could be involved in designing custom silicon tailored for ByteDance's massive data-center workloads. If it goes through, the deal would make ByteDance one of Qualcomm's early anchor customers for its fastly growing custom chip-design division, For years, Qualcomm was the king of making smartphone processors and modems. The company has also been moving into the PC ecosystem and other formats such as on-device AI for Android XR headsets. However, this particular deal is about Qualcomm's custom Application-Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs). For a platform like TikTok, ByteDance needs hardware that can help it ingest, process, and serve billions of short-form videos daily. Generalised hardware is no longer the most cost-effective and efficient route, which is why ByteDance is trying to develop custom Video Processing Units (VPUs). VPUs designed specifically for ByteDance’s algorithmic needs could drastically reduce data-center power consumption and improve encoding speeds at an unprecedented scale. The underlying tech behind these processors is actually from Qualcomm's recent acquisition of AlphaWave Semi, a high-speed connectivity specialist company. By combining AlphaWave’s high-bandwidth IP with Qualcomm’s architectural expertise, the company could begin mass production by the end of 2026, if the talks go through. All this also comes at a time when U.S.-China tech relations have dwindled. Escalating trade frictions between Washington and Beijing have severely impacted the export of high-end AI chips from U.S. firms like Nvidia, AMD, and Lam Research. Yet, the Qualcomm-ByteDance discussions show that U.S. tech companies are still actively seeking growth avenues and are open to doing business with China, where regulators still permit. Reuters notes that the outcome of this deal could be uncertain, and ByteDance might also seek partners other than Qualcomm. via Reuters | Image via DepositPhotos.com
    • Look who's back!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      DaviKar went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      455
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      162
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      116
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!